Thomas says the Labour Party were "enormously supportive" of the film even though it "knocked the Labour Party terribly" and "half the cabinet came to premiere."
Box Office In March 1961
Kinematograph Weekly wrote the film "had a first-class opening week. The melodrama... is an amalgam of sex and politics, but, although politics are usually anathema to the ladies, the film's appealing equally to men and women. The picture bears an X certificate, but the X, far from being a handicap, is almost an infallible sign of success." However it was not a commercial success. Thomas says the film "got great notices although it was never a commercial success, didn't even pay for itself... it very much reflected the politics of the day. The plain fact is that people were not very interested in the politics of the day."
The Monthly Film Bulletin wrote: "The story splits awkwardly in two. Its emphasis, and most of the feeling, are on the side of Johnnie's affair with Pauline, a middle-aged man's efforts to rediscover himself through his love for a twenty-year-old girl. ... Stanley Holloway's fatherly M.P., with his talk of "the people in the streets", and Donald Pleasence's thin lipped intriguer are undeveloped and consequently improbable characters, though hardly more so than Dennis Price's chic photographer or Fenella Fielding's wild party-giver. With its range of contemporary allusions,
No Love for Johnnie no doubt considers that it is making a move towards realism; but the lack of real conviction or spirit behind its "frank" love scenes, its strip-tease club visit and the rest of it, produce an effect which at first looks self-conscious and ends up looking vulgar."
Variety said the film "though not sensational in treatment, it has some earthy sex angles and is a strong, adult film which should hold intelligent audiences. Though it has no obvious stellar value for the U.S.,
No Love For Johnnie is a film worth the attention of any out-of-the-rut booker."
Filmink argued "it's extremely well made with superb work from Peter Finch but is also (surprisingly) dramatically underwhelming. The movie didn’t recover its cost at the box office; Ralph Thomas blamed politics, but we think the main reason is the lead has no drive, no passion – he’s bad at his job, slacks off, doesn't care about anything, just sort of flounders around. If Finch’s character had ambition and drive like the leads of
Room at the Top and
Saturday Night and Sunday Morning, this film would’ve had more kick. Nonetheless,
No Love for Johnnie remains a high point in the career of Finch, Box and Thomas."
Bosley Crowther of
The New York Times praised the films authentic depiction of British political life, highlighting Ralph Thomas' direction and the films vivid sense of place, from constituency backrooms to the House of Commons. He also praised it for Peter Finch's performance calling it "sharp and compelling" and called the supporting cast strong. Crowther also criticised the film for its structural inconsistency, saying that the shift from political drama to romantic melodrama weakened the narrative, the romance subplot being implausible and overly dominant, causing the film to lose focus and he also felt that the final act of the film felt contrived. ==Accolades==