, 1931 Artist
George Catlin, during an 1832 trip to the Dakotas, was perhaps the first to suggest the concept of a national park. Indian civilization, wildlife, and wilderness were all in danger, wrote Catlin, unless they could be preserved "by some great protecting policy of government... in a magnificent park... A nation's Park, containing man and beast, in all the wild[ness] and freshness of their nature's beauty!"
Yellowstone National Park was created as the first
national park in the United States. In 1872, there was no
state government to manage it (Wyoming
was a U.S. territory at that time), so the
federal government managed it directly through the army, including the famed African American
Buffalo Soldier units. The movement for an independent agency to oversee these federal lands was spearheaded by
business magnate and
conservationist Stephen Mather. With the help of journalist
Robert Sterling Yard, Mather ran a publicity campaign for the
Department of the Interior. They wrote numerous articles that praised the scenic and historic qualities of the parks and their possibilities for educational, inspirational, and recreational benefits. This campaign resulted in the creation of the NPS. On August 25, 1916, President
Woodrow Wilson signed the
National Park Service Organic Act that mandated the agency "to conserve the scenery and the natural and historic objects and wildlife therein, and to provide for the enjoyment of the same in such manner and by such means as will leave them unimpaired for the enjoyment of future generations". Mather became the first director of the newly formed NPS. On March 3, 1933, President
Herbert Hoover signed the Reorganization Act of 1933. The act gave the president the authority to transfer national monuments from one governmental department to another. Later that summer, new president
Franklin D. Roosevelt made use of this power after NPS Deputy Director
Horace M. Albright suggested that the NPS, rather than the
War Department, should manage historic
American Civil War sites. ), in a
NBC Today Show. Left to right:
George Hartzog, William Everhart,
Frank McGee and Jack K. Anderson. The popularity of the parks after the end of the
World War II left them overburdened with demands that the NPS could not meet. In 1951,
Conrad Wirth became director of the NPS and began to bring park facilities up to the standards that the public was expecting. In 1952, with the support of President
Dwight D. Eisenhower, Wirth began
Mission 66, a ten-year effort to upgrade and expand park facilities for the 50th anniversary of the Park Service. New parks were added to preserve unique resources and existing park facilities were upgraded and expanded. Director
George Hartzog began the process with the creation of the
National Lakeshores and then
National Recreation Areas.
Resource stewardship policies 1963: The Leopold Report A 1963 report titled "Wildlife Management in the National Parks" was prepared by a five-member advisory board on Wildlife Management, appointed by
United States Secretary of the Interior Stewart Udall. In later years, this report came to be referred to by its chairman and principal author,
A. Starker Leopold. The
Leopold Report was just fourteen pages in length, but it set forth
ecosystem management recommendations that would guide parks policy until it was revisited in 2012. The Leopold Report was the first concrete plan for managing park visitors and ecosystems under unified principles. Park management issues and controversies addressed in this report included the difficulties of managing elk populations in
Yellowstone National Park and how "overprotection from natural ground fires" in California's
Sequoia National Park,
Kings Canyon National Park, and
Yosemite National Park had begun to threaten groves of
Giant Sequoia with catastrophic wildfires. The report also established a historical baseline that read, "The goal of managing the national parks and monuments should be to preserve, or where necessary to recreate, the ecologic scene as viewed by the first European visitors." This baseline would guide
ecological restoration in national parks until a
climate change adaptation policy, "Resist-Adapt-Direct", was later established in 2021.
2012: Revisiting Leopold: Resource Stewardship in the National Parks National Parks director
Jonathan Jarvis charged the twelve-member NPS Advisory Board Science Committee to take a fresh look at the ecological issues and make recommendations for updating the original Leopold Report. The committee published their 23-page report in 2012, titled, "Revisiting Leopold: Resource Stewardship in the National Parks". The report recommended that parks leadership "manage for change while confronting uncertainty." "... New and emerging scientific disciplines — including conservation biology, global change science, and genomics — along with new technological tools like high-resolution remote sensing can provide significant information for constructing contemporary tactics for NPS stewardship. This knowledge is essential to a National Park Service that is science-informed at all organizational levels and able to respond with contemporary strategies for resource management and ultimately park stewardship."
