Edson and the Heavenly Sanctuary After the disappointment of October 22 many of Miller's followers were left upset and disillusioned. Most ceased to believe in the imminent return of Jesus. Some believed the date was incorrect. A few believed that the date was right but the event expected was wrong. This latter group developed into the Seventh-day Adventist Church. One of the Adventists,
Hiram Edson (1806–1882) wrote "Our fondest hopes and expectations were blasted, and such a spirit of weeping came over us as I never experienced before. It seemed that the loss of all earthly friends could have been no comparison. We wept, and wept, till the day dawn." On the morning of October 23, Edson, who lived in
Port Gibson, New York was passing through his grain field with a friend. He later recounted his experience: :We started, and while passing through a large field I was stopped about midway of the field. Heaven seemed opened to my view, and I saw distinctly and clearly that instead of our High Priest coming out of the Most Holy of the heavenly sanctuary to come to this earth on the tenth day of the seventh month, at the end of the 2300 days [calculated to be October 22, 1844], He for the first time entered on that day the second apartment of that sanctuary; and that He had a work to perform in the Most Holy before coming to the earth. Edson shared his experience with many of the local Adventists who were greatly encouraged by his account. As a result, he began studying the bible with two of the other believers in the area, O. R. L. Crosier and Franklin B. Hahn, who published their findings in a paper called
Day-Dawn. This paper explored the biblical
parable of the
Ten Virgins and attempted to explain why the
bridegroom had tarried. The article also explored the concept of the
day of atonement and what the authors called "our chronology of events". The findings published by Crosier, Hahn and Edson led to a new understanding about the sanctuary in heaven. Their paper explained how there was a sanctuary in heaven, that Christ, the
High Priest, was to cleanse. The believers understood this cleansing to be what the 2300 days in Daniel was referring to.
George Knight wrote, "Although originally the smallest of the post-Millerite groups, it came to see itself as the true successor of the once-powerful Millerite movement." This view was endorsed by Ellen White. However,
Seeking a Sanctuary sees it more as an offshoot of the Millerite movement. The "Sabbath and Shut Door" Adventists were disparate, but slowly emerged. Only Joseph Bates had had any prominence in the Millerite movement. Adventists see themselves as heirs of earlier outcast believers:
Waldenses,
Protestant Reformers including the
Anabaptists, English and Scottish
Puritans,
Evangelicals of the 18th century including
Methodists,
Seventh Day Baptists, and others who rejected established church traditions.
Sabbath observance develops and unites A young
Seventh Day Baptist layperson named
Rachel Oakes Preston living in
New Hampshire was responsible for introducing
Sabbath to the Millerite Adventists. Due to her influence, Frederick Wheeler, a local Methodist-Adventist preacher, began keeping the seventh day as Sabbath, probably in the early spring of 1844. Several members of the
Washington, New Hampshire church he occasionally ministered to also followed his decision. These included William and Cyrus Farnsworth.
T. M. Preble soon accepted it either from Wheeler or directly from Oakes. These events were shortly followed by the Great Disappointment. Preble promoted Sabbath through the February 28, 1845 issue of the
Hope of Israel. In March he published his Sabbath views in tract form. Although he returned to observing Sunday in the next few years, his writing convinced
Joseph Bates and
J. N. Andrews. These men in turn convinced
James and
Ellen White, as well as
Hiram Edson and hundreds of others. Bates proposed that a meeting should be organised between the believers in New Hampshire and Port Gibson. At this meeting, which occurred sometime in 1846 at Edson's farm, Edson and other Port Gibson believers readily accepted Sabbath and at the same time forged an alliance with Bates and two other folk from New Hampshire who later became very influential in the Adventist church,
James and
Ellen G. White. Between April 1848, and December 1850 twenty-two "Sabbath conferences" were held in
New York and
New England. These meetings were often seen as opportunities for leaders such as James White, Joseph Bates, Stephen Pierce and Hiram Edson to discuss and reach conclusions about doctrinal issues. While initially it was believed that Sabbath started at 6 pm, by 1855 it was generally accepted that Sabbath begins at Friday sunset. The
Present Truth (see below) was largely devoted to Sabbath at first. J. N. Andrews was the first Adventist to write a book-length defense of Sabbath, first published in 1861.
