Death Avenue ramps Before the West Side Highway was built, the road along the
Hudson River was busy, with significant cross traffic going to
docks and
ferries. At 22nd Street, most traffic continued north along
Eleventh Avenue, along which the
New York Central Railroad (NYCRR)'s
West Side Line ran; it was known by many as "
Death Avenue" for the many crashes caused by trains and automobiles colliding. The first official proposal for an elevated highway along Manhattan's west side was made by Police Commissioner
Richard Edward Enright on January 12, 1924, in a letter to the
New York City Board of Estimate. The highway was to be 100 feet (30 m) wide, running north from the
Battery to
72nd Street at
Riverside Drive,
West End Avenue, or
Amsterdam Avenue. According to Enright, "During business hours
West Street [was] the most
congested thoroughfare in the city. Vast quantities of the city's foodstuffs [were] handled in the territory adjacent to West Street." He cited traffic congestion as an extra cost of doing business and a blockage for
fire engines.
Plans for the new highway Double-decker railroad/highway proposal On February 2, 1925, it was announced that the railroad would build a combined double-decker elevated highway and freight railroad (with the highway above the railroad) for $24 million at no cost to the city. At the time, Eleventh Avenue was popularly known as "Death Avenue" owing to the dangers of the surface line. The elevated structure would eliminate 106 grade crossings over 84 blocks. The proposal came about after six months of negotiations between Manhattan Borough President
Julius Miller and the NYCRR. The planned highway would no longer go to the Battery, instead ending at
Canal Street, meeting the Holland Tunnel (which would open to traffic on November 13, 1927). The northern terminus was set at
72nd Street and
Riverside Drive. Ramps were planned at
Canal Street,
23rd Street,
Riverside Drive, and at least two other locations. The
Port of New York Authority opposed the plan, preferring a more forward-looking comprehensive freight distribution plan. They attacked Miller as trying to push the plan through without input from the Port Authority. The Port Authority wanted a system of inland terminals and belt-line railroads. According to Port Authority Chairman Julian Gregory, it was almost certain that NYCRR would not go along with the Port Authority plan. It was also believed that giving NYCRR elevated tracks on the west side would allow the railroad to monopolize freight and raise prices. The Port Authority believed it was primarily a freight problem, but NYCRR and New York City considered it to be a grade-crossing elimination project. Miller responded by arguing that something had to be done right away. He said that if the Port Authority could put forward a comprehensive plan within five years, he would put his full support behind it. He also pointed out that his plan was only one part of his "comprehensive plan for the relief of traffic congestion"; he had already widened many avenues and removed several
Midtown elevated railroad spurs. He said the plan would not give the NYCRR any rights they did not already have; it was merely a relocation of existing tracks. The tracks had been on the surface for 55 years despite legal action taken against them, and Miller claimed they would be there for another 50 if nothing were done. Miller also received a letter from NYCRR Vice President Ira Place, stating that the railroad would reduce freight rates if the new elevated structure were built.
Miller's elevated single-deck highway 's
Central Artery, based on the West Side Highway On January 20, 1926, borough president Miller sent a plan for an $11 million elevated highway to be built completely on city property to the Board of Estimate. The elevated railroad was removed from the plan, since NYCRR had come up with a separate project for partially elevating and depressing their railroad (now known as the
High Line). According to Miller, there were questions over who would own and maintain the dual structure. There were also objections to its height of 40 feet (12 m) and its placement at the east building line of the existing surface roads. The elevated highway was to connect to a planned parkway (now the
Henry Hudson Parkway) at
72nd Street, forming a highway free from cross traffic stretching from
Canal Street to
129th Street. The elevated road was to be 60 feet (18 m) wide, wide enough for six lanes of traffic; the existing surface road would carry local traffic beneath the highway. Ramps would be provided at
Canal Street,
Christopher Street,
14th Street,
23rd Street,
34th Street,
42nd Street, and
57th Street. Slow-moving traffic would use the left lanes, due to the
left-hand ramps. This contrasts with the current method of using the left lane for passing and putting ramps on the right side, and to the method popular around the 1950s of putting ramps on whichever side was easier. The highway would "carry buses that will make both its conveniences and its beauties available to the general public", according to Miller. He suggested Hudson River Boulevard for the name of the highway. On April 24, 1925, Governor
Al Smith signed a bill authorizing the construction of the highway. Funds for the $11 million highway were to be procured by
property assessments along the route; this was considered reasonable due to advantages gained from the highway by those living along the route. The road was to be , five feet wider than
Fifth Avenue, with a speed limit of at least , and would be off the ground. It would be built of
steel, with a
cement face. A three-foot (1 m) sidewalk would be built for
