The vase is a
Type A amphora, a vase-form favored by Euthymides. Two-handled amphorae, like the Revellers Vase, were typically used for the storage of wine, oil and other liquids and solids. One side of the vase shows three mostly nude male dancers (komasts) engaged in a , a wild and usually drunken ritual dance in honour of the god
Dionysos, perhaps in the aftermath of an all-male drinking party known as a
symposium. The left-most reveller holds a
kantharos, a Greek drinking vessel. Two of the komasts are named as Eudemos and Teles, while the left-hand figure is labelled , meaning "leader of the dance". All three wear floral crowns. The vase is decorated with floral and geometric motifs on the handles and at the base, which frame the main scenes. On the opposite side to the revellers, the Trojan prince
Hector is shown donning his armour before combat. He is watched by his parents,
Priam and
Hecuba. Hector, depicted frontally, wears a
chiton (a form of
tunic fastened at the shoulder),
greaves and a
cuirass, which he adjusts. A shield, decorated with the head of a
faun, stands at his feet. Hecuba wears a chiton, a wreath and an -veil: the latter garment was traditionally associated with marriage, but often denoted mythological queens in vase-painting. She hands Hector his helmet and spear, and parts of her breast and leg can be seen through her clothing. There is a simple scratched
graffito on the bottom of the foot. All of the figures in both scenes are labelled; these names, along with Hector's
headband and some stripes on the vase, are executed in purple slip. Apart from Priam, all of the figures have the detail of their hair indicated by incision into the slip. The vase includes an inscription, written by Euthymides in purple slip, along the left edge of the image of the komasts: "As never
Euphronios" (; ). Euphronios was Euthymides's contemporary and rival, and both painters were familiar with each other's work. The inscription is generally interpreted as a taunt or challenge to Euphronios, and as a claim that he could never equal the painting of the dancers. The art historian
Gisela Richter specifically interpreted the inscription as a reference to Euthymides's use of three-quarter views, in contrast with the front-on or side-on perspective universal in Euphronios's work. However, it has also been interpreted as more closely linked with the image, claiming instead that Euphronios had never taken part in a , perhaps because this was an aristocratic activity and Euphronios was of comparatively low social origin. The classicist
Jenifer Neils states that the inscription has sometimes been interpreted as a show of "senile jealousy". ==Artistic importance==