Trinitarianism At the formation of the church in the 19th century, many of the Adventist leaders held to an antitrinitarian view, thanks to many antitrinitarian Christian Connexion ministers entering the former Millerite fold. Ellen G. White contributed to this discussion by helping to develop a landmark doctrine called "the personality of God." This doctrine asserts that God is a tangible being, having a form. In one of her earliest publications of a vision, Mrs. White recalled asking "Jesus if his Father had a form like himself; He said he had" (DayStar March 14, 1846, par. 1). Thus Mrs. White's doctrine of God does not mesh with the trinitarian creeds which teach that God is a formless triune being. Mrs. White classified the personality of God as one of "the old landmarks" of the Seventh-day Adventist faith (Ms62-1905.14). At the same time, her theology clearly developed over the decades and by the late 1890's and early 1900s she published that there are "three living persons of the heavenly trio" (Special Testimonies Series B07 pg 63). She referred to the Spirit as the "third person of the Godhead" (Desire of Ages pg 671) and a stenographer's report of one her sermons in the early 1900s refers to the Father, Son, and Spirit as the "three holiest beings" (see 21LtMs, Ms, 95, 1906 par. 29). Woodrow Whidden notes that the Christology of Ellen White is "a bit problematic, but more evidently Trinitarian and Athanasian" (Arianism, Adventism and Methodism: The Healing of Trinitarian Teaching and Soteriology). Her
Pneumatology is also a bit unclear because, while referring to the Spirit as the third person several times, she wrote statements of direct equivalence between the Spirit and Jesus Letter 66, April 10, 1894- par. 18; Ms 125, 1906, par.13; Southern Review Oct 25, 1898). She also wrote about the Spirit being God making Himself into a fountain of Divine influence, and It being His vital presence, power, breath, life, character of God or His Son (7T 273; ST, November 23, 1891; BEcho August 5, 1901, par. 4, etc,...). Ellen White's son, William White, stated that he "never clearly understood" his "mother’s position in reference to the personality of the Holy Spirit" but concluded that "the Spirit without individuality was the representative of the Father and the Son throughout the universe, and it was through the Holy Spirit that they dwell in our hearts and make us one with the Father and with the Son." (W.C. White to H.C. Carr, April 30th 1935). Seventh-day Adventists today, in general, tend to believe that the Spirit is His own individual person but there is confusion as to whether or not the Spirit is a separate bodily personage like the Father and Son. There is a fair amount of confusion within Seventh-day Adventism today on the subject of the trinity. M.L. Andreasen wrote in the 1940s that “The field is divided on the subject of the Trinity” (M.L. Andreason to Elder J.L. McElhany and Elder W.H. Branson, December 25th, 1942 pg 5) and that testimony remains true. There is a growing grass roots movement within Seventh-day Adventism that labels the doctrine of the Trinity as an assumption and seeks to return to a position that can be proven by the express words of the Bible. This movement is inseparably connected to the historical development of this doctrine within Adventism and there are different and competing interpretations of that history. Modern Seventh-day Adventists that hold to an antitrinitarian view are in the minority. Many of these individuals oppose the stenographer's report of the "three holiest beings." It is true that stenographer reports contain errors, as demonstrated by comparing multiple stenographer reports of the same sermon Mrs. White gave on April 1, 1901 (Compare Manuscripts 43, 43a, 43b, 43c, and 43d). According to the White Estate stenographer reports can only give us a "feel" (1SAT i.3) for Mrs. White as a speaker. Thus some argue that unless Mrs. White published the report then they should be taken with a grain of salt because they might not reflect her true teaching. SDA pro-trinitarian scholars, on the other hand, counter these claims by pointing out that these transcripts were in her possession and she could have modified them at any time had they reflected an inaccurate version of what she said, given the perceived doctrinal importance of the topic. They also note that she published that the Spirit was "third person" many times and that is virtually synonymous with a third being. In 1855,
James White stated in a clear way his view on the subject: "Here we might mention the Trinity which does away the personality of God, and his Son Jesus Christ..." In 1856,
he again makes his stance clear by saying: "The greatest fault we can find in the Reformation is, the Reformers stopped reforming. Had they gone on, and onward, till they had left the last vestige of Papacy behind, such as natural immortality, sprinkling, the trinity, and Sunday-keeping, the church would now be free from her scriptural errors." Lemuel Sapian writes "...by the dawn of the 20th century it was evident to many that the former position [the Adventists] took [against] the Trinity was erroneous. This came about not by any internal conspiracy or meddling of third parties intent on diluting [the] distinctive [Adventist] message, but because the pen of Inspiration [of Ellen G. White] took action—and men...took heed."
Posttribulation Premillennialism Beginning with William Miller's teachings, Adventists have played a key role in introducing the Bible doctrine of premillennialism in the United States. They believe the saints will be received or gathered by Christ into the Kingdom of God in heaven at the end of the Tribulation at the
Second Coming before the
Millennium. In the appendix to his book "Kingdom of the Cults" where Walter Martin explains why Seventh-day Adventists are accepted as orthodox Christians (see page 423) Martin also summarizes the key role that Adventists played in the advancement of premillennialism in the 19th century. However the unique contribution of Seventh-day Adventists to this doctrine does not stop there. Seventh-day Adventists are posttribulation premillennialists who accept the Bible teaching on a literal 1000 years in Revelation 20 that immediately follows the literal second coming of Christ described in Revelation 19. In contrast to almost all premillennialist groups they do not believe in a 1000-year kingdom on earth during the millennium. In Adventist eschatology Christ's promise to take the saints to His Father's house in John 14:1–3 is fulfilled at the 2nd coming where both the living and the dead saints are taken up in the air to meet the Lord (see 1 Thess 4:13–18 ). John, the author of Revelation, calls this moment the "first resurrection" in Revelation 20:5–6. Instead of a Millennial Kingdom on earth, Adventists teach that there is only a desolated earth for 1000 years and during that time the saints are in heaven with Christ (see Jeremiah 4:23–29).
Adventist publishing work begins with The Present Truth On November 18, 1848, Ellen White had a vision in which God told her that her husband should start a paper. In 1849, James, determined to publish this paper, went to find work as a farm-hand to raise sufficient funds. After another vision, she told James that he was to not worry about funds but to set to work on producing the paper to be printed. James readily obeyed, writing from the aid "of a pocket Bible,
Cruden's Condensed Concordance, and an abridged dictionary with one of its covers off." Thanks to a generous offer by the printer to delay charges, the group of Advent believers had 1000 copies of the first publication printed. They sent the publication, which was on the topic of Sabbath, to friends and colleagues they believe would find it of interest. Eleven issues were published in 1849 and 1850. ==Formal organization and further growth, 1860–1880==