East India Company During the second half of the 17th century, the newly established factories of the
East India Company in
South Asia started to produce finished cotton goods in quantity for the British market. The imported
Calico and
chintz garments competed with, and acted as a substitute for Indian
wool and the
linen produce, resulting in local weavers, spinners, dyers, shepherds and farmers petitioning their
MPs and in turn
Parliament for a ban on the importation, and later the sale of woven cotton goods. Which they eventually achieved via the 1700 and 1721
Calico Acts. The acts banned the importation and later the sale of finished pure cotton produce, but did not restrict the importation of raw cotton, or sale or production of
Fustian. The exemption of raw cotton saw two thousand bales of cotton being imported annually, from Asia and the Americas, and forming the basis of a new indigenous industry, initially producing
Fustian for the domestic market, though more importantly triggering the development of a series of mechanised spinning and weaving technologies, to process the material. This mechanised production was concentrated in new
cotton mills, which slowly expanded till by the beginning of the 1770s seven thousand bales of cotton were imported annually, and pressure was put on Parliament, by the new mill owners, to remove the prohibition on the production and sale of pure cotton cloth, as they wished to compete with the EIC imports. Indian cotton textiles, mainly those from
Bengal, continued to maintain a competitive advantage up until the 19th century. In order to compete with Indian goods, British merchants invested in labour-saving technical advancements, while the
government implemented
protectionist policies such as bans and
tariffs to restrict Indian imports. Britain eventually surpassed India as the world's leading cotton textile manufacturer in the 19th century.
Timeline of inventions In 1734 in
Bury, Lancashire,
John Kay invented the
flying shuttle — one of the first of a series of
inventions associated with the cotton industry. The flying shuttle increased the width of cotton cloth and speed of production of a single weaver at a
loom. Resistance by workers to the perceived threat to jobs delayed the widespread introduction of this technology, even though the higher rate of production generated an increased demand for
spun cotton. In 1738,
Lewis Paul (one of the community of
Huguenot weavers that had been driven out of France in a wave of religious persecution) settled in
Birmingham and with
John Wyatt, of that town, they patented the
Roller Spinning machine and the
flyer-and-bobbin system, for drawing
wool to a more even thickness. Using two sets of rollers that travelled at different speeds
yarn could be twisted and spun quickly and efficiently. This was later used in the first
cotton spinning
mill during the Industrial Revolution. 1742: Paul and Wyatt opened a mill in Birmingham which used their new rolling machine powered by
donkey; this was not profitable and was soon closed. 1743: A factory opened in
Northampton, fifty spindles turned on five of Paul and Wyatt's machines proving more successful than their first mill. This operated until 1764. 1748: Lewis Paul invented the hand driven
carding machine. A coat of wire slips were placed around a card which was then wrapped around a cylinder. Lewis's invention was later developed and improved by
Richard Arkwright and
Samuel Crompton, although this came about under great suspicion after a fire at Daniel Bourn's factory in
Leominster which specifically used Paul and Wyatt's spindles. Bourn produced a similar patent in the same year. 1758: Paul and Wyatt based in
Birmingham improved their roller spinning machine and took out a second patent. Richard Arkwright later used this as the model for his
water frame.
Start of the Revolution The
Duke of Bridgewater's canal connected Manchester to the coal fields of
Worsley. It was opened in July 1761.
Matthew Boulton opened the
Soho Foundry engineering works in
Handsworth,
Birmingham in 1762. These were both events that enabled
cotton mill construction and the move away from home-based production. In 1764,
Thorp Mill the first water-powered cotton mill in the world was constructed at
Royton,
Lancashire, England. It was used for carding cotton. The multiple spindle spinning jenny was invented in 1764.
James Hargreaves is credited as the inventor. This machine increased the thread production capacity of a single worker — initially eightfold and subsequently much further. Others credit the original invention to
Thomas Highs.
Industrial unrest forced Hargreaves to leave
Blackburn, but more importantly for him, his unpatented idea was exploited by others. He finally patented it in 1770. As a result, there were over 20,000 spinning jennies in use (mainly unlicensed) by the time of his death.
