MarketMontigny Mission
Company Profile

Montigny Mission

Montigny Mission was a diplomatic mission of Charles de Montigny, a French diplomat who was then the French Consul of Shanghai, to Southeast Asian polities of Siam, Cambodia and Vietnam, from July 1856 to February 1857. The mission was a part of French effort to catch up with British Empire to establish influences in the Far East.

History of French relations with Siam and Vietnam
Foundation of Paris Foreign Missions Society Originally, the Catholic mission in the Continental Southeast Asia had been under management of Portuguese Dominican and Franciscan priests. The Catholic Church had been relying on Spain and Portugal for evangelization of the faraway lands. The Portuguese were granted exclusive authority over missionary activities in Asia under the Padroado system. However, the Portuguese missionaries had been struggling, with little success in preaching the Gospel and ended up just mostly maintaining the church for the Portuguese and Luso-Asian Mestizos in Southeast Asia. By the seventeenth century, the popes began to see the Padroado system as ineffective and sought to bring missionary works in Asia back to papal power. (Southern Vietnam was still part of Cambodia). Portuguese Jesuit priests from Macau began effective evangelization in Vietnam, starting in Cochinchina in 1615. However, like in China, Christianity readily conflicted with Confucianism, which put high emphasis on the ancestor worship. and preparing to go to Vietnam. However, the Portuguese Jesuits priests in Cochinchina warned De la Motte of imminent persecution by the Nguyen Lord so De la Motte decided to stay in Ayutthaya for a time being. Bishop Pallu, along with another French priest Louis Laneau, left France in 1662, arriving in Ayutthaya in 1664. was built in 1665 on the land of Bangplahet in Ayutthaya granted by King Narai of Siam. The seminary later alternated between Bangplahet and Mahaphram.|200x200px Establishment of French Catholic mission in Continental Southeast Asia allowed France to pursue political and commercial interests in that region. French East India Company (French: Compagnie des Indes Orientales, CIO) was founded in 1664. At Ayutthaya, Bishop François Pallu the Apostolic Vicar of Tonkin and Bishop Lambert de la Motte the Apostolic Vicar of Cochinchina resided in Bangplahet, a Vietnamese resulting in the humiliating Dutch–Siamese Treaty of 1664. De la Motte reported to the French court that King Narai was interested in Christianity and could be possibly converted. In 1665, Bishop Pallu returned to Rome from Siam to seek papal support against Portuguese resistance. to be under exclusive jurisdiction of the French MEP order and assigned Bishop François Pallu to bring papal letter to the Siamese king. In 1670, Bishop Pallu asked the French king Louis XIV to write letters to the Siamese king and to the Vietnamese Emperor. Bishop Pallu returned to Ayutthaya in 1673, where he presented the papal and French royal letters to the Siamese king Narai. This was the first official diplomatic contact between France and Siam. King Narai allowed the French to establish a comptoir or trade factory in Ayutthaya. • A French merchant named Chapelain, travelling with the ship Tonkin, went to Thăng Long (Hanoi) to establish commercial relation with Tonkin. Chapelain had an audience with the Vietnamese Emperor Lê Hy Tông. The Trinh Lord Trịnh Tạc allowed the French to establish a comptoir at Phố Hiến. The French bought a large amount of merchandises from Tonkin, carrying on a French ship ''Soleil d'Orient from Tonkin to Ayutthaya. The Siamese king Narai, hoping to secure a relation with France, sent the Siamese Deputy Trade and Foreign Minister Okya Phiphatkosa to board on Soleil d'Orient to France in a diplomatic mission. Soleil d'Orient left Ayutthaya in 1681. However, Soleil d'Orient'' shipwrecked off the coast of Madagascar with all the crews, including the Siamese envoy, presumed dead. The Tonkinese merchandises on the ship were also lost at sea. After his release from Madrid, Bishop François Pallu was appointed as the Apostolic Vicar of Fujian. Pallu left Ayutthaya in 1683, reaching Zhangzhou in 1684 but Bishop Pallu died in Fujian in the same year. after the failure of the first mission, under guidance of a French MEP priest Bénigne Vachet, who led the Siamese envoys to Paris. The two Siamese envoys had an audience with the French King Louis XIV at the Palace of Versailles. Louis XIV reciprocated by sending Chevalier de Chaumont to lead a French diplomatic mission to Siam in 1685, leading to the conclusion of the Franco–Siamese Treaty of 1685, With papal support, the French MEP order practically supplanted the mostly-Portuguese Dominican, Franciscan and Jesuit priests, who refused to accept French priests as their overseers, as the main pioneer of evangelization in the region. As French–Portuguese rivalry over Catholic Church in Southeast Asia became more intense, Pope Innocent XI sought a compromise among the competing orders. In 1686, King Narai sent the third and most well-known mission under Kosa Pan, along with Jesuit priest Tachard, accompanying De Chaumont back to France. Tachard presented Phaulkon's plan to the French royal court, who began their own plan to conquer Siam. King Louis XIV sent second embassy under Simon de la Loubère, along with General Desfarges to bring around 600 French men to Siam. King Narai allowed Desfarges to station French troops in Bangkok, downstream from Ayutthaya and at Mergui on the Tenasserim Coast. La Loubère concluded the Franco–Siamese Treaty of 1687 with the Siamese signatory Okya Phrasadet the Phrakhlang or Siamese Foreign Minister. Most of the clauses of this new Treaty of 1687 was similar to the previous Treaty of 1685, with additional clauses allowing the French to settle and establish posts anywhere in Siam and allowing France to impose extraterritoriality on Siam. In January 1688, King Narai sent his fourth mission to Europe led by Father Guy Tachard to bring Narai's amicable letters to the French king and the Pope. Bishop Louis Laneau the Apostolic Vicar of Siam also served as the guarantor of the terms. calling for Kosa Pan to make a new treaty and to cede Phuket to France. whose father was Chaophraya Phrakhlang Chin the deceased Siamese Trade Minister of Chinese descent and whose mother was a Vietnamese Catholic, In 1749, François Dupleix the Governor-General of French India at Pondicherry sent Pierre Poivre as the delegate of the Company to procure a commercial relation with Cochinchina under Nguyen Lord Nguyễn Phúc Khoát. Nguyễn Phúc Khoát, however, did not agree, prompting Poivre to abduct a Vietnamese official who was the French interpreter, angering the Nguyen Lord. Next year, in 1750, Nguyễn Phúc Khoát expelled all French Catholic priests from Cochinchina. Bishop Lefebvre the Apostolic Vicar of Cochinchina had to flee to Prambeichhom near the Cambodian royal capital of Oudong, in 1757, where he died in 1760. in 1766 in the territory of the Principality of Hà Tiên. Bishop Piguel at Prambeichhom also sent Father Pierre Pigneau de Béhaine from Cambodia to teach at the Seminary of Hòn Đất. Prince Sisang, a refugee Siamese prince, at the suggestion of his Catholic followers, destroying the Siamese kingdom. The Seminary of Saint Joseph in Ayutthaya, built in 1665, was destroyed by the Burmese conquerors in 1767. Bishop Pierre Brigot the Apostolic Vicar of Siam was taken by the Burmese as captive to Rangoon in Lower Burma, where he stayed for some time and eventually went to Pondicherry without ever returning to Siam again. Mạc Thiên Tứ the ruler of Hà Tiên, wanting to keep Siamese refugee princes as political leverages against Taksin, the new King of Siam, was angered that Father Artaud let Prince Sisang go to Cambodia without informing him. Mạc Thiên Tứ arrested Father Artaud and Father Pigneau de Béhaine at Hòn Đất, led the three Tây Sơn brothers. As the Tây Sơn toppled Nguyen rule and took control of Central Vietnam, members of the Nguyen Lord Nguyễn Phúc clan moved south to Saigon known colloquially in modern historiography as the Treaty of Versailles, was signed by Bishop Pigneau de Béhaine, the Apostolic Vicar of Cochinchina, on behalf of Nguyễn Phúc Ánh the King of Cochinchina, with ten articles. King Louis XVI of France promised to help Nguyễn Ánh by sending four frigates, 1,200 infantrymen, 200 artillerymen and 250 African soldiers. a Cambodian–Portuguese Mestizo Catholic man who entered the service under the Siamese king as Phra Wisetsongkhram the commander of Siamese artillery. King Rama appointed Oknha Yomreach Baen as Chaophraya Aphaiphubet as a regent to govern Cambodia on behalf of King Ang Eng, who lived in Bangkok as a refugee and political hostage. After conclusion of the Treaty, Bishop Pigneau de Béhaine and Nguyễn Phúc Cảnh returned to Pondicherry in French India in December 1788. However, the French royal government sent a confidential order just tolerating Christianity but not embracing it either. French adventurers Jean-Baptiste Chaigneau and Philippe Vannier continued to serve in Vietnam as Gia Long's officials. The prospect of having a Christian king in Vietnam, however, died with the death of his Christian-sympathetic eldest son in 1801. when Gia Long died in 1820, there were up to 300,000 Catholics in Northern Vietnam and 60,000 Catholics in Central and Southern Vietnam combined, becoming a visible minority. Gia Long's other son ascended the Vietnamese throne as Emperor Minh Mạng, who had a staunch Confucian and anti-Western view. Jean-Baptiste Chaigneau, after his thirty years of service in Vietnam, went to France in 1819 during the Bourbon Restoration period. The French royal government of King Louis XVIII found Chaigneau's connection to Vietnam an opportunity to establish a trade relation with Vietnam. Jean-Baptiste Chaigneau was appointed as the French Consul to Vietnam. However, when Chaigneau returned to Vietnam in 1821, Gia Long had already died Joseph Havard the Apostolic Vicar of Western Tonkin died from illness in 1838 during his hiding from Vietnamese authorities. Pope Gregory XVI appointed Pierre Dumoulin-Borie as the new Apostolic Vicar of Western Tonkin but Father Borie was executed before the papal order reached him in Northern Vietnam. Two French MEP missionaries; François Jaccard and Gilles Delamotte, were executed by the Vietnamese in Quảng Trị province in 1838 and 1840, respectively. == French entry into Southeast Asia ==
French entry into Southeast Asia
French Expedition to Danang (1843) in Sơn Tây in September 1837, during which his body was dissected, internal organs coming out as the Vietnamese executioner reportedly ate a piece of his liver. • Pierre-André Retord of MEP in Sơn Tây was appointed as the new Apostolic Vicar of Western Tonkin. In 1839, Pope Gregory issued papal brief Quod nuncia exiling her to Saigon. Dissatisfied with Vietnamese cultural assimilation policies, the Cambodians arose in a nationwide uprising against Vietnamese rule in September 1840.'' dividing the Apostolic Vicariate of Siam into Apostolic Vicariate of Western Siam based at Singapore and Apostolic Vicariate of Eastern Siam based at Assumption Church in Bangkok. Jean-Baptiste Pallegoix the Bishop of Mallus was appointed as the first Apostolic Vicar of Eastern Siam in this new division. and Chuang Bunnag attacked the Vietnamese port of Hà Tiên, temporarily taking position at Phú Quốc Island. However, this Siamese amphibious assault was repelled by the Vietnamese. Facing strong Cambodian resistance with Siamese support, the Vietnamese were obliged to evacuate from Cambodia in November 1841, ending the period of direct Vietnamese rule over Cambodia as Trấn Tây province, with Trương Minh Giảng the Vietnamese Commissioner of Cambodia allegedly committed suicide. a local official in Quảng Nam province, however, told Emperor Thiệu Trị that France had sent someone to apologize for the crimes of the French missionaries and ask to take them back. Out of mercy, Thiệu Trị granted to allow the five French MEP priests to leave Vietnam with Favin-Lévêque on Héroïne in March 1843 on condition that they would never return to Vietnam again. Even though no armed clashes happened, the expedition of Favin-Lévêque to Danang in early 1843 was the first of five successive French expeditions to Danang (1843, 1845, 1847, 1856 and 1858) to intervene on behalf of the missionaries, with some of them turned violent. As Favin-Lévêque managed to rescue all the five French priests to safety, dropping off Father Duclos at Singapore, Father Miche at Penang and others at Réunion. However, three of the five priests; Galy, Miche and Duclos, would soon return to Vietnam. Lagrené Mission and Treaty of Whampoa (1844) Charles de Montigny was born in 1805. Montigny's father used to serve Prince Comte de Provence, younger brother of King Louis XVI of France. During the French Revolution, as an émigré, Montigny's father took refuge in Hamburg in Germany, Keying, then Viceroy of Liangguang and chief negotiator of all treaties China was to make with Western nations, was the plenipotentiary and signatory on the Chinese part. The Treaty of Whampoa or Treaty of Huangpu mostly Catholics. Keying supported Christian legalization as it would secure French support for China against Britain. Due to frequent persecutions of Western missionaries by the Vietnamese imperial court, Pope Gregory XVI issued papal brief Exponendum Nobis curavit Dominique Lefebvre, in Vietnamese prison in Huế, wrote a letter and had a Vietnamese Catholic secretly deliver to Percival, pleading Pervical to rescue him. where Théodore Forcade the Apostolic Vicar of Japan had been residing, to establish a trade relation but did not succeed. Augustin de Lapierre the commander of French navy in the China Seas brought the same two French frigates Gloire and Victorieuse, along with his colleague De Genouilly and six hundred French marines, Ang Duong also expressed his wishes to send Khmer people for education in France. Queen Mother Vara Neak Neang Ros, mother of Ang Duong, expressed her opinion that French presence would deter Vietnamese intervention in Cambodia. and discouraged the Catholics from following the king's order. Dissatisfied, the king ordered the expulsion of all French missonaries from Siam and all Catholic churches be destroyed. Among the nine French priests in Bangkok, only Bishop Pallegoix the Apostolic Vicar of Eastern Siam compromised with the king by assigning Phra Wisetsongkhram Pascoal Ribeiro de Albergaria, a Siamese Catholic official of Cambodian–Portuguese Mestizo descent, younger brother of the previous Phra Wisetsongkhram Bento Ribeiro, to collect domesticated animals from the Catholic churches for the king to release. The king thus became satisfied and rescinded his order to destroy the churches. However, the eight other French missionaries chose to leave Siam rather than to comply with the king's order. These French priests were Pierre Clémenceau, Jean-Baptiste Grandjean, Jean Claudet, Aimé Dupond, Séverin Daniel, Louis Larnaudie, Nicolas Lequeux and Pierre Gibarta, who left Siam for Singapore, Penang and Hong Kong. The cholera epidemic then spread from Siam to Cambodia and Southern Vietnam, reaching Northern Vietnam by 1850. Ten thousands of Cambodian, Siamese and Vietnamese people died from the disease. In August 1850, Pope Pius IX issued papal brief Quoties benedicente creating the Apostolic vicariate of Cambodia, separating from the Western Cochinchina vicariate, with Jean-Claude Miche the Bishop of Dansara at Ponhea Lueu appointed as the first Apostolic Vicar of Cambodia. == Prelude to the Montigny Mission ==
Prelude to the Montigny Mission
Cambodia's approach to Britain After the fifteen years of Siamese–Vietnamese warfare over Cambodia, both Siam and Vietnam reached an agreement that allow Ang Duong to be enthroned as King Harireak Reamea of Cambodia during 1847–1848 a Cambodian–Portugese Mestizo official, to bring gifts to William John Butterworth the Governor of the Straits Settlements, asking for British protection against the Chinese pirates in the Gulf of Siam. and arriving in Kampot, a Cambodian port in Southwestern Cambodia. Siam was informed about Helms' arrival in Kampot. King Nangklao died in April 1851 and was succeeded by Mongkut as the new king of Siam. Itsaret Rangsan, Mongkut's younger brother, was also made the Second King of Siam as the Vice-king Pinklao, taking the residence at the Front Palace. As Mongkut ascended the throne with the support of Bunnag family, he appointed the Bunnags to high ministerial positions; • Chaophraya Phrakhlang Dit Bunnag was appointed Somdet Chaophraya Prayurawong, known colloquially as Somdet Chaophraya Ong Yai • The new Siamese king deplored Sir James Brooke, who had earlier attempted to negotiate a new treaty with Siam in 1850, to return to Siam to resume his negotiations; "The views of Sir James Brooke in regard to Siamese affair were appreciated an acquiesced in by the present King and his Ministers is best testified by the very general wish which is stated to prevail at the Siamese Court that Sir James should renew his visit to Bangkok at as early a period as possible." This was the first contact between Bowring and the Siamese king. Mongkut also stressed that Siam should be treated with at least the same honor as Vietnam, which was the enemy of Siam; "they may be with us in like or similar manner with that have been or will be with Cochin China which is opposing to our country, so that our council might see that the fortune of Siam and Cochin China is tolerable or equal." Bowring was knighted in February, becoming Sir John Bowring. In his instructions to Bowring, Clarendon prioritized Japan above all other kingdoms but Bowring saw that Japan had just been coerced by the Americans to sign the Convention of Kanagawa in March 1854 and Japan would be in no mood to negotiate with any other Western nations. In the royal audience, the three envoys sat on three chairs before the royal throne, while the Siamese princes, nobles and officials prostrated on the floor. Bowring presented the gifts from Queen Victoria to King Mongkut, who asked whether Bowring was going to make a treaty with Vietnam. Bowring reassured the Siamese king that he was going to do so. Mongkut then spoke about a French missionary who had been his friend (Bishop Pallegoix) and stated that he would appoint four Siamese plenipotentiaries to negotiate the treaty with Bowring. Next day, on April 5, Sir John Bowring visited the French Catholic Mission in Bangkok. As Bishop Pallegoix had been away to France, Bishop Jean-Claude Miche the Apostolic Vicar of Cambodia had arrived in Bangkok to act in Pallegoix's stead. Bishop Miche led the nine French missionaries in Bangkok to greet Bowring and told Bowring that Cambodia had been sending tributes to Siam and Vietnam because Cambodia feared both; "Monseigneur represents the Cambodians as paying tribute to both the Cochin Chinese and the Siamese, and equally afraid of both.", and that violent persecutions of Christians were going on in Vietnam; "persecutions against the