In 1917, before meeting Marie Stopes, Humphrey Roe offered to endow a birth control clinic attached to St Mary's Hospital in Manchester. He proposed all patients would be married and that no abortions would be done, but his offer was declined. This was a serious issue for Roe; after their marriage, he and Stopes planned to open a clinic for poor mothers in London.
Margaret Sanger, another birth-control pioneer, had opened a birth control clinic in New York but the police closed it. In 1920, Sanger proposed opening a clinic in London; this encouraged Stopes to act more constructively, but her plan never materialised. Stopes resigned her lectureship at
University College London at the end of 1920 to concentrate on the clinic; she founded the
Society for Constructive Birth Control and Racial Progress, a support organisation for the clinic. Stopes explained that the object of the Society was: "...to counteract the steady evil which has been growing for a good many years of the reduction of the birth rate just on the part of the thrifty, wise, well-contented, and the generally sound members of our community, and the reckless breeding from the C.3 end, and the semi-feebleminded, the careless, who are proportionately increasing in our community because of the slowing of the birth rate at the other end of the social scale. Statistics show that every year the birth rate from the worst end of our community is increasing in proportion to the birth rate at the better end, and it was in order to try to right that grave social danger that I embarked upon this work." On the printed notepaper is a list of prominent supporters which include the militant suffragette Lady Constance Lytton, feminist novelist
Vera Brittain,
Emily Pethick-Lawrence (former Treasurer of the Women's Social and Political Union), Rev
Maude Royden (Women's Suffrage Societies). Later supporters included eminent economist
John Maynard Keynes. Three months later she and Roe opened the Mothers' Clinic at 61 Marlborough Road,
Holloway,
North London, on 17 March 1921. The clinic was run by midwives and supported by visiting doctors. It offered mothers birth control advice, taught them birth control methods and dispensed Stopes own "Pro-Race" (and "Racial") cervical caps. The free clinic was open to all married women for knowledge about reproductive health. Stopes tried to discover alternatives for families and increase knowledge about birth control and the reproductive system. Options included the
cervical cap—which was the most popular—
coitus interruptus, and
spermicides based on soap and oil. Stopes rediscovered the use of
olive oil-soaked sponges as an alternative birth control. Olive oil's use as a spermicide dates to Greek and Roman times. Her recipe proved very effective. She tested many of her contraceptives on patients at her clinics. Stopes became enthusiastic about a contraceptive device called the "gold pin", which was reportedly successful in America. A few months later, she asked
Norman Haire, an Australian doctor, whether he would be interested in running a clinical trial of the device, as she had two correspondents who wanted to use it. Haire had already investigated the device and found it to be dangerous. Haire became involved in another birth control clinic that opened in
Walworth in November 1921; later a rivalry between Stopes and Haire erupted in
The Lancet. Haire brought up the gold-pin episode, even though Stopes's clinic had never used it. The issue of the gold pin device resurfaced in the Stopes-Sutherland libel case a few years later. In 1925, the Mothers' Clinic moved to Central London, where it remains . Stopes gradually built up a small network of clinics across Britain, working to fund them. She opened clinics in
Leeds in April 1934;
Aberdeen in October 1934;
Belfast in October 1936;
Cardiff in October 1937; and
Swansea in January 1943. She also helped
Beatrice Green establish a clinic in
Abertillery in 1925.
The Marie Stopes International organisation The clinics continued to operate after Stopes's death, but by the early 1970s they were in financial difficulties and in 1975 they went into voluntary
receivership.
Marie Stopes International was established a year later as an international
non-governmental organisation (NGO) working on
sexual and reproductive health. The global partnership took over responsibility for the main clinic, and in 1978 it began its work overseas in
New Delhi, India. Since then the organisation has grown steadily; today it works in 37 countries (2019), has 452 clinics and has offices in London,
Brussels,
Melbourne and in the US. Due to Stopes's beliefs on eugenics, in 2020 the organisation changed its name to "MSI Reproductive Choices" with no other changes. Simon Cooke, Chief Executive of MSI Reproductive Choices, said:
Opposition and libel case In 1922,
Halliday Sutherland wrote a book called
Birth Control: A Statement of Christian Doctrine Against the Neo Malthusians. In the inter-war years, the terms "birth control" and "
eugenics" were closely related; according to Jane Carey they were "so intertwined as to be synonymous". Following attacks on "the essential fallacies of Malthusian teaching", Sutherland's book attacked Stopes. Under the headings "Specially Hurtful to the Poor" and "Exposing the Poor to Experiment", it read:In the midst of a London slum a woman, who is a doctor of German philosophy (Munich), has opened a Birth Control Clinic, where working women are instructed in a method of contraception described by Professor McIlroy as 'The most harmful method of which I have had experience'. When we remember that millions are being spent by the Ministry of Health and by Local Authorities – on pure milk for necessitous expectant and nursing mothers, on Maternity Clinics to guard the health of mothers before and after childbirth, for the provision of skilled midwives, and on Infant Welfare Centres – it is truly amazing that this monstrous campaign of birth control should be tolerated by the home secretary.
Charles Bradlaugh was condemned to jail for a less serious crime. The court case began on 21 February 1923; it was acrimonious. Four questions were put to the jury, which they answered as follows: • Were the words complained of defamatory of the plaintiff?
Yes. • Were they true in substance and in fact?
Yes. • Were they fair comment?
No. • Damages, if any?
£100. Based on the jury's verdict, barristers for both sides asked for judgement in their favour, so it came down to legal argument. Sutherland's barrister successfully argued that as soon as the jury decided that the statements were true in substance and in fact, that was the end of the matter. It was a moral victory for Stopes as the press saw it, and she appealed. On 20 July, the Court of Appeal reversed the previous decision (2–1), awarding the £100 to Stopes. The Catholic community mobilised to support Sutherland, a Catholic, and Stopes publicly campaigned to raise £10,000. Sutherland made a final appeal to the House of Lords on 21 November 1924, and won; Stopes was ordered to repay the one hundred pounds arising from the previous hearing, and to pay the defendant's costs in relation to the appeals to the Court of Appeal and the House of Lords. The trial had made birth control a public topic and the number of clients visiting the clinic doubled. The Law Lords found in Sutherland's favour (4–1) and, despite the fact that the decision was irrevocable, Stopes wrote to the Lord Chancellor to overturn it "so that legal subtleties based on misapprehension may not rob me of my victory". The cost for Stopes was vast; costs were partially compensated by publicity and book sales. Stopes was even remembered in a playground rhyme: Jeanie, Jeanie, full of hopes, Read a book by Marie Stopes, But, to judge from her condition, She must have read the wrong edition. The lawsuit was later made into a television movie,
Marie Stopes: Sexual Revolutionary. ==Eugenics==