Development stage During the 1950s, Toronto experienced the same sort of
urban sprawl that was sweeping through the United States. This caused enormous traffic problems within the city, and a network of new highways to address the problem became part of the Official Plan in 1959. By the mid-1960s, there was a growing awareness that
the growth of the suburbs led to a
flight of capital from the city cores, resulting in the
urban decay being seen throughout the US leading to
freeway revolts across North America. Activists inspired by urbanist
Jane Jacobs rallied to oppose development of the
Spadina Expressway project. The government reconsidered and cancelled the construction of the Spadina Expressway and other planned expressways. Instead of expressways,
Bill Davis and his new Minister of Transport,
Charles MacNaughton, outlined the "
GO-Urban" plan. GO-Urban called for a system of three advanced mass transit lines that would be run by the newly formed
GO Transit. The idea was to select a system with low capital costs, one that would be cost effective in low-density areas where a traditional
subway would be too expensive to build and operate. Designed to have a design capacity half-way between buses and subways, the new system was referred to as the Intermediate Capacity Transit System or ICTS. The
space age automated guideway transit (AGT) systems being designed in the late 1960s seemed like the right solution. Toronto was not the only city looking for such a solution, and there appeared to be a large market for automated transit systems in the 1970s and 80s. As GO-Urban was larger than most networks being considered, practically every company working on an AGT, or hoping to, submitted a proposal. The first cut reduced the field to a still-large fourteen proposals. After a year-long selection process, GO selected the
Krauss-Maffei Transurban maglev as the preferred solution. As a maglev, the system would be silent, addressing concerns about noise on elevated portions of the track. Additionally, the system's
linear induction motor did not require physical contact for traction, which meant it would run with equal capacity in snow or icy conditions.
Krauss-Maffei agreed to do all vehicle construction in Ontario, and allow the local office to handle all sales efforts in North America – a stipulation most US companies were not willing to agree to. Local testing, construction and sales were centralized in the newly created "Ontario Transportation Development Corporation" (OTDC). Construction of a test track on the grounds of the
Canadian National Exhibition started in late 1975, but shortly after this Krauss-Maffei announced that development funding provided by the German government was ending. Ontario was not willing to continue funding development of the system on their own, and cancelled the maglev plans. The result was essentially a larger, rubber-wheeled version of the original maglev vehicle. The consortium included of
SPAR Aerospace for the
linear induction motor,
Standard Elektrik Lorenz (SEL) for the automatic control system,
Dofasco for the
bogies,
Alcan and
Canadair for the design of the car bodies and a set of prototypes, and Canadair as the overall prime contractor. The arrangements, funding and final system definitions were in place by 1976. Between 1976 and 1980, three prototype cars were built. The first immediately demonstrated a problem with the rubber-wheeled bogies. The linear induction motor required very accurate positioning about above its "reaction rail" in order to work efficiently and the slight give in the wheels was enough to make this a problem. A dedicated test facility was desired; modelled after the similar
Transit Testing Center set up in the US as part of their own mass transit developments, the site would be open to use for any company that wanted to test new technologies without the need to build out their own testing sites. A site in Millhaven, outside of
Kingston, Ontario, was selected for the new test centre. Kingston had been home to the
Canadian Locomotive Company that closed its doors in 1969, and the city lobbied hard for the new company to locate to their city. The site was officially opened on September 29, 1978, by
James Snow, the Minister of Transportation and Communications. The site included a oval test track that included at-grade, elevated and ramped sections, switches, and the automatic control centre. Phase III of the ICTS program ended on January 31, 1980, when testing on the prototype was completed at the Millhaven site, by this point the government had invested about $57.2 million, of a total $63 million spent on the product by the government and its industrial partners.
