The Committee of 100 was a group formed to lobby for the Poor People's Campaign in advance of the arrival of thousands for Resurrection City. On April 29, 1968, the Committee began lobbying members of Congress and leaders of executive agencies. The group, a diverse coalition of different people from around the country, acted as a formal lobby that delivered organized presentations of the campaign's demands. Tijerina was arrested in New Mexico (on charges that had earlier been dismissed) hours before he was scheduled to leave for Washington to join the lobby. His arrest was interpreted as an intentional effort to thwart the campaign. SCLC leaders including Abernathy, Young, and Lafayette were present and led delegations. Poor people from around the country made up most of the group. Many officials perceived even this group as threatening. The Committee demanded an Economic Bill of Rights with five planks: • "A meaningful job at a living wage" • "A secure and adequate income" for all those unable to find or do a job • "Access to land" for economic uses • "Access to capital" for poor people and minorities to promote their own businesses • Ability for ordinary people to "play a truly significant role" in the government Abernathy defended these demands by highlighting the use of slave labor in the production of America's capital and arguing that historically oppressed populations did not have the same opportunities as whites who already controlled economic and political resources. Regarding the last point, Abernathy also made specific call for
collective bargaining, invoking King's recent involvement with the Memphis strike. • The Committee made a separate stop at the
Department of Justice, where it demanded legal reforms including an end to police brutality against Mexican Americans and indigenous Americans. Attorney General
Ramsey Clark responded that "man is not the most efficient or effective creature we would hope him to be," and, "We'll do our best and I hope you will do yours." • At the
Department of Labor, the Committee met with Secretary
William Wirtz to demand jobs, living wages, job training, input on labor policy, and an end to discrimination. The Committee also called attention to the high unemployment rate among minorities, which they believed to be underreported by the Department. • The Committee had particularly sharp criticism for the
Department of Agriculture, which they said had done little to address the crisis of hunger and malnutrition in the United States—and in fact neglected to use available funds to feed the starving and malnourished. They called for food stamps, school lunches, and distribution programs, which would be staffed by some of those who needed jobs. They also criticized the favoritism showed for
corporate farming and demanded protection for poor small farmers. Secretary
Orville Freeman was reportedly dismissive, and downplayed his Department's responsibility for the subsidies to corporate
agribusiness. • The
Office of Economic Opportunity was intended specifically to assist poor people. A contingent of the Committee, led by Andrew Young, made the case that the OEO had failed in its responsibility and failed to authentically involve poor people in its decision making. • Young led a delegation the next day to the
Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. A statement read by Lafayette highlighted duality and hypocrisy within the American medical system: "We come to ask why a rich nation with the most advanced medical knowledge in the world can develop artificial organs yet cannot provide inoculations against disease to many of its poorest children." Walter Fauntroy read a separate statement about education, which called for increased minority control of education through policies that "permit poor black, brown, and white children to express their own worth and dignity as human beings, as well as the extent to which instruction, teaching materials, and the total learning process stresses the contributions and the common humanity of minority groups." The delegation called for democratic control over schools and curricula, transparency of school budgets, affirmative action in HEW's own hiring practices, and real progress on desegregation. Finally, they made similar demands for democracy and dignity in the administration of welfare. • At the
Department of Housing and Urban Development, the Committee demanded low-incoming housing and enforcement of laws against housing discrimination. In particular they outlined a work program that would allow poor people to construct and rehabilitate housing. They also demanded Chicago participation in housing policy and greater inclusion of Spanish speakers in low-cost housing programs. And they
criticized "urban renewal" programs, which they (following
James Baldwin) called "Urban Negro Removal". Secretary
Robert C. Weaver said he was doing the best he could. • The Committee of 100 also visited Secretary
Dean Rusk at the
State Department to demand enforcement of the
Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo, limitations on
immigration while Americans still lacked jobs, and cessation of diplomatic relations with
South Africa and
Portugal because of their governments' racist policies. • At the
Department of the Interior, the Committee presented a list of concerns related to the situation of American Indians. They repeated demands of jobs or income, housing, and schools. They also criticized the cultural assimilation of young Indians. There was some accusations that the Bureau of Indian Affairs was intentionally inculcating racism against Blacks among
Indian Americans. The Committee of 100 also lobbied the Senate Committee on Manpower, Employment, and Poverty, which had more direct power to act and appropriate funds. The Senate Committee created a new ad hoc poverty committee that met during the Poor People's Campaign occupation. Media reports were mixed on the Committee of 100. Many delegates received the opportunity to tell their stories for the first time, publicly challenging those in power (who typically enjoyed automatic access to the media). Congress's reaction, as quoted in the media, was hostile. Appropriations chair
George H. Mahon suggested that the Committee would be mostly ignored because Congress could not "legislate under threats of violence. On June 5, activist
Bayard Rustin had drafted an "Economic Bill of Rights," which he published in
The New York Times with more specific aims intended to convince the middle class and labor groups to support the action. Rustin suggested that the federal government should: • Recommit to the
Full Employment Act of 1946 and legislate the immediate creation of at least one million socially useful career jobs in public service; • Adopt the pending
Housing and Urban Development Act of 1968; • Repeal the 90th Congress's punitive welfare restrictions in the
1967 Social Security Act; • Extend to all farm workers the right—guaranteed under the National Labor Relations Act – to organize agricultural labor unions; • Restore budget cuts for bilingual education, Head Start, summer jobs, Economic Opportunity Act, Elementary and Secondary Education Acts. == Roads to Resurrection City ==