Early history In 1880, the French naturalist
Henri Filhol described fossils from the deposits of the French
commune of
Caylus, Tarn-et-Garonne (formerly "Caylux"). For one species (the other species he described now belong to
Metriotherium and
Dacrytherium), he designated the binomial name
Mixtotherium cuspidatum to a small "
pachyderm" with a continuous series of teeth. The specimen had a strong upper
canine and upper
molars with five sharp points (three in the front area). He also noticed that it had a proportionally enormous
sagittal crest. The genus name
Mixtotherium derives from both
Latin for (mixed) and
Ancient Greek for (beast or wild animal), meaning "mixed beast". Filhol described another species from the
phosphorite deposits of Quercy in 1883 based on a skull cast that palaeontologist
Jean Albert Gaudry gave to him. According to Filhol, the upper
incisors were missing and the strong canines stuck out beyond the
premolars similar to
Mixtotherium. The naturalist stated the premolars were similar to those of
Mixtotherium but that it had specific dental differences from it. As a result, he designated another binomial name
Adrotherium depressum.
Adrotherium derives from the Ancient Greek words ("stout" or "large") plus meaning "stout beast". Likewise, he reaffirmed the validity of
A. depressum in 1884, reproducing an image of the skull cast that he previously described. In 1888, Filhol described another species from the Quercy lime deposits based on a partial
mandible with the 4th premolar and the 3 molars, observing that the dentition was peculiar. He concluded that it must have had affinities with
anoplotheriids like
Anoplotherium and
Diplobune based on dentition and gave another binomial name
Uphelognatos quercyi. In 1891, Swiss palaeontologist
Ludwig Rütimeyer erected the species
M. gresslyi based on some upper jaw fossils from the Swiss municipality of
Egerkingen that were previously classified as "
Hyopotamus (=
Bothriodon)
gresslyi". He recognized that the species name would have drawn attention to the taxonomic confusion resulting from another taxon "
H. gresslyi", which in 1908 was synonymized with
Haplobunodon lydekkeri by the Swiss palaeontologist
Hans Georg Stehlin. The same year that Rütimeyer erected
M. gresslyi, German palaeontologist
Karl Alfred von Zittel synonymized
Mixtotherium with
Diplobune and
Adrotherium with
Dacrytherium, synonymizing
A. depressum with
D. cayluxense (=
D. ovinum). He did not indicate the status of the species
M. cuspidatum. In 1896, palaeontologist Charles Earle objected to von Zittel's synonymy of
Mixtotherium with
Diplobune, considering it to be a valid genus entirely distinct from both
Diplobune and
Anoplotherium. He also disagreed with von Zittel's synonymy of
Adrotherium with
Dacrytherium, suggesting that the genus was instead based on the milk teeth of
Mixtotherium. He considered that mixtotheres were intermediate between
cebochoerids and anoplotheriids and arose from a common ancestral group of it and
merycoidodonts. Stehlin synonymized both
Uphelnognatos and
Adrotherium with the revalidated
Mixtotherium in 1908, transferring both individual species of the
junior synonyms to the senior synonym as
M. queryci and
M. depressum. He erected two additional species of mixtotheriids. The first was
M. priscum from Egerkingen, which he stated was somewhat larger than
M. gresslyi. The second was
M. Leenhardti from the Quercy phosphorites deposits. In 1913, German palaeontologist Martin Schmidt erected the species
M. mezi from the
Jebel Qatrani Formation of Egypt, making it the first species classified as
Mixtotherium from outside Europe. The species was eventually synonymized with
Bothriogenys sp. by Patricia A. Holroyd et al. in 2010. During 1927, British palaeontologist Helga Sharpe Pearson established the family Mixtotheriidae of which
Mixtotherium is the only member. Pearson argued that the genus does not form a
natural group, or a
clade indicating close evolutionary relations, with
Cebochoerus or the
Anthracotheriidae, although they do possess similar anatomical traits. In 1945, American palaeontologist
George Gaylord Simpson demoted the Mixtotheriidae to subfamily rank within the Cebochoeridae as Mixtotheriinae, for which the other listed subfamily was Cebochoerinae.
Later taxonomic interpretations British palaeontologist Jerry J. Hooker in 1986 recognized the validity of the Mixtotheriidae, with
Mixtotherium as the only genus classified in the family. He stated that
M. cuspidatum was the
type species and that the other species included are
M. depressum,
M. gresslyi,
M. quercyi,
M. leenhardti, and
M. infans as valid species. Hooker also synonymized
M. priscum with
M. gresslyi on the basis that the two species were difficult to separate from each other. However, he also argued that only
M. cuspidatum,
M. gresslyi, and
M. infans were well-characterized whereas
M. quercyi and
M. depressum very closely resemble
M. cuspidatum. Hooker recognized the possibility of subspecies for
Mixtotherium based on Egerkingen material. He stated that a complete revision of the genus would be ideal. Palaeontologists Jean Sudre and Léonard Ginsburg in 1993 supported retaining the Mixtotheriidae as a family but argued for the distinctions of both
M. gresslyi and
M. priscum, pointing out that the mixtothere species of different localities had significant variations in size. In 2000, Hooker and Marc Weidmann referenced the 1986 synonymization of
M. priscum with
M. gresslyi, hence not listing the former as a valid species. They also transferred the species
Robiacina lavergnensis, previously erected by Sudre in 1977, to
Mixtotherium as
M. lavergnense. They also synonymized
R. weidmanni, previously named by Sudre in 1978, with
M. lavergnense. Damien Becker et al. in 2013 adopted the reclassification of
M. lavergnense, but in 2020, Romain Weppe et al. chose to retain in
Robiacina the species
R. lavergnensis, going contrary to the previous reclassification by Hooker and Weidmann. In 2021, Maëva Judith Orliac et al. suggested based on previous sources that
M. priscum was probably synonymous with
M. gresslyi and that
R. lavergnensis is to be retained within
Robiacina.
Classification , including
Cainotherium (skeleton at
Natural History Museum of Basel)
Mixtotherium is the type and only genus of the
artiodactyl family Mixtotheriidae. The genus was endemic to western Europe and lived from the Middle to Late
Eocene (~44.9 to 37 Ma). Originally, it was classified as a member of the superfamily
Cainotherioidea with the
Cainotheriidae by Hooker and Weidmann in 2000. Since 2020, however, the Mixtotheriidae is no longer classified within the superfamily, although it is considered to be a
sister group to it. The phylogenetic relations of the Mixtotheriidae as well as the Anoplotheriidae,
Xiphodontidae and Cainotheriidae have been elusive due to the
selenodont morphologies (or having crescent-shaped ridges) of the molars, which were convergent with
tylopods or
ruminants. Other researchers consider them more closely related to ruminants than tylopods based on dental morphology. Different
phylogenetic analyses have produced different results for the "
derived" (or of new evolutionary traits) selenodont Eocene European artiodactyl families, making it uncertain whether they were closer to the Tylopoda or Ruminantia. {{clade| style=font-size:85%; line-height:85% In 2020, Vincent Luccisano et al. created a phylogenetic tree of the basal artiodactyls, a majority endemic to western Europe, from the Palaeogene. In one clade, the "bunoselenodont endemic European" Mixtotheriidae, Anoplotheriidae, Xiphodontidae, Amphimerycidae, Cainotheriidae, and Robiacinidae are grouped together with the Ruminantia. The phylogenetic tree as produced by the authors is shown below: == Description ==