Critical response Initial reviews Reviews of
The Colbert Report upon its 2005 premiere were positive, although critics were generally skeptical that the character could extend beyond one season without growing tiresome. Melanie McFarland of the
Seattle Post-Intelligencer summarized the show's early reaction: "Critics and bloggers either loved the premiere or declared themselves to be unmoved, but that's the standard reaction after any late-night program's debut. A truer measure will be seen in coming weeks, after the hype wears off and the ratings lose their exuberance." Gilbert Cruz of
Entertainment Weekly noted that "Colbert proves that the line between serious TV journalism and utter nonsense is a very thin one indeed." Heather Havrilesky of
Salon was effusive, remarking, "Not only does Colbert maintain his persona without skipping a beat throughout the entire show, but he's got great comic timing, the show's writers are brilliant, and the whole thing is pure foolish, bizarre, idiotic fun." Barry Garron of
The Hollywood Reporter dubbed it an "auspicious debut", writing, "The new show dovetails nicely with its lead-in to present a solid hour of skewered news and punctured pomposity."
Variety Brian Lowry commented that the show had an "impressive start with a topnotch premiere followed by a respectable second outing." Paul Brownfield of the
Los Angeles Times wrote, "In the run-up to the show it all sounded a bit hard to get your head around, but in the flesh the show zinged, at least this first week."
The Boston Globe Matthew Gilbert praised the show's wordplay, summarizing, "Colbert's a clever creation, and a necessary one, and he deserves an opportunity to offend as many people as possible with his pompous blather." Alessandra Stanley of
The New York Times commented that the show was a welcome addition to the Comedy Central lineup, remarking, "What puts Mr. Colbert over the top is that he is not just impersonating well known television personalities, he also uses parody to score larger points about politics and the press." Nevertheless, there were more negative reviews:
USA Today Robert Bianco opined that the show "tried too hard", writing, "Unfortunately, in just two weeks on the air, this half-hour spoof of a no-spin-zone type show has already stretched Colbert's character and the artifice that supports it past its natural breaking point."
Later reviews The New Yorker remarked that the show had remained funny throughout its entire run. In a 2009 academic analysis of the show's popularity,
Temple University researcher, Heather LaMarre found that the show appealed to both liberals and conservatives, concluding, "there was no significant difference between the groups in thinking Colbert was funny, but conservatives were more likely to report that Colbert only pretends to be joking and genuinely meant what he said while liberals were more likely to report that Colbert used satire and was not serious when offering political statements". Canadian journalist
Malcolm Gladwell discussed LaMarre's findings in his
Revisionist History podcast, "The Satire Paradox" (2016).
Ratings The ratings of
The Colbert Report, from its premiere, benefited from the lead-in
The Daily Show provided, which at the time of the show's debut averaged 1.3 million viewers per night. and 98 percent of the viewership of
The Daily Show, which had Comedy Central's second-largest viewership. Averaged over its opening week,
The Report had 1.2 million viewers per episode, more than double the average for the same time the previous year, when the time slot was occupied by
Too Late with Adam Carolla. The show regularly began attracting over one million viewers with near immediacy. The show also drew more young men, a powerful demographic, than other late-night hosts (at that time,
Jay Leno,
David Letterman, and Conan O'Brien). Within a year,
The Colbert Report began averaging 1.5 million viewers per night. From 2012 to 2013, viewership decreased from 1.2 million to 1.1 million. That year,
The Colbert Report attracted $52.1 million in advertising for an audience whose median age was 39.4, about a year younger than
The Daily Show. In 2014, the final year of the show's run, ratings were down three percent (coinciding with a general ratings slide for cable television). The
series finale on December 18, 2014, was watched by 2.4 million viewers, making it the most watched episode ever in the show's history. The finale was the most watched cable program of the night in its time slot, beating
The Daily Show which was seen by two million viewers.
Awards The Colbert Report received numerous awards and accolades throughout its run. The show was nominated for four
Emmy Awards in its inaugural year, but lost to
The Daily Show. Colbert subsequently referenced his win on his program as the conclusion of Stewart's "reign of terror."
The Report also won the award the following year, and received a subsequent nomination in 2015. The show received two
Peabody Awards, recognizing its excellence in news and entertainment. It also won two
Grammy Awards, one for
Best Comedy Album for the soundtrack to the special
A Colbert Christmas, and later for
Best Spoken Word Album for the
audiobook to
America Again. ==Legacy==