Catholics are actively carried on in Cochin China." Anglo–Siamese Bowring Treaty (1855) King Mongkut appointed four Siamese plenipotentiaries to negotiate and conclude the new treaty with Sir John Bowring; • Somdet Chaophraya Prayurawong, personal name Dit Bunnag, called Somdet Chaophraya Ong Yai • Somdet Chaophraya Phichaiyat, personal name That Bunnag, younger brother of Dit Bunnag, called Somdet Chaophraya Ong Noi • Chaophraya Si Suriyawong, personal name Chuang Bunnag, eldest son of Dit Bunnag, whom Bowring called Kralahom • Chaophraya Rawiwong, personal name Kham Bunnag, other son of Dit Bunnag, the Phrakhlang or Siamese Foreign Minister. King Mongkut later added his younger half-brother Prince Kromma Luang Wongsathirat Sanit as the fifth plenipotentiary. Si Suriyawong Chuang Bunnag expressed his own opinion to Bowring that Siam's traditional system of tax farming was a burden on the populace and should be reformed but the senior nobles, most notably his own uncle That Bunnag, had been opposing the reforms because they were the beneficiaries of the old system. The negotiations began on 9 April 1855 at the mansion of Somdet Ong Yai near Bowring's residence, in which the five Siamese plenipotentiaries and the three British envoys Bowring, Parkes and John Charles attended. The British proposed establishment of consulate in Siam, land ownership of British subjects in Siam and reduction of import duties into a single three-percent levy. The Siamese replied that the British would be allowed to reside in Siam only in the area within twenty-four hour journey from Bangkok. Siamese delegates were divided on the matter of duties. That Bunnag the Somdet Ong Noi opposed the British proposal of reduction of traditional Siamese duties, while Chuang Bunnag supported the British proposal. On April 10, the British plenipotentiaries went to discuss the matter of duties at the mansion of Somdet Ong Noi, who opposed these proposals. On the same day, Bowring visited Bishop Miche again. Bishop Miche told Bowring that both French Catholic and American Protestant missionaries barely made any conversions in Siam and gave Pallegoix's French-Thai-Latin dictionary to Bowring. In the evening of 10 April 1855, Bowring received a shocking news from Chuang Bunnag that his father and uncle, Dit and That Bunnag, the senior Somdets, were planning to overturn the negotiation by rejecting British proposals altogether. Chuang Bunnag "found it impossible to persuade the Commissioners and the influential nobles to accede to the conditions of the Treaty set forth by the Plenipotentiary." Enraged, Bowring declared that he would no longer attend any ceremonies and would take Rattler to leave Siam immediately. Bowring's threat indeed made the senior Somdets cower to British demands. Chuang Bunnag the Kralahom thanked Bowring that his threat was "well suited to the occasion". In the night of April 10, Prince Kromma Luang Wongsa held a meeting at his residence the Thonburi Palace. Somdet Ong Yai Dit Bunnag became suddenly ill and did not attend the meeting. Somdet Ong Noi That Bunnag and Kham Bunnag the Phrakhlang also called in sick. Bowring himself also did not attend but sent Harry Parkes and Bowring's son John Charles to the meeting. In the meeting at Thonburi Palace, only four people; Prince Wongsa, Chuang Bunnag, Harry Parkes and John Charles Bowring were present. These four people managed to settle all the terms by next day on April 11. On 16 April 1855, the Siamese plenipotentiaries brought the three British envoys to present the treaty to King Mongkut in a grand audience at the royal palace. of April 1855 began the new age of Siam's foreign relations in the era of Western imperialism, also serving as the model for subsequent unequal treaties that Siam was to conclude with other nations. Treaty of Friendship and Commerce between Great Britain and Siam, known colloquially as the Bowring Treaty, was signed on 18 April 1855 at the mansion of Somdet Ong Yai, who had been ailing on his bed. The Siamese at Wichaiprasit Fort shot twenty-one salute cannon shots, to which HMS Rattler responded with twenty-one salute cannon shots, celebrating the conclusion of the treaty. The terms of this Bowring Treaty included; • Establishment of British consulate to oversee British subjects in Siam • In legal cases that British nationals were defendants, the British Consul would judge the case with British law "in conjunction with" Siamese officials. • Stipulation of the low three-percent general import duty • Permission of land ownership and travel of British subjects in Siam only in the area four-mile farther from Bangkok but within the twenty-four journey from Bangkok According to Bowring, Chuang Bunnag or Kralahom was instrumental in this successful conclusion of the treaty. Prince Wongsa also told Bowring that this treaty would be the model for all future treaties Siam was to conclude with other Western nations. On 24 April 1855, the three British envoys had a farewell audience with King Mongkut and left Bangkok for Paknam. The Bowring Mission left Siam at Paknam Samut Prakarn on April 25, with Bowring assigning Harry Parkes to bring the treaty to London for ratification, while Bowring himself returned to Hong Kong. Somdet Ong Yai Dit Bunnag died from his illness next day, on April 26, eight days after the signing of Bowring Treaty at his house. After the successful conclusion of the treaty with Siam, Sir John Bowring eyed Vietnam as his next target. As the Vietnamese imperial court had been strongly anti-Western, Bowring had to carefully plan. Bowring speculated a tripartite British–French–American diplomatic mission to Vietnam but France and the United States were apparently not ready. As a survey, Bowring sent his own Chinese secretary Thomas Francis Wade boarding on HMS Rattler to bring his diplomatic letter to Vietnam. Thomas Wade on the Rattler arrived in Danang in September 1855. Wade gave Bowring's letter to the Vietnamese officials in Danang, who told Wade not to go to Huế. After waiting for some time, it became apparent that the Vietnamese court would not respond to Bowring's letter and Wade was obliged to leave empty-handed. == Journey of Montigny to Southeast Asia ==
Journey of Montigny to Southeast Asia
Catholic Church in Cambodia, Siam and Vietnam By 1855, there were Catholic apostolic vicariates in Cambodia, Siam and Vietnam, with seven Apostolic Vicars in Vietnam, one in Siam and one in Cambodia, all of them were from Paris Foreign Missions Society (MEP), except for the Apostolic Vicars of Eastern and Central Tonkin, who belonged to the Spanish Dominican Order; Northern VietnamApostolic vicariate of Western Tonkin, under Pierre-André Retord the Bishop of Acanthus, who had been hiding from Vietnamese authorities in Northern Vietnam. There were 117,870 Catholics under his jurisdiction. • In 1846, Pope Gregory XVI separated the Apostolic vicariate of Southern Tonkin from Bishop Retord's Western Tonkin vicariate, appointing Jean-Denis Gauthier the Bishop of Emmaus as the first Apostolic Vicar of Southern Tonkin based in the Nghệ An Province. There were 66,350 Catholics under his jurisdiction. • Apostolic vicariates of Eastern Tonkin and Central Tonkin were under Spanish Dominican Order. Central VietnamApostolic vicariate of Eastern Cochinchina, under Étienne Cuenot the Bishop of Metellopolis, based at Gò Thị Earl of Clarendon, the British Foreign Secretary, assigned Lord Cowley the British Ambassador in Paris to deliver a copy of the Bowring Treaty to Count Colonna-Walewski the French Foreign Minister on 9 August 1855, Unlike Britain, who had already gained a concrete foothold in the Far East, France essentially lacked experienced diplomatic personnel who were well-versed in Asian affairs. Alphonse de Bourboulon at Macau, the prospective French envoy to Siam, was unable to go to Siam as he was on his leave to France. Bourboulon had assigned his apprentice the young 27-year-old French diplomat René de Courcy to go to Siam in his stead. However, Charles de Montigny the French Vice-Consul of Shanghai, who had returned from Shanghai and arrived in France in early 1855, convinced Walewski to appoint him as the French envoy to Siam to replace Bourboulon. Montigny used to take part in the Lagrené Mission of 1843–1846 that resulted in the Treaty of Whampoa and establishment of French presence in the Far East. As a diplomat, Montigny retained much of military ardor and audacity of this youth as a French soldier with bravery, patriotic zeal and feverish activity. Montigny had disobeyed his superiors for than once. Nevertheless, Montigny had been a senior French diplomat in the Far East and had personal ties to the French Emperor. Montigny's winning over the Siamese Mission alienated many French diplomats, most notably Bourboulon and De Courcy. the French Minister of Marines France had been having problems of shortage of marine vessels in the Far East, with the steam corvette Marceau as the only warship available for Montigny. Admiral Hamelin the French Minister of Marines told Walewski that, due to situation of the ongoing Crimean War, there could be hardly any warships left for the Siamese Mission; Nevertheless, Walewski insisted that the mission needed at least two warships in order not to be inferior to Bowring's mission to Siam in 1855. Admiral Hamelin then entrusted the Rear Admiral Nicolas François Guérin the French naval commander in Réunion, who had been in Ryukyu, to find another warship for Montigny. Montigny's appointment to the Siamese Mission was applauded by the Paris Foreign Missions Society (MEP) as Montigny had been tending to the concerns of Christianity and missionaries in Asia. The Paris Foreign Missions Society congratulated Montigny on his appointment, affirming Montigny that all the French missionaries in Siam and Vietnam were at Montigny's command and promising that Bishop Jean-Baptiste Pallegoix of Siam would provide Montigny with translation. The MEP also deplored Montigny to address the issues of freedom of Christian proselytization in Siam and the Christian persecutions in Vietnam. Objective of Montigny Mission After failures of the two previous French envoys to actually go to Siam, Emperor Napoleon III of France officially appointed Charles de Montigny as the French plenipotentiary to Siam on 10 October 1855 as Siam under King Mongkut had become more open to formalize relations with Western nations. Montigny was later elevated to the Consul of the First Class (French: Consul de première classe) on October 24. Count Walewski drafted this upcoming Franco–Siamese Treaty, consisting of twenty-two articles, based on the Anglo–Siamese Bowring Treaty of 1855, the Sino–French Treaty of Whampoa of 1844 and the treaty that France had concluded with Imamate of Muscat in 1844. Townsend Harris the American plenipotentiary left New York on October 17, 1855, transversing the Atlantic, reaching Liverpool on October 28 and reaching Paris on November 1st. On 22 November 1855, while Townsend Harris was in Paris, Count Walewski the French Foreign Minister officially issued instructions on the Siamese Mission to Montigny. The mission objective was to procure a commercial treaty with Siam with at least equal concessions that Siam had earlier surrendered to the British in the Bowring Treaty. Walewski gave the Bowring Treaty and his own twenty-two-article treaty draft to Montigny. Walewski told Montigny to adhere to the Bowring Treaty as the model. Walewski also allowed Montigny to improvise for any innovative terms and, if Siam refused to negotiate, Montigny might directly put forward the Bowring Treaty as the new treaty for France without any alterations. Montigny was also to introduce some clauses from the Whampoa Treaty that were not present in the Bowring Treaty including the unlimited French naval access, guarantee of security of French buildings and possessions, assistance in cases of shipwrecks and desertions. Apart from this instruction on commercial aspect of the treaty, Montigny was also assigned a mission on the religious issue, which applied both to Siam and Vietnam as France had been promoting itself to be the global protector of Roman Catholic Church. Montigny was assigned to secure freedom of Christian evangelization and permission to build Catholic churches in Siam. After the supposedly-successful negotiation with Siam, Montigny was to go to Cambodia to settle some minor misunderstandings with King of Cambodia and to fetch an interpreter to go to Vietnam to peacefully demonstrate to the Vietnamese imperial court that the French Emperor was dissatisfied with Christian-banning decrees of the Vietnamese Emperor and Christian persecutions that had been going on, without using any excessive forces. Count Walewski urged Montigny to seek advice and assistances from Frédéric Gauthier the French Consul in Singapore and Bishop Pallegoix in Siam, who had been residing in the region for a long time. Lastly, Walewski urged Montigny to leave as soon as possible as Montigny was scheduled to reach Singapore by March 1856, where the French warship Marceau would take Montigny to Siam. The 23-year-old young French diplomat Ernest-Napoléon Godeaux would also accompany Montigny on the mission as an apprentice, who would bring the Franco–Siamese Treaty back to Paris for ratification. Cardinal Carlo Sacconi the papal nuncio to France asked Montigny to have an audience with Pope Pius IX at Rome to put himself under the service of the pope and to discuss about the missionary activities in Asia. Comte de Rayneval the French ambassador to the Holy See also wrote to Walewski, asking for Montigny to go to Rome first. Montigny was then obliged to go to Rome before going on his mission to Southeast Asia. Townsend Harris left Paris on November 26, reaching Marseilles on the next day on November 27, 1855. Harris left Marseilles on November 29, crossing the Mediterranean to reach Alexandria in Egypt on December 4th. On December 7th, Harris left from Suez on a British mail steamship to Southeast Asia, entering the Indian Ocean and reaching Galle in Ceylon on December 24, 1855. Impassé of Montigny in Egypt the French ambassador to the Holy See, whose illness caused Montigny to stay in Rome for one month in January 1856 Charles de Montigny, along with his diplomatic troupe and his family, left Paris on 30 December 1855. Montigny was obliged to go to Rome first to have an audience with Pope Pius IX. However, Montingy found out that Comte de Rayneval the French ambassador in Rome had been ill so Montigny had to wait for one month for Rayneval to recover in order to have the audience with the pope. Harry Parkes had earlier brought the Bowring Treaty to London for ratification. The Queen's Advocate pointed out that some treaty terms were vague and ill-defined, especially the clause concerning the jurisdiction over British subjects in Siam, which stated that the British Consul would oversee the British subjects jointly with Siamese officials but the Queen's Advocate suggested that the British subjects should be put under exclusive British consular jurisdiction without any interferences from the Siamese government. Harry Parkes was then assigned to return to Siam to amend these treaty terms. While Montigny was in Rome, Harry Parkes left London in January 1856, passing through Paris and continuing to Marseilles. There had been a regular passenger mail ship service by the British Peninsular Oriental Company departing from Marseilles, going through Alexandria by train to Suez and taking another mail ship to Singapore. Harry Parkes took a mail ship of the Peninsular Oriental Company, departing from Marseilles in January. Also in January 1856, Sir John Bowring at Hong Kong informed the Siamese government about appointment of Montigny as the French envoy to Siam. Lord Cowley the British ambassador to France told Walewski that Sir John Bowring would offer any assistances to Montigny in his Siamese Mission and hoped that Walewski would also empower Montigny to conclude a similar commercial treaty with Vietnam, apart from Siam, in accordance with Bowring's multi-nation approach on Vietnam. Townsend Harris the American envoy left Ceylon on January 13, arriving in Penang on January 19, 1856. French corvette Capricieuse, which carried French gifts to the Siamese king including the life-sized portraits of the French Emperor Napoleon and Empress Eugénie, departed from Toulon on 19 January 1856. In his meeting with the Pope Pius in February 1856, Montigny reminded the pope of France's unrelenting contributions to the Catholic Mission in Asia, to which the pope resonated by expressing his gratitude for France. After finishing his business in Rome, Montigny and his entourage traveled to Alexandria in Egypt, intending to catch a mail ship for further journey to Asia. However, the Crimean War led to shortage of passanger vessels. The mail ship scheduled to leave Alexandria for Singapore in March 1856 had been fully-booked, as well as the April ship. Montigny had to speak to the high authorities of the Peninsular Oriental Company in order to secure his seat. During Montigny's impassé in Egypt, Harry Parkes the British envoy arrived in Penang on 25 February 1856, where he met his American counterpart Townsend Harris. Parkes and Harris discussed their upcoming negotiations with Siam and Parkes gave a copy of Bowring Treaty to Harris. Parkes then left Penang for Singapore. Harry Parkes had been in hurry to meet the deadline of bringing the ratified Bowring Treaty back to Siamese government. Harry Parkes, with British frigate HMS Auckland, arrived at the river bar of the Siamese Chaophraya River on 12 March 1856, bringing with him the royal letter from Queen Victoria of the United Kingdom. The two Siamese kings were delighted upon knowing that Parkes had brought the British royal letter with him as this was the first British royal letter (Sir James Brooke and Sir John Bowring did not bring royal letter.). In traditional Siamese diplomacy, a royal letter was the most important aspect of diplomatic mission where the dignity resided, not in the person of the envoy, who served only as a mere carrier of sanctity in the royal letter. Siamese preparation for the arrival of the British royal letter caused Auckland to remain stuck at the river bar. was stranded in Alexandria in Egypt for two months from February to April 1856 for his inability to procure a British mail ship to travel to Singapore. Rear Admiral Guérin the French naval commander at Macau sent two French corvettes Constantine and Nissus under capitaine de vaisseau Tardy de Montravel for Montigny's Siamese Mission. Tardy de Montravel brought Constantine and Nisus to reach Singapore on 16 March 1856. On 19 March 1856, at Alexandria, Montigny wrote a letter to Guérin, reminding Guérin of the importance of Montigny's mission as Montigny had been entrusted by both the French Emperor and the Pope to negotiate with Siam and Vietnam. As Siam had been putting high emphasis on external appearance and grandeur, not meeting Siam's expectations would compromise Montigny's mission. Moreover, ever since Lapierre's bombardment of Danang