Directional couplers Coupled transmission lines The most common form of directional coupler is a pair of coupled transmission lines. They can be realised in a number of technologies including coaxial and the planar technologies (
stripline and
microstrip). An implementation in stripline is shown in figure 4 of a quarter-wavelength (λ/4) directional coupler. The power on the coupled line flows in the opposite direction to the power on the main line, hence the port arrangement is not the same as shown in figure 1, but the numbering remains the same. For this reason it is sometimes called a
backward coupler. The
main line is the section between ports 1 and 2 and the
coupled line is the section between ports 3 and 4. Since the directional coupler is a linear device, the notations on figure 1 are arbitrary. Any port can be the input, (an example is seen in figure 20) which will result in the directly connected port being the transmitted port, the adjacent port being the coupled port, and the diagonal port being the isolated port. On some directional couplers, the main line is designed for high power operation (large connectors), while the coupled port may use a small connector, such as an
SMA connector. The
internal load power rating may also limit operation on the coupled line. Accuracy of coupling factor depends on the dimensional tolerances for the spacing of the two coupled lines. For planar printed technologies this comes down to the resolution of the printing process which determines the minimum track width that can be produced and also puts a limit on how close the lines can be placed to each other. This becomes a problem when very tight coupling is required and couplers often use a different design. However, tightly coupled lines can be produced in
air stripline which also permits manufacture by printed planar technology. In this design the two lines are printed on
opposite sides of the dielectric rather than side by side. The coupling of the two lines across their width is much greater than the coupling when they are edge-on to each other. The λ/4 coupled-line design is good for coaxial and stripline implementations but does not work so well in the now popular microstrip format, although designs do exist. The reason for this is that microstrip is not a homogeneous medium – there are two different mediums above and below the transmission strip. This leads to
transmission modes other than the usual TEM mode found in conductive circuits. The propagation velocities of even and odd modes are different leading to signal dispersion. A better solution for microstrip is a coupled line much shorter than λ/4, shown in figure 5, but this has the disadvantage of a coupling factor which rises noticeably with frequency. A variation of this design sometimes encountered has the coupled line a higher
impedance than the main line such as shown in figure 6. This design is advantageous where the coupler is being fed to a detector for power monitoring. The higher impedance line results in a higher RF voltage for a given main line power making the work of the detector diode easier. The frequency range specified by manufacturers is that of the coupled line. The main line response is much wider: for instance a coupler specified as might have a main line which could operate at . The coupled response is periodic with frequency. For example, a λ/4 coupled-line coupler will have responses at
nλ/4 where
n is an odd integer. This preferred response gets obvious when a short impulse on the main line is followed through the coupler. When the impulse on the main line reaches the coupled line a signal of the same polarity is induced on the coupled line similar to the response of an RC-high-pass. This leads to two non-inverted pulses on the coupled line that travel in opposite direction to each other. When the pulse on the main line leaves the coupled line an inverted signal is induced on the coupled line, triggering two inverted impulses that travel in opposite direction to each other. Both impulses on the coupled line that go in the same direction as the pulse on the main line are of opposite polarity. They cancel each other so there is no response on the exit of the coupled line in forward direction. This is the decoupled port. The pulses on the coupled line that travel in the opposite direction to the pulse on the main line are also of opposite polarity to each other but the second impulse is delayed by twice the delay of the parallel line. For a λ/4 coupled-line the total delay length is λ/2 so the second signal is inverted and this gives a maximum response on the coupled port. A single λ/4 coupled section is good for bandwidths of less than an octave. To achieve greater bandwidths multiple λ/4 coupling sections are used. The design of such couplers proceeds in much the same way as the design of
distributed-element filters. The sections of the coupler are treated as being sections of a filter, and by adjusting the coupling factor of each section the coupled port can be made to have any of the classic filter responses such as maximally flat (
Butterworth filter), equal-ripple (
Cauer filter), or a specified-ripple (
Chebychev filter) response.
Ripple is the maximum variation in output of the coupled port in its
passband, usually quoted as plus or minus a value in dB from the nominal coupling factor. It can be shown that coupled-line directional couplers have \tau \ purely real and \kappa \ purely imaginary at all frequencies. This leads to a simplification of the S-matrix and the result that the coupled port is always in
quadrature phase (90°) with the output port. Some applications make use of this phase difference. Letting \kappa = i \kappa_\mathrm I \ , the ideal case of lossless operation simplifies to, :\tau^2 + {\kappa_\mathrm I}^2 = 1 \
Branch-line coupler The branch-line coupler consists of two parallel transmission lines physically coupled together with two or more branch lines between them. The branch lines are spaced λ/4 apart and represent sections of a multi-section
filter design in the same way as the multiple sections of a coupled-line coupler except that here the coupling of each section is controlled with the impedance of the branch lines. The main and coupled line are \scriptstyle \sqrt 2 of the system impedance. The more sections there are in the coupler, the higher is the ratio of impedances of the branch lines.
