Earlier efforts The
British Army was among the first to introduce a heavy anti-tank missile when they introduced the
Malkara in 1958. The Malkara had a number of problems, among them that the missiles had to be raised into the line of sight for firing, and left a line of smoke from its
rocket motor that lingered long enough to point directly back to the launcher. Additionally, the guidance system was difficult to use and had limited performance against moving targets. Malkara was nevertheless purchased for the
airborne infantry to allow them to deal with Soviet armour at long range. Desiring a more capable weapon, the
Ministry of Supply funded the
Orange William development at
Fairey Engineering Ltd beginning in 1954. The idea behind Orange William was that the launcher and guidance systems were separated by up to , allowing the launcher to remain far behind the front line while the small and heavily camouflaged guidance vehicle moved forward where it could see the enemy. Unfortunately, testing demonstrated the selected guidance system was easily blocked by smoke and dust, making it ineffective on the battlefield. Through this same period, the Army was developing the
Royal Ordnance L11 120 mm gun for the
Chieftain tank, as development continued it appeared it would be able to defeat any Soviet tank design. The need for a heavyweight missile was less pressing and development of Orange William was cancelled in September 1959. Through the same period, a much lighter man-portable weapon was also being developed, the
Vickers Vigilant. Based on the experience with Malkara, Vigilant introduced a much improved guidance system. While it was still manual, requiring the gunner to watch the missile approach the target, it used a new method of sending corrections to the missile that was far easier for the gunner to use, especially against moving targets. Vigilant went on to see widespread use in several nations including the United States.
Swingfire and TOW The basic idea of under-cover fire remained of interest to the Army after the cancellation of Orange William, and the
Royal Armament Research and Development Establishment (RARDE) was given £250,000 a year to continue research into the basic concepts. As part of the resulting Project 12, they developed two basic concepts, Quickfire and Swingfire. The former appears to be a fast-action weapon, but few details have been made public. The latter was designed to allow it to be fired from under cover, like Orange William. As the company already had experience in the indirect fire role, and fearing it would otherwise lead to the breakup of their missile team, Fairey was issued a new development contract in October 1959. The basic idea of the Swingfire concept was that
thrust vectoring of the rocket exhaust allowed the missile to make extreme maneuvers, including a right-angle turn immediately after launch. This was especially useful in urban settings like
Berlin; the gunner could take the sight up to from the launcher and position themselves along potential lines of approach, while the launcher parked down a side street or alleyways. The crew would then dial in the distance to the main line of fire and its angle relative to the launcher, and the missile would travel that distance and then turn, flying past the gunner and into his sights. The missiles could be fired without the launcher ever exposing itself to the enemy, and the gunner could remain hidden in a foxhole or building. While the rocket smoke would still give away the rough location of the launcher, the enemy would be unable to return fire against the hidden launcher and would have no idea where the gunner was located. As the
Warsaw Pact greatly increased its number of tanks during the 1960s, the long-range missile was once again considered important. The Soviet plan was to simply overrun
NATO forces using sheer numbers, so a weapon that could attrit these forces before they reached friendly forces was highly desirable. The
US Army was equally interested in such a system, and in July 1961 the two countries signed the Rubel-Zuckerman Agreement for further development. Under this plan, the US would concentrate on short-range rapid-fire weapons, while RARDE would continue Swingfire development for the long-range role. Of the several concepts studied in the US, the
BGM-71 TOW was ultimately selected. TOW used a
semi-automatic guidance system that was very easy to use and capable of easily tracking moving targets, but had limited accuracy in long-range use and had to fly directly at the target and thereby expose the gunner to attack. As TOW developed, it continued to grow larger and gain more range, ultimately emerging as a much larger design similar to the Swingfire. The US suggested the British adopt the TOW, but the necessity for the tracker to be inline with the missile throughout its flight was considered completely unacceptable to the British while the US saw this as irrelevant. Any plans to introduce TOW in British service ended.
Prototype problems During testing, the system proved to have a huge number of minor problems and continually failed. It was not until 1969 that the system was considered even partially usable and the missiles began to work reliably. A significant problem was due to the rocket's exhaust smoke. Previous missile designs like Malkara had left an exhaust trail pointing directly back to the launcher which could then be attacked. Swingfire didn't need to be concerned about the trail because the launcher itself would be hidden, so little effort was expended on using a lower-smoke fuel. In testing, it was found that the exhaust cloud was thick enough to obscure the missile or the target. This was especially a problem at long range when the missile was being viewed through the entire column of exhaust. This made aiming at long range largely a matter of luck, and as a result the accuracy proved to be below specifications. The missile was initially presented to the Army for acceptance in July 1969. and on 28 July they initially rejected it until additional corrections were made. They also found the training systems were inadequate. The new owners of the system,
British Aerospace, agreed to make several changes to the design, and the Army eventually accepted the design on a provisional basis in August.
Hawkswing As part of their studies on
helicopter gunships, in March 1966 the General Staff issued GST.3334 for a new helicopter-launched missile to replace SS.11 starting around 1975. This led to a Swingfire development known as Hawkswing, and later after the BAC purchase, Air Strike Swingfire. When used with the
Westland Lynx, the helicopter could carry six missiles, aimed using a sight projecting through the roof. Lynx XW839 was converted and began testing in September 1974. Testing demonstrated several problems. Among these was a slow initial speed, which caused it to be blown downward by the rotor's downwash. A more serious concern was a lack of range, even with the improved "Somme" rocket motor. While the system worked, in head-to-head comparison with TOW and the Franco-German
HOT, Hawkswing came in last. The role was ultimately given to TOW. ==Service==