Origins The ideology of the
Islamic State is based on the tenets of
Al-Qaeda literature that had ascended in the
Jihadist field since the 1980s. The core features of Jihadist literature during this era were outlined by the influential
Egyptian Islamist scholar
Sayyid Qutb (d. 1966 C.E/ 1386 A.H), who believed that Islamic principles had become titular and condemned his society as being sunk in a state of
Jahiliyya (pre-Islamic ignorance). To overcome this state, Qutb proposed the implementation of the
Hakimiyya doctrine, which espoused the Sovereignty of God in all aspects of life. This was to be achieved by overthrowal of the modern-day
nation-states and subsequent establishment of an
Islamic order based on the society of
Muhammad and his
companions, through armed
Jihad. Those Muslims who opposed their principles were considered renegades guilty of
apostasy. Qutb drew his revolutionary ideals mainly from the works of medieval theologians
Ibn Taymiyya (d. 1328 C.E/ 728 A.H) and
Ibn Qayyim (d. 1350 C.E/ 751 A.H); which strongly condemned the cult of saints and practices related to grave veneration. Qutb re-oriented Ibn Taymiyya's critiques against what he described as the "modern idols", i.e, the contemporary nation states. These re-invigorated doctrines would shape the
Salafi Jihadist theology from the 1970s, represented by organisations like
Al-Qaeda,
Egyptian Islamic Jihad, etc. The Islamic State regards itself as the true successor of these theological doctrines and accuses Al-Qaeda leadership under
Zawahiri of being deviated. Unlike Al-Qaeda, IS was also able to implement these doctrines in its territories during its brief stint of power in parts of Iraq and Syria during 2014-2019. According to Professor Bartosz Bolechów of the
University of Warsaw, the ideology of the
Islamic State was formed as a consequence of ideological radicalisation in response to the
war on terror launched after
9/11. Asserting that the binary worldview of Islamic State and its ideological evolution is compatible with the conclusions of
Terror Management Theory (TMT), Bolechów states:"Jihadi, revolutionary variant of Salafism is a modern phenomenon inspired initially by the writings of
Sayyid Qutb (and then by scholars like
Abu Muhammad al-Maqdisi and
Abu Basir al-Tartusi) and born as a reaction to Islamic political fragmentation (after the
fall of Ottoman Empire),
colonization (by Western powers) and modernization.. If
Jihadi-Salafism should be understood as a radical fringe of Salafism, the ideology of the Islamic State is so far its most extreme version. Some scholars are calling this variant Neo-
Takfirism to stress the fact of its strained or even openly hostile relations with more "traditional" strains of jihadi organizations, its thinkers and leaders. This new variant is definitely an indirect byproduct of 9/11 and direct byproduct of GWOT: the chain of events started by the disruption of Al-Qaeda central in Afghanistan and then continued with an
intervention in Iraq.. GWOT basically supported the narrative of the revolutionary Salafism: that counterterrorism is only a pretext used by the West in its historical quest for destroying Islam. It was a leading force and a key factor behind a further radicalization of an already radical worldview."