in 1847, nine years ago, not a single French ship visited Vietnam. Montigny's arrival in Vietnam would be a dangerous endeavor if Guérin did not provide Montigny with strong warships, or else Montigny, his colleagues and his family would be killed by the Vietnamese. Unbeknownst to Montigny, Guérin had already provided Montigny with two warships waiting for him in Singapore. Parkes Mission in Siam As Siam took some time to prepare for the reception ceremony of Queen Victoria's royal letter, the British frigate Auckland could only enter Siam on 23 March 1856 after spending ten days on the river bar. Like Rattler in 1855, Auckland was only allowed to proceed up to the Pong Patchamit Fort, not going to the actual Bangkok Fort. Harry Parkes was received with more pomp ceremonies than Bowring as the Siamese grand reception ceremony of the British royal letter took place at Dusit Maha Prasat Throne Hall, where Harry Parkes delivered the letter to the hand of King Mongkut. Parkes then presented a plethora of gifts to Mongkut, including several portraits of Queen Victoria. The gifts were so abundant that Siamese scribes could not record all of them. On 24 March 1856, at ''Quai d'Orsay'', influenced by Bowring's request, Count Walewski issued additional instruction to Montigny to conclude a commercial treaty with Vietnam in similar manner with Siam. As Montigny was stranded in Egypt, Walewski sent this new directive directly to Singapore waiting for Montigny there. Townsend Harris the American envoy, on USS San Jacinto, left Penang and then arrived in Singapore on April 4, 1856, in his preparation for the Siamese Mission. At Singapore, Harris saw two French corvettes Constantine and Nisus that had been waiting for Montigny. Harris also learned that two additional French corvettes, Marceau and Catinat, might also join the mission to Siam, bringing the total number of French ships to four. Seeing such grandeur of French mission, in comparison with his own mission, which contained only one ship, Harris decided that he should hurry to finish his negotiation with Siam before arrival of Montigny, or else his mission in Siam would be delayed. , called Haripak in Thai chronicles, was the Second Envoy of the Bowring Mission in 1855, brought the Bowring Treaty back from London to Siam in March 1856 and proposed amendments of the treaty, which were signed in May. On 5 April 1856, the Bowring Treaty, which had earlier been ratified by the British government and brought back by Harry Parkes, was ratified by the Siamese government in a ceremony. King Mongkut then appointed five Siamese plenipotentiaries to negotiate the amendment of treaty terms with Harry Parkes. They were Prince Wongsathirat Sanit, Somdet Ong Noi That Bunnag, Chaophraya Si Suriyawong Chuang Bunnag the Kalahom, Phrakhlang Kham Bunnag and the newcomer Chaophraya Yommarat Nuch. Earlier, Mongkut saw the Anglo–Japanese Convention of 1854 and became dissatisfied towards Chuang Bunnag the chief supporter of Bowring Treaty as Mongkut saw that Siam had conceded to Britain much more than that Japan had conceded. During this Parkes negotiation, Chuang Bunnag was sidelined in favor of his rival and uncle Somdet Ong Noi, while Mongkut himself also closely monitored the process. As the Parkes negotiation was going on in Siam, Townsend Harris left Singapore on April 8 with San Jacinto, arriving at the Siamese river bar on April 13, 1856. However, Harris could not begin his negotiations with Siam, who had been preoccupied with Harry Parkes. Parkes proposed to the Siamese commissioners that British subjects in Siam should be placed under exclusive jurisdiction of British Consul without any involvement of Siamese government. The Siamese were reluctant to surrender such power to the British Consul but eventually the Siamese conceded because they did not yet have a clear protocol of appointing Siamese officials to assist the British in a mixed court. Distances of four miles and twenty-four-hour journey from Bangkok were also demarcated. Eventually, Charles de Montigny, his colleagues and his family were able to board on the British mail ship Bombay at Suez on 21 April 1856, travelling to Asia. On Bombay, Montigny had booked ten berths for his entourage but John Paterson, the British captain of Bombay, only gave Montigny five berths, causing the ladies to stand with luggages for many hours. Dissatisfied, Montigny went to see Paterson, asking to see the ship's plan to find out why there was no room left. Paterson allegedly responded with angry protest and refusal. Tardy de Montravel, who had been waiting for Montigny with his two corvettes Constantine and Nisus at Singapore for one month, realized that, when Montigny arrived, he had to enter the Gulf of Siam in May, when the southwestern monsoon was strongest, not the best safety choice for sea travel. Montravel then decided to pull his ships away from Singapore to Réunion, not waiting for Montigny. Montravel, Constantine and Nisus left Singapore on April 29, robbing Montigny of two warships for him on his mission. Rear Admiral Guérin sent a report to the French Ministry of Marines that he had sent two warships waiting for Montigny at Singapore but they had to be withdrawn due to unfortunate delay of Montigny and unfavorable seasonal conditions. Guérin's report caused an uproar in the Ministry of Marines, who harshly condemned Montigny for his delay. Some even called for René de Courcy at Macau to replace Montigny as French envoy to Siam. Montigny was allowed to retain his credentials only because he had been the most senior French diplomat in the Far East., appointed by President Franklin Pierce as Consul General to Japan, was commissioned to conclude the American–Siamese Treaty of May 1856 before his journey to Japan. Townsend Harris the American envoy, who had been kept waiting in Bangkok, was granted an official grand audience with the Siamese king Mongkut on May 1st, 1856 at Dusit Maha Prasat Throne Hall. Harris rode on a sedan chair carried on the shoulders of Siamese porters to enter the Siamese royal palace. During the audience with Mongkut, Harris delivered the presidential letter into the king's hand and presented many gifts including a portrait of President Franklin Pierce. Despite having the audience, Harris was still unable to begin his businesses as Siam was still negotiating with Harry Parkes. Montigny in Singapore Montigny was reportedly harassed by Paterson the British captain of Bombay through his journey, arriving at Galle in Ceylon on 4 May 1856. At Galle, Montigny found the French corvette Catinat under the command of capitaine de frégate Le Lieur de Ville-sur-Arce. Montigny personally told Le Lieur that the Crimean War had been effectively over by the Treaty of Paris of March 1856 and asked Le Lieur to take the Catinat to join Montigny's mission to Siam and Vietnam. The Parkes negotiation in Siam dragged on into early May 1856. As Harry Parkes was running out of his provisions on Auckland, he urged the Siamese government to yield to his proposals. Harry Parkes' supplementary articles to the Bowring Treaty were eventually signed on 13 May 1856 and Parkes hurriedly left Siam two days later on May 15, returning to Singapore. After the conclusion of the Parkes Treaty, King Mongkut appointed the same five Siamese commissioners to negotiate the American–Siamese Treaty with Townsend Harris, who was dissatisfied that Siam had kept him waiting for a whole month as Siam was unable to simultaneously deal with both Parkes and Harris at the same time. Montigny and his entourage then took another British ship Norma from Galle to Singapore, arriving in Singapore on 16 May 1856. At Singapore, Montigny met two surprises. First, Frédéric Gauthier the French Consul in Singapore gave Montigny Walewski's new assignment for Montigny to conclude a commercial treaty with Vietnam, apart from remonstrating the Christian persecution. Second, Montigny learned that the two French corvettes Constantine and Nisus had been waiting for Montigny in Singapore but left before Montigny's arrival. Montigny found the steam corvette Marceau to be dissatisfyingly small, unable to face even a Chinese pirate ship. Per Montigny's calculation, the large corvette Capricieuse, which carried the French gifts for the Siamese king and had left Toulon on January 19, would not arrive in Singapore until June and Montigny would be unable to initiate his mission before that. Montigny wrote a letter to Walewski, expressing his regret at his loss of Constantine and Nisus but also reassuring Walewski that, with two French corvettes Catinat and Capricieuse, accompanied by the small corvette Marceau, his mission to Siam would be adequate. Gauthier the French Consul in Singapore advised Montigny that the success of his Siamese Mission depended entirely on the presentation and the number of ships was important as the Siamese king had been asking the missionaries whether France had any warships because he had not seen one. Gauthier suggested Montigny to formally request the ''Quai d'Orsay to allow the commanders of the Catinat and the Capricieuse to accompany Montigny to Siam and Vietnam all through his mission. Montigny at Singapore wasted his time again by waiting for the Capricieuse'' to arrive. Montigny's plan for Vietnam was that Montigny would demonstrate to the Vietnamese imperial court that he was backed by Britain and Siam. An introduction letter from the King of Siam to the Vietnamese Emperor on behalf of Montigny would facilitate his entry into Vietnam and Montigny would be empowered by telling Vietnam at British warships would soon follow him to arrive. the Apostolic Vicar of Eastern Siam and a French missionary who had been residing in Siam since 1830. Harry Parkes returned from Siam to Singapore and met with Montigny. Parkes recounted his diplomatic mission in Siam to Montigny that he had to spend a whole month negotiating but assured Montigny that his prospective Siamese Mission would be successful because the Siamese king and his commissioners were amicable. Montigny was relieved that he would enter Siam after departures of the British and the Americans. A British merchant in Singapore named Read told an opposite story to Montigny, saying that Parkes had left a bad impression on the Siamese court by refusing to listen to any Siamese proposals. Montigny then wrote to Bishop Jean-Baptiste Pallegoix the Apostolic Vicar of Eastern Siam, who had been residing in Bangkok since 1830, to ask the Siamese king Mongkut to write a letter introducing Montigny to the Emperor of Vietnam, according to his plan. Captaine Le Lieur and his corvette Catinat reached Singapore on 28 May 1856. In order to make up for his mistake of surrendering too much Siamese concessions to the British in recent treaties, Chaophraya Si Suriyawong Chuang Bunnag attempted to grant less concessions to Americans than that Siam had earlier conceded to the British but Townsend Harris insisted that the United States would be accorded at least the same concession as Britain. Siam eventually had to grant the same concessions to the Americans in the same manner that Siam had given to the British. The American–Siamese Treaty of Amity and Commerce was signed on May 29, 1856. Townsend Harris left Siam with negative sentiment, saying he wished he would never be assigned to Siam again. Harris then left Siam on May 31 to assume his position as the Consul General of Japan. At Singapore, Montigny wrote to his rival René de Courcy at Macau on May 30, telling De Courcy not to hold against him and saying "Remember, my young friend, that I am finishing my career and you are beginning yours". Montigny also wrote a letter to Sir John Bowring at Hong Kong, thanking Bowring for suggesting to Walewski that Montigny should also be empowered to conclude a commercial treaty with Vietnam and asking Bowring to allow Montigny to invoke Bowring's name in his approach to Vietnam. Bowring granted Montigny the permission to tell the Vietnamese court that Bowring was going to arrive in Vietnam with British warships after Montigny. Bishop Pallegoix at Bangkok, however, replied to Montigny's letter that the French Catholic Mission in Siam was at Montigny's disposal but it would be inappropriate to ask the King of Siam to write to the Emperor of Vietnam because Siam and Vietnam had ceased their relations for many years, having waged war with each other for more than ten years. Siamese royal letter to Vietnam would be of no use. Montigny, knowing next to nothing about regional history, was upset by this reply of Pallegoix. Montigny replied to Pallegoix explaining that he was going into an anti-Western polity with three warships and, without the introduction letter, misunderstanding would lead to confrontation. Montigny also asserted that the Siamese king helping Montigny would be his first act of courtesy for the French Emperor. This incident led to a conflict between Montigny and the bishop. Montigny continued to wait for the arrival of the Capricieuse at Singapore into mid-June 1856. Captain Le Lieur of the Catinat told Montigny that if the Capricieuse did not arrive soon he was obliged to bring the Catinat to join Rear Admiral Guérin in Macau. Montigny had to send a request to Guérin asking for permission for Le Lieur to stay with Montigny on his diplomatic mission, which Guérin granted. Corvette Capricieuse eventually arrived in Singapore on 15 June 1856, along with its commander capitaine de vaisseau Jules Collier and the gifts for the Siamese monarch. Coincidentally, June 15 was also the birthday of Prince Imperial so the French in Singapore celebrated the princely birthday by decorating the Capricieuse with French flags, firing three salutatory cannon shots and chanting of Te Deum on the Capricieuse and at the Church of the Good Shepherd in Singapore. Both Captain Collier of the Capricieuse and Captain Le Lieur of the Catinat were allowed to accompany Montigny on his whole mission to Siam and Vietnam. == Montigny Mission in Siam ==
Montigny Mission in Siam
Arrival of Montigny in Siam Charles de Montigny (called Mongtikni in Thai chronicles) the French Consul of Shanghai and the French imperial plenipotentiary appointed by Emperor Napoleon III, left Singapore on 29 June 1856 along with his family and his colleagues the 24-year-old young French diplomat Ernest-Napoléon Godeaux and capitaine de vaisseau Jules Collier, who was the commander of all three corvettes accompanying Montigny in his mission, which consisted of; • Large sailing corvette Capricieuse, without a steam engine, under personal command of Collier, who was accorded by Montigny the rank of "Commodore". The Capricieuse also contained the gifts for the Siamese monarch. • Steam corvette Catinat under the command of capitaine de frégate Le Lieur de Ville-sur-Arce • Small steam corvette Marceau under command of lieutenant de vaisseau Le Fer de la Motte. The Marceau was the main vessel for Montigny and his family to reside. The three French warships faced strong southwestern monsoon winds. During his journey, Montigny conducted a scientific experiment on a sea snake but ended up having his finger pierced by the snake fang. As the poison of a sea snake was lethal, the ship surgeon performed a surgery to cauterize the bitten site to prevent the spread of the poison but Montigny still had the symptoms of fever, chill and nausea. Montigny even gave instruction that if Montigny died from the sea snake poison, Captain Collier would take over his mission but eventually Montigny survived. of Ayutthaya from Paris Foreign Missions Society served as the interpreter for Charles de Montigny the French plenipotentiary to Siam in 1856. Montigny, along with his entourage and the three French warships, arrived at the river bar at the mouth of Chaophraya River on 9 July 1856. The river bar is a 100-kilometer crescent of deposited sediments, a major obstable to naval passage. The hull of any ships going into the Siamese river should not be deeper that eleven feet or else the ship would run aground. Bishop Jean-Baptiste Pallegoix the Apostolic Vicar of Siam had already sent Father Louis Larnaudie the abbot of Saint Joseph Church of Ayutthaya to be the interpreter for Montigny in Siam. Father Larnaudie had been waiting for Montigny at the river bar. At the river bar, Montigny sent his assistant Godeaux to announce the arrival of the French envoy to Phraya Samut Buranurak the Siamese governor of Paknam Samut Prakarn. Through Godeaux, Montigny demanded that Siamese should treat him, as the French imperial plenipotentiary, with at least the same pomp and grandeur the Siamese had received Chevalier de Chaumont, Sir John Bowring and Harry Parkes before him or else he would not disembark. Montigny requested to reside in the British Factory, a Western-style mansion near Wat Prayurawong temple that had previously received Bowring in 1855 and other British envoys since 1822. However, after the departure of Harry Parkes, the Siamese government had leased the house to Charles Hillier the first-ever British Consul in Siam. Phraya Samut Buranurak reported to the Siamese government about the arrival of the French envoy. Charles Hillier the British Consul refused to move out to make room for Montigny, telling the Siamese that France was a faraway nation that would rarely come so Siam should not care much. Hillier also pointed out that Montigny could reside in the thatched-roof bamboo house that Townsend Harris the American envoy had stayed. Montigny retaliated Hillier by saying that France was a great nation with justice and desire for perpetual friendship with Siam. The five Siamese commissioners held an urgent meeting to decide on the matter. The solution was that King Mongkut would annul the lease of the British Factory to Consul Hillier in order for Hillier to move out. Hillier, however, was persistent, refusing to move out. Prince Kromma Luang Wongsa and Chaophraya Si Suriyawong Chuang Bunnag then asked the king to allow Montigny to reside in the mansion of the deceased Somdet Chaophraya Ong Yai Dit Bunnag who had just earlier died in April 1855, to which Mongkut agreed. Chaophraya Phrakhlang Kham Bunnag then wrote to inform Montigny at the river bar on July 11 that it had been arranged for Montigny to stay in the mansion of the deceased Siamese Chief Minister, where the Bowring Treaty was signed, the place that was even more pomp that the British Factory. Montigny was satisfied with this arrangement. at Samut Prakarn was shaped like a gigantic bell surmounted by a spire. King Mongkut sent Chaophraya Si Suriyawong Chuang Bunnag and Phraya Montri Suriyawong Chum Bunnag to bring a steamship to receive Montigny at Paknam Samut Prakarn. From Samut Prakarn, Chum Bunnag rode the steamship to greet Montigny on the Marceau at the river bar on 12 July 1856 and to bring Montigny to Samut Prakarn. On that day, Montigny on the Marceau crossed the river bar with difficulty as the steam engine propelled the corvette. The Marceau arrived at Samut Prakarn, where Montigny observed the Phra Samut Chedi Pagoda. Next morning, on July 13, the Siamese at Samut Prakarn fired twenty-one salute cannon shots