Origins The specification followed the cancellation of the Air Ministry's 1942
specification E.24/43 supersonic research aircraft which had resulted in the
Miles M.52 programme.
Teddy Petter, formerly chief designer at
Westland Aircraft, who was hired by English Electric in 1944 to develop aircraft rather than just make other manufacturers' designs, was a keen proponent of Britain developing a supersonic fighter. In 1947, Petter approached the
Ministry of Supply (MoS) with his proposal, and in response Specification ER.103 was issued for a single research aircraft, which was to be capable of flight at and . Petter initiated a design proposal with
Frederick Page leading the design and
Ray Creasey responsible for the aerodynamics. By July 1948 their proposal incorporated the stacked engine configuration and a high-mounted tailplane. Designed for Mach 1.5, the wing leading edge was swept back 40° to keep it clear of the
Mach cone. This proposal was submitted in November 1948, and in January 1949 the project was designated P.1 by English Electric. On 29 March 1949 the MoS granted approval to start a detailed design, develop wind tunnel models and build a full-size mockup. In 1949, the Ministry of Supply had issued Specification F23/49, which expanded upon the scope of ER103 to include fighter-level manoeuvring. On 1 April 1950, English Electric received a contract for two flying
airframes, as well as one static airframe, designated
P.1. The
Royal Aircraft Establishment disagreed with Petter's choice of sweep angle (60 degrees) and tailplane position (low) considering it to be dangerous. To assess the effects of wing sweep and tailplane position on the stability and control of Petter's design
Short Brothers were issued a contract by the Ministry of Supply to produce the
Short SB.5 in mid-1950. This was a low-speed research aircraft that could test sweep angles from 50 to 69 degrees and high or low tailplane positions. Testing with the wings and tail set to the P.1 configuration started in January 1954 and confirmed this combination as the correct one.
Prototypes From 1953 onward, the first three prototype aircraft were hand-built at
Samlesbury Aerodrome, where all Lightnings were built. These aircraft were given the
aircraft serials WG760,
WG763, and
WG765 (the structural test airframe). The prototypes were powered by
un-reheated Armstrong Siddeley Sapphire turbojets, as the selected
Rolls-Royce Avon engines had fallen behind schedule due to their own development problems. Since there was no space in the fuselage for fuel, the thin wings were used as the fuel tanks. Because the wings also provided space for the stowed main undercarriage, the fuel capacity was relatively small, giving the prototypes an extremely limited
endurance. The narrow tyres rapidly wore out in a crosswind during take-off or landing. Outwardly, the prototypes looked very much like the production series, but they were distinguished by the rounded-triangular air intake with no centre-body at the nose, short fin, and lack of operational equipment. P.1B was a significant improvement on P.1A. While it was similar in aerodynamics, structure and control systems, it incorporated extensive alterations to the forward fuselage, reheated
Rolls-Royce Avon R24R engines, a conical centre body
inlet cone, variable nozzle reheat and provision for weapons systems integrated with the
ADC and
AI.23 radar. In May 1954,
WG760 and its support equipment were moved to
RAF Boscombe Down for pre-flight ground taxi trials; on the morning of 4 August 1954,
WG760, piloted by
Roland Beamont, flew for the first time from Boscombe Down. One week later,
WG760 officially achieved
supersonic flight for the first time, having exceeded the
speed of sound during its third flight. During its first flight,
WG760 had unknowingly exceeded , but due to
position error the
Mach meter only showed a maximum of . The occurrence was noticed during flight data analysis a few days later. While
WG760 had proven the P.1 design to be viable, it was limited to due to
directional stability limits. In May 1956, the P.1 received the "Lightning" name, which was said to have been partially selected to reflect the aircraft's supersonic capabilities.
OR.155 and project selection In 1955, the
Air Ministry learned of the
Tupolev Tu-22, expected to enter service in 1962. It could cruise for relatively long periods at and had a dash speed of Mach 1.5. Against a target flying at these speeds, the existing
Gloster Javelin interceptors would be useless; its primary
de Havilland Firestreak armament could only attack from the rear and the Tu-22 would run away from the Javelin in that approach. A faster version, the "thin-wing Javelin", would offer limited supersonic performance and make it marginally useful against the Tu-22, while a new missile, "
Red Dean" would allow head-on attacks. This combination would be somewhat useful against the Tu-22, but of marginal use if faster bombers were introduced. In January 1955, the Air Ministry issued
Operational Requirement F.155 calling for a faster design to be armed with either an improved Firestreak known as "Blue Vesta", or an improved Red Dean known as "
Red Hebe". The thin-wing Javelin was cancelled in May 1956. In March 1957,
Duncan Sandys released the
1957 Defence White Paper which outlined the changing strategic environment due to the introduction of
ballistic missiles with nuclear warheads. Although missiles of the era had relatively low accuracy compared to a manned bomber, any loss of effectiveness could be addressed by the ever-increasing yield of the warhead. This suggested that there was no targeting of the UK that could not be carried out by missiles, and Sandys felt it was unlikely that the Soviets would use bombers as their primary method of attack beyond the mid-to-late 1960s. This left only a brief period, from 1957 to some time in the 1960s, in which bombers remained a threat. Sandys felt that the imminent introduction of the
Bloodhound Mk. II surface-to-air missile would offer enough protection against bombers. The Air Ministry disagreed; they pointed out that the Tu-22 would enter service before Bloodhound II, leaving the UK open to sneak attack. Sandys eventually agreed this was a problem, but pointed out that F.155 would enter service after Bloodhound, as would a further improved SAM, "
Blue Envoy". F.155 was cancelled on 29 March 1957 and Blue Envoy in April. To fill the immediate need for a supersonic interceptor, the Lightning was selected for production. The aircraft was already flying, and the improved P.1B was only weeks away from its first flight. Lightnings mounting Firestreak could be operational years before Bloodhound II, and the aircraft's speed would make it a potent threat against the Tu-22 even in a tail-chase. To further improve its capability, in July 1957 the Blue Vesta program was reactivated in a slightly simplified form, allowing head-on attacks against an aircraft whose fuselage was heated through skin friction while flying supersonically. In November 1957, the missile was renamed "
Red Top". This would allow Lightning to attack even faster bombers through a collision-course approach. Thus, what had originally been an aircraft without a mission beyond testing was now selected as the UK's next front-line fighter.
