The uniqueness of the
Laotian rock rat was clear upon its initial discovery. The results of the
phylogenetic analyses placed
Diatomys in the family
Pedetidae (springhares). Others considered
Fallomus to belong to the
Chapattimyidae (a completely fossil group). The family Diatomyidae was erected and considered to be a member of the superfamily
Ctenodactyloidea. united the two into a single family (Diatomyidae), but also suggested this family might be related to the Pedetidae. Dawson's fossil study which suggested a roughly
Lutetian (about 44 Mya, Early/Middle
Eocene) divergence date between the ancestors of the Laotian rock rat and the African
gundis, which are each other's closest living relatives. Considering the present-day distribution, the fossil record, and
Eocene paleogeography, this divergence probably took place in one of three regions. Either the lineages split in Eurasia, somewhere in today's
Zagros Mountains or adjacent ranges of the
Alpide belt. These at that time formed a rugged and broken coastline with many offshore islands, as they emerged from the shrinking
Tethys Sea. Alternatively, the entire Ctenodactyloidea might be of African origin, or the lineage split took place on
India as it joined the Asian mainland, with the gundis reaching Africa via the
Mascarene Plateau's archipelagos and island continents. Each hypothesis would unite the paleontological, anatomical, and molecular findings into a robust model. Which one is preferred depends on whether the
Hystricomorpha were
Laurasian or
Gondwanan in origin. == Species ==