Early life and career Duffy was born at No. 10 Dublin Street in
Monaghan Town, County Monaghan, Ireland, the son of a
Catholic shopkeeper. He was educated in
Belfast at
St Malachy's College and in the collegiate department of the
Royal Belfast Academical Institution where he studied logic, rhetoric and
belles-lettres. One day, when Duffy was aged 18,
Charles Hamilton Teeling, a
United Irish veteran of the
1798 rising, walked into his mother's house (his father had died when he was 10). Teeling was establishing a journal in
Belfast and asked Duffy to accompany him on a round of calls to promote it in Monaghan. Inspired by Teeling's recollections of '98, Duffy began contributing to the journal,
The Northern Herald. In Belfast, Duffy went on to edit
The Vindicator, an
O'Connellite journal launched by
Thomas O'Hagan (later the first Catholic to become
Lord Chancellor of Ireland since 1687). At the same time, he began studying law at the
King's Inns in
Dublin. Duffy was admitted to the
Irish Bar in 1845. But before then he established himself in literary circles as the editor of
Ballad Poetry of Ireland (1843), and in political circles as editor of a new Dublin weekly,
The Nation.
The Nation In 1842, Duffy co-founded
The Nation with
Thomas Osborne Davis, and
John Blake Dillon. Contributors were notable for including nationally minded Protestants: in addition to Davis,
Jane Wilde,
Margaret Callan,
John Mitchel,
John Edward Pigot and
William Smith O'Brien. All were members or supporters of
Daniel O'Connell's
Repeal Association, dedicated to a restoration of an Irish parliament through a reversal of the
1800 Acts of Union. When he had first followed O'Connell, Duffy concedes that he had "burned with the desire to set up again the
Celtic race and the catholic church". But in
The Nation (which repeatedly invoked memory of the
United Irishmen) Duffy committed himself to a "nationality" that would embrace as easily "the stranger who is within our gates" as "the Irishman of a hundred generations." This expansive, ecumenical, view of the opinion-forming tasks of the paper brought him into conflict with the
clericalism of the broader movement.
At issue with O'Connell O'Connell's paper,
The Pilot, did not hesitate to identify religion as the "positive and unmistakable" mark of distinction between Irish and English. As leader of the
Catholic Association, O'Connell had fought to secure not only Catholic entry to
Parliament but also the prerogatives and independence of the
Catholic Church. It was, he maintained, "a national Church" and should the people "rally" to him, they would "have a nation for that Church". O'Connell, at least privately, was of the view that "Protestantism would not survive the Repeal ten years". He assured Dr
Paul Cullen (the future
Cardinal and Catholic
Primate of Ireland) that once an Irish parliament had swept aside
Ascendancy privilege, "the great mass of the Protestant community would with little delay melt into the overwhelming majority of the Irish nation". In 1845, the
Dublin Castle administration proposed to educate Catholics and Protestants together in a non-denominational system of higher education.
The Nation welcomed the proposition, but O'Connell, claiming that there had been "unanimous and unequivocal condemnation" from the bishops", opposed. Disregarding
Thomas Davis's plea that "reasons for separate education are reasons for [a] separate life", and declaring himself content to take a stand "for Old Ireland", O'Connell rejected the "godless" colleges. For Duffy there was a further, less liberal basis, for his disaffection: O'Connell's repeated denunciations of a "vile union" in the United States "of republicanism and slavery", and his appeal to Irish Americans to join in the abolitionist struggle. Duffy believed the time was not right "for gratuitous interference in American affairs". Not least because of the desire for American support and funding, it was a common view.
Young Ireland Following Davis's sudden death in 1845, Duffy appointed
John Mitchel deputy editor. Against the background of increasingly violent peasant resistance to evictions and of the onset of famine, Mitchell brought a more militant tone. When the
Standard in London observed that the new Irish railways could be used to transport troops to quickly curb agrarian unrest, Mitchel responded that the tracks could be turned into pikes and trains ambushed. O'Connell publicly distanced himself from the seditious import of the remarks—it appeared to some setting Duffy, as the publisher, up for prosecution. When the courts failed to convict, O'Connell pressed the issue, seemingly intent on effecting a break with those he referred to disdainfully as "Young Irelanders"—a reference to
Giuseppe Mazzini's anti-clerical and insurrectionist
Young Italy. In 1847, the
Repeal Association tabled resolutions declaring that under no circumstances was a nation justified in asserting its liberties by force of arms. The Young Irelanders had not advocated physical force, but in response to the "Peace Resolutions"
Thomas Meagher argued that if Repeal could not be carried by moral persuasion and peaceful means, a resort to arms would be a no less honourable course.