Further testing On 4 April 1957 Beamont made the first flight of the P.1B
XA847, exceeding Mach 1 during this flight. in a British aircraft.
Production The first operational Lightning,
designated Lightning F.1, was designed as an interceptor to defend the
V Force airfields in conjunction with the "last ditch" Bristol Bloodhound missiles located either at the bomber airfield, e.g. at
RAF Marham, or at dedicated missile sites near to the airfield, e.g. at
RAF Woodhall Spa near the 3-squadron Vulcan station
RAF Coningsby. The bomber airfields along with the
dispersal airfields, would be the highest priority targets in the UK for enemy nuclear weapons. To best perform this intercept mission, emphasis was placed on rate-of-climb, acceleration, and speed, rather than
range – originally a radius of operation of from the V bomber airfields was specified – and endurance. It was equipped with two
30 mm ADEN cannon in front of the cockpit windscreen and an interchangeable fuselage weapons pack containing either an additional two ADEN cannon, 48
unguided air-to-air rockets, or two de Havilland Firestreak
air-to-air missiles. The
Ferranti AI.23 onboard radar provided
missile guidance and ranging, as well as search and track functions. The A.I.23B radar and Red Top missile offered a forward hemisphere attack capability and deletion of the nose cannon. The new engines and fin made the F.3 the highest performance Lightning yet, but with an even higher fuel consumption and resulting shorter range. The next variant, the
Lightning F.6, was already in development, but there was a need for an interim solution to partially address the F.3's shortcomings, the
Interim F.Mk6. The Interim F.Mk6 introduced two improvements: a new, non-jettisonable, ventral fuel tank, and a new, kinked, conically cambered wing leading edge, incorporating a slightly larger
leading edge fuel tank, raising the total usable internal fuel by . The conically cambered wing improved manoeuvrability, especially at higher altitudes, and the ventral tank nearly doubled available fuel. The increased fuel was welcome, but the lack of cannon armament was felt to be a deficiency. It was thought that cannon would be useful in a peacetime interception for firing warning shots to encourage an aircraft to change course or to land. The
Lightning F.6 was originally nearly identical to the F.3A with the exception that it could carry two
ferry tanks on
pylons over the wings. These tanks were jettisonable in an emergency, and gave the F.6 a substantially improved deployment capability. There remained one glaring shortcoming: the lack of cannon. This was finally rectified in the form of a modified ventral tank with two ADEN cannon mounted in the front. The addition of the cannon and their ammunition decreased the tank's fuel capacity from . Although the F.2A lacked the thrust of the later Lightnings, it had the longest tactical range of all Lightning variants, and was used for low-altitude interception over
West Germany.
Export and further developments The
Lightning F.53, otherwise known as the
Export Lightning, was developed as a private venture by BAC. While the Lightning had originated as an interception aircraft, this version was to have a
multirole capability for quickly interchanging between interception, reconnaissance, and ground-attack duties. The F.53 was based on the F.6 airframe and avionics, including the large ventral fuel tank, cambered wing and overwing pylons for drop tanks of the F.6, but incorporated an additional pair of hardpoints under the outer wing. These hardpoints could be fitted with pylons for
air-to-ground weaponry, including two bombs or four
SNEB rocket pods each carrying eighteen 68 mm rockets. A gun pack carrying two ADEN cannons and 120 rounds each could replace the forward part of the ventral fuel tank. Alternative, interchangeable packs in the forward fuselage carried two Firestreak missiles, two Red Top missiles, twin retractable launchers for 44× rockets, or a
reconnaissance pod fitted with five 70 mm Type 360 Vinten cameras. BAC also proposed clearing the overwing hardpoints for carriage of weapons as well as
drop tanks, with additional Matra JL-100 combined rocket and fuel pods (each containing 18 SNEB rockets and of fuel) or bombs being possible options. This could give a maximum ground attack weapons load for a developed export Lightning of six bombs or 44 × rockets and 144 × 68 mm rockets. The
Lightning T.55 was the export two-seat variant; unlike the RAF two-seaters, the T.55 was equipped for combat duties. The T.55 had a very similar fuselage to the T.5, while also using the wing and large ventral tank of the F.6. In 1963, BAC Warton was working on the preliminary design of a two-seat Lightning development with a
variable-geometry wing, based on the Lightning T.5. In addition to the
variable-sweep wing, which was to sweepback between 25 degrees and 60 degrees, the proposed design featured an extended ventral pack for greater fuel capacity, an enlarged dorsal fin fairing, an arrestor hook, and a revised inward-retracting undercarriage. The aircraft was designed to be compatible with the
Royal Navy's existing
aircraft carriers'
carrier-based aircraft, the VG Lightning concept was revised into a land-based interceptor intended for the RAF the following year. Various alternative engines to the Avon were suggested, such as the newer
Rolls-Royce Spey engine. It is likely that the VG Lightning would have adopted a solid nose (by moving the air inlet to the sides or to upper fuselage) to install a larger, more capable radar. ==Design==