Breakdown in relations between Hasina and Yunus (2007) Yunus maintained a professional relationship with Hasina. Yunus appointed Hasina—along with U.S. First Lady
Hillary Clinton—as co-chair of a microcredit summit held 2–4 February 1997. In her statement she praised, "the outstanding work done by Professor Yunus and the Grameen Bank he founded. ... The success of the Grameen Bank has created optimism about the viability of banks engaged in extending micro-credit to the poor". The inaugural ceremony of Grameen Phone, Bangladesh's largest telephone service, took place at Hasina's office on 26 March 1997. Using Grameen Phone, Hasina made the first call to
Thorbjorn Jagland, the then-Norwegian prime minister. When her conversation ended, she received another call, from Laily Begum, a Grameen Phone employee. On 11 January 2007, Army
General Moeen U Ahmed staged a military intervention, and
Fakhruddin Ahmed took office on 11 January 2007 as Chief Advisor saying he intended to arrange free and fair elections but also to clean up corruption. While
Khaleda Zia and Hasina criticised Fakruddin and claimed that it was not his job to clean up corruption, Yunus expressed his satisfaction. In an interview with the AFP news agency, Yunus remarked "There is no ideology here." In reaction to Yunus' comments Sheikh Hasina called him a "usurer who has not only failed to eradicate poverty but has also nurtured poverty." This was Hasina's first public statement against Yunus. The
Awami League government of
Sheikh Hasina campaigned against Grameen and Yunus.
The New York Times reported, "Her actions appear to be retaliation for Mr. Yunus's announcement in 2007 that he would seek public office, even though he never went through with his plans". According to
Times of India, one other factor contributed to her decision against Yunus: the Nobel Peace Prize. It was rumored that Hasina thought that she would win the Nobel Peace Prize for signing the 1997
Chittagong Hill Tracts peace treaty. On 9 March,
Attorney General Mahbubey Alam expressed the government's attitude when he said, "Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina should have been awarded the Nobel Peace Prize". He went on to challenge the wisdom of the Nobel committee.
Dismissal from and cases against Grameen Bank (2011–2013) The second Awami League government announced a review of Grameen Bank activities on 11 January 2011. In February 2011, several international leaders, such as
Mary Robinson, stepped up their defence of Yunus through a number of efforts, including the founding of a formal network of supporters known as "Friends of Grameen". On 15 February 2011, the
Finance Minister of Bangladesh,
Abul Maal Abdul Muhith, declared that Yunus should "stay away" from Grameen Bank while it is being investigated. On 2 March 2011, Muzammel Huq, a former Bank employee, whom the government had appointed chairman in January, announced that Yunus had been fired as managing director of the Bank. However, Bank General Manager Jannat-E Quanine issued a statement that Yunus was "continuing in his office" pending review of the legal issues surrounding the controversy. In March 2011, Yunus petitioned the
Bangladesh High Court challenging the legality of the decision by the
Bangladeshi Central Bank to remove him as managing director of Grameen Bank. The same day, nine elected directors of Grameen Bank filed a second petition. U.S. Senator
John Kerry expressed his support to Yunus in a statement on 5 March 2011 and declared that he was "deeply concerned" by this affair. The same day in Bangladesh, thousands of people protested and formed human chains to support Yunus. The High Court hearing on the petitions, was planned for 6 March 2011 but postponed. On 8 March 2011, the Court confirmed Yunus's dismissal. On 2 August 2012, Sheikh Hasina approved a draft of "Grameen Bank Ordinance 2012" to increase government control over the bank. in his later years as managing director of Grameen. The prime minister also alleged that Yunus had received his earnings without the necessary permission from the government, including his Nobel Peace Prize earnings and book royalties. On 4 October 2013, Bangladesh's cabinet approved the draft of a new law that would give the country's central bank greater control over Grameen Bank, raising the stakes in the long-running dispute. The Grameen Bank Act 2013 was approved at a cabinet meeting chaired by Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina and was passed by parliament on 7 November 2013. It replaced the Grameen Bank Ordinance, the law that underpinned the creation of Grameen Bank as a specialised microcredit institution in 1983.
The New York Times reported in August 2013: Since then, the government has started an investigation into the bank and is now planning to take over Grameen—a majority of whose shares are owned by its borrowers—and break it up into 19 regional lenders.
Legal cases and trials (2010–2024) Yunus faced 174 lawsuits in Bangladesh, 172 of which were civil cases. Allegations included labour law violations, corruption, and money laundering, which Yunus alleged were politically motivated. Hasina launched a series of trials against Yunus. The former put the latter on trial in 2010 and ultimately removed him from
Grameen Bank, citing his age. The government launched the first trial against Yunus in December 2010, alleging that in 1996 he had transferred approximately $100 million to a sister company of Grameen Bank. Yunus denied the allegations and he was found innocent by the Norwegian government. In 2013, he was tried a second time, because he had supposedly received earnings without the necessary government permission, including his Nobel Peace Prize earnings and royalties from his book sales. The series of trials against Yunus puzzled figures worldwide, from the 8.3 million underprivileged women served by Grameen Bank to U.S. President
Barack Obama. On 27 January 2011, Yunus appeared in court in a
food-adulteration case filed by the
Dhaka City Corporation (DCC) Food Safety Court, accusing him of producing an "adulterated" yogurt whose fat content was below the legal minimum. This yogurt is produced by
Grameen Danone, a
social business joint venture between Grameen Bank and
Danone that aims to provide opportunities for street vendors who sell the yogurt and to improve child nutrition with the nutrient-fortified yogurt. According to Yunus' lawyer, the allegations are "false and baseless". On 1 January 2024, a court in Bangladesh sentenced Yunus to a six-month prison term, along with three employees from
Grameen Telecom for labor law violations. However, the court granted bail pending appeals.
Amnesty International declared Yunus's conviction a "blatant abuse" of the justice system. The conviction was overturned on 7 August 2024 following an appeal. He was acquitted in a graft case filed by the
Anti-Corruption Commission (ACC) just four days after getting acquittal for the labour violations case.
Allegations of political targeting at the 2025 World Economic Forum In December 2010, Grameen Bank was quickly cleared by the Norwegian government of all allegations surrounding misused or misappropriated funds. In January 2011, Yunus appeared in court in a defamation case filed by a local politician from a minor left-leaning party in 2007, complaining about a statement that Yunus made to the
AFP news agency, "Politicians in Bangladesh only work for power. There is no ideology here". At the hearing, Yunus was granted
bail and exempted from personal appearance at subsequent hearings. due to difficult relations between
Sheikh Hasina and Yunus since early 2007, when Yunus created his own political party, an effort he dropped in May 2007.
Criticism over government privileges (2024–2025) Following his appointment as chief adviser, Yunus faced criticism after several Grameen-affiliated institutions received government approvals and benefits. These included approval for
Grameen University, tax waivers and a reduction in government shareholding in Grameen Bank, and licenses for manpower export and a digital wallet. The dismissal of labor law violation and money laundering cases against him during this period also raised concerns from some quarters regarding transparency and conflicts of interest.
Persecution of journalists ==Personal life==