for Montigny. Phra Wisetsongkhram Pascoal Ribeiro led the way for Montigny to disembark from the Marceau with Godeaux and Larnaudie as the Siamese fired another seventeen salute cannon shots and the Siamese military band played God Save The Queen. Si Suriyawong Chuang Bunnag, whom Montigny called Kalahom (Kalaoum) led the Siamese soldiers dressed in British military costume to greet Montigny in military columns. Chuang Bunnag spoke to Montigny in English language, ensuring Montigny that he would be received with appropriate ceremonies and expressing his joy that the Franco–Siamese relation was renewed after long hiatus since the seventeenth century. Chuang Bunnag then told Montigny that Siam needed a powerful nation like France to protect Siam from aggressive neighbor, indirectly referring to the British. Montigny responded to this sensitive question with neutral stance, staying that the prospective France–Siamese Treaty would guarantee Siam's security. Montigny was impressed by Chuang Bunnag; "His Excellency the Kalaoum seemed to me truly a remarkable man, even in Europe, he is indeed the first head of the Kingdom." Montigny learned that the Kalahom had forty-five brothers and his father the late Somdet Ong Yai Dit Bunnag, whose house Montigny was going to reside, had been the Prime Minister and the Somdet of the previous reign. In that evening, Chuang Bunnag, along with his younger brother Phraya Montri Suriyawong Chum Bunnag and his son Chaomuen Waiworanat Won Bunnag came on the Marceau to have a Western-style dinner with Montigny and his family. After the dinner, as the three Bunnags descended from the Marceau, Montigny had his warship salute them with seventeen cannon shots. Arrival of Montigny in Bangkok On 13 July 1856, twenty-five Siamese royal barges came down from Bangkok to fetch Montigny's entourage but Montigny requested that Siam allow him to bring his warship up to Bangkok to salute the Siamese royal flag, to which the Siamese surprisingly consented. Montigny required Captain Jules Collier to leave the two corvettes Catinat and Capricieuse at the river bar for Collier to command the Marceau to go upstream to Bangkok. Captain Collier weighted the anchor of the Marceau at Samut Prakarn on July 14, bringing Montigny and his family to Bangkok. Montigny complimented Bangkok was the "Venice of the East" and a fairytale city; "No European city, and perhaps no other in the world, however picturesque, can evoke such an impression." Montigny on the Marceau reached Bangkok on 14 July 1856, anchoring at the Pong Patchamit Fort about 2.5 kilometers downstream from the actual Bangkok Fort in modern Khlong San. The Marceau fired twenty-one salute cannon shots and the Siamese reciprocated with seventeen salutatory cannon shots. At Pong Patchamit, Prince Wongsa the king's younger half-brother brought all the five Siamese royal commissioners to greet Montigny on the Marceau. Vice-king Pinklao the Second King of Siam also wrote a greeting letter to Montigny. Montigny was informed that there were about 400,000 inhabitants of Bangkok, of which 250,000 were Siamese, 100,000 were Chinese and the rest of 50,000 were Mon, Malay, Vietnamese and the Portuguese Mestizos. Next day, on July 15th, as Montigny was preparing to disembark from the Marceau at Pong Patchamit, the Marceau fired salute cannon shots but a French cannon exploded, amputating arms of two French solidiers and the whole ceremony had to stop. Vice-king Pinklao wrote to Montigny expressing condolences to the accident. The Bunnag brothers Kalahom Chuang Bunnag and Phrakhlang Kham Bunnag led Montigny to the house of the their late father Somdet Dit Bunnag, where Montigny and his family would reside during his mission in Siam. Montigny noticed that the houses of the late Somdet, the houses of Kalahom, Phrakhlang and Somdet Ong Noi, all of whom were of the same (Bunnag) family, were in the same vicinity. King Mongkut granted two royal barges with canopies and sixty oarsmen for Montigny's personal use. Mongkut also assigned Chuang Bunnag's son Chaomuen Waiworanat Won Bunnag and Father Larnaudie the interpreter to tend to Montigny's personal needs. On 21 July 1856, the Siamese king Mongkut requested Montigny to have a private audience. Bishop Pallegoix and Abbé Larnaudie led Montigny, who rode on a sedan chair carried on the shoulders of eight Siamese porters, to visit the king at the Siamese royal palace. Montigny waited outside of the Amarin Winitchai Throne Hall, where the Bowring Mission had been received in 1855 and Montigny's private audience with the king was going to take place. Montigny, however, was kept waiting for a rather long time. Montigny told the Siamese that punctuality was an important part of Western diplomatic protocol and the French imperial plenipotentiary should not be kept waiting for a long time. Montigny then sent Bishop Pallegoix into the Throne Hall, where Mongkut asked Pallegoix how should he receive the French envoy. Montigny's mission to Siam presented a new challenge to the Siamese elites, who had learned English to deal with the British and the Americans but knew no French. Pallegoix replied that the king might converse with Montigny in English language. The Siamese king was surprised to learn that the French envoy also understood English but Pallegoix affirmed him. Montigny was eventually admitted into the Throne Hall, where Siamese royal princes and officials prostrated on the floor. The interior of the hall was decorated in Western-style. Montigny was allowed to stand conversing with King Mongkut, who sat on the throne, not having to prostrate. Montigny noticed that King Mongkut looked like King Louis IX and spoke English more fluently than his subjects. Montigny had been informed that Mongkut had learned English from American missionaries and also studied history of the European dynasties. Montigny thanked King Mongkut for such warm reception. Mongkut asked whether Montigny had brought a letter from the French Emperor with him. The Siamese had been expecting letters from the sovereigns of the incoming envoys. Montigny, who did not bring a letter from Napoleon III, replied that the French Emperor only wrote letters to nations that had already established relations with France and he was sure that if the Siamese king wrote a letter to the French Emperor, he would reply in kind. King Mongkut asked further why did France wait for Britain and the United States to conclude treaties with Siam in order for France to send a plenipotentiary to do the same. Montigny explained that France had sent Rear Admiral Laguerre as the French envoy to Siam but the war with Russia kept Laguerre from actually arriving in Siam. Montigny also pointed out that Gauthier the French Consul at Singapore had earlier notified Siam of imminent arrival of Laguerre in 1853. Mongkut mentioned that Sir John Bowring had earlier informed the Siamese government about appointment of Montigny as the French envoy to Siam. Montigny quickly asserted that France was a powerful nation, who did not require British approval nor British mediation in her venture with Siam. King Mongkut reportedly smiled at this patriotic reply of Montigny. Montigny's grand audience with King Mongkut , original work by German painter Franz Xaver Winterhalter in 1853 Montigny's grand audience with King Mongkut was scheduled by Siamese astrologers to be on 24 July 1856 at Dusit Maha Prasat Throne Hall, where Harry Parkes and Townsend Harris had been received. Montigny arranged that his procession took place in daylight, in contrast to the audiences of Parkes and Harris, which took place after sunset, in order for the Siamese to clearly observe the grandeur of French diplomatic mission. On July 23, Montigny unveiled the life-sized portraits of Emperor Napoleon and Empress Eugénie, which were copies of the original work of the German painter Franz Xaver Winterhalter, at Montigny's residence. Siamese ministers and officials came to see the portraits. Kalahom Chuang Bunnag asked Montigny in English language whether French women were as beautiful as Empress Eugénie, to which Montigny replied that most French women were beautiful but the Empress was the fairest of them. On the day of grand audience, on July 24, Siamese gilded royal barges flocked to Montigny's residence. The procession, which would transport Montigny from his residence to the Siamese royal palace, commenced at one o'clock in the afternoon. Portraits of the French Emperor and Empress were placed on the main barge, on a throne under a canopy with red roof and white curtains, rowed by sixty Siamese oarsmen. Montigny's barge, also rowed by sixty oarsmen, which he shared seats with Captain Collier, Godeaux and Father Larnaudie, followed the main barge that contained the portraits. Following Montigny's barge were the barge of Bishop Pallegoix and twenty other royal barges, all gilded and having the bows of Siamese mythological beasts. Montigny observed that the riparian procession extended beyond the horizon in the river. Montigny's riparian procession reached the royal palace on two o'clock, where the Siamese fired twenty-one salute cannon shots and fired additional seventeen shots to pay respect to Montigny. Siamese officials paraded the two portraits down from the royal barge into the palace, flanked at both sides by two columns of Siamese soldiers. Montigny disembarked from his barge and he was greeted by columns of four hundred Siamese soldiers. Montigny rode on a sedan chair carried on the shoulders of Siamese porters to enter the palace. Montigny observed multi-ethnic Siamese military forces, including Siamese, Lao, Khmer and Vietnamese. Montigny saw royal war elephants, some of them as high as fifteen feet. Montigny also noticed the female royal guards, who carried bayonets and sabers, whom Montigny called the "Amazones of the King". the French plenipotentiary to Siam had a grand audience with King Mongkut on 24 July 1856 at Dusit Maha Prasat Throne Hall in Grand PalaceMontigny's procession eventually reached Dusit Maha Prasat Throne Hall, where Pallegoix explained to Montigny that a Mahaprasat was a grand Siamese royal pavilion for state ceremonies with four façades and a spire. Siamese officials brought the portraits of the French Emperor and Empress to place at both flanking sides of the royal throne. Montigny entered the Throne Hall, where Siamese princes, dignitaries, ministers and officials all dressed in white gowns with gold trims and prostrated on the floor with absolute silence and stillness like Egyptian Sphinxes. In the Throne Hall, the veil opened, revealing King Mongkut of Siam, who sat on the throne in his full enthronement attire adorned with gold and jewelry, wearing the Great Crown of Victory and holding the Sword of Victory, under tiered royal umbrella. Montigny was allowed to stand before the king, flanked at his both sides by Collier and Pallegoix. Montigny bowed deeply to King Mongkut three times and read his French letter addressing the Siamese king; Montigny then handed the English-translated version for Abbé Larnaudie to read to the king. King Mongkut expressed his joy to Montigny's arrival as the French plenipotentiary to conclude a treaty with Siam, saying that no French envoys had ever come to Siam since the reign of King Narai and he had been waiting for one. Mongkut declared that he would appoint Siamese plenipotentiaries to negotiate the treaty with Montigny. Mongkut inspected the portrait of Emperor Napoleon III, saying that even though the French Emperor did not have a letter for him he still sent his portrait. The veil then closed, signifying the end of royal audience. All the Siamese subjects then arose from their prostrations. After the ceremony, Phrakhlang Kham Bunnag took Montigny on a tour to see Theravadin temples in Bangkok and to see royal white elephants. of King Mongkut and Queen Debsirindra, sent as a gift to President of the United States in 1856, now at Smithsonian Institution On 29 July 1856, the Siamese female guards escorted the ladies of the mission including Madame de Montigny, Montigny's wife, her two daughters Nina and Blanche and her sister Madame Alliot, to have an audience with King Mongkut in the Inner Palace or women's quarters, where the king's consorts and female royals resided and any males were strictly forbidden to enter, except for the king. As the ladies entered the Inner Palace, they were greeted by King Mongkut and his consort the 22-year-old Queen Debsirindra, both of whom shook hands with the ladies in Western-style and had conversations in English language. Mongkut led Madame Montigny, who took her two daughters in her hands, to tour the women's quarters. King Mongkut noticed that Nina, eldest daughter of Montigny, was a charismatic lady and entrusted her with a golden cigar box, asking Nina to deliver it to her father. After the event, the female guards returned the ladies of the mission to Montigny. Also on July 29, Montigny and his interpreter Abbé Larnaudie had an audience with Pinklao the Second King of Siam at the Front Palace. The reception ceremony was similar to the one Montigny had experienced with the First King as Montigny was carried in a sedan chair by the Siamese porters to enter the Front Palace. Montigny noticed Vietnamese soldiers dressed in Western military costume. These were the Vietnamese Catholics from An Giang who moved to settle in Samsen in 1834 and entered the service under the Second King. Montigny related that Pinklao, who had allegedly adopted British customs, was even more well-disposed towards Westerners than his elder brother Mongkut. Montigny asking Mongkut about Cambodia and Vietnam In his plan to approach the anti-Christian and anti-Western Vietnamese imperial court, Montigny would invoke support of both Britain and Siam in order to pressure the Vietnamese to the negotiation table. Montigny was to procure an introduction letter written by the Siamese king Mongkut, which would be delivered to Huế in order to facilitate Montigny's arrival. Montigny would also tell the Vietnamese that Sir John Bowring the British envoy would also follow Montigny to arrive in Vietnam. Montigny had earlier asked Bishop Pallegoix to request, on Montigny's behalf, the Siamese king to write such letter. However, Pallegoix refused, saying that it would be inappropriate to ask King Mongkut to write to Vietnam because Siam and Vietnam had waged wars for more than ten years and had long ceased their relations. Montigny was dissatisfied with Pallegoix's refusal and took a negative view on the bishop. The Siamese, however, somehow knew, before Montigny's arrival in Siam, that the French diplomatic mission would also go to Cambodia. Chaophraya Nikonbodin the Prime Minister of Northern Siam then sent Khmer officials from Bangkok to inform King Ang Duong of Cambodia about Montigny's upcoming journey to Cambodia. Montigny and his two daughters requested an audience with King Mongkut specifically for the matters of Cambodia and Vietnam. Speaking to the king in English, Montigny asked Mongkut to have the Siamese government issue a letter to inform the Vietnamese court of imminent arrival of both Montigny and Sir John Bowring after Montigny's conclusion of the Siamese Treaty. Montigny also asserted that Mongkut's assisting Montigny would be the proof of Siam's sincerity in friendship with France. Mongkut refused, saying that, after the conclusion of the Siamese–Vietnamese War, Siam and Vietnam had not restore relations. Siam saw no benefits of restoring relations with Vietnam and Siam had also been avoiding to initiate because it would be perceived by Vietnam as Siam's yielding and deploring. Montigny, who knew next to nothing about Siam–Cambodia–Vietnam regional histories, pointed out to Mongkut that in the West, even when nations were in bitter wars and fought relentlessly, they still maintained diplomatic relations. Montigny took the Crimean War as an example, when Russia fought Britain and France but still maintained relations, having Russian ambassadors in both London and Paris. Montigny then informed Mongkut about his mission in Cambodia. The King of Cambodia had earlier (in 1853) sent gifts including cardamoms, gambodge, etc. to the French government but the Cambodian gifts were lost on the journey (The Cambodian gifts had reached and had been stored in Toulon, where the French government did not care to receive.) so Montigny asked for permission of the Siamese king for him to travel to Cambodia to achieve his mission to explain to the Cambodian king about the gifts. Montigny also asked Mongkut to write a letter to inform the Cambodian king about Montigny's imminent arrival in Kampot. Montigny acknowledged that King of Cambodia was a vassal of Siam but somehow thought that the King of Cambodia could independently pursue relations with France without Siam's approval. Montigny asked Mongkut whether there were any Khmer language interpreters for him. Mongkut replied that there was a French missionary 'Reverend Doctor Miche' the Bishop of Dansara, who knew both Khmer and Vietnamese languages and could certainly be the interpreter for Montigny. Mongkut told Montigny that Bishop Miche used to spent some time in Bangkok (during Pallegoix's leave to France in 1855) and had once visited the king but Mongkut had to speak with Miche through an interpreter because the bishop did not speak English nor Siamese. Upon hearing that King Ang Duong had earlier pursued relations with France, without Siamese approval, Mongkut speculated that it was Bishop Miche who persuaded Ang Duong to do such thing. Montigny then asked Mongkut about journey from Kampot to Ang Duong's residence at Oudong. Mongkut told Montigny that the journey from Kampot to Oudong was an arduous one, taking four to five days, having to transverse through thick forests and, during this rainy season, the path would be flooded and muddy. Mongkut suggested that Montigny should try sailing French corvettes to enter from Mekong Delta at Bassac (Sóc Trăng) and Preah Trapeang (Trà Vinh), which had been under Vietnamese control, to take a more-comfortable riparian journey upstream to Phnom Penh, where Montigny would continue to Oudong. Mongkut told Montigny that he should contact Vietnamese authorities in An Giang and Hà Tiên for permission to sail through Southern Vietnam and this would be Montigny's preliminary survey of Vietnamese reaction to Montigny's mission. Montigny and his daughter Nina disagreed with Mongkut's plan, saying that they were unsure about Vietnam's possible hostilities. Mongkut told Montigny that he had already notified King of Cambodia about upcoming journey of Montigny to Cambodia and the King of Cambodia might send delegates to receive Montigny at Kampot. Montigny asked further whether he could have the Cambodian king write an introduction letter for Montigny to Vietnam. Mongkut replied that he did not know about Cambodia's relations with Vietnam as Cambodia had been paying tributes to both Siam and Vietnam. However, Mongkut strongly asserted that the incumbent king of Cambodia, Harireak Reamea Ang Duong, had closer ties to Siam than to Vietnam; Mongkut also asserted