Sources Egyptian
Jihadist theoretician and ideologue
Abu Abdullah al-Muhajir, is widely regarded as the "theologian who shaped ISIS". His works provided the most influential inspiration for modern jihadist strategies. Al-Muhajir's legal manual on violence,
Fiqh al-Dima (
The Jurisprudence of Jihad or
The Jurisprudence of Blood), became IS's standard reference for justifying its extraordinary acts of violence. In particular, he believes IS has drawn from three works that share an advocacy of offensive jihad, opposition to any gradualism or political activity, attacking the near enemy not just the far, observing no limits in killing and brutalizing as extreme violence as this is following the way of the prophet and is the best way to bring the enemy to submission. Three works are: •
Management of Savagery (
Idarat at-Tawahhush). Written under the pseudonym Abu Bakr al-Najji and published online around 2004. The most famous of the three works, it has been described by several journalists and analysts as influential to IS, and intended to provide a strategy to create a new Islamic
caliphate. Among its important points are that earlier jihadists wasted time on preaching, neglecting killing and destruction. "We must drag all the people to battle and bring the temple down on the heads of everyone". After all, "the worst chaotic condition is by far preferable to stability under the system of apostasy", and even "if the whole umma [community of Muslims] perishes" during jihadi generated fighting, "they would all be martyrs". The classical references of IS mainly consist of the medieval legal literature of
Ibn Taymiyya,
Ibn Qayyim al-Jawziyya and various collections of
hadiths and their exegeses. Contemporary scholarly references relied upon by IS include the 19th century treatises of
Wahhabi Aal al-Shaykhs, treatises of
Sayyid Qutb,
Juhayman al-Otaybi, as well as the popular
Jihadi literature produced by the exponents of the
Sahwa movement,
Shu'aybi school and
Al-Qaeda. Major references also consist of the legal works of various scholars influential in the
Salafi tradition; such as the early 19th century
Yemeni theologian
Muhammad Al-Shawkani. The writings of classical theologian Ibn Taymiyya are disproportionately cited throughout IS pamphlets, propaganda videos and magazines. Throughout their works, IS ideologues refer to Ibn Taymiyya by the title "
Shaykh al-Islām". As of 2019, Ibn Taymiyya has been cited more than 40,000 times out of all the 300,000 pages published by various AQ and IS Publications. However, IS strategists are highly selective in appropriating the ideas found in scholarly literature; by moulding them to align with their revolutionary propaganda and militant ideology. Al-Shawkani's tracts condemning the building over graves, in particular, are often abbreviated, re-published and distributed via IS propaganda material and leaflets. During its
occupation of Mosul, IS distributed Shawkani's treatises that advocated the "levelling" of tombs and elevated graves, asserting it as a core religious doctrine. Citing Shawkani, IS
excommunicated those who visit graves for beseeching favours as polytheists and
apostates. Executions of captured enemy combatants suspected of being
Shiites are also justified through these writings. Despite resistance from local populace, IS engaged in a campaign of destroying the tombs of various saints throughout their three year-reign in
Mosul.
Demands of the Caliphate Having declared itself to be a new Caliphate, and al-Baghdadi to be the new Caliph, IS has declared "We inform the Muslims that, with the announcement of the caliphate, it has become obligatory for all Muslims to give
Bay'ah and support him", and "O Muslims in all places. Whoso is able to emigrate to the Islamic State, let him emigrate. For emigration to the Abode of Islam is obligatory". But IS goes further, ordering all jihadists everywhere that they obey and must pledge their loyalty to the commander of the faithful — i.e. their now deceased caliph Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi. All traditional Islamic scholars believe in Offensive Jihad, but the majority of them also say that Offensive Jihad must be performed by the Caliphate. According to jihadist preacher
Anjem Choudary, "Hitherto, we were just defending ourselves," but now IS can fight to the forcible expansion into countries that are ruled by non-Muslims. Waging of war to expand the caliphate is an essential duty of the caliph, so according to its ideological supporters like Anjem Choudary, IS is not just allowed to fight offensively but forbidden not to. • Once the state has been overthrown, the "administration or management of savagery" (
Idrarat al-Tawhush) will follow. The "law of the jungle" will prevail and survivors will "accept any organization, regardless of whether it is made up of good or evil people," and jihadis will step in to provide organization, administering sharia law. • The final stage, "empowerment" (
Shawkat al-Tamkeen), will establish the Islamic state, ruled by a single leader who would then unify diffuse and scattered groups and regions of "savagery" in a caliphate. Despite the enormous suffering and loss of life caused by the forces of jihad, through a mixture of persuasion and coercion, they will (according to Najji) win hearts and minds and gain legitimacy and recognition for Islamic rule. However, the sheer brutality and extreme tendencies of IS have alienated them from mainstream Salafi-Jihadists. Prominent Salafi-Jihadist ideologues have condemned IS and wrote treatises against them.
