Discovery Following French astronomer
Frédéric Petit's spurious report of a
second moon of Earth in 1846, other astronomers began searching for potential undiscovered moons. Between 1953 and 1956, a team headed by
Clyde Tombaugh planned to search for small
natural satellites near the Moon's
Lagrange pointsdynamically stable regions of spacebut were prevented by poor weather. In 1951, Polish astronomer
Kazimierz Kordylewski began his own search for
Trojan satellites at the lunar and Lagrange points. He was also unsuccessful, but in 1956 Josef Witkowski suggested to Kordylewski to instead search for faint, diffuse
dust clouds. The clouds were first observed with the naked eye by Kordylewski in October 1956, at the
Skalnaté pleso Observatory in the
Tatra Mountains of former
Czechoslovakia. Even with very dark skies, the clouds were difficult to observe. They appeared as slight brightenings near the lunar and points at least 2° in diameter and one to two
magnitudes fainter than the brightest
gegenschein. On 6 March and 6 April 1961, Kordylewski successfully photographed two distinct clouds at the lunar point from
Kasprowy Wierch's summit observatory. The photographs were taken using a Jupiter 3
Leica camera, with an
exposure times of 11–12 minutes. Kordylewski photometrically analyzed the photographs and published his results in the journal
Acta Astronomica in 1961, and an
International Astronomical Union circular announced the clouds' discovery on 23 May of that year.
Later observations and debate Further attempts to detect the Kordylewski clouds were conflicting and controversial. Ground-based observations of the clouds are complicated by their exceedingly dim nature, making observations sensitive to weather, gegenschein, and
airglow. Following Kordylewski's announcement on 1961, other professional and amateur astronomers attempted to observe the clouds, initially without success. On 4 January 1964, astronomer J. W. Simpson and his colleagues R. G. Miller and G. Gardner observed the Kordylewski cloud. Thence until 1967, the team took about 100 photographs of the cloud. In 1966,
NASA organized an airborn observations campaign, reporting detections of "circular or elliptical nebulous patches" at both Lagrange points on four flights. Other astronomers reported negative detections through optical or radar observations. From 1962 to 1963, an attempt by the
United States Geological Survey to photograph the clouds from
Chacaltaya, Bolivia gave inconclusive results. A photographic search for the cloud was conducted from March 1966 to March 1967 by astronomer Robert Roosen at the
McDonald Observatory failed to find any clouds. Astronomers C. Wolff, L. Dundelman, and L. C. Haughney attempted to aerially photograph the clouds, flying well away from land over the Pacific Ocean to minimize light pollution. The team did not detect any clouds. Later observation attempts from space were conducted; space-based observations have the advantage of avoiding atmospheric airglow. In 1975, researcher J. R. Roach analyzed photographic data collected from 1969 to 1970 by the sixth
Orbiting Solar Observatory telescope (OSO-6). The imagery was taken in green visible light, revealing clouds near both Lagrange points that appeared to librate around each point. A team of researchers led by R. H. Munro analyzed data taken by the
coronograph aboard the
Skylab space station, aiming to detect potential
forward scattered sunlight by the clouds. No clouds could be distinguished against the solar
coronal background. In 1991–1992, the Japanese
Hiten spacecraft made single looping passes around the lunar and points, failing to detect the dust clouds with its dust counting instrument. With mixed observational results, several astronomers expressed skepticism of the Kordylewski clouds' existence. In 1969, Roosen and Wolff published an article arguing against the existence of dust clouds within the Earth–Moon system, asserting on theoretical grounds that any such clouds would be unstable and destroyed by perturbations from the Sun or from the
Moon's orbital eccentricity. Instead, they suggested that reported positive detections may be due to passing
interplanetary dust clouds. In 1970, Naosuke Sekiguchi computed the behavior of dust, stating that dust tends to disperse from the lunar Lagrange points and suggested that positive detections may have been transient dispersing clouds. A similar analysis conducted by GP. Horedt, meanwhile, was inconclusive regarding dust behavior near the Lagrange points. Other astronomers suggested the possibility that the Kordylewski clouds quickly vary in structure over time as an explanation to conflicting ground observations. Successful reported observations of a cloud at the point are around three times more common than those for the point.
Current status The Kordylewski clouds were tentatively confirmed in 2018 by a team of astronomers led by Judit Slíz-Balogh. The team first developed computer models to simulate the cloud's appearance in
polarimetric observations from Earth. Polarimetric observations of the area around the point were then conducted over several months in 2017 at a private observatory in
Badacsonytördemic, Hungary. As a control, the same region of sky was photographed when thin
cirrus clouds and
contrails passed overhead or when the point was not in view. Using a CCD camera with three linearly
polarizing filters attached to its lens, the team successfully photographed features with polarization characteristics consistent with light scattered by dust clouds. When compared against the control photographs, the polarization characteristics differed from those expected of clouds, contrails, or zodiacal dust. Slíz-Balogh's team then compared their photographs of the clouds to their earlier computer models, finding that the photographed cloud structures matched predictions. The team published their confirmation of the clouds' existence in the
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society in 2018. A followup observation campaign was led by Slíz-Balogh on 31 October 2021 and 3 July 2022, targeting both the and points. Using the same methods and location as the 2017 observations, the and clouds were successfully photographed. == Properties ==