Box office Black Hawk Down collected $179,823 from its limited release on December 28, 2001. The film later earned $748,459 from its expanded release on January 11, 2002. It grossed a total of $28.6 million at 3,101 theaters in its first wide-release weekend, placing it
No. 1 at the box office. The film finished No.1 at the box office during its first three weeks of wide release, part of a consecutive five weeks in the Top10.
Roger Ebert of the
Chicago Sun-Times gave the film four stars out of four, saying that films like this "help audiences understand and sympathize with the actual experiences of combat troops, instead of trivializing them into entertainments."
Empire magazine said that, though "ambitious, sumptuously framed, and frenetic,
Black Hawk Down is nonetheless a rare find of a war movie which dares to turn genre convention on its head". Mike Clark of
USA Today wrote that the film "extols the sheer professionalism of America's elite Delta Force—even in the unforeseen disaster that was 1993's Battle of Mogadishu," and praised Scott's direction: "in relating the conflict, in which 18 Americans died and 70-plus were injured, the standard getting-to-know-you war-film characterizations are downplayed. While some may regard this as a shortcoming, it is, in fact, a virtue". The film has had a small cultural legacy, which has been studied academically by media analysts dissecting how media reflects American perceptions of war.
Newsweek writer Evan Thomas considered the movie one of the most culturally significant films of the
George W. Bush presidency. He suggested that, although the film was presented as being anti-war, it was at its core pro-war: "though it depicted a shameful defeat, the soldiers were heroes willing to die for their brothers in arms ... The movie showed brutal scenes of killing, but also courage, stoicism and honor ... The overall effect was stirring, if slightly pornographic, and it seemed to enhance the desire of Americans for a thumping war to avenge
9/11." Stephen A. Klien, writing in
Critical Studies in Media Communication, argued that the film's sensational rendering of war encouraged audiences to empathize with the film's pro-soldier leitmotif, to "conflate personal support of American soldiers with support of American military policy," and to discourage "critical public discourse concerning justification for and execution of military interventionist policy." In a review featured in
The New York Times, film critic
Elvis Mitchell expressed dissatisfaction with the film's "lack of characterization" and opined that the film "reeks of glumly staged racism".
Owen Gleiberman and Sean Burns, the film critics for
Entertainment Weekly and the alternative newspaper
Philadelphia Weekly, respectively, echoed the sentiment that the depiction was racist. American film critic
Wheeler Winston Dixon also found the film's "absence of motivation and characterization" disturbing, and wrote that while American audiences might find the film to be a "
paean to patriotism", other audiences might find it to be a "deliberately hostile enterprise"; nevertheless, Dixon lauded the film's "spectacular display of pyrotechnics coupled with equally adroit editing."
Jerry Bruckheimer, the film's producer, rejected these criticisms on ''
The O'Reilly Factor'', putting them down to political correctness in part due to
Hollywood's liberal leanings.
Accolades Black Hawk Down received four
Academy Award nominations: for Best Director (lost to
A Beautiful Mind), Best Cinematography (lost to
The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring), and won two Oscars for Best Sound and Best Film Editing. It received three
BAFTA Award nominations for Best Cinematography, Best Sound and Best Editing. ==Historicity==