Cells cannot function if DNA damage corrupts the integrity and accessibility of essential information in the
genome (but cells remain superficially functional when non-essential genes are missing or damaged). Depending on the type of damage inflicted on the DNA's double helical structure, a variety of repair strategies have evolved to restore lost information. If possible, cells use the unmodified complementary strand of the DNA or the sister
chromatid as a template to recover the original information. Without access to a template, cells use an error-prone recovery mechanism known as
translesion synthesis as a last resort. Damage to DNA alters the spatial configuration of the helix, and such alterations can be detected by the cell. Once damage is localized, specific DNA repair molecules bind at or near the site of damage, inducing other molecules to bind and form a complex that enables the actual repair to take place.
Direct reversal Cells are known to eliminate three types of damage to their DNA by chemically reversing it. These mechanisms do not require a template, since the types of damage they counteract can occur in only one of the four bases. Such direct reversal mechanisms are specific to the type of damage incurred and do not involve breakage of the
phosphodiester backbone. • The formation of
pyrimidine dimers upon irradiation with UV light results in an abnormal covalent bond between adjacent pyrimidine bases. The
photoreactivation process directly reverses this damage by the action of the enzyme
photolyase, whose activation is obligately dependent on energy absorbed from
blue/UV light (300–500 nm
wavelength) to promote catalysis. Photolyase, an old enzyme present in
bacteria,
fungi, and most
animals no longer functions in humans, who instead use
nucleotide excision repair to repair damage from UV irradiation. • Another type of damage, methylation of guanine bases, is directly reversed by the enzyme
methyl guanine methyl transferase (MGMT), the bacterial equivalent of which is called
ogt. This is an expensive process because each MGMT molecule can be used only once; that is, the reaction is
stoichiometric rather than
catalytic. A generalized response to methylating agents in bacteria is known as the
adaptive response and confers a level of resistance to alkylating agents upon sustained exposure by upregulation of alkylation repair enzymes. • The third type of DNA damage reversed by cells is certain methylation of the bases cytosine and adenine.
Single-strand damage excising a hydrolytically-produced uracil residue from DNA. The uracil residue is shown in yellow. When only one of the two strands of a double helix has a defect, the other strand can be used as a template to guide the correction of the damaged strand. In order to repair damage to one of the two paired molecules of DNA, there exist a number of
excision repair mechanisms that remove the damaged nucleotide and replace it with an undamaged nucleotide complementary to that found in the undamaged DNA strand. enzyme removes the damaged base from the DNA by cleaving the bond between the base and the deoxyribose. These enzymes remove a single base to create an apurinic or apyrimidinic site (
AP site). •
Nucleotide excision repair (NER): bulky, helix-distorting damage, such as
pyrimidine dimerization caused by UV light is usually repaired by a three-step process. First the damage is recognized, then 12-24 nucleotide-long strands of DNA are removed both upstream and downstream of the damage site by
endonucleases, and the removed DNA region is then resynthesized. NER is a highly evolutionarily conserved repair mechanism and is used in nearly all eukaryotic and prokaryotic cells.
Double-strand breaks Double-strand breaks, in which both strands in the double helix are severed, are particularly hazardous to the cell because they can lead to
genome rearrangements. In fact, when a double-strand break is accompanied by a cross-linkage joining the two strands at the same point, neither strand can be used as a template for the repair mechanisms, so that the cell will not be able to complete mitosis when it next divides, and will either die or, in rare cases, undergo a mutation. Three mechanisms exist to repair double-strand breaks (DSBs):
non-homologous end joining (NHEJ),
microhomology-mediated end joining (MMEJ), and
homologous recombination (HR): bond between the phosphate backbone and the deoxyribose nucleotides. • In NHEJ,
DNA Ligase IV, a specialized
DNA ligase that forms a complex with the cofactor
XRCC4, directly joins the two ends. To guide accurate repair, NHEJ relies on short homologous sequences called microhomologies present on the single-stranded tails of the DNA ends to be joined. If these overhangs are compatible, repair is usually accurate. NHEJ can also introduce mutations during repair. Loss of damaged nucleotides at the break site can lead to deletions, and joining of nonmatching termini forms insertions or translocations. NHEJ is especially important before the cell has replicated its DNA, since there is no template available for repair by homologous recombination. There are "backup" NHEJ pathways in higher
eukaryotes. Besides its role as a genome caretaker, NHEJ is required for joining hairpin-capped double-strand breaks induced during
V(D)J recombination, the process that generates diversity in
B-cell and
T-cell receptors in the
vertebrate immune system. • MMEJ starts with short-range
end resection by
MRE11 nuclease on either side of a double-strand break to reveal microhomology regions. In further steps,
Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 (PARP1) is required and may be an early step in MMEJ. There is pairing of microhomology regions followed by recruitment of
flap structure-specific endonuclease 1 (FEN1) to remove overhanging flaps. This is followed by recruitment of
XRCC1–
LIG3 to the site for ligating the DNA ends, leading to an intact DNA. MMEJ is always accompanied by a deletion, so that MMEJ is a mutagenic pathway for DNA repair. • HR requires the presence of an identical or nearly identical sequence to be used as a template for repair of the break. The enzymatic machinery responsible for this repair process is nearly identical to the machinery responsible for
chromosomal crossover during meiosis. This pathway allows a damaged chromosome to be repaired using a sister
chromatid (available in G2 after DNA replication) or a
homologous chromosome as a template. DSBs caused by the replication machinery attempting to synthesize across a single-strand break or unrepaired lesion cause collapse of the
replication fork and are typically repaired by recombination. In an
in vitro system, MMEJ occurred in mammalian cells at the levels of 10–20% of HR when both HR and NHEJ mechanisms were also available.