that Siam only allowed Cambodia to pay tributes to Vietnam because the Cambodia was close in proximity to Vietnam and it would keep Cambodia in peace and happiness, not suffering from Vietnamese invasions. In his speech, Mongkut demonstrated to Montigny the French envoy that Siam had been the suzerain of Cambodia. Montigny correctly speculated that Siam was tenacious on holding Cambodia as its vassal state. Montigny did not give up as he presented his draft letter to King Mongkut to write to Vietnam, promising procurement of a minting machine for Siam in exchange, to which Mongkut replied with strong words such as "There is no willing of Siamese government to have communication with the government of Anam or Cochin China who are our opposed enemy. We are happy without intercourse with the country.", "The Cochin Chinese nation is our enemy with whom we do not wish to have connection in Friendship again for we are enjoyment of good and better happiness than when we had been connected in friendship with that country." During Montigny's stay in Bangkok, Prince Wongsa also took the three Cambodian princes Ang Voddey, Sisowath and Sivotha, sons of Ang Duong, to meet Montigny in an audience. Conclusion of Franco–Siamese Montigny Treaty On 29 July 1856, King Mongkut appointed five Siamese plenipotentiaries to conclude a new treaty with Montigny; • Prince Kromma Luang Wongsathirat Sanit, younger half-brother of King Mongkut • Somdet Chaophraya Phichaiyat That Bunnag, also known as Somdet Chaophraya Ong Noi • Chaophraya Si Suriyawong Chuang Bunnag, also known as the KalahomChaophraya Rawiwong Kham Bunnag, known as Phrakhlang the Minister of Foreign Affair • Chaophraya Yommarat Nuch, the Head of Nakhonban Police The negotiation commenced on July 30 at Thonburi Palace, which was the residence of Prince Kromma Luang Wongsa. Montigny presented Walewski's treaty draft, which composed of twenty-two articles, to the Siamese commissioners. Montigny had learned from the accounts of Bowring Mission of 1855 that Somdet Ong Noi, who had been controlling Siam's trade duties, opposed the British notion of 'free trade' and any changes on the duties but Bowring managed to reduce Siam's import duties to three percent. Montigny noted that Somdet Ong Noi totally gave up his efforts to retain the old system and took virtually no parts in the negotiations. Only three commissioners; the Prince Wongsa, Kalahom Chuang Bunnag and Phrakhlang Kham Bunnag were active. Montigny observed that Chuang Bunnag, as the leader of the faction demanding to open the country to Western trades, held immense powers and even held sway over the king himself. Unlike the preceeding British and American envoys, Montigny the French envoy did not rush the Siamese commissioners to conclude treaty, for Montigny understood that slowness was the way of the Orient. Montigny contemplated that, if France were to bring Siam, Laos and Cambodia under French protectorate, France should have a clear policy, not to be hindered by the British. The negotiations, however, proceeded quickly as most of the treaty terms were exactly the same as the treaties Siam had concluded with Britain. Montigny essentially capitalized on the works of British envoys Bowring and Parkes in Siam. There were also new clauses introduced from the Sino–French Treaty of Whampoa (1844), which were not present in the Bowring Treaty; • The French in Siam needed to hire some Siamese as interpreters and boat-rowers. However, ordinary Siamese Phrai commoners had been subjected to periodic corvée service to the government. Article 6 of this treaty then stipulated that any Siamese in French employment in Siam were exempted from such corvée obligations. • Montigny proposed that French biologists and naturalists should be allowed to explore out of Siam's designated area around Bangkok to explore the inner hinterlands of Siam, Laos and Cambodia, which was granted in Article 7. • Montigny took Article 29 of the Whampoa Treaty, which stated that if a French ship was pillaged in Chinese waters, the Chinese authorities were bound to strive their best to arrest the perpetrator and retrieve the stolen properties or else responsible Chinese officials would be punished, to add to include any French subjects being robbed on land. Montigny cited the example of a British merchant named Hubertson, who had been robbed in China in 1845 and the Chinese authorities did not compensate for his losses. Article 10 stipulated that if any French subjects were robbed both on land and sea in Siamese territories, the Siamese government would be obliged to arrest the perpetrator and retrieve properties. However, failure to do such thing did not oblige the responsible Siamese to compensate nor to be punished. • Siam had checked British naval threat to Bangkok in Article 7 of Bowring Treaty, which stipulated that any British warships could only anchor at Paknam Samut Prakarm and could not go upstream to Bangkok without prior permission. If British warships were allowed upstream, they could not go beyond Pong Patchamit. Montigny asserted that French navy signified honor and prowess of the French nation and the passage of French navy should be unrestricted anywhere in the world. The Siamese commissioners bargained to allow only two French warships to go to Bangkok at one time, which Montigny rejected, allowing no restrictions of French navy. The result was a discrepancy between French and Thai language versions of the treaty, in which the French version stated that any French warships were allowed unrestricted access to Bangkok, while the Thai version stated that French warships were allowed to Bangkok only with prior permission. The Siamese commissioners accepted all the twenty-two articles of the treaty draft on 8 August 1856. On August 9, the Siamese commissioners added two articles, including stipulation that the treaty was to be made in French and Siamese languages, to the treaty, bringing the total number of articles to twenty-four. The commissioners proposed to make an English-language version of the treaty because the Siamese did not know French, which Montigny refused. As King Mongkut had sternly refused to write a letter to Vietnam, Montigny ended up writing the introduction letter by himself. Montigny assigned his letter to Captain Le Lieur, who departed with the Catinat from Siam on August 12 to bring the letter to Huế. Montigny chose the signing date of the treaty to be on August 15th, which was the Feast Day of Emperor Napoleon I, who was born on August 15th. The signing took place at the Thonburi Palace on 15 August 1856, during which the Siamese at Wichaiprasit Fort fired twenty-one salute cannon shots to celebrate, which was reciprocated by similar twenty-one cannon shots from the French warship Marceau nearby. The terms of this Franco–Siamese Treaty were similar to the earlier treaties Siam had concluded with Britain and the United States; • Establishment of French consulate in Bangkok and French extraterritorial jurisdiction over French subjects in Siam, in which French subjects accused of offenses would be judged by the French Consul according to French law rather than native Siamese law and judiciary. • Stipulation of a general low three-percent rate of import duty on Siam, while the export duties were stipulated individually for each commodities. • Permission of French subjects to reside and buy lands in Siam in the designated area further than four kilometers from Bangkok but not further than the distance of twenty-four-hour boat journey from Bangkok. • Freedom of Christian proselytization in Siam, abolishing the Siamese ban on evangelization on native people, which had been in place since 1731. After the signing of the treaty, the Siamese held a banquet for Montigny at his residence, during which the five Siamese commissioners dined with Montigny, Collier, Godeaux, Bishop Pallegoix, Larnaudie and the rest of the French missionaries. Montigny received a reproach from French Foreign Ministry for his delay in his diplomatic mission to Siam and Vietnam. King Mongkut also wrote a letter to notify King Ang Duong of imminent journey of Montigny to Cambodia, also sending a copy of the Franco–Siamese Montigny Treaty to Ang Duong; Journey of Montigny to Ayutthaya and Lopburi After conclusion of the Franco–Siamese Treaty, King Mongkut contemplated sending Siamese diplomatic mission to France in the same manner as in the seventeenth century, also considering sending mission to Britain. Charles Hillier the British Consul in Bangkok became alarmed at the news of prospective Siamese mission to France and abruptly went to see Mongkut, asking the Siamese king about the details of the mission; when would the mission depart, who would be the Siamese envoy, whether the mission would go to Britain or France first. Mongkut was angered by Hillier's discourteous visit and retired into his quarters without giving any answers to the British Consul. On 20 August 1856, Ernest-Napoléon Godeaux presented French imperial gifts to Mongkut at Sutthaisawan Throne Hall. The gifts included a bronze six-inch caliber cannon, four horse wagons, chandeliers, a folding screen depicting a map of Paris, a folding screen depicting French soldier costume, a chess folding screen, a chessboard, a stereoscope, a colt pistol and a singing bird box. Montigny himself gifted a horse to the Siamese king. Montigny found that the French gifts were inferior to those given to the Siamese king by the British on two occasions. On the same day, Mongkut invited Montigny and his family to go on a tour inside of the Siamese royal palace. Next day, on August 21, Mongkut discussed his plan of sending Siamese diplomatic mission to France, saying that Kosa Pan the Siamese envoy to France in 1686 was his ancestor. Mongkut asked Montigny how would the French escort the Siamese envoy to France. Montigny was shocked as he had not been briefed nor prepared for this question. Montigny could only offer warship Catinat to bring the Siamese envoys to France, proposing that the Catinat would deliver the Siamese to Suez, where the Egyptian Pasha would transport them to Alexandria, where any French warships in the Mediterranean would take them. Commodore Jules Collier, the naval commander of Montigny's warships, went to explore Ayutthaya on August 23, where he met Phra Samutmuni the Theravadin Buddhist abbot of Wat Mondop Temple in Ayutthaya and then Collier returned to Bangkok. Having received the reproach on his delay, Montigny was keen on leaving Siam for Cambodia and Vietnam as soon as possible, with Collier setting departure date to September 10th. Later, Montigny concluded that the Siamese intentionally delayed his departure in order for them to plan with Phraya Aphaiphubet Nong the Siam-appointed governor of Battambang about how to deal with Montigny's venture in Cambodia. On August 28, King Mongkut asked Montigny to visit Ayutthaya, which was about seventy kilometers upstream north of Bangkok, urging Montigny to meet Phra Samutmuni the Buddhist monk who had traveled to Singapore and Ceylon. Killing time until his departure, Montigny took his family on an excursion to the former royal capital of Siam. and his family went on an excursion to visit Ayutthaya and Lopburi, visiting King Narai's Palace and former residence of Constantine Phaulkon. Montigny, along with his family, Godeaux and Abbé Larnaudie, departed from Bangkok on August 30 on a small Siam-owned steamship, going upstream, reaching Ayutthaya on the same day. Montigny was informed that Ayutthaya had the population of 30,000, most of the inhabitants were Siamese or Chinese. Chaophraya Maha Siritham the governor of Ayutthaya (called Chao P'aya Kromma P'ahou by Montigny) and Phra Samutmuni came to greet Montigny. The Siamese took Montigny and his retinue to explore the ruins of Ayutthaya, visiting Wat Phukhaothong Temple and the elephant khedda, circumventing the city moat. On September 3, Maha Siritham the governor of Ayutthaya sent his son to bring Montigny's retinue to ride on elephant backs to visit Lopburi, which was about fifty kilometers to the northeast of Ayutthaya, visiting King Narai's Palace and former residence of Constantine Phaulkon. Montigny and his family stayed in Lopburi for three days and returned to Ayutthaya on September 6. Next day, on September, Montigny and his family attended a Catholic mass conducted by Larnaudie, who had been the abbot of Saint Joseph Church in Ayutthaya. Montigny wrote a letter to report to Mongkut about his travel to Ayutthaya and Lopburi. In this letter, Montigny addressed Mongkut as "King of Siam, Sovereign of Laos, Suzerain of Cambodia, etc" (French: S. M. le roi de Siam, souverain du Laos, suzerain du Cambodge, etc). Montigny and his family returned to Bangkok on the same day on September 7. When Montigny returned to Bangkok on September 7, he found that the Siamese had not finished preparing the royal letter and gifts for Emperor Napoleon III. As the departure was scheduled to be on September 10, Commodore Collier threatened that if Montigny did not depart on that day he was obliged to bring the Capricieuse to join Captain Le Lieur in Vietnam or join Rear Admiral Guérin in Macau. Montigny could do nothing but to plead Collier to stay. Montigny was thus stalled in Siam and did not manage to depart on September 10. On September 11, King Mongkut announced the Siamese gifts for the French Emperor and held another banquet for Montigny. To demonstrate his desire to leave Siam, Montigny and his family left the banquet early. Next day, on September 12, Montigny the French plenipotentiary appointed António Frederico Moor the Portuguese Consul in Bangkok, who had been in Siam for twelve years, as the acting French Consul in Siam. Even though France and Portugal used to compete for jurisdiction over Catholic Mission in the Far East, they cooperated as fellow Catholic nations. Montigny explained that there had been an agreement, in which French Consul would be responsible for Portuguese subjects and Portuguese Consul would be responsible for French subjects where either France or Portugal did not have representatives. Montigny's appointment of António Frederico Moor as acting French Consul in Bangkok displeased the Siamese, who had been expecting France to send a dignitary as Consul to Siam, like the British had done. France, however, was short of diplomatic personnel in the Far East and Montigny himself was soon to return to his consular position in Shanghai. The Siamese saw Moor's appointment as France not caring about Siam. Siamese proposals to Montigny about Phú Quốc Commodore Jules Collier set the new departure date to be on September 21 and continued to pressure Montigny about the delay of his departure from Siam. Collier argued that they had earlier scheduled to reach Danang on September 21, to which Montigny denied. Montigny deplored King Mongkut to hasten the procedures, to which the Prince Kromma Luang Wongsa replied that the Siamese could not finish before September 19. Prince Wongsathirat Sanit asked Collier to take nine Khmer men, who were said to have accompanied the Cambodian princes to Siam, on board the Capricieuse to return them to Cambodia. During the last week of Montigny's stay in Bangkok, Chaophraya Si Suriyawong Chuang Bunnag requested a confidential meeting with Montigny. In the meeting, Chuang Bunnag the Kalahom rolled out a map depicting the coasts of Gulf of Siam, Cambodia and Southern Vietnam. Chuang Bunnag pointed to the Phú Quốc Island on the map, which faces the Cambodian seaport town of Kampot, which was called Koh Dot Island by the Siamese. Chuang Bunnag told Montigny that the Phú Quốc or Koh Dot Island had beautiful pristine beaches with freshwater sources and arable land for cultivation. Chuang Bunnag had earlier visited the island himself when he led the Siamese navy to attack Hà Tiên during the Siamese–Vietnamese War in 1842. Chuang Bunnag proposed that France should take control of this island as the island situated perfectly on the trade route between China and India, its location very strategic. Chuang Bunnag suggested that France could make Phú Quốc into the French commercial entrepôt of the Far East. Listening to the Siamese Kalahom flattering on the Phú Quốc Island, Montigny assumed that France conquering Phú Quốc was the desire of the Siamese king Mongkut, who had told Montigny several times that he wished France to be a neighbor of Siam. Montigny replied to this bizarre Siamese proposal that he had not been empowered to receive any territorial concessions and could only relay to the French imperial government. Montigny asked Chuang Bunnag whether the Phú Quốc or Koh Dot Island belonged to Siam. Bunnag denied, saying that the island did not belong to Siam as it used to belong to Cambodia but the Vietnamese had taken possession of it. Montigny laughed at Bunnag's answer, asking why should the Siamese give an island that was not theirs to France. Montigny suggested that if Siam was so eager to have France as its neighbor, Siam should give one of its own islands to France. Chuang Bunnag briskly replied that if Siam had any islands so strategic as Koh Dot it would give to France but there were no other islands as valuable as Phú Quốc. Next day, Prince Wongsa and Phrakhlang Kham Bunnag also talked to Montigny about France taking control of Phú Quốc. It is not known why the Siamese wanted France to take control of Phú Quốc. Perhaps the Siamese intended to test whether France had territorial ambitions or Siam simply utilized France to reduce the influences of Vietnam in the region. Departing Ceremonies with King Mongkut, published on ''L'Illustration in 1857As Montigny bid farewell to the Siamese ministers, the grand ceremony of King Mongkut entrusting his letter to Montigny took place on 19 September 1856, The royal letter was written in Siamese language in Siamese alphabets engraved on a gold plate, accompanied by an English translation written by King Mongkut himself and another English letter written by Pinklao the Second King. The same riparian royal barges procession came to receive Montigny from his residence, who took the royal barge to the palace, where Montigny rode the sedan chair carried on shoulders of Siamese porters to enter. Montigny entered the Sutthaisawan Throne Hall. King Mongkut sat on the throne with Siamese dignitaries and officials prostrating on the floor. Mongkut took Montigny to Sihabanchon'' windowed balcony overlooking the courtyard. Mongkut then presented Siamese gifts for the French Emperor to Montigny including the golden royal letter enclosed in a gold-enameled case, a daguerreotype of Mongkut and his queen Debsirindra (taken by Larnaudie, who had also been a photographer), two rings for Emperor Napoleon and Empress Eugénie each, six golden inkwells and nibs, golden betel bowl set and pipe, a Siamese sword with golden hilt, a golden scissor and a Malay kris as Siamese officials knelt down to receive each of them. The Second King also sent gifts to the French Emperor. Montigny had requested exotic animals from Siam to display in France, to which Mongkut granted a male and a female elephants, a tapir, a gaur, a serow, a gibbon, a peacock, etc. These animals, however, could not be immediately transported to France and had to wait for another French ship to arrive to fetch them. Montigny also had Chaophraya Si Suriyawong Chuang Bunnag the Kalahom Siamese Minister of War write a letter to the French Minister of War Marshal of France Jean-Baptiste Philibert Vaillant. == French Bombardment of Danang (1856) ==