Initial sales By the late 1970s, it appeared there were no more technology issues to overcome and efforts turned to debugging the system and developing methods for mass production. As this process started, UTDC started its own efforts to market the design. Toronto, the inspiration for the system, was an obvious target, but the company also found interest in the system in
Ottawa,
Hamilton,
Vancouver,
Detroit and
Los Angeles. A test system in Toronto was the primary concern. With the GO-Urban concept having since been cancelled, and
GO Transit having turned to conventional
heavy rail systems, the only suitable local market was the
Toronto Transit Commission (TTC). The TTC had recently extended the east–west
Bloor-Danforth subway line with the addition of another station on each end of the line, and had planned to further extend the line with
streetcars running from those stations into the suburbs. Construction had already started on the streetcar system at the eastern end of the line at
Kennedy station. The provincial government asked the TTC to switch the streetcar line to the ICTS. The TTC was uninterested until the government threatened to pull their financing, which accounted for 75% of its capital budget. In exchange, the government agreed to pay for any cost overruns above the original streetcar budget. Construction of the internal streetcar platform and a turn-around loop had already been completed at the station. The platform had to be raised to the higher floor height of the ICTS, but UTDC claimed the vehicle would be able to make its way around the existing radius loop at without additional modification. Vancouver proved very interested in the system on its own merits. As early as 1978, the city had been planning a transportation-themed event for its centennial in 1986, and in 1980 they won the rights to host the
Expo '86 World's Fair, giving it the theme "Transportation and Communications". The city is newer than Toronto and more spread out, making a traditional subway unattractive – precisely the problem that the ICTS had been designed to solve. The ICTS vehicle design, with shorter vehicle heights, was also ideal, as the old heavy-rail
Dunsmuir Tunnel in downtown Vancouver could be easily modified and split into two stacked tunnels. With UTDC interested in showcasing the system at the Expo, and the Expo backers interested in a transit solution that could be open in time for the show, a deal was quickly arranged that was attractive to both parties. At the time, it was a somewhat controversial project and had its detractors. Detroit had been one of six cities selected for rapid development under the United States
Urban Mass Transportation Administration (UMTA)
Downtown People Mover (DPM) program. After ten years, little actual development had taken place and UMTA was mandated to install systems with all possible speed. None of the high-tech developments funded by UMTA had been installed, nor developed to the point where they were ready for service. Instead, the Detroit system was favouring the
Cabinentaxi system from Germany, but that company decided to pull out of the contest in order to focus on a larger development in
Hamburg. The UTDC responded to a "buy American" clause in UMTA by opening a branch office in Detroit, and that immediately swung the decision in their favour. However, with the
Ronald Reagan administration taking office in 1981, DPM was rapidly de-funded. Four of the five cities ended their development plans, but Detroit and Miami (using a different design) decided to press ahead with their deployments. Construction of the Toronto and Vancouver systems proceeded apace, with the
Scarborough RT opening for service on March 22, 1985, followed by the
SkyTrain on December 11, 1985, with passenger service starting in January.
Hiatus Sales of additional ICTS systems went nowhere, and the government began to worry about UTDC's continued successes. The government pushed any potential deployment to buy from UTDC, but with only one product, and that product having many problems in Toronto, there was little interest from other cities. At the same time, the buy-UTDC clause locked
Hawker Siddeley Canada out of many local projects, and they had formerly been a major supplier in the local market. The solution was to form a 50–50 combined company, Can-Car Rail, who marketed the combined product line. Hawker had a number of successful products, notably their
Bombardier BiLevel Coach, and as these other products were selling well through this period, interest in actively selling ICTS waned. In spite of Can-Car's success in other markets, as early as 1981 the government had considered selling UTDC to the private sector. Their concern was that without a manufacturing business, UTDC would find it difficult to make enough income to justify its Kingston operations. If the company did start a manufacturing side, it would be inappropriate for the company to remain government owned. The Can-Car deal put this on hold for a time. In 1986 the new Ontario government announced their intention to sell UTDC to
Lavalin, a large engineering company in Montreal. Lavalin purchased the company for only CAD$50 million, less than the $70 million spent on the UTDC by the government up to 1981. Bombardier started a redesign effort for the ICTS, resulting in the larger, advanced rapid transit (ART) Mark II vehicle. Compared to the original ICTS (retroactively named Mark I), the newer ART cars are longer with more seating, and have a more open layout inside. ART technology was selected for the
AirTrain JFK project, which is widely considered a great success in spite of predictions to the contrary. After winning the SkyTrain
Millennium Line contract in Vancouver, Bombardier further improved the design by introducing an articulating section between adjacent cars, replacing the coupling and doors of the older Mark I design. The articulation allows passengers to move freely between the cars, as well as adding more internal space for passenger seating. These versions of the Mark II design won several more contracts, and are currently operating on the
Kelana Jaya Line in Kuala Lumpur, the
Airport Express, Beijing Subway in China (in four-car trains), and the YongIn
EverLine near Seoul in South Korea. When Bombardier started marketing ART as part of its
Bombardier Innovia family of automated transit systems, the technology was rebranded as the Innovia ART 100 for the Mark I and Innovia ART 200 for the Mark II. Vancouver continues to be the largest operator of an Innovia ART system, with of operational lines in its SkyTrain network (Expo Line and Millennium Line). This network increased in 2016 with the opening of a extension of the Millennium Line, named the
Evergreen Extension. The SkyTrain system uses a mixed fleet of Innovia ART 100, 200 and 300 cars.
Innovia Metro The latest version of the technology uses the name "Innovia Metro" and is marketed as a mid-size metro system. Innovia Metro is compatible with Bombardier's own CITYFLO 650 integrated transit automation system and is offered in variants compatible with both linear motor and electric rotary propulsion. Bombardier now markets the Innovia Metro alongside the larger
Movia Metro and has touted its system versatility. The first rotary-powered Innovia Metro 300 vehicles were ordered by
Riyadh Metro in Saudi Arabia for Line 3 of its new
rapid transit network. Those 47 vehicles will be equipped with Bombardier's MITRAC propulsion drives. == Design ==