pedestrians, although the highway was intended mainly for motor vehicles. Two-block-long ramps would be provided with easy grades for entering and exiting the highway. Trucks would be allowed on the highway. The Board of Estimate approved the highway, now costing $13.5 million on June 14, 1926. It was to be built so a second deck could be added at a later time for about $9 million if traffic warranted. Controller
Charles W. Berry questioned the proposal until he realized the money would come from tax assessments, at which time he agreed with the project. On November 10, 1926, the Sinking Fund Commission voted to give the city title to the
waterfront property along the proposed highway. The highway plan was linked to a plan by the city for more piers for ocean steamships; since the highway required land takings between
47th Street and
51st Street, it was easier to combine the projects and prevent additional expense. On February 17, 1927, the Board of Estimate adopted the final plans for the highway, setting a hearing date of March 24. It was split into two sections, Section one went from
Canal Street to
59th Street. Section two was to carry the road over the NYCRR's 60th Street Yard from
59th Street to
72nd Street. Section two was approved by the Board of Estimate on August 16, 1928; section one was postponed until September 27 due to objections. On October 18, the Board of Estimate approved section one. The highway was advocated by most business interests, including the Downtown League, the
Fifth Avenue Association, the West End Association, and eleven other organizations. They cited increasing traffic and the need of a
bypass route to support the highway, which would cost little in comparison to its benefits. Miller spoke at a meeting of the Market and Business Men's Association of the
Greenwich and
Chelsea Districts on October 30, 1928, detailing plans for the highway. It was announced that between 90 and 100 meat and poultry dealers in the West Washington Market and the
Gansevoort Market would be evicted to make way for the highway. Minor changes to the highway were approved on January 10, 1929, in response to several objections. The alignment in the Chelsea district was slightly modified to avoid proposed piers, and the path through the markets was realigned to pass over a corner of the property. In addition, the
14th Street ramps were moved to the area between
19th Street and
23rd Street, where they would spare many markets at 14th Street. In addition, the West Washington Market would no longer be demolished, and instead the highway would graze the roofs of some of the stores.
Exotic alternatives An alternate plan was put forth by John Hencken, an engineer, and approved by
Ernest P. Goodrich, consulting engineer to the
Regional Plan of New York and its Environs. A linear corridor would be built from the
Battery to
Yonkers. A freight railroad would lie underground. On ground level would be roads alongside the corridor and an indoor enclosed sidewalk. The mezzanine, between the first and second floors, would be occupied by office space. The second floor would carry a "continuous noiseless
moving platform system for passenger service", with adjacent belts moving at various speeds, for a maximum of 21 miles per hour (34 km/h) in the middle. This service would be free, and would be a substitute for new
subways in the corridor. Above the second floor would be about ten stories of apartments, offices, businesses, and other uses appropriate for the neighborhoods; these would be the main source of revenue to pay for the project. A high-speed motor parkway, open to passenger cars only, would lie on top. Cars would reach the upper level via ramps at both ends and elevators at convenient intervals. Dr. Benjamin Battin, a professor at
Swarthmore College, Pennsylvania, had a similar plan for an eight-story high boulevard. The street level and first floor would be connected to the
Hudson River piers. The second and third stories would carry electric passenger trains, with the second floor carrying northbound traffic and southbound traffic using the third floor. A public garage would occupy the fourth and fifth floors, helping to pay off the bonds for the project. The sixth and seventh floors would carry one-way passenger car traffic, permitting speeds of up to . A reversible roadway, carrying cars in the direction of rush hour traffic, would occupy the eighth and ninth (top) levels. Ramps to the upper car levels would be provided every 15 to 20 blocks.
Art Society objections The plan was criticized by
Thomas Adams,
Regional Plan Association director, at the 1927 meeting of the
Municipal Art Society. He disapproved of its ugliness and noise, and suggested simply clearing obstructions to the existing surface road to speed traffic. Adams instead supported a comprehensive regional plan for development in the
Hudson Valley. The
Fine Arts Federation also opposed the highway, saying that elevated structures were unsightly, and that if the existing street were cleared a new highway might not be required. The City Club and New York City Mayor
Jimmy Walker objected to the highway on the grounds that it would block waterfront-bound freight traffic. They believed that the plans should wait until the surface railroad tracks were removed in the area, at which point the elevated highway might not be necessary. Parallels were drawn with
elevated passenger railroads, which were being torn down at the time;
Henry Curran of the City Club called elevated structures "a misfit in New York". The City Club also objected to more passenger cars in downtown Manhattan. Concerns were raised by the Women's League for the Protection of Riverside Park, which opposed routing trucks through
Riverside Park, which would contain a parkway extending from the north end of the planned elevated highway. The League emphasized that commercial traffic should be banned north of
72nd Street (as it currently is on the
Henry Hudson Parkway). ==Construction==