O'Connell's son John forced the decision: the resolution was carried on the threat of the O'Connells themselves quitting the Association. Duffy and the other Young Ireland dissidents associated with his paper withdrew and formed themselves as the
Irish Confederation. In the desperate circumstances of the
Great Famine and in the face of martial-law measures that, following O'Connell's death, a number of Repeal Association MPs had approved in
Westminster, Duffy conceded the case for taking "the no less honourable course". With Mitchel he was arrested, leaving it to Meagher, O'Brien and Dillon to raise the standard of revolt. This was a
republican tricolour with which Meagher had returned from
revolutionary Paris, its colours intended to symbolise reconciliation (white) between Catholic (green) and Protestant (orange). But with the rural priesthood against them and the body of their support confined to the garrisoned towns, their efforts issued in a small demonstration that broke up after its first armed encounter, the
Battle of Ballingarry. Their death sentences for treason commuted, the leaders were transported to
Van Diemen's Land (
Tasmania). Duffy alone escaped. Defended by
Isaac Butt he was freed after his fifth trial.
League of North and South On his release, Duffy toured famine-stricken Ireland with the renowned Scottish essayist, historian and philosopher
Thomas Carlyle. Duffy had invited Carlyle, a Unionist and anti-Catholic, in the vain hope that he might help sway establishment opinion in favour of humane and practical relief. Increasingly he was convinced that agrarian reform was the nation's existential issue and one that could form the basis for a non-sectarian national movement. From his youth Duffy recalled a
Quaker neighbour who had been a
United Irishman and had laughed at the idea that the issue was kings and governments. What mattered was the land from which the people got their bread. Instead of singing
La Marseillaise, he said that what the
men of '98 should have borrowed from the French was "their sagacious idea of bundling the landlords out of doors and putting tenants in their shoes". In 1842, he had already allied himself with
James Godkin who had abandoned a bible mission to campaign for the rights of the Catholic tenants he had been tasked with bringing into the Protestant fold. He now looked to
James MacKnight (M'Knight) who, closely aided by a group of radical Presbyterian ministers, in 1847 had formed the Ulster Tenant Right Association in Derry. In 1850, a convention called in Dublin by Duffy and MacKnight formed the Irish
Tenant Right League. It was committed in its charter to MacKnight's "
three F's": fair rent, free sale, and fixity of tenure. Uniting activists across the sectarian and constitutional divide, in 1852, the League helped return Duffy (for
New Ross) and 49 other tenant-rights
MPs to
Westminster. In November 1852,
Lord Derby's short-lived Conservative government introduced a land bill to compensate Irish tenants on eviction for improvements they had made to the land. The bill passed in the
House of Commons in 1853 and 1854, but failed to win consent of the landed grandees in the
House of Lords. What Duffy optimistically hailed as the "
League of North and South" unravelled. In the Catholic South,
Archbishop Cullen approved the leading Catholic MPs
William Keogh and
John Sadleir breaking their pledge of independent opposition and accepting positions in a new Whig administration. In the Protestant North
William Sharman Crawford and other League candidates had their meetings broken up by
Orange "bludgeon men".
"Irish Mazzini" To the cause of tenant rights, Cullen was sympathetic, but of Duffy he was deeply suspicious. Following O'Connell, he described Duffy as an "Irish
Mazzini"—condemnation from a man who had witnessed the Church's humiliation under Mazzini's
Roman Republic in 1849. Duffy in turn accused the Church under Cullen of pursuing a "Roman policy" in Ireland "hostile to its nationality." Until O'Connell's death, Duffy suggested that Rome had "believed in the possibility of an Independent Catholic State" in Ireland, but that since O'Connell's death could "only see the possibility of a Red Republic". The
Curia had, as a result, returned to "her design of treating Ireland as an entrenched camp of Catholicity in the heart of the British Empire, capable of leavening the whole." Ireland for this purpose had to be"thoroughly imperialised, localised, welded into England." But Cullen's biographers would argue that Duffy travestied Cullen and his church's complex and nuanced relationship to Irish nationalism.—perhaps as much as Cullen caricatured Duffy's separatism. ==Australia==