Topoisomerases introduce both single- and double-strand breaks in the course of changing the DNA's state of
supercoiling, which is especially common in regions near an open replication fork. Such breaks are not considered DNA damage because they are a natural intermediate in the topoisomerase biochemical mechanism and are immediately repaired by the enzymes that created them. Another type of DNA double-strand breaks originates from the DNA heat-sensitive or heat-labile sites. These DNA sites are not initial DSBs. However, they convert to DSB after treating with elevated temperature. Ionizing irradiation can induces a highly complex form of DNA damage as clustered damage. It consists of different types of DNA lesions in various locations of the DNA helix. Some of these closely located lesions can probably convert to DSB by exposure to high temperatures. But the exact nature of these lesions and their interactions is not yet known.
Translesion synthesis Translesion synthesis (TLS) is a DNA damage tolerance process that allows the
DNA replication machinery to replicate past DNA lesions such as
thymine dimers or
AP sites. It involves switching out regular
DNA polymerases for specialized translesion polymerases (i.e. DNA polymerase IV or V, from the Y Polymerase family), often with larger active sites that can facilitate the insertion of bases opposite damaged nucleotides. The polymerase switching is thought to be mediated by, among other factors, the post-translational modification of the replication
processivity factor
PCNA. Translesion synthesis polymerases often have low fidelity (high propensity to insert wrong bases) on undamaged templates relative to regular polymerases. However, many are extremely efficient at inserting correct bases opposite specific types of damage. For example,
Pol η mediates error-free bypass of lesions induced by
UV irradiation, whereas
Pol ι introduces mutations at these sites. Pol η is known to add the first adenine across the
T^T photodimer using
Watson-Crick base pairing and the second adenine will be added in its syn conformation using
Hoogsteen base pairing. From a cellular perspective, risking the introduction of
point mutations during translesion synthesis may be preferable to resorting to more drastic mechanisms of DNA repair, which may cause gross chromosomal aberrations or cell death. In short, the process involves specialized
polymerases either bypassing or repairing lesions at locations of stalled DNA replication. For example, Human DNA polymerase eta can bypass complex DNA lesions like guanine-thymine intra-strand crosslink, G[8,5-Me]T, although it can cause targeted and semi-targeted mutations. Paromita Raychaudhury and Ashis Basu studied the toxicity and mutagenesis of the same lesion in
Escherichia coli by replicating a G[8,5-Me]T-modified plasmid in
E. coli with specific DNA polymerase knockouts. Viability was very low in a strain lacking pol II, pol IV, and pol V, the three SOS-inducible DNA polymerases, indicating that translesion synthesis is conducted primarily by these specialized DNA polymerases. A bypass platform is provided to these polymerases by
Proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA). Under normal circumstances, PCNA bound to polymerases replicates the DNA. At a site of
lesion, PCNA is ubiquitinated, or modified, by the RAD6/
RAD18 proteins to provide a platform for the specialized polymerases to bypass the lesion and resume DNA replication. After translesion synthesis, extension is required. This extension can be carried out by a replicative polymerase if the TLS is error-free, as in the case of Pol η, yet if TLS results in a mismatch, a specialized polymerase is needed to extend it;
Pol ζ. Pol ζ is unique in that it can extend terminal mismatches, whereas more processive polymerases cannot. So when a lesion is encountered, the replication fork will stall, PCNA will switch from a processive polymerase to a TLS polymerase such as Pol ι to fix the lesion, then PCNA may switch to Pol ζ to extend the mismatch, and last PCNA will switch to the processive polymerase to continue replication. ==Global response to DNA damage==