Takfir The
Takfiri ideology of groups like
Al-Qaeda and
Islamic State has its roots in the writings of the 20th century Egyptian
militant Islamist ideologue
Sayyid Qutb (1906-1966 C.E), which preached against the governments and societies of the
Muslim World. Qutb regarded the Muslim world as being sunk in a state of
Jahiliyya (pre-Islamic ignorance) and by employing
Takfir (excommunication); he demanded violent overthrowal of contemporary regimes. Describing the contemporary conditions of society, Qutb claimed: "Our whole environment, people's beliefs and ideas, habits and art, rules and laws - is
Jahiliyyah, even to the extent that what we consider to be Islamic culture, Islamic sources, Islamic philosophy and Islamic thought are also constructs of
Jahiliyyah!"Daesh's sectarianism and
takfiri approach is historically rooted in
Al-Qaeda in Iraq (AQI), founded by
Abu Mussab al-Zarqawi in 2004. Its ideological roots are found in the writings of
Ibn Taymiyya,
Ibn 'Abd al-Wahhab and Sayyid Qutb. The
takfir (declaring self-proclaimed Muslims to be apostates, which usually also means calling for their death) of IS on large numbers of Muslims has been a point of difference between itself and other jihadis such as Al-Qaeda. IS is "committed to purifying the world by killing vast numbers of people", according to
Graeme Wood. Consequently, the majority of the "27,947 terrorist deaths" it has been responsible for as of 2020 have been Muslims it regards "as kafir". On the other hand, Troy E. Spier notes that the demarcation of believers and non-believers is more complex than a simple assignation of religious faith. IS continued the policy of takfir, on Shia and others. "Those who reject the takfir of Twelver Shiite scholars" are "disbelievers". The group states that if a Muslim who commits one of the "10 nullifiers (
nawaqid) of Islam" established by
Ibn Abd al-Wahhab, they become an apostate from Islam. The "third nullifier" was that: "Whoever does not hold the polytheists (mushrikeen) to be disbelievers (kuffar), or has doubts about their disbelief or considers their ways and beliefs to be correct, has committed disbelief" However the IS definition of
mushrikeen was not limited to those who had multiple gods in their religion. IS included amongst the sins qualifying as one of the nullifiers "adopting democracy or fighting for the sake of patriotism, nationalism or civil state". Another example of the willingness to takfir is a statement not only calling for the revival of slavery (specifically of
Yazidi) but takfiring any Muslim who disagreed with that doctrine. Yazidi women and children [are to be] divided according to the Shariah amongst the fighters of the Islamic State who participated in the
Sinjar operations … Enslaving the families of the
kuffar and taking their women as concubines is a firmly established aspect of the Shariah that if one were to deny or mock, he would be denying or mocking the verses of the Koran and the narrations of the Prophet … and thereby apostatizing from Islam. According to Jamileh Kadivar, an examination of IS public statements reveals conflict within the group over takfir—over whether takfir is "one of the principles of the religion," or merely a "requirement/necessity of religion", which has led to "warnings, imprisonment, and execution" of "Sharia office members, judges, and amirs" or "horrifying" brutality, its release of videos and photographs of beheadings, shootings, caged prisoners being burnt alive or submerged gradually until drowned. Among other effects, the group's mass killings and publicizing of them led to a split between it and Al-Qaeda. This work asserts that "one who previously engaged in jihad knows that it is naught but violence, crudeness, terrorism, deterrence and massacring." While "savage chaos" is unpleasant it has to be remembered that even "the most abominable of the levels of savagery" are better "than stability under the order of unbelief," i.e. any regime other than IS. One observer has described IS's publicizing of its mass executions and killing of civilians as part of "a conscious plan designed to instill among believers a sense of meaning that is sacred and sublime, while scaring the hell out of fence-sitters and enemies." (That this doctrine has been embraced by at least some lower level IS fighters would seem to be corroborated by German journalist
Jürgen Todenhöfer, an opponent of Western intervention in Iraq who spent ten days embedded with IS in Mosul, and noted "something that I don't understand at all is the enthusiasm in their plan of religious cleansing, planning to kill the non-believers ... They were talking about hundreds of millions. They were enthusiastic about it ...")