2021: Resist–Accept–Direct (RAD): A Framework for the 21st-century Natural Resource Manager The "Revisiting Leopold" report mentioned
climate change three times and "climate refugia" once, but it did not prescribe or offer any management tactics that could help park managers with the problems of climate change. Hence, the 2020 NPS-led report specific to the need for
climate adaptation: "Resist–Accept–Direct (RAD): A Framework for the 21st-century Natural Resource Manager." This "Natural Resource Report" has ten authors. Among them are four associated with the National Park Service, three with the
US Fish and Wildlife Service, and two with the
US Geological Survey — all of which are government agencies within the US Department of Interior. The report's Executive Summary, points to "intensifying global change." "... The convention of using baseline conditions to define goals for today's resource management is increasingly untenable, presenting practical and philosophical challenges for managers. As formerly familiar ecological conditions continue to change, bringing novelty, surprise, and uncertainty, natural resource managers require a new, shared approach to make conservation decisions.... The RAD (Resist–Accept–Direct) decision framework has emerged over the past decade as a simple tool that captures the entire decision space for responding to ecosystems facing the potential for rapid, irreversible ecological change." The RAD framework emerged from efforts by the NPS and partners since 2015 to hone a tool that could integrate into standard resource-management planning processes and thereby foster strategic thinking and clear communication about how to steward transforming ecosystems. It built on the Resist–Accept–Guide framework first proposed in the 2012 book
Beyond Naturalness: Rethinking Park and Wilderness Stewardship in an Era of Rapid Change. The NPS and partners in 2021 replaced the 2012 term "guide" with "direct." This explicitly recognized the potential for strong intervention at key points to foster preferred new conditions. Initially, the NPS experimented with the term "accommodate" in place of "accept." This early formulation appeared in a 2016 NPS publication:
Coastal Adaptation Strategies Handbook. Another interagency publication in 2016 also used the term "accommodate":
Resource Management and Operations in Central North Dakota: Climate change scenario planning workshop summary. In 2020, the "Resist-Accept-Direct" framework was used in a paper published in the journal
Fisheries. Eighteen researchers from federal and state agencies and universities collaborated in this effort, which included short case studies of where and how this framework had already been applied. The interagency efforts to forge a climate-adaptive framework culminated in a January 2022 series of six articles in the journal
BioScience. These were grouped in the "Special Section on the Resist–Accept–Direct Framework." In 2024, the RAD Framework was included in an NPS policy memorandum titled "Managing National Parks in an Era of Climate Change." That memorandum also links to the three previous statements pertaining to NPS climate change responses and adaptation (2012, 2014, and 2015).
2025 In 2025 the National Park Service (NPS) underwent a period of intense workforce contraction and political scrutiny during Donald Trump's second term as president of the United States. On 14 February 2025, more than 1000 probationary and lower-seniority NPS employees were dismissed in an event widely referred to by staff and media as the "Valentine’s Day Massacre". The cuts were followed by buyouts and early retirements for longer-serving rangers and specialists, as well as a federal hiring freeze that prevented most vacant positions from being refilled. Advocacy groups such as the National Parks Conservation Association (NPCA) reported that by mid-2025 the NPS had lost roughly 25% of its permanent workforce since January 2025. These conditions were further tested in October 2025, when a federal government shutdown began after Congress failed to pass appropriations legislation. The Interior Department's contingency plan directed that most of the more than 400 NPS units remain at least partially open, while furloughing roughly 9,200–9,300 employees—about two-thirds of NPS staff—and keeping only limited "excepted" personnel such as law enforcement, emergency responders and dispatchers on duty. ==National Park System==