French Bombardment of Danang (1856)
Arrival of Le Lieur in Danang Apart from concluding a treaty with Siam, Count Colonna-Walewski the French Foreign Minister had also assigned Charles de Montigny the French plenipotentiary, who had been in Siam since July 1856, to conclude a commercial treaty with the Vietnamese Nguyen-dynasty imperial court in similar manner to Siam, Next day, on September 20, the two rejected letters of Montigny and Le Lieur were returned to Thuận An as the Vietnamese refused to take these letters. A Vietnamese official threw the letters into a small boat. Father Fontaine took Montigny's letter from the boat and laid it on the beach, where it was left as it was. Fontaine then boarded the Catinat and Le Lieur took them back to Danang on the same day. At Danang, the Vietnamese officials came to inform Le Lieur that, according to Vietnamese law, Western ships were not allowed to visit Vietnam under any pretext and ask Le Lieur whether he managed to deliver the letter at Huế, to which Le Lieur angrily replied that he had left the letter at the place and he would wait for six days for arrival of Montigny. If Vietnam did not response, the allied Western nations of France and Britain would attack Vietnam. Next day, on September 21 (the day of departure of Montigny from Siam), four young Vietnamese mandarins came to visit Le Lieur on the Catinat. Le Lieur told them with anger that Vietnam had earlier resisted French diplomatic advances, resulting in the bombardment of Danang in 1847 and, this time, the same thing was going to happen again. Le Lieur threatened to bombard Danang with his warship Catinat. Upon learning of the approach of French warship Catinat on Danang and Huế and threats of the French naval commander Le Lieur, the Vietnamese Emperor Tự Đức was reportedly furious, declaring that any Vietnamese officials who dare to receive the French diplomatic letter would be considered traitors and would be subjected to death penalties. Some Vietnamese officials petitioned the Emperor to accept French diplomatic gesture and conclude a treaty with France but Trương Đăng Quế (called "The old Long-koué" by the French) the Chief Minister of Vietnam insisted that Vietnam should adhere to isolationist policies and should enforce Christian persecutions even more. Trương Đăng Quế the Vietnamese Prime Minister, concurrently the Minister of War, commanded Trần Tri the Tổng đốc Nam Nghĩa governing Quảng Nam and Quảng Ngãi provinces to garrison more troops in Danang in defense against incoming French attack. Trần Tri was given order to strike first when the French warship came near. Le Lieur's bombardment of Danang On 24 September 1856, Abbé Fontaine came down from the Catinat to ask the Vietnamese at Danang whether the two letters of Montigny and Le Lieur had reached the Vietnamese Emperor and demanded the reply to those letters. The Vietnamese returned the two letters, which were untouched and unopened, to Fontaine. Captain Le Lieur considered the Vietnamese refusing to accept and open French diplomatic letters a serious breach of Western protocols and an insult to the French nation. Le Lieur then decided to go to war with Vietnam, without consulting his superior Collier, who was then heading to Chanthaburi in Eastern Siam, nor consulting the French government. Father Fontaine also urged Le Lieur that only military action could compel Vietnam to yield to French proposals. On 25 September 1856, capitaine de frégate Le Lieur brought French steam corvette Catinat to bombard and destroy three forts of the Sơn Trà peninsula in front of Danang bay including a small fort with three cannons, a medium fort with five cannons and a large fort. This was just a preliminary assault. Le Lieur noticed that the Vietnamese, in response to his attack on Sơn Trà, reinforced. Le Lieur also noticed two new Vietnamese mandarins, who were higher-ranking than those he had encountered. These were Tôn Thất Dũng and Phạm Thuật, who were responsible for the defense of Sơn Trà. Contemplating more French attacks, the Vietnamese in Danang were busy taking their defensive positions. Le Lieur observed intensive mobilization in Danang and on the Hàn River. Le Lieur decided that he should attack first in an pre-emptive strike before the Vietnamese could establish a strong defensive ground against him. On 26 September 1856, Le Lieur had lunch with his French marine soldiers on the Catinat and then proceeded to attack Danang. The Catinat entered the Hàn River and the Danang citadel responded with cannon fires. This French attack on Danang was different from the previous occasions, when the French remained in their warship but this time the French also made an amphibious landing. Le Lieur sent fifty-three French marines under Bouet to land on Danang, destroying Vietnamese forts and cannons. According to French source, the Vietnamese in those forts simply retreated. Facing superior French military technology, the Vietnamese in Danang shifted to guerilla warfare. Vietnamese gunmen rushed to hide themselves in rocks and bushes to fire their rifles on the French. Le Lieur called this tactic "War of Rocks and Bushes" (Guerre de rochers et de buissons). The Catinat fired cannons on the Vietnamese ambushing gunmen, inflicting heavy casaulties on the Vietnamese. The main Danang fort also intensely fired successive shots on the Catinat. As the battle became intense, Le Lieur decided to retreat as he could not deal with these Vietnamese guerilla tactics, recalling all the French marines on the Vietnamese soil back on the Catinat. Retreat of the Catinat from Hàn River was not a genuine victory for the Vietnamese, however. Le Lieur brought the Catinat to attack the Sơn Trà Forts. There were three hundred Vietnamese defenders in Sơn Trà. Bouet bombarded the main Sơn Trà Fort with a mountain howitzer, destroying the gate as the French seized and occupied Sơn Trà. The French captured forty Vietnamese soldiers in Sơn Trà, while the rest fled into the Sơn Trà Mountain. Le Lieur send French infantry to gun down the Vietnamese retreating into Danang, inflicting more casualties. At the end of the battle, the French had destroyed sixty Vietnamese bronze cannons and neutralized a large amount of Vietnamese gunpower by pouring water on them. A large portion of Vietnamese fortifications in Danang and Sơn Trà were also crumbled. Through the battle, not a single French solider died. It turned out that violence softened the Vietnamese, who became open for negotiations. Next day, on September 27, Trần Tri the Prefect of the Province came to meet Le Lieur on the Catinat at Sơn Trà, telling Le Lieur that the Vietnamese imperial court would make peace and send four delegates to conclude the treaty. Le Lieur was unsure whether his attack on Danang was legitimate as he had not sought approval from his superiors beforehand. Le Lieur told the Vietnamese official that his name was Lê Liệu and refused to negotiate, saying that he had no authority and they should wait for the arrival of Montigny the true French plenipotentiary, who should arrive anytime soon. For the Vietnamese damages inflicted during the battle, the French might compensate after conclusion of the treaty. Trần Tri then opened the letters of Montigny and Le Lieur and sent them to Huế imperial court. The Vietnamese Emperor Tự Đức was enraged at the Vietnamese losses and casualties, wondering how could one single French warship inflict such damages. Refusing to believe in Western military superiority, Tự Đức put the blame on local officials and defenders. Trần Tri, whom Tự Đức accused of being idle and doing nothing during the French attack, was stripped of his position as Tổng đốc Nam Nghĩa and was put on a judiciary trial of Minister of Justice for his incompetence and negligence. Tôn Thất Dũng and Phạm Thuật, the defenders of Sơn Trà, also suffered similar punishments. Trần Hoằng replaced Trần Tri as the new Tổng đốc Nam Nghĩa. Tự Đức also sent Đào Trí to bring forces from Huế to guard the Trấn Hải or Thuận An Forts at the mouth of the Perfume River leading to Huế. == Montigny Mission in Cambodia ==
Montigny Mission in Cambodia
Journey of Montigny from Bangkok to Kampot Apart from diplomatic missions in Siam and Vietnam, Count Walewski the French Foreign Minister had also assigned Charles de Montigny to go to Cambodia. Earlier, in 1853, King Harireak Reamea Ang Duong of Cambodia contacted Frédéric Gauthier the French Consul at Singapore, through Bishop Jean-Claude Miche the Apostolic Vicar of Cambodia, in efforts to establish Franco–Cambodian relations. King Ang Duong had sent Cambodian products including ivory, rhinoceros horns, gambodge, sugar and pepper to Singapore, On September 29, Montigny rode a sedan chair to visit Abbé Ranfaing at the Church of Immaculate Conception, which was, by that time, still a wooden building with thatched roof. Montigny and the Marceau joined Collier and the Capricieuse at the Chinese ethnic town of Prey Srok, entering the Prek Thom River. At Prey Srok, Bishop Jean-Claude Miche the Apostolic Vicar of Cambodia, who had been waiting for Montigny in Kampot for many months, came on board the Marceau to greet Montigny. Bishop Miche told Montigny that the Cambodian king Ang Duong had entrusted him to receive Montigny in Kampot and the king would soon travel from his capital Oudong to meet Montigny. Due to Montigny's persisting delay in his diplomatic mission to Vietnam, Commodore Collier decided to leave with Godeaux on the Capricieuse to Vietnam as the strong northeastern monsoon winds during the last months of the year would render naval journey from Cambodia to Vietnam difficult. Montigny and the Marceau would stay in Cambodia until Montigny's Cambodian businesses were finished. Collier warned Montigny not to spend too much time in Cambodia and should hurry to Vietnam. A French missionary named Lafitte took Montigny and his family on small vessels to go upstream the Prek Kampot River (now called Preaek Teuk Chhou River) to reach the Cambodian town of Kampong Bay, the administrative headquarter of Kampot. Bishop Miche assigned Montigny and his family to reside in the abandoned storehouse that used to belong to Evans, a British–Malay mixed merchant from Singapore, the house that Montigny also shared with Bishop Miche and Miche's assistant Father Arsène Hestrest. As soon as Montigny took residence in this storehouse, Bishop Jean-Claude Miche came to tell Montigny that among the nine Cambodian men Collier had taken from Bangkok was a Siamese official who came to spy on Montigny's venture in Cambodia. This Siamese official had been threatening the Khmer officials in Kampot and had come to ask Miche about the reason why Montigny the French plenipotentiary came to Cambodia. Bishop Miche warned Montigny that presence of this Siamese official would jeopardize Montigny's diplomatic mission in Cambodia. King Ang Duong would not dare to meet Montigny because the King of Cambodia would tremble in fear just by hearing the name of the King of Siam. Montigny summoned that Siamese official to meet him at his residence. Montigny immediately remembered this Siamese official as being present during Montigny's earlier audience with the three Cambodian princes in Bangkok arranged by Prince Wongsa. Montigny reached his own conclusion that this Siamese was sent by Prince Wongsa under the command of the Siamese king Mongkut. Montigny interrogated this Siamese spy why did a Siamese subject deceptively pose himself as a Cambodian to board the French warship Capricieuse to Cambodia, to which the Siamese official replied that he just went a leisure trip to Cambodia. Montigny noticed that the Siamese official stood to speak to him with defiance, in contrast to other Cambodian officials in the room who were prostrating on the floor. Montigny then commanded the official to lower down like the rest of the Cambodians or else Montigny would treat him as a deserter and would take due actions. Facing Montigny's threat, the Siamese official backed down and eventually confessed that he had been sent by the Prince Kromma Luang Wongsa to board on the French warships. Montigny objected that Prince Wongsa had never taken any initiatives and this should be the original idea of the Siamese king Mongkut. Montigny then became angry at Mongkut, saying that he had never concealed his diplomatic mission to Cambodia and had informed the Siamese king many times. Siam's clandestine attempt to place a spy at Montigny's side was a grave insult to the French imperial plenipotentiary and could affect Franco–Siamese relations that had just been renewed. Montigny gave an ultimatum to the Siamese spy official to leave Kampot within twenty-four hours or else Montigny would force him onto the Capricieuse, which Collier would take to Vietnam, where the Siamese official was certain to be executed by the Vietnamese. That Siamese official was then obliged to leave Kampot per Montigny's threat to join the other two Siamese officials in Oudong. This episode of Montigny expelling the Siamese spy from Kampot on 5 October 1856 was recounted many times in the French historiography of Cambodia. Jean Moura, the French representative in Cambodia in the 1870s and author of Le royaume du Cambodge (1883), criticized Montigny's action, saying that Montigny was too consumed by his anger and should instead inflict a calculated punishment by imprisoning the Siamese spy on the French warship. Charles Meyniard, in his Le Second Empire an Indo-Chine (1891), defended Montigny, saying that any explicit punishments on the Siamese spy official would break down the renewed Franco–Siamese relations, something Montigny did not desire and was of no use because the Cambodian king would be influenced by Siam anyway. Franco–Siamese relations in the 1850s were mostly cordial, in contrast to Moura's time of the 1870s, when the Franco–Siamese relations went downhill over Cambodia. Commodore Collier took Ernest-Napoléon Godeaux on the Capricieuse to leave Prey Srok, Kampot, on 7 October 1856, leaving for Vietnam to join Captain Le Lieur and the Catinat. Next day, on October 8, the Arrow Incident happened in Canton, where Chinese authorities seized the Chinese lorcha Arrow hoisting British flag in suspicion of piracy and arrested its Chinese crew. The Chinese put down the British flag from Arrow, a great offense in Western diplomacy. The British had been contemplating an opportunity to revise the Nanking Treaty (1842). This Arrow Incident became the perfect casus belli for the British. Harry Parkes the British Consul at Canton and Sir John Bowring the Governor of Hong Kong, both former envoys to Siam, exaggerated the incident to become a full war. Efforts of Bowring and Parkes to capitalize on the incident led to the Second Opium War. The French and the Americans in China were reluctant to follow the British urge for them to join, considering the British intervention rather unjustified. Montigny's refusal to go to Oudong Montigny arrived in Cambodia with confidence, flattered by his success in Siam. Even though Count Walewski had assigned Montigny only to tell the King of Cambodia that his gifts had been lost, Bishop Jean-Claude Miche the Apostolic Vicar of Cambodia urged that Montigny should also procure Christian freedom and security from King Ang Duong. Montigny was then poised to conclude a commercial and religious treaty with Cambodia, in similar manner that he had concluded with Siam and was going to conclude with Vietnam. Montigny recognized Siam's suzerainty over Cambodia but somehow understood that Cambodia could independently seek relations with France without Siamese approval. On 6 October 1856, the day after Montigny's expulsion of the Siamese spy, Oknha Sena Anchit the Cambodian governor of Kampot came to see Montigny, who assumed that the governor would not dare to meet Montigny if the Siamese official had not been rid of. Oknha Sena Anchit told Montigny and Bishop Miche that King Ang Duong would take journey from his capital Oudong to arrive in Kampot in ten or twelve days to meet Montigny. Montigny and Bishop Miche waited for the arrival of the Cambodian king Ang Duong in Kampot for six days, during which Oknha Sena Anchit and Father Lafitte took Montigny, his wife Madame de Montigny and his family to explore the vicinity of Kampot. King Ang Duong was going to depart from his royal capital Oudong when the two Siamese officials from the Capricieuse arrived just in time to bring Mongkut's letter to Ang Duong. Ang Duong had to return to his palace to receive the letter from King Mongkut. According to French account, the Siamese official sat on a chair, while King Ang Duong of Cambodia prostrated on the floor to receive the letter of the Siamese king. Mongkut had approved that Ang Duong could make a treaty with France if the treaty terms were appropriate, having sent a copy of the Franco–Siamese Montigny Treaty to Ang Duong. Ang Duong could also seek assistance from Phra Ratchathani the Siamese official who delivered Mongkut's letter to Ang Duong. Also in the letter, Mongkut knew about Ang Duong's earlier secret endeavor with France in 1853. After reading Mongkut's letter, Ang Duong somehow decided not to go to meet Montigny in Kampot. On 12 October 1856, a shocking news arrived for Montigny as a letter from Ang Duong to Bishop Miche said that the king was going to embark on his journey but suddenly fell ill with boils so the king was unable to arrive in Kampot and thus invited Montigny to go to Oudong instead. Ang Duong also sent his officials and two hundred elephants to fetch Montigny's retinue and assigned Bishop Miche to arrange for journey of the French plenipotentiary to Oudong. In the letter, Ang Duong related that he had earlier built a road in 1851 connecting Oudong to Kampot, which had been the only available seaport for Cambodia as the Vietnamese had taken control of the Mekong Delta. The journey from Kampot to Oudong took about 200 kilometers but journey on elephant backs took only eight days. Later account of Bishop Miche stated that Ang Duong was not ill but was instead prevented by the Siamese from coming to Kampot. In Thai historiography, however, the Siamese king Mongkut did not oppose Cambodia signing a 'commercial' treaty with France, even encouraging Ang Duong to consider as the Siamese king had sent a copy of Montigny's Siamese Treaty to the Cambodian king beforehand. Both Montigny and Bishop Miche were shocked at this unfortunate turn of event. The French had been planning for Ang Duong to meet Montigny in Kampot. Montigny did not have any prospects of going to Oudong as he had already been late on his mission to Vietnam, which was his main objective and he was supposed to spend little time in Cambodia. Montigny also