, known as the "Father of Modern Medicine"
Knowledge of causes This subject inquires into the nature of things first began out of practical concerns among the
ancient Greeks. For instance, an attempt to establish a
calendar is first exemplified by the
Works and Days of the Greek poet
Hesiod, who lived around 700 BC. Hesiod's calendar was meant to regulate seasonal activities by the seasonal appearances and disappearances of the stars, as well as by the phases of the Moon, which were held to be propitious or ominous. Around 450 BC we begin to see compilations of the seasonal appearances and disappearances of the stars in texts known as
parapegmata, which were used to regulate the civil calendars of the Greek
city-states on the basis of astronomical observations. Medicine is another area where practically oriented investigations of nature took place during this period.
Greek medicine was not the province of a single trained profession and there was no accepted method of qualification of licensing. Physicians in the
Hippocratic tradition, temple healers associated with the cult of
Asclepius, herb collectors, drug sellers, midwives, and gymnastic trainers all claimed to be qualified as healers in specific contexts and competed actively for patients. This rivalry among these competing traditions contributed to an active public debate about the causes and proper treatment of disease, and about the general methodological approaches of their rivals. An example of the search for causal explanations is found in the Hippocratic text
On the Sacred Disease, which deals with the nature of epilepsy. In it, the author attacks his rivals (temple healers) for their ignorance in attributing epilepsy to divine wrath, and for their love of gain. Although the author insists that epilepsy has a natural cause, when it comes to explain what that cause is and what the proper treatment would be, the explanation is as short on specific evidence and the treatment as vague as that of his rivals. Nonetheless, observations of natural phenomena continued to be compiled in an effort to determine their causes, as for instance in the works of
Aristotle and
Theophrastus, who wrote extensively on animals and plants. Theophrastus also produced the first systematic attempt to classify
minerals and rocks, a summary of which is found in Pliny's
Natural History. The legacy of Greek science in this era included substantial advances in factual knowledge due to empirical research (e.g., in zoology, botany, mineralogy, and astronomy), an awareness of the importance of certain scientific problems (e.g., the problem of change and its causes), and a recognition of the methodological significance of establishing criteria for truth (e.g., applying mathematics to natural phenomena), despite the lack of universal consensus in any of these areas. Although the question is much the same, their answers and their attitude towards the answers is markedly different. As reported by such later writers as Aristotle, their explanations tended to center on the material source of things.
Thales of Miletus (624–546 BC) considered that all things came to be from and find their sustenance in water.
Anaximander (610–546 BC) then suggested that things could not come from a specific substance like water, but rather from something he called the "boundless". Exactly what he meant is uncertain but it has been suggested that it was boundless in its quantity, so that creation would not fail; in its qualities, so that it would not be overpowered by its contrary; in time, as it has no beginning or end; and in space, as it encompasses all things.
Anaximenes (585–525 BC) returned to a concrete material substance, air, which could be altered by rarefaction and condensation. He adduced common observations (the wine stealer) to demonstrate that air was a substance and a simple experiment (breathing on one's hand) to show that it could be altered by rarefaction and condensation.
Heraclitus of Ephesus (about 535–475 BC), then maintained that change, rather than any substance was fundamental, although the element fire seemed to play a central role in this process. Finally,
Empedocles of Acragas (490–430 BC), seems to have combined the views of his predecessors, asserting that there are
four elements (Earth, Water, Air and Fire) which produce change by mixing and separating under the influence of two opposing "forces" that he called Love and Strife. All these theories imply that matter is a continuous substance. Two Greek philosophers,
Leucippus (first half of the 5th century BC) and
Democritus came up with the notion that there were two real entities:
atoms, which were small indivisible particles of matter, and the void, which was the empty space in which matter was located. Although all the explanations from Thales to Democritus involve matter, what is more important is the fact that these rival explanations suggest an ongoing process of debate in which alternate theories were put forth and criticized.
Xenophanes of
Colophon prefigured
paleontology and
geology as he thought that periodically the earth and sea mix and turn all to mud, citing several
fossils of sea creatures that he had seen.
Pythagorean philosophy The materialist explanations of the origins of the cosmos were attempts at answering the question of how an organized universe came to be; however, the idea of a random assemblage of elements (e.g., fire or water) producing an ordered universe without the existence of some ordering principle remained problematic to some. One answer to this problem was advanced by the followers of
Pythagoras (c. 582–507 BC), who saw number as the fundamental unchanging entity underlying all the structure of the universe. Although it is difficult to separate fact from legend, it appears that some Pythagoreans believed matter to be made up of ordered arrangements of points according to geometrical principles: triangles, squares, rectangles, or other figures. Other Pythagoreans saw the universe arranged on the basis of numbers, ratios, and proportions, much like musical scales.
Philolaus, for instance, held that there were ten heavenly bodies because the sum of 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 gives the perfect number 10. Thus, the Pythagoreans were some of the first to apply mathematical principles to explain the rational basis of an orderly universe—an idea that was to have immense consequences in the development of scientific thought.
