In 1977, Ray fired Foreman and claimed that a man whom he had met in
Montreal by the alias of "Raoul" was involved, as was Ray's brother Johnny, but that Ray himself was not. He said through his new attorney
Jack Kershaw that, although he did not "personally shoot King", he may have been "partially responsible without knowing it." In May 1977, Kershaw presented evidence to the
House Select Committee on Assassinations that he believed exonerated his client, but tests did not prove conclusive. Kershaw also claimed that Ray was somewhere else when the shots were fired, but he could not find a witness to corroborate the claim. As early as August 1979,
Jesse Jackson had been convinced that Ray was innocent, and wrote a foreword for Ray's book
Who Killed Martin Luther King?: The True Story by the Alleged Assassin in 1991. It has stated that the evidence allegedly supporting the existence of "Raoul" is dubious.
Coretta Scott King v. Loyd Jowers In 1997, King's son
Dexter met with Ray and asked him, "I just want to ask you, for the record, um, did you kill my father?" Ray replied, "No. No I didn't," and King told Ray that he, along with the King family, believed him. The King family urged that Ray be granted a new trial. In 1999, the family filed a
civil case against Jowers and unnamed co-conspirators for the
wrongful death of King. The case,
Coretta Scott King, et al. vs. Loyd Jowers et al., Case No. 97242, was tried in the circuit court of Shelby County, Tennessee from November 15 to December 8, 1999. Attorney
William Francis Pepper, representing the King family, presented evidence from 70 witnesses and 4,000 pages of transcripts. Pepper alleges in his book
An Act of State (2003) that the evidence implicated the FBI, the CIA, the U.S. Army, the Memphis Police Department, and organized crime in the murder. The suit alleged government involvement; however, no government officials or agencies were named or made party to the suit, so there was no defense or evidence presented or refuted by the government. The jury of six black people and six white people decided that King had been the victim of a conspiracy involving the Memphis police and federal agencies, finding Jowers and unknown co-defendants
civilly liable and awarding the family $100. Local assistant district attorney John Campbell, who was not involved in the case, said that the case was flawed and "overlooked so much contradictory evidence that never was presented". The family said that it had requested only $100 in damages to demonstrate that it was not seeking financial gain. Dexter King called the verdict "a vindication for us". At a press conference following the trial, he and his mother Coretta Scott King told reporters that they believed the mafia and state, local, and federal government agencies had conspired to plan the assassination and frame Ray as the shooter. When asked whom the family believed was the true assassin, Dexter King said that Jowers had identified Lt. Earl Clark of the Memphis Police Department as the shooter. A sister of Jowers said that he had fabricated the story in order to earn $300,000 by selling it, and that she had corroborated the story to get money to pay her income taxes. King biographer
David Garrow disagrees with Pepper's claims that the government killed King. He is supported by author
Gerald Posner, who wrote
Killing the Dream: James Earl Ray and the Assassination of Martin Luther King, Jr. (1998), concluding that Ray killed King, acting alone, likely for the hope of collecting a racist bounty for the murder. Critics of the official verdict on King's death bristled at
Killing the Dream, criticizing Posner for, in part, basing it on "a psychological evaluation of James Earl Ray, which he [Posner] is not qualified to give, and he dismisses evidence of conspiracy in King's murder as cynical attempts to exploit the tragedy". Pepper repeatedly dismissed Posner's book as inaccurate and misleading, and Dexter King also criticized it. In response to the 1999 verdict in
King vs. Jowers, Posner told
The New York Times: "It distresses me greatly that the legal system was used in such a callous and farcical manner in Memphis. If the King family wanted a rubber stamp of their own view of the facts, they got it." Some witnesses with King at the moment of the shooting said that the shot had been fired from a different location and not from Ray's window; they believed that the source was a spot behind thick shrubbery near the rooming house. King's friend and SCLC organizer Reverend
James Lawson has suggested that the impending occupation of Washington, D.C. by the
Poor People's Campaign was a primary motive for the assassination. and had also been under surveillance by military intelligence agencies during the period leading up to his assassination under the code name Operation Lantern Spike. Minister Ronald Denton Wilson claimed that his father, Henry Clay Wilson, assassinated King. He stated: "It wasn't a racist thing; he thought Martin Luther King was connected with communism, and he wanted to get him out of the way." However, reportedly Wilson had previously admitted his father was a member of the
Ku Klux Klan. In 2004,
Jesse Jackson, who was with King when he was assassinated, noted: According to biographer Taylor Branch, King's friend and colleague
James Bevel put it more bluntly: "There is no way a ten-cent white boy could develop a plan to kill a million-dollar black man."
Executive order to release government records On January 23, 2025, president
Donald Trump signed an
executive order to declassify the documents regarding King's assassination, as well as those regarding the assassinations of John F. Kennedy and Robert F. Kennedy. ==See also==