remembered the words of Siamese king Mongkut, who had told Montigny that the journey from Kampot to Oudong was an arduous one. Montigny then decided to turn down Ang Duong's invitation for him to go to Oudong. On 14 October 1856, fifteen Cambodian ministers and officials including Chauvea Tolaha Keo the Prime Minister, Oknha Chakrey Meas the Minister of War, Oknha Kralahom Keo the Minister of Navy, Oknha Essorea Akkharea Prak the royal secretary, etc., arrived in Kampot with two hundred elephants to fetch Montigny and his family to Oudong, even though Montigny had declined travelling. Next day, on October 15, the ministers presented Ang Duong's letter to Bishop Miche, appointing Miche as the Cambodian plenipotentiary to conclude a treaty with France and promising to endorse any treaties the bishop was to make in case Montigny would not go to Oudong. Montigny said to the Cambodian ministers that, if Cambodia was to procure an amicable relation with France, Cambodia should ensure freedom and protection of the missonaries. Montigny also warned Oknha Kralahom the son-in-law of Ang Duong, whom Montigny was told about of being hostile towards the missionaries, that any negative intentions towards the missionaries would result in fatal consequences. The Cambodian ministers then presented the gifts from Ang Duong, silk fabric and ivory, to Montigny. Montigny's Cambodian Treaty draft As Bishop Jean-Claude Miche was empowered as the Cambodia plenipotentiary, Montigny and Miche worked together to produce a treaty draft, the Commercial and Religious Convention (French: Convention Commerciale et Religieuse), consisting of fourteen articles, which was signed by Montigny on 18 October 1856. The treaty terms were mostly similar to the preceeding Franco–Siamese Treaty earlier concluded by Montigny in August 1856 but shorter and less-detailed. The treaty terms included; • Most Favored Nation clause; if Cambodia granted any rights privileges to any other nations, France would also be accorded the same. • French subjects were entitled to travel to anywhere and reside in anywhere in Cambodia. • French merchants were to trade freely in Cambodia without subjecting to any restrictions nor monopolies, except for opium duty, which had been the income of the Cambodian court. • French imported commodities would only be subjected to a low three-percent import duty ad valorem (exactly the same as in the Siamese Treaties), which would be levied only once. • Any French vessels, including warships, were at total freedom to visit and anchor at any of the Cambodian seaports. The King of Cambodia would also treat and protect French ships as his own vessels. • The French Emperor might appoint a Consul to Cambodia. The French Consul would reserve his right to hoist the French flag and would be accorded similar privileges as the Consuls of other nations. • The Cambodian government would support French scientists and naturalists in their venture to study Cambodian geography and wildlife in Cambodian hinterlands. • If any French merchants or French ships were robbed in Cambodia, both on land and at sea, the Cambodian government was obliged to arrest the perpetrator and retrieve the stolen goods. However, failure to do so did not accord compensation. • If a French subject died in Cambodia, the Cambodian government would arrange for the wealth of the dead to be inherited by the rightful heirs. • Christian missionaries were free to go to anywhere to preach Gospel anywhere in Cambodia without any restrictions. • Roman Catholicism became another 'state religion' (religions de L'État) of Cambodia apart from Theravada Buddhism. This article was probably requested by Bishop Miche. Cambodian Christians would not be forced to attend Buddhist ceremonies and the Cambodians could convert to Christianity without any restrictions. • France could export teak logs from Cambodia, subjected to a ten-percent export duty ad valorem. • This treaty was made in four copies, each two in Khmer and French languages. • This treaty would come into effect only at the ratification by the French government. The terms of this Franco–Cambodian Treaty draft, put forward by the two French Montigny and Miche, were rather one-sided agreements, without any involvements of the native Cambodians and did not address protection of Cambodia's independence from the powerful suzerains; Siam and Vietnam. Issue of Phú Quốc Island Apart from the treaty draft with fourteen articles, Montigny also produced the supplementary treaty annex, in which King Ang Duong of Cambodia would cede the Phú Quốc Island, known in Khmer as Koh Tral and in Siamese as Koh Dot, to France. The Annex was also signed by Montigny on 18 October 1856. Earlier, in efforts to borrow French hands to counter Vietnamese influences, the Siamese ministers including Kalahom Chuang Bunnag, Phrakhlang Kham Bunnag and the Prince Wongsathirat Sanit all persuaded Montigny that France should take possession of Phú Quốc Island for its natural resources and strategic position, allegedly inhabited by a few Vietnamese fishermen. Montigny claimed that Bishop Jean-Claude Miche had told Montigny that Ang Duong himself wanted to give Koh Tral to France. Bishop Miche, however, refuted saying such thing. Though not empowered nor assigned to receive any territorial concessions, Montigny thought that he should not let this opportunity of French territorial acquisition pass without consideration, citing a number of reasons; • The location of Phú Quốc was strategic, situating in the middle of the Indochinese region on the trade route between China and India. France could utilize Phú Quốc as her commercial and naval base. • France taking control of Phú Quốc would also prevent other competing Western nations to do the same. to draft a treaty in October 1856 for Cambodia to cede Phú Quốc or Koh Tral, which had been under control of Nguyen dynasty, to France. King Ang Duong of Cambodia eventually rejected this treaty. Cambodia ceding Phú Quốc or Koh Tral to France in 1856 was irrelevant because the island had been under Vietnamese control. Neither Cambodia nor Siam had actual control over the island. The Siamese convinced Montigny that Cambodia could cede Phú Quốc to France, even though the island had been under Vietnamese control. In this treaty annex, the King of Cambodia peacefully cede the island to France; French acquisition of Koh Tral or Phú Quoc would earn Cambodia a French protection against Vietnamese incursions and would also satisfy the Siamese goal by putting the French to shield Siam against Vietnam; Montigny convincing Ang Duong to accept the treaty As Montigny did not personally go to present his treaty draft to King Ang Duong at Oudong due to his hurry to embark on his journey to Vietnam, he had to send someone to deliver it. Montigny also wrote an apology letter to Ang Duong. In the letter, Montigny expressed his sympathy for Cambodia enduring the Vietnamese taking away its lands, depriving Cambodia of its commercial potential to export products. Montigny, however, did not consider Siam being oppressive on Cambodia because Montigny had recognized Siam as the rightful suzerain over Cambodia. Montigny could only relay the Phú Quốc Island cession proposal to the French government. In his 'apology' letter, Montigny urged King Ang Duong of Cambodia to accept and sign his treaty draft, which would cement Franco–Cambodian relations. Montigny reminded Ang Duong that all the Siamese ministers, the King of Siam and Ang Duong himself had been desiring to give the island to France. As Montigny required Bishop Jean-Claude Miche to follow him to Vietnam as interpreter, he assigned Miche's assistant the 26-year-old French MEP priest Arsène Hestrest to bring three documents; Montigny's fourteen-article Franco–Cambodian Treaty draft, the Treaty Annex ceding Phú Quốc from Cambodia to France and Montigny's apology letter, all of them to Ang Duong at Oudong. Montigny was overconfident that the Cambodian king would accept his treaty draft without hassle. The young priest Hestrest had not been well-versed in Khmer language and culture and had just arrived in 1854, two years prior. In order to ensure that King Ang Duong would accept his treaty draft, Montigny gave six points for Father Hestrest to relay to Ang Duong in Oudong; • Ang Duong's acceptance of the treaty would indicate his goodwill to the French Emperor, securing the Franco–Cambodian relations. • If Ang Duong refused to accept the treaty, he would be compelled to sign this kind of treaty with France or other nations anyway, unless Cambodia wanted to adopt anti-Western sentiment in the same manner as Vietnam. • Ang Duong could independently sign this treaty without Siamese consent, despite his status of being a vassal of Siam, "the most suspicious overlord". Montigny asserted that he had already explained to the Siamese king Mongkut that Cambodia signing a treaty with France would also benefit Siam because French influence would protect both Cambodia and Siam from Vietnamese aggressions. When this Franco–Cambodian Treaty, which was essentially the same as the Franco–Siamese Treaty Montigny had earlier concluded, was signed, Montigny would also sent a copy of this treaty to Mongkut with explanations. • Montigny was upset by Ang Duong's refusal to come to meet Montigny in Kampot. Ang Duong's excuse of illness was not satisfactory. If Ang Duong did not provide a clear explanation, Montigny would assume that the Cambodian king had deliberately avoided meeting him. • Montigny preferred to negotiate with the native Cambodian ministers Ang Duong had sent to him but they were not friendly. Montigny complained that the Oknha Kralahom was particularly hostile to him. Montigny suspected that, unless they had been under foreign ("Siamese") influences, it was the King of Cambodia himself who did not want to establish relations with France. • If Ang Duong did not accept this treaty, Montigny would give a "very unfavorable account" of Cambodia to Paris and would consider Ang Duong a mere provincial governor under Siam. Montigny also suggested, through Hestrest, that Ang Duong, like Mongkut, should also send Cambodian exotic animals to him for display in France. Montigny, in turn, sent his own gifts, including weapons and tableware, to Ang Duong at Oudong. Hestrest departed with the Cambodian officials, led by Chauvea Tolaha Keo the Cambodian Prime Minister, from Kampot to Oudong, with Montigny's treaty draft and letter. After finishing his businesses in Cambodia, Montigny, his family and Bishop hurriedly board on the Marceau to embark on their next journey to Vietnam. The Montigny Mission left Prey Srok in Kampot on 22 October 1856, having spent time in Cambodia for the total of 17 days, with Montigny not ever meeting the Cambodian King Ang Duong. == Interlude ==
Interlude
Arrival of Collier in Danang When Charles de Montigny the French imperial plenipotentiary had been in Bangkok, he dispatched captaine de frégate Le Lieur to take the French corvette Catinat to bring his introduction letter to the Vietnamese imperial court at Huế. Le Lieur and the Catinat departed from Siam in August 1856 and reached Danang in September. The Vietnamese, however, refused to accept Montigny's letter and Le Lieur saw this refusal as the insult to the prestige of French nation. Upon reaching Danang, Bishop Pellerin disguised himself as French sailor, managing to slip onto the Capricieuse to take refuge under Commodore Collier. Collier and Le Lieur, the Capricieuse and the Catinat, waited for Montigny in Danang. Collier speculated that, due to the strong northwestern monsoon, Montigny and the Marceau might have to take the circumventing route by going to Singapore, Borneo and then to Manila in order to reach Danang in Vietnam. Collier sent Le Lieur and the Catinat to search for Montigny and the Marceau at Manila several times but did not find them. Trần Hoằng the Governor of Quảng Nam reported to Emperor Tự Đức that there were two French warships at Danang, with one anchoring still and another going back and forth, arriving and leaving. As Montigny had not arrived yet, the shock from French attack died down and the Vietnamese began to be bold and hostile again. Eventually, Rear Admiral Guérin the French naval commander at Macau recalled the Catinat, whose presence in Vietnam was of no use. Le Lieur was then obliged to take the Catinat to leave Danang to return to Macau, leaving the Montigny Mission for good, leaving Collier and the Capricieuse in Danang waiting for Montigny. Lieutenant De la Motte took Montigny and the Marceau from Singapore to go through storms and monsoons. The small steam corvette Marceau was leaky through the journey, requiring repairs at British Labuan in Borneo and Spanish Manila in the Philippines, further delaying Montigny's journey to Vietnam. Ang Duong's rejection of Montigny's Treaty Montigny had assigned the 26-year-old French missionary Arsène Hestrest, assistant to Bishop Jean-Claude Miche, to bring Montigny's fourteen-article Franco–Cambodian Treaty draft, the Treaty ceding Phú Quốc Island or Koh Tral from Cambodia to France and Montigny's apology letter to King Ang Duong of Cambodia at Oudong. For Hestrest did not know Khmer language well, Bishop Miche assigned the 34-year-old Louis Aussoleil, another French missionary, to accompany Hestrest for translation. The Cambodian ministers led the two French priests Hestrest and Aussoleil to ride on elephant backs from Kampot to Oudong, reaching Oudong in early November 1856. However, they had to wait for some time. In November 1856, when Hestrest was in Oudong, according to Thai records, the Vietnamese governor at Châu Đốc (Tổng đốc An Hà Cao Hữu Phùng) sent a delegate to Oudong to remind Ang Duong that tributes were due next year. Even before the audience, Ang Duong knew beforehand that there would be a treaty term about Cambodia ceding Koh Tral or Phú Quốc to France. Ang Duong decided to send a delegate to inform the Vietnamese governor at Châu Đốc that France wanted Cambodia to give Phú Quốc to France but Ang Duong, on behalf of Vietnam, had rejected this proposal. This news caused a great alarm among Southern Vietnamese mandarins, leading to intensive military preparations including the clearing of Vĩnh Tế Canal to facilitate movement of Vietnamese troops from Châu Đốc to Hà Tiên. The Emperor of Vietnam allegedly commanded that Southern Vietnamese governors should resist the speculated French entry, on the pain of death upon failure. On November 22, the Châu Đốc governor sent a letter to Ang Duong, asking an ominous question whether Ang Duong was still grateful to the Vietnamese Emperor. Hestrest and Aussoleil were granted an audience with the Cambodian king Ang Duong to present Montigny's documents on 24 November 1856. The two Siamese officials from the Capricieuse were also present. Phraya Aphaiphubet Nong the Siam-appointed governor of Battambang sent his son Luang Aphaiphitak (called Luong P'ay by the French, This Luang Aphaiphitak would become Chaophraya Kathathon the governor of Battambang upon the death of his father in 1860.) to attend this meeting. Hestrest found the audience to be crowded with Khmer and some Siamese officials. Hestrest also remembered the two Siamese officials from the Capricieuse. Hestrest suggested to Ang Duong the audience should be discreet but Ang Duong insisted that he had no secrets to hide from the Siamese. King Harireak Reamea Ang Duong of Cambodia, in the audience, acted in a very angry emotion at Montigny's refusal to come to have an actual audience with him in Oudong. Montigny instead sent two young French missionaries to deliver such treaty drafts. Ang Duong asked Hestrest why did the French plenipotentiary not come to see him; "''What reason could have motivated Monsieur de Montigny's refusal to come to Oudong to discuss these very points with me in person? Is he unaware that its not the king's place to seek out an inferior? Since he did not come, is it because he did not wish to deal with me as a friend?, because he wished to deceive me? I will never consent to enter into business with him.''" Hestrest deplored Ang Duong to consider the treaty terms but the Cambodian king simply brushed them off. Hestrest presented Montigny's letter to Ang Duong, who simply took it to his interpreter to open and translate without care. The French missionaries were shocked at Ang Duong's hostile gesture towards the treaty. Hestrest presented Montigny's gift of a magnificent rifle to Ang Duong, who did not take interest in it. Ang Duong did not even listen to Hestrest's explanation of each articles of the treaty. Hestrest then relayed Montigny's six points to Ang Duong, saying that if Ang Duong did not accept this treaty, it would be detrimental to Cambodia and France would consider Cambodia a mere vassal of Siam. Hestrest explained the reason Montigny did not visit Ang Duong was that because Ang Duong himself had earlier promised to go to Kampot but somehow the Cambodian king changed his mind, not upholding his promise but instead sent his ministers, who had not been empowered to negotiate, to Montigny. Hestrest said that Montigny had been in great urgency to go to Vietnam so he did not come to see Ang Duong in person. About the issue of Cambodia ceding Phú Quốc or Koh Tral to France, Ang Duong denied saying anything about ceding the island that had not been controlled by him. Phú Quốc had been under Vietnamese control, not under Cambodian control. Giving Vietnam's Phú Quốc to France was an act of war. Hestrest attempted to convince Ang Duong that agreeing to these Montigny's proposals would benefit both Cambodia and Siam but Ang Duong would not listen. Hestrest told Ang Duong that the issue of ceding Koh Tral to France had already been discussed by Montigny with the Siamese government and Ang Duong should follow the Siamese. Ang Duong replied "The King of Siam acts as he sees fit. For my part, I act in my own way, and nothing obliges me to conform my actions to those of the King of Siam." After the audience, Luang Aphaiphitak from Battambang commanded that Montigny's treaty draft and letter given to him to Battambang. As Ang Duong refused to accept any of Montigny's terms, Hestrest concluded that the two Siamese officials from the Capricieuse and the Battambang delegate had threatened the Cambodian king not to accept the French treaty proposal. Ang Duong, in fact, refused to sign a treaty that guaranteed him nothing but instead exposed his earlier secret endeavor with France to the Siamese. Moreover, even though Ang Duong had closer ties with Siam, Vietnam was still feared. Ang Duong was, at least diplomatically, a vassal of Vietnam as Cambodia's triennial tributes to Vietnam at Châu Đốc served to prevent Vietnamese aggression. Ang Duong's letter to Emperor Napoleon III As King Harireak Reamea Ang Duong of Cambodia had rejected Montigny's treaty proposal during the audience of 24 November 1856, next day, on November 25, Ang Duong produced two letters and gave to Hestrest, one for Montigny the French plenipotentiary and the other one for the French Emperor Napoleon III. In his letter to Montigny, Ang Duong related