Eschatology One difference between IS and other Islamist and jihadist movements, including
al-Qaeda, is the group's emphasis on
eschatology and
apocalypticism—that is, a belief that the final Day of Judgment by God are near, and specifically, that the arrival of one known as the
Mahdi is close at hand. It has been described as "a major part" of IS's "recruiting pitch." The IS caliph,
Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi and other leaders have depicted themselves as battling the "
Antichrist" (
Al-Masih ad-Dajjal) according to Fawaz A. Gerges. In the wake of the fall of
Saddam Hussein, not only were Sunnis removed from power but the capital
Baghdad and the Iraqi army were cleansed of Sunnis. This created a "sense of Sunni loss of privilege" and power; "a deep desire for revenge against "usurpers" specifically the "cosmopolitan, affluent elite" and "above all" the Shi'a and Iran. Al-Qaeda leadership criticised both Zarqawi and his successor
Abu Omar al-Baghdadi over their
anti-Shia outlook. Bin Laden had advocated for a joint front of Shia and Sunni
Islamist groups to fight together during the
Iraqi insurgency against the
American occupation of Iraq. However, Zarqawi believed in igniting a sectarian war in Iraq as part of the anti-American insurgency; which eventually culminated in the
Iraqi civil war. IS ideologues had adopted Wahhabist beliefs that Islam should be "cleansed" or purged of deviant groups that "defiled" the religion, and amplified them in their Global Jihadist strategy. Urging Zarqawi to refrain from harming Shia civilians and mosques;
Ayman al-Zawahiri wrote: "such acts affect the protected blood of women, children, and non-combatant Shia public, who are protected because they are excused for their ignorance [of true religious doctrine, unlike Shia clerics]. This is the consensus of the Sunni toward the Shia public and ignorant followers." By February 2014, Al-Qaeda had publicly severed its ties to Islamic State and condemned its brutal violence; accusing the organisation of estranging the Muslim public from the
Jihadist cause. Former
British Intelligence officer and diplomat
Alastair Crooke sees "two elements" to the difference between IS and Al-Qaeda: • IS believes that original historic Islamic state was formed by "fighting-scholars" and their armed followers. Although it adopted Wahhabi doctrines, IS radically departs from Wahhabi tradition by denying the home of that sect (Saudi Arabia) "any legitimacy as founders of a State, as the head of the Mosque, or as interpreter of the Qur'an." Instead, IS asserts these attributes for itself and views itself as the sole legitimate State. Citing Rashid Rida, Al-'Uraydi writes: "Sheikh Muhammad Rashid Rida, (may God have mercy on him) says: 'The meaning of this is that;
seizing power by force is like eating dead meat and pork in necessity to avoid starvation, is enforced by force and is less [disastrous] than anarchy... and its implication is that it is necessary to strive to always remove it when possible, and it is not permissible to settle on its permanence' " A document entitled
Women in the Islamic State: Manifesto and Case Study, released 23 January 2015 by the media wing of IS's all-female
Al-Khansaa Brigade, (issued in Arabic and not translated by IS but by an anti-Islamist Quilliam Foundation Under "exceptional circumstances," women may leave home—doctors, teachers, women studying Islam are exempt from confinement, as are women if they are needed to fight jihad and ordered to do so by religious leaders when there are not enough men around to protect the country from enemy attack. According to political scientist Massimo Ramaioli:"
Al-Baghdadi was not unlike
Lenin: leaders of an uncompromising vanguard, hellbent on the rejection of the incumbent historical bloc, ready to deploy violence to upend such order, zealots in their representation of the Enemy. The scientific truth adumbrated by an averred correct understanding of history granted both ISIS and the
Bolsheviks brazen confidence and frightful resolve. It revealed in their ideology and attendant political praxis." == In practice ==