High impedance lines have narrow tracks and this usually limits the design to three sections in planar formats due to manufacturing limitations. A similar limitation applies for coupling factors looser than ; low coupling also requires narrow tracks. Coupled lines are a better choice when
loose coupling is required, but branch-line couplers are good for tight coupling and can be used for hybrids. Branch-line couplers usually do not have such a wide bandwidth as coupled lines. This style of coupler is good for implementing in high-power, air dielectric, solid bar formats as the rigid structure is easy to mechanically support. Branch line couplers can be used as crossovers as an alternative to
air bridges, which in some applications cause an unacceptable amount of coupling between the lines being crossed. An ideal branch-line crossover theoretically has no coupling between the two paths through it. The design is a 3-branch coupler equivalent to two 90° hybrid couplers connected in
cascade. The result is effectively a coupler. It will cross over the inputs to the diagonally opposite outputs with a phase delay of 90° in both lines.
Lange coupler The construction of the Lange coupler is similar to the
interdigital filter with paralleled lines interleaved to achieve the coupling. It is used for strong couplings in the range to .
Power dividers The earliest transmission line power dividers were simple T-junctions. These suffer from very poor isolation between the output ports – a large part of the power reflected back from port 2 finds its way into port 3. It can be shown that it is not theoretically possible to simultaneously match all three ports of a passive, lossless three-port and poor isolation is unavoidable. It is, however, possible with four-ports and this is the fundamental reason why four-port devices are used to implement three-port power dividers: four-port devices can be designed so that power arriving at port 2 is split between port 1 and port 4 (which is terminated with a matching load) and none (in the ideal case) goes to port 3. The term
hybrid coupler originally applied to coupled-line directional couplers, that is, directional couplers in which the two outputs are each half the input power. This synonymously meant a quadrature coupler with outputs 90° out of phase. Now any matched 4-port with isolated arms and equal power division is called a hybrid or hybrid coupler. Other types can have different phase relationships. If 90°, it is a 90° hybrid, if 180°, a 180° hybrid and so on. In this article
hybrid coupler without qualification means a coupled-line hybrid.
Wilkinson power divider The
Wilkinson power divider consists of two parallel
uncoupled λ/4 transmission lines. The input is fed to both lines in parallel and the outputs are terminated with twice the system impedance bridged between them. The design can be realised in planar format but it has a more natural implementation in coax – in planar, the two lines have to be kept apart so that they do not couple but have to be brought together at their outputs so they can be terminated whereas in coax the lines can be run side-by-side relying on the coax outer conductors for screening. The Wilkinson power divider solves the matching problem of the simple T-junction: it has low VSWR at all ports and high isolation between output ports. The input and output impedances at each port are designed to be equal to the characteristic impedance of the microwave system. This is achieved by making the line impedance \scriptstyle \sqrt 2 of the system impedance – for a system the Wilkinson lines are approximately
Hybrid coupler Coupled-line directional couplers are described above. When the coupling is designed to be it is called a hybrid coupler. The S-matrix for an ideal, symmetric hybrid coupler reduces to; : \mathbf S = \frac {1}{\sqrt 2} \begin{bmatrix} 0 & -i & -1 & 0 \\ -i & 0 & 0 & -1 \\ -1 & 0 & 0 & -i \\ 0 & -1 & -i & 0 \end{bmatrix} The two output ports have a 90° phase difference (-
i to −1) and so this is a 90° hybrid.
Hybrid ring coupler The
hybrid ring coupler, also called the rat-race coupler, is a four-port directional coupler consisting of a 3λ/2 ring of transmission line with four lines at the intervals shown in figure 12. Power input at port 1 splits and travels both ways round the ring. At ports 2 and 3 the signal arrives in phase and adds whereas at port 4 it is out of phase and cancels. Ports 2 and 3 are in phase with each other, hence this is an example of a 0° hybrid. Figure 12 shows a planar implementation but this design can also be implemented in coax or waveguide. It is possible to produce a coupler with a coupling factor different from by making each λ/4 section of the ring alternately low and high impedance but for a coupler the entire ring is made \scriptstyle \sqrt 2 of the port impedances – for a design the ring would be approximately . The S-matrix for this hybrid is given by; : \mathbf S = \frac {1}{\sqrt 2} \begin{bmatrix} 0 & -i & -i & 0 \\ -i & 0 & 0 & i \\ -i & 0 & 0 & -i \\ 0 & i & -i & 0 \end{bmatrix} The hybrid ring is not symmetric on its ports; choosing a different port as the input does not necessarily produce the same results. With port 1 or port 3 as the input the hybrid ring is a 0° hybrid as stated. However using port 2 or port 4 as the input results in a 180° hybrid. This fact leads to another useful application of the hybrid ring: it can be used to produce sum (Σ) and difference (Δ) signals from two input signals as shown in figure 12. With inputs to ports 2 and 3, the Σ signal appears at port 1 and the Δ signal appears at port 4.
Multiple output dividers A typical power divider is shown in figure 13. Ideally, input power would be divided equally between the output ports. Dividers are made up of multiple couplers and, like couplers, may be reversed and used as
multiplexers. The drawback is that for a four channel multiplexer, the output consists of only 1/4 the power from each, and is relatively inefficient. The reason for this is that at each combiner half the input power goes to port 4 and is dissipated in the termination load. If the two inputs were
coherent the phases could be so arranged that cancellation occurred at port 4 and then all the power would go to port 1. However, multiplexer inputs are usually from entirely independent sources and therefore not coherent. Lossless multiplexing can only be done with filter networks. ==Waveguide types==