his reason of rejection of Montigny's treaty draft, saying that the treaty terms were of impact and importance and Montigny had not come to discuss these terms with Ang Duong himself. Moreover, Ang Duong had to consult the King of Siam before signing any treaties. In his letter to Napoleon III, Ang Duong began with expressing his wish to establish relations with the French Emperor, narrating his earlier gesture in 1853 when Bishop Jean-Claude Miche, on behalf of Ang Duong, sent a letter and gifts to Gauthier the French Consul at Singapore in order for them to be forwarded to the French government; Then, Ang Duong recounted, in his own version, the adventure of Nguyễn Phúc Ánh who allegedly sought help from Ang Duong's father King Ang Eng (In fact, it was Chaophraya Aphaiphubet who helped Nguyễn Ánh, while Ang Eng stayed in Bangkok.). When Nguyễn Phúc Ánh ascended the throne as Emperor Gia Long, founding the Nguyen dynasty, according to Ang Duong, Gia Long asked for Trapeang (Trà Vinh), which Ang Eng granted and Vietnam did not return it since then; Ang Duong narrated how Emperor Minh Mạng had oppressed Cambodia and Siam came to rescue. This was the Thai version of history of the Siamese–Vietnamese War. When King Ang Chan died in 1835 without a male heir, the Vietnamese took Ang Duong's mother Neak Neang Ros and Ang Duong's daughters to be detained in Saigon. Moreover, the Vietnamese had executed the pro-Thai Cambodian Princess Ang Baen. Then, the Cambodians arose against Vietnamese rule in 1840 and asked for Ang Duong as their king. King Nangklao of Siam sent Chaophraya Bodindecha to help the Khmers drive out the Vietnamese. Eventually, Vietnam accepted Ang Duong as King of Cambodia and Vietnam allegedly promised to return the lands taken from Cambodia; In the letter, Ang Duong informed Napoleon the names of the provinces that Vietnam had taken from Cambodia. If Vietnam ceded these provinces to France, Ang Duong deplored France not to take these dominions because they were supposedly parts of Cambodia; Mongkut's letter to Montigny In July 1856, King Mongkut of Siam had the Cambodian prince Ang Voddey (future King Norodom), eldest son of Ang Duong, who had been staying in Bangkok as political hostage since 1848, ordained as a Buddhist monk per coming-of-age tradition. Mongkut then sent Prince Ang Voddey, in monk robes, on a Siamese sailing ship to visit his father Ang Duong in Cambodia. Ang Voddey arrived in Kampot in December 1856, where he continued his journey to Oudong and stayed with his father Ang Duong for a month. On 13 January 1857, Queen Debsirindra, consort of King Mongkut, bore a prince (Prince Chaturonrasmi). King Mongkut received report that Montigny had sent a letter and gifts to King Ang Duong at Oudong and Mongtigny had left Kampot for Singapore. Mongkut also learned that Montigny's preceeding warship (Le Lieur of the Catinat) had attacked Turong (Danang) and the Vietnamese at P'uddhymart (Hà Tiên) and Chodok (Châu Đốc) in Southern Vietnam had been assembling forces in anticipation of a French attack. Phra Ratchathani, called "Mi Muang Thip raj dhany", the Siamese official earlier sent by Siam to bring Mongkut's letter to Ang Duong at Oudong, who had also been present during Hestrest's presentation of Montigny treaty draft in November 1856, returned to Bangkok to present Montigny's treaty draft and Montigny's letter to Ang Duong to the Siamese king Mongkut on January 25. This was when King Mongkut learned of the outcome of Montigny's mission in Cambodia. King Mongkut wrote a letter on 25 January 1857 to Montigny to verify these news he had received with Montigny himself. In the letter, Mongkut informed Montigny that his queen had given birth to a prince and that Charles Hillier the first-ever British Consul in Siam had died from dysentery in Bangkok in October 1856. Mongkut also told Montigny about sending the eldest son of the Cambodian king to visit his father in Oudong. Lastly, in the letter, Mongkut stated that there were rumors among the Lao people that Vietnam was a greater nation than China and Siam because no Western nations had ever managed to force Vietnam to conclude any treaties; Prince Ang Voddey, after staying with his father King Ang Duong in Oudong for about a month, returned to Bangkok in early February 1857, accompanied by some Khmer officials. During an audience, King Mongkut asked Ang Voddey and the Cambodians why did Ang Duong not accept Montigny's treaty, to which Ang Voddey and the Khmers replied that King Ang Duong of Cambodia did not accept Montigny's treaty because Montigny had unilaterally drafted the treaty without consulting the Khmers. Moreover, Cambodia had been a "small country" paying tributes to both Siam and Vietnam. Knowing that Montigny was going to negotiate treaty with Vietnam, Ang Duong decided to wait and see Vietnam's reaction on Montigny. Accepting Montigny's treaty without Vietnamese approval might incur Vietnamese wrath or even invasion; == Montigny Mission in Vietnam ==
Montigny Mission in Vietnam
Montigny's arrival in Danang In January 1857, Évariste Régis Huc the French Lazarist missionary, who was known for his Tibet Mission, presented a note On January 29, five Vietnamese plenipotentiaries arrived in Danang from Huế to negotiate with Montigny. The names of Vietnamese plenipotentiaries were not recorded in the Đại Nam thực lục but the Vietnamese chief negotiator is assumed to be Đào Trí, who had been responsible for defenses against French attacks and reported the French affairs to the Emperor. In Danang, Montigny was ceremonially received with more Vietnamese troops and four war elephants. According to Montigny, the main Vietnamese plenipotentiary was a close relative of the Vietnamese Emperor and seemed to be intelligent. The first meeting between Montigny and the Vietnamese commissioners was amicable. The negotiation about the treaty was set to begin next day on January 30. Montigny's conflict with Đào Trí After numerous French and British advances on Vietnam, this was the first time that the Vietnamese actually went to the negotiation table in the prospect of concluding a modern treaty with Western nation. The negotiation between Montigny and Đào Trí, total of five Vietnamese plenipotentiaries, took place at Danang government house on 30 January 1857, nearly seven months after Montigny's first arrival in Siam. Ernest-Napoléon Godeaux was Montigny's assistant. Bishop Pellerin served as the interpreter. Conflict arose even before the beginning of the negotiation. Per Western diplomatic protocol, Montigny asked Đào Trí for documents showing full powers accorded by the Vietnamese sovereign. The Vietnamese were totally unfamiliar with Western diplomatic rules. Đào Trí instead showed his official seal, which Montigny considered not adequate to affirm full powers. A heated debate ensued concerning the negotiation powers of Đào Trí. Montigny told Đào Trí that he could only negotiate with fully-empowered plenipotentiaries, whose powers emanated from the sovereign, so that the treaty would have reciprocal binding effects on both France and Vietnam. Đào Trí confessed that he did not have such thing. Montigny then told Đào Trí to acquire full credentials from his sovereign first in order to negotiate. Đào Trí refused, saying that he was not a child and had necessary powers. Seeing Montigny as fussy, Đào Trí said to Montigny; "if you wish to settle matters and make peace, I am ready to do so, if you want war, we will fight". Montigny considered Đào Trí to be oblivious of Western diplomatic protocol so he tried to make Đào Trí understood what the credentials looked like. Next day, on January 31, Montigny brought his own paper describing his credentials as the French plenipotentiary appointed by the French Emperor Napoleon III with Chinese explanation; Montigny threatened that, if the Vietnamese plenipotentiaries were not accorded with full powers, he would have to go to Huế to find out whether the Vietnamese Emperor really wanted to conclude a treaty with France. Đào Trí was dissatisfied at Montigny's repeated threats of going to Huế, saying that if France wanted to fight, Vietnam would fight; "We the Annamese know very well that, at sea, the French are the strongest, but that, on land, we Cochinchinese do not yet know if we will be as strong." Đào Trí then pointed at a Vietnamese soldier, saying that such Vietnamese soldier did not fear three Europeans. Montigny shrugged his shoulders and stopped Đào Trí mid-speech, saying that the Vietnamese knew nothing of war. Montigny urged the Vietnamese to pray to God that war would not descend on the unfortunate country of Vietnam. "Our strength and our means of destruction were powerful enough to erase the very name of the Empire of Annam from the map of the world, the day we arrived as enemies in Cochinchina." Montigny then told Đào Trí about the recently-concluded Crimean War, claiming that France was able to field 200,000 men with 1,200 artilleries on the enemy shores. Montigny told Đào Trí that he came to Danang government house only accompanied by his assistant Godeaux and his interpreter Pellerin because he did not fear the Vietnamese who, according to Montigny, were of no match for the French military. Lastly, Montigny threatened that, if Đào Trí did not accept the treaty, Đào Trí would be "the first victim of the consequences of your action". Montigny stated that because the Vietnamese plenipotentiary kept repeating the phrase "If you want war, let's fight", Montigny had to prematurely terminate the meeting on that day. According to Montigny, four other Vietnamese plenipotentiaries did not agree with assertive stance of the chief Vietnamese negotiator. Đào Trí told Montigny that, if the treaty was concluded, the treaty would be brought to be signed by the Vietnamese Emperor at Huế himself. Montigny gave a translated note to the Vietnamese plenipotentiaries that they have twenty-four hours to decide whether to send this ultimatum to the Vietnamese Emperor requesting the Emperor to empower the plenipotentiaries with full credentials or else the Vietnamese would not have to deal with Montigny anymore but instead deal with Commodore Collier and warship Capricieuse, who would attack and disarm the Vietnamese coastal forts again. Montigny's failed negotiation with Vietnam Commodore Collier, who had been maintaining an amicable relation with the Vietnamese, disagreed with Montigny's tough stance and saw Montigny's ultimatum as unnecessary. Collier sent Bishop Pellerin to withdraw Montigny's threatening letter from Danang. Vietnamese Emperor himself signing the treaty would bypass the problem of the powers of the plenipotentiaries. Next day, on February 1st, 1857, A Vietnamese interpreter came on board the Marceau to tell Montigny that the Vietnamese Emperor would sign the treaty himself. Montigny was delighted at this news and told the Vietnamese that this stance allowed Montigny to resume negotiations. Through the interpreter, Montigny requested a formal audience with Đào Trí, during which Montigny would present the whole mission including Collier. Montigny then instructed the Vietnamese how to formally receive an envoy, that was, all the presenting Vietnamese officials should be in full formal attire, the Danang fort should fire salute cannon shots to honor Montigny and the Capricieuse would reciprocate with similar salute cannon shots. On February 1st, 1857, after exchange of salutatory cannon shots, Montigny, Godeaux, Pellerin and Collier set sail with a small vessel from the warships to the Danang fort. As Montigny approached Danang, a Vietnamese messenger rowed a boat to inform Montigny that the Vietnamese officials could not receive the French Mission in ceremonial attires because they did not have them. Given his experiences in China, Montigny believed that the Vietnamese officials in disheveled robes receiving French dignitaries was a way to humiliate the French. Upon arrival in Danang, Đào Trí and the Vietnamese plenipotentiaries received Montigny and his retinue with pomp ceremonies and a large number of troops but not in ceremonial dresses. During the event, Montigny glimpsed the ceremonial attire beneath the outer garment of the second Vietnamese plenipotentiary. Montigny then understood that the Vietnamese officials deliberately wore usual dresses on top of the ceremonial ones. Montigny retaliated by expressing his displeasure that the Vietnamese plenipotentiaries received him in normal clothes not in ceremonial robes. Đào Trí apologized to Montigny for misunderstanding, saying that the Vietnamese messenger he had earlier sent to Montigny had failed to tell Montigny the reason why the Vietnamese did not wear ceremonial robes. Montigny said he would not believe Đào Trí until the responsible messenger was punished immediately. At once, the Vietnamese messenger was pinned down on the floor, beaten with fifty lashes in front of Montigny. Only when Montigny declared that he was satisfied that the beating on the messenger stopped. After this Vietnamese reception, next day, on February 2nd, Montigny the French plenipotentiary began negotiation with his Vietnamese counterparts. Montigny assumed the same negotiating tactic as he had been in Siam. Montigny presented his own translated treaty draft to the Vietnamese, assigning them to read and study it and Montigny would come to receive their opinions and counter-proposals next day Next day, on 3 February 1857, Đào Trí presented his own version of treaty draft, which began with an assertive preamble: "The Emperor of the French having humbly begged the Great Emperor of Annam to make peace. The latter, taking pity on him, was kind enough to grant him this favor.". Montigny found this preamble unacceptable and became furious, saying aloud that the French Emperor had been generous to send an envoy to negotiate a treaty instead of punishing Vietnam for insulting French nationality. Đào Trí continued to read his treaty proposal, which asserted that the French should not "sell opium and abduct girls", to which Montigny replied with fury that, unlike the British, the French did not sell opium and abduction of girls had been a grave criminal offense in France. Another article in Đào Trí's treaty proposal was that the incoming French merchants could only sell their merchandises to the Vietnamese Emperor, which could be paraphrased into the Vietnamese Emperor holding trade monopoly over the French. Montigny found this proposal not acceptable as the Westerners were dismantling traditional monopolies everywhere in Asia. Montigny pointed out that Vietnamese imperial monopoly was "devoid of all reasons and justice", invoking the principle of 'free trade'. Đào Trí proposed further that French merchant vessels could only come to trade at Danang and could only stay for four to five months, to which Montigny countered that the French should be allowed to trade, buy land and build churches in any Vietnamese seaports in Northern, Central and Southern Vietnam. Đào Trí insisted that he could only allow the French to trade in Danang and to reside only for some months but if the French behaved well they might be granted more rights. The negotiation broke down at this point as both Montigny and Đào Trí, representing France and Vietnam, respectively, refused to compromise their proposed terms. Đào Trí asserted that he could not concede more than he had proposed and Montigny countered that the Emperor should empower someone who can accept his proposals. Montigny said that Vietnam's persistent refusal to accept French terms would result in "the most dangerous consequences". Đào Trí replied that he was assigned only to make peace with France and Montigny's proposals went too far in the terms – the matters that should be discussed with the Emperor first. Đào Trí also reminded Montigny that if France wanted to fight, Vietnam would fight. Enraged by Đào Trí's defiance, Montigny threatened to bring French warship to Huế, to which Đào Trí taunted that the French could go to Huế if they wanted because the Vietnamese would be there to 'receive' the French. Lastly, Đào Trí insisted that, as he had been appointed by Emperor Tự Đức to make peace with France, his signature alone was sufficient to make a treaty. Facing Vietnamese resistance and realizing that his any further attempts to haggle would be futile, Montigny gave up. Montigny declared that Vietnam had rejected French proposal to conclude a friendship treaty and would hold the five Vietnamese plenipotentiaries responsible for any consequences Vietnam was going to face. Montigny gave his treaty draft, which contained twenty-eight articles, to the Vietnamese to consider presenting it to Emperor Tự Đức. Montigny's fifteen days of forceful and futile attempt to coerce Vietnam to accept an unequal treaty with France thus ended anticlimactically. Contents of Montigny's proposed Franco–Vietnamese Treaty were essentially the same as the preceeding France–Siamese Treaty, which included establishment of French extraterritorial and consular jurisdiction in Vietnam, stipulation of low three-percent import duty and freedom of Christianity in Vietnam. Most outstanding clauses were the Article 4, which stipulated that all the past Vietnamese Christian persecution edicts be repealed, any punishments on Christian practice be removed from Vietnamese law and the Article 5, in which Roman Catholicism became one of Vietnam's state religion. Montigny's departure from Danang Montigny's negotiation with the Vietnamese plenipotentiaries on 3 February 1857 ended in total failure as he did not manage to force the Vietnamese to accept his treaty proposals. Đào Trí gifted three oxen, one ounce of gold and one hundred chains of Vietnamese sapèque coins to Montigny, who refused the gifts out of gratitude. According to Montigny, about his overall experience in Vietnam, the Vietnamese were courteous and had received Montigny with pomp ceremonies. The only point was that the Vietnamese did not accept his treaty. Montigny spent the next two days reflecting and preparing for departure. Montigny stated that the Vietnamese, with sincerity, wanted to make a treaty with France but they were willing to do so only on their own terms. A military force was required to awaken the Vietnamese to see what had been going on in the world around them. On 6 February 1857, all communications with the Vietnamese had ceased for two days, Montigny sent the last note threatening the Vietnamese that their refusal to accept his treaty proposal would have detrimental consequences, while also comically telling that he would leave Vietnam alone for now and urging the Vietnamese to treat the French right. Montigny asserted that if Vietnam continued to persecute Christians, France would be obliged to take actions. Montigny also told the Vietnamese in the note that he would go to Singapore to wait for further instructions from the French government; These last threats of Montigny, however, did not seem to incite fear nor compliance on the Vietnamese side. Bishop François Pellerin the Apostolic Vicar of Northern Cochinchina, who had taken refuge from Vietnamese persecution with