Hippocrates and the Hippocratic Corpus According to tradition, the physician
Hippocrates of Kos (460–370 BC) is considered the "father of medicine" because he was the first to make use of
prognosis and clinical observation, to categorize diseases, and to formulate the ideas behind
humoral theory. However, most of the
Hippocratic Corpus—a collection of medical theories, practices, and diagnoses—was often attributed to Hippocrates with very little justification, thus making it difficult to know what Hippocrates actually thought, wrote, and did. Despite their wide variability in terms of style and method, the writings of the Hippocratic Corpus had a significant influence on the medical practice of Islamic and Western medicine for more than a thousand years.
Schools of philosophy The Academy depicting Plato's Academy, from the Villa of T. Siminius Stephanus in
Pompeii (1st century AD) The first institution of higher learning in Ancient Greece was founded by
Plato (c. 427 – c. 347 BC), an Athenian who
—perhaps under Pythagorean influence
—appears to have identified the ordering principle of the universe as one based on number and geometry. A later account has it that Plato had inscribed at the entrance to the academy the words "Let no man ignorant of geometry enter." Although the story is most likely a myth, it nonetheless testifies to Plato's interest in mathematics, which is alluded to in several of his dialogues. Plato's philosophy maintained that all material things are imperfect reflections of eternal unchanging
ideas, just as all mathematical diagrams are reflections of eternal unchanging mathematical truths. Since Plato believed that material things had an inferior kind of reality, he considered that demonstrative knowledge cannot be achieved by looking at the imperfect material world. Truth is to be found through rational argumentation, analogous to the demonstrations of mathematicians. For instance, Plato recommended that astronomy be studied in terms of abstract geometrical models rather than empirical observations, and proposed that leaders be trained in mathematics in preparation for philosophy.
Aristotle (384–322 BC) studied at the academy and nonetheless disagreed with Plato in several important respects. While he agreed that truth must be eternal and unchanging, Aristotle maintained that the world is knowable through experience and that we come to know the truth by what we perceive with our senses. For him, directly observable things are real; ideas (or as he called them, forms) only exist as they express themselves in matter, such as in living things, or in the mind of an observer or artisan. Aristotle's theory of reality led to a different approach to science. Unlike Plato, Aristotle emphasized observation of the material entities which embody the forms. He also played down (but did not negate) the importance of mathematics in the study of nature. The process of change took precedence over Plato's focus on eternal unchanging ideas in Aristotle's philosophy. Finally, he reduced the importance of Plato's forms to one of four causal factors. Aristotle thus distinguished between
four causes: • the matter of which a thing was made (the
material cause). • the form into which it was made (the
formal cause; similar to Plato's ideas). • the agent who made the thing (the moving or
efficient cause). • the purpose for which the thing was made (the
final cause). Aristotle insisted that scientific knowledge (Ancient Greek:
ἐπιστήμη, Latin: ) is knowledge of necessary causes. He and his followers would not accept mere description or prediction as science. Most characteristic of Aristotle's causes is his final cause, the purpose for which a thing is made. He came to this insight through
his biological researches, such as those of marine animals at
Lesbos, in which he noted that the organs of animals serve a particular function: :The absence of chance and the serving of ends are found in the works of nature especially. And the end for the sake of which a thing has been constructed or has come to be belongs to what is beautiful.
The Lyceum After Plato's death, Aristotle left the academy and traveled widely before returning to Athens to found a school adjacent to the Lyceum. As one of the most prolific natural philosophers of Antiquity, Aristotle wrote and lecture on many topics of scientific interest, including
biology,
meteorology,
psychology,
logic, and
physics. He developed a comprehensive
physical theory that was a variation of the classical theory of the elements (
earth,
water,
fire,
air, and
aether). In his theory, the light elements (fire and air) have a natural tendency to move away from the center of the universe while the heavy elements (earth and water) have a natural tendency to move toward the center of the universe, thereby forming a spherical Earth. Since the celestial bodies (i.e., the
planets and
stars) were seen to move in circles, he concluded that they must be made of a fifth element, which he called
aether. Aristotle used intuitive ideas to justify his reasoning and could point to the falling stone, rising flames, or pouring water to illustrate his theory. His laws of
motion emphasized the common observation that
friction was an omnipresent phenomenon: that any body in motion would, unless acted upon,
come to rest. He also proposed that heavier objects fall faster, and that
voids were impossible. Aristotle's successor at the Lyceum was
Theophrastus, who wrote valuable books describing plant and animal life. His works are regarded as the first to put
botany and
zoology on a systematic footing. Theophrastus' work on
mineralogy provided descriptions of ores and minerals known to the world at that time, making some shrewd observations of their properties. For example, he made the first known reference to the phenomenon that the mineral
tourmaline attracts straws and bits of wood when heated, now known to be caused by
pyroelectricity.
Pliny the Elder makes clear references to his use of the work in his
Natural History, while updating and making much new information available on
minerals himself. From both these early texts was to emerge the science of mineralogy, and ultimately
geology. Both authors describe the sources of the minerals they discuss in the various mines exploited in their time, so their works should be regarded not just as early scientific texts, but also important for the
history of engineering and the
history of technology. Other notable
peripatetics include
Strato, who was a tutor in the court of the Ptolemies and who devoted time to physical research,
Eudemus, who edited Aristotle's works and wrote the first books on the
history of science, and
Demetrius of Phalerum, who governed Athens for a time and later may have helped establish the
Library of Alexandria. == Hellenistic age ==