Richard Arkwright first spinning mill,
Cromford Mill,
Derbyshire, was built in 1771. It contained his invention the
water frame. The water frame was developed from the
spinning frame that Arkwright had developed with (a different)
John Kay, from
Warrington. The original design was again claimed by Thomas Highs: which he purposed he had
patented in 1769. Arkwright used
waterwheels to power the textile machinery. His initial attempts at driving the frame had used horse power, but a mill needed far more power. Using a waterwheel demanded a location with a ready supply of water, hence the mill at Cromford. This mill is preserved as part of the
Derwent Valley Mills. Arkwright generated jobs and
constructed accommodation for his workers which he moved into the area. This led to a sizeable industrial community. Arkwright protected his investment from industrial rivals and potentially disruptive workers. This model worked and he expanded his operations to other parts of the country.
Matthew Boulton partnership with Scottish engineer
James Watt resulted, in 1775, in the commercial production of the more efficient
Watt steam engine which used a separate condensor.
Samuel Crompton of
Bolton combined elements of the spinning jenny and water frame in 1779, creating the
spinning mule. This mule produced a stronger thread than the water frame could. Thus in 1780, there were two viable hand-operated spinning systems that could be easily adapted to run by power of water. Early mules were suitable for producing yarn for use in the manufacture of
muslin, and were known as the muslin wheel or the
Hall i' th' Wood (pronounced Hall-ith-wood) wheel. As with Kay and Hargreaves, Crompton was not able to exploit his invention for his own profit, and died a pauper. In 1783 a mill was built in Manchester at Shudehill, at the highest point in the city away from the river.
Shudehill Mill was powered by a 30 ft diameter waterwheel. Two storage ponds were built, and the water from one passed from one to the other turning the wheel. A steam driven pump returned the water to the higher reservoir. The steam engine was of the atmospheric type. In 1784,
Edmund Cartwright invented the
power loom, and produced a prototype in the following year. His initial venture to exploit this technology failed, although his advances were recognised by others in the industry. Others such as
Robert Grimshaw (whose factory was destroyed in 1790 as part of the growing reaction against the mechanization of the industry) and Austin – developed the ideas further. In the 1790s industrialists, such as
John Marshall at
Marshall's Mill in Leeds, started to work on ways to apply some of the techniques which had proved so successful in cotton to other materials, such as flax. In 1803,
William Radcliffe invented the
dressing frame which was
patented under the name of
Thomas Johnson which enabled power looms to operate continuously.
Later developments With the Cartwright Loom, the Spinning Mule and the Boulton & Watt steam engine, the pieces were in place to build a mechanised textile industry. From this point there were no new inventions, but a continuous improvement in technology as the mill-owner strove to reduce cost and improve quality. Developments in the transport infrastructure - the canals and, after 1831, the railways - facilitated the import of raw materials and export of finished cloth. The use of water power to drive mills was supplemented by steam driven water pumps, and then superseded completely by the
steam engines. For example,
Samuel Greg joined his uncle's firm of textile merchants, and, on taking over the company in 1782, he sought out a site to establish a mill.
Quarry Bank Mill was built on the
River Bollin at
Styal in
Cheshire. It was initially powered by a
water wheel, but installed steam engines in 1810. In 1830, the average power of a mill engine was 48 hp, but Quarry Bank mill installed a new 100 hp water wheel. This was to change in 1836, when Horrocks & Nuttall, Preston took delivery of 160 hp double engine. William Fairbairn addressed the problem of line-shafting and was responsible for improving the efficiency of the mill. In 1815 he replaced the wooden turning shafts that drove the machines at 50rpm, to wrought iron shafting working at 250 rpm, these were a third of the weight of the previous ones and absorbed less power. The
draw while spinning had been assisted by power, but the
push of the wind had been done manually by the spinner, the mule could be operated by semiskilled labour. Before 1830, the spinner would operate a partially powered mule with a maximum of 400 spindles after, self-acting mules with up to 1,300 spindles could be built. The savings that could be made with this technology were considerable. A worker spinning cotton at a hand-powered spinning wheel in the 18th century would take more than 50,000 hours to spin 100 lb of cotton; by the 1790s, the same quantity could be spun in 300 hours by mule, and with a self-acting mule it could be spun by one worker in just 135 hours. ==Working practices==