Early history The Artemis program incorporates several major components of previously cancelled
NASA programs and missions, including the
Constellation program and the
Asteroid Redirect Mission. Originally legislated by the
NASA Authorization Act of 2005, as the retirement of the
Space Shuttle drew near, the Constellation program included the development of the
Ares I and
Ares V rockets along with the Orion spacecraft. In May 2009, U.S. president
Barack Obama established the
Augustine Committee to take into account several objectives including support for the
International Space Station, development of missions beyond
low Earth orbit (including the Moon, Mars, and
near-Earth objects), and use of the commercial space industry within defined budget limits. The committee concluded that the Constellation program was massively underfunded and that a 2020 Moon landing was impossible. Constellation was subsequently put on hold. On April 15, 2010,
President Obama spoke at the Kennedy Space Center, announcing the administration's plans for NASA and cancelling the non-Orion elements of Constellation, saying that the program was not viable. He instead proposed US$6 billion in additional funding and called for the development of a new heavy-lift rocket program to be ready for construction by 2015 with crewed missions to Mars orbit by the mid-2030s. On October 11, 2010, President Obama signed into law the
NASA Authorization Act of 2010, which included requirements for the immediate development of the SLS rocket and the Orion spacecraft to support missions beyond low Earth orbit starting in 2016, while making use of the workforce, assets, and capabilities of the
Space Shuttle program, Constellation program, and other NASA programs. The law also invested in space technologies and robotics capabilities tied to the overall space exploration framework, ensured continued support for
Commercial Orbital Transportation Services,
Commercial Resupply Services, and expanded the
Commercial Crew Development program. On June 30, 2017, President
Donald Trump signed an executive order to re-establish the
National Space Council, chaired by Vice President
Mike Pence. The administration's first budget request kept Obama-era human spaceflight programs: Commercial Resupply Services, Commercial Crew Development, the Space Launch System, and the Orion spacecraft for deep space missions, while reducing Earth science research and calling for the elimination of NASA's education office.
Redefinition and naming as Artemis On December 11, 2017, President Trump signed
Space Policy Directive 1, calling for a U.S.-led program for a human return to the Moon, followed by missions to Mars and beyond. The policy calls for the NASA administrator to "lead an innovative and sustainable program of exploration with
commercial and international partners to enable human expansion across the
Solar System and to bring back to Earth new knowledge and opportunities". The effort intends to more effectively organize government, private industry, and international efforts toward returning humans to the Moon and working toward eventual human
exploration of Mars. Space Policy Directive 1 authorized the lunar-focused campaign, later named Artemis, drawing upon legacy U.S. programs, including the Orion space capsule, the Lunar Gateway space station, and Commercial Lunar Payload Services, and created the new
Human Landing System program. The Space Launch System was expected to serve as the primary launch vehicle for Orion, while commercial launch vehicles were to launch various other elements of the program. , following the
Exploration Flight Test-1 mission On March 26, 2019, Pence announced that NASA's Moon landing goal would be accelerated by four years with a planned landing in 2024. On May 16, 2019, NASA Administrator
Jim Bridenstine announced that the new program would be named
Artemis, after the goddess of the Moon in
Greek mythology who is the twin sister of
Apollo, after which NASA's 1960's moon landing program was named. Mars missions by the 2030s were still intended . while the Senate Appropriations Committee requested from NASA a five-year budget profile which is needed for evaluation and approval by
Congress. In February 2020, the White House requested a funding increase of 12% to cover the Artemis program as part of its
fiscal year 2021 budget. The total budget would have been US$25.2 billion per year with US$3.7 billion dedicated toward a Human Landing System. NASA chief financial officer
Jeff DeWit said he thought the agency had "a very good shot" to get this budget through Congress despite Democratic concerns around the program. However, in July 2020, the
House Appropriations Committee rejected the White House's requested funding increase. The bill proposed in the House dedicated only US$700 million toward the Human Landing System, 81% (US$3 billion) short of the requested amount. In April 2020, NASA awarded funding to Blue Origin, Dynetics, and SpaceX for 10-month-long preliminary design studies for the HLS. More specifically, White House Press Secretary
Jen Psaki expressed the Biden administration's "support [for] this effort and endeavor". However, throughout February 2021, Acting Administrator of NASA
Steve Jurczyk reiterated those budget concerns when asked about the project's schedule, clarifying that "The 2024 lunar landing goal may no longer be a realistic target [...]". On April 16, 2021, NASA contracted
SpaceX to develop, manufacture, and fly two lunar landing flights with the
Starship HLS lunar lander. On November 15, 2021, an audit of
NASA's Office of Inspector General estimated the true cost of the Artemis program at about $93 billion until 2025. In addition to the initial SpaceX contract, NASA awarded two rounds of separate contracts in May 2019 and September 2021, on aspects of the HLS to encourage alternative designs, separately from the initial HLS development effort. It announced in March 2022 that it was developing new sustainability rules and pursuing both a Starship HLS upgrade (an option under the initial SpaceX contract) and new competing alternative designs. These came after criticism from members of Congress over the lack of redundancy and competition, and led NASA to ask for additional support. == Missions ==