Jallikattu is a traditional bull taming event wherein a berserk bull is released into a crowd, and the participants of the crowd individually attempt to grab and hold on to the bull's hump for a determined distance, a determined time, or with the goal of removing a packet of money tied to the bull's horns. The sport, which is considered to be 2500–10,000 years old, is usually held during
Thai Pongal across several locations in
Tamil Nadu, with the primary event being held in
Alanganallur. During the event, injuries or even death often occur to participants. While bull breeders contend that the participating bulls are treated well, PETA asserts its investigators found that the bulls suffers
cruel treatment, from having their tails twisted, being stabbed, punched and jumped on. India's
Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act (PCAA) outlaws animal cruelty, and sets up the punishment offenders can expect to receive. The Madras High Court was the first to rule that jallikattu was not allowable under the PCAA in 2006. However, traditional sports like jallikattu have since then always been allowed through various legal and extralegal means, the most recent of which is the Tamil Nadu Regulation of Jallikattu Act No 27, passed by the
Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly and signed into law in 2009. Armed with this, in April 2011, PETA announced that it would challenge the 2009 Tamil Nadu law as
unconstitutional, as it now conflicts with the
Indian federal law. After three years in court, on 7 May 2014, PETA, represented by Raj Panjwani, along with the
Animal Welfare Board of India (AWBI), striking down the 2009 Tamil Nadu law. In preparation for the 2016 jallikattu season,
the Centre reversed its earlier decision and on 7 January 2016 MoE once again removed bulls from the list of banned performing animals. Justices
Dipak Misra and
Rohinton Fali Nariman were highly critical of this reaction, and were quoted by
The Hindu as stating jointly: "How can you negate our judgment banning jallikattu by coming up with the January 2016 notification allowing bulls to participate in the sport again? [...] We cannot import
Roman gladiator-type sport here." The Supreme Court issued a stay order on 12 January 2016, effectively banning the sport just five days after the Centre unbanned it. With the police on their side this time, however, jallikattu went ahead anyway, and thousands gathered to watch bull races and the main sport. In preparation for the 2017 season, once again multiple petitions were filed to try to get the Supreme Court to reconsider; and once again they were all denied, including a petition attempting to argue a
religious freedom angle. The Supreme Court once again sparred with the Centre, who was trying to get it unbanned as it was a 5,000-year-old cultural tradition of the Tamil people, but the court responded simply "In 1899, ten thousand girls below 12 years of age were married. Should we allow it today because it was a tradition at that time?" and rejected the petition. For the 2017 season, political tension was high, perhaps sparking the massive protest: people blamed the
AIADMK and
BJP political parties for failing to reverse the ban during the last three years. Once again, citizens flouted the Supreme Court, and jallikattu went ahead despite its legal status. In an interview, former Supreme Court justice
Markandey Katju observed that laws can be changed even when the matter is in court as was done for the act that abolished
zamindari in the 1950s when the
Nehru government removed the
right to property as a
fundamental right.
Support Jallikattu is cited as one of the last available ways to promote and preserve the native livestock because the other uses of native breeds such as ploughing, breeding via mating and milk is on decline due to advancement in mechanization by tractors, improvement in artificial insemination and hybrid Jersey cows respectively. There were also claims that the indigenous cattle bulls are critically endangered in Tamil Nadu and banning jallikattu will have the adverse effect of wiping them out completely. According to pro-jallikattu activists, jallikattu is not just a sport that is deeply entrenched in Tamil culture, but it has also inadvertently served as a scientific method of breeding cattle. This view is held among a majority of jallikattu supporters. The protest is aimed at revival of the native humped bull, called the
zebu. The
Tamil Nadu breed of zebu is unique to India and has several advantages compared to European varieties of cattle such as the
Holstein cow. The native breeds are rich in the A2 variety of beta
casein protein which aides easy
digestion whereas milk from European
Bos taurus contain the A1 variant of the beta casein protein which is related to allergies and some serious health conditions. The Holstein breeds found their way into India as a result of
Operation Flood of late 1960s through cross breeding to increase the low milk yield of native breeds. As the
Jersey cow can yield nine times the quantity of milk as a zebu in the same period, there is concern among protesters that without jallikattu providing an
economic incentive for the breeding of zebu, the breed will become
endangered and eventually
extinct. Support from various groups, including film actors, politicians, cricketers and other sportsmen, social activists, and authors.
Raghava Lawrence, actor
Silambarasan, director
V. Gowthaman,
Seeman,
Samuthirakani,
Ameer,
RJ Balaji,
Aari,
Mansoor Ali Khan and
G. V. Prakash Kumar took part actively during the protests. Spiritual leaders like
Sri Sri Ravi Shankar, and
Sadhuguru Jaggi Vasudev also spoke in support of the sport. The protestors rejected any attempt for leadership by politicians and celebrities and wished to remain a leaderless mass movement. On 19 January 2017, film composer
A. R. Rahman announced that he will observe a day-long fast in support of the protesters, and for 'Tamil Nadu's spirit'. Judges of the Supreme Court of India have likewise criticized the Indian Central Government's support of jallikattu just because it is a tradition and have voiced their opposition of it. The Supreme Court has also held that the sport is inherently cruel in nature and this deprives the animal of its basic right to live without subject to fear and torture. The judgement also clarifies that the sport is neither religious ritual nor an essential sport for the Tamil community as the sport is played only in few districts of central Tamil Nadu and not in all districts. The sport has claimed multiple lives including those of the tamers, onlookers and the police. The first ban on jallikattu was a result of a case filed by the father of a tamer who lost his life in the event.
PETA denies that ending the jallikattu event will lead to the loss of the native bull, and has pointed out that bulls can be used as studs regardless of whether or not they are engaged in jallikattu. Furthermore, PETA claims that
veterinarians can determine which bulls are healthiest with far more scientific rigor than jallikattu can. == Timeline ==