Diatoms belong to a large group of protists, many of which contain plastids rich in chlorophylls a and c. The group has been variously referred to as
heterokonts,
chrysophytes,
chromists or
stramenopiles. Many are
autotrophs such as
golden algae and
kelp; and
heterotrophs such as
water moulds, opalinids, and actinophryid heliozoa. The classification of this area of protists is still unsettled. In terms of rank, they have been treated as a
division,
phylum,
kingdom, or something intermediate to those. Consequently, diatoms are ranked anywhere from a
class, usually called
Diatomophyceae or
Bacillariophyceae, to a division (=phylum), usually called
Bacillariophyta, with corresponding changes in the ranks of their subgroups.
Genera and species An estimated 20,000
extant diatom
species are believed to exist, of which around 12,000 have been named to date according to Guiry, 2012 (other sources give a wider range of estimates). Around 1,000–1,300 diatom genera have been described, both extant and fossil, of which some 250–300 exist only as fossils.
Classes and orders For many years the diatoms—treated either as a class (Bacillariophyceae) or a phylum (Bacillariophyta)—were divided into just 2 orders, corresponding to the centric and the pennate diatoms (
Centrales and
Pennales). This classification was extensively overhauled by Round, Crawford and Mann in 1990 who treated the diatoms at a higher rank (division, corresponding to phylum in zoological classification), and promoted the major classification units to classes, maintaining the centric diatoms as a single class
Coscinodiscophyceae, but splitting the former pennate diatoms into 2 separate classes,
Fragilariophyceae and Bacillariophyceae (the latter older name retained but with an emended definition), between them encompassing 45 orders, the majority of them new. As of 2020, it is recognised that the 1990 system of Round et al. is in need of revision with the advent of newer molecular work, however the best system to replace it is unclear. Current systems in widespread use, such as
AlgaeBase, the
World Register of Marine Species, and its contributing database
DiatomBase, and the system for "all life" represented in Ruggiero et al., 2015, all retain the Round et al. treatment as their basis, albeit with diatoms as a whole treated as a class rather than division/phylum, with Round et al.'s classes reduced to subclasses, for better agreement with the treatment of phylogenetically adjacent groups and their containing taxa. (For references refer the individual sections below). One proposal, by
Linda Medlin and co-workers commencing in 2004, considers some of the centric diatoms more closely related to the pennates to be split off as a new class, Mediophyceae, itself more closely aligned with the pennate diatoms than the remaining centrics. This hypothesis—later designated the Coscinodiscophyceae-Mediophyceae-Bacillariophyceae, or Coscinodiscophyceae+(Mediophyceae+Bacillariophyceae) (CMB) hypothesis—has been accepted by D.G. Mann among others, who use it as the basis for the classification of diatoms as presented in Adl. et al.'s series of syntheses (2005, 2012, 2019), and also in the Bacillariophyta chapter of the 2017
Handbook of the Protists edited by Archibald et al., with some modifications reflecting the apparent non-monophyly of Medlin et al. original "Coscinodiscophyceae". Meanwhile, a group led by E.C. Theriot favours a different hypothesis of phylogeny, which has been termed the structural gradation hypothesis (SGH) and does not recognise the Mediophyceae as a monophyletic group. Another analysis, by Parks et al., 2018, finds that the radial centric diatoms (Medlin et al.'s Coscinodiscophyceae) are not monophyletic, but supports the monophyly of Mediophyceae minus
Attheya, which is an anomalous genus. Discussion of the relative merits of these conflicting schemes continues by the various parties involved.
Adl et al., 2019 treatment In 2019, Adl
et al. presented the following classification of diatoms, while noting: "This revision reflects numerous advances in the phylogeny of the diatoms over the last decade. Due to our poor taxon sampling outside of the Mediophyceae and pennate diatoms, and the known and anticipated diversity of all diatoms, many
clades appear at a high classification level (and the higher level classification is rather flat)." This classification accepts the Mediophyceae of Medlin and co-workers and introduces new clades for a number of otherwise isolated genera. •
Ochrophyta Cavalier-Smith 1986, emend. Cavalier-Smith & Chao 1996 (ochrophytes) •
Diatomista Derelle et al. 2016, emend. Cavalier-Smith 2017 (diatoms plus a subset of other ochrophyte groups) •
Diatomeae Dumortier 1821 [=
Bacillariophyta Haeckel 1878] (diatoms) •
Leptocylindrophytina D.G. Mann in Adl et al. 2019 •
Leptocylindrophyceae D.G. Mann in Adl et al. 2019 (
Leptocylindrus,
Tenuicylindrus) •
Corethrophyceae D.G. Mann in Adl et al. 2019 (
Corethron) •
Ellerbeckiophytina D.G. Mann in Adl et al. 2019 (
Ellerbeckia) •
Probosciophytina D.G. Mann in Adl et al. 2019 (
Proboscia) •
Melosirophytina D.G. Mann in Adl et al. 2019 (
Aulacoseira,
Melosira,
Hyalodiscus,
Stephanopyxis,
Paralia,
Endictya) •
Coscinodiscophytina Medlin & Kaczmarska 2004, emend. (
Actinoptychus,
Coscinodiscus,
Actinocyclus,
Asteromphalus,
Aulacodiscus,
Stellarima) •
Rhizosoleniophytina D.G. Mann in Adl et al. 2019 (
Guinardia,
Rhizosolenia,
Pseudosolenia) •
Arachnoidiscophytina D.G. Mann in Adl et al. 2019 (
Arachnoidiscus) •
Bacillariophytina Medlin & Kaczmarska 2004, emend. •
Mediophyceae Jouse & Proshkina-Lavrenko in Medlin & Kaczmarska 2004 •
Chaetocerotophycidae Round & R.M. Crawford in Round et al. 1990, emend. •
Lithodesmiophycidae Round & R.M. Crawford in Round et al. 1990, emend. •
Thalassiosirophycidae Round & R.M. Crawford in Round et al. 1990 •
Cymatosirophycidae Round & R.M. Crawford in Round et al. 1990 •
Odontellophycidae D.G. Mann in Adl et al. 2019 •
Chrysanthemodiscophycidae D.G. Mann in Adl et al. 2019 •
Biddulphiophyceae D.G. Mann in Adl et al. 2019 •
Biddulphiophycidae Round and R.M. Crawford in Round et al. 1990, emend. •
Attheya •
Bacillariophyceae Haeckel 1878, emend. •
Striatellaceae •
Urneidophycidae Medlin 2016 •
Fragilariophycidae Round in Round, Crawford & Mann 1990, emend. •
Bacillariophycidae D.G. Mann in Round, Crawford & Mann 1990, emend. See
taxonomy of diatoms for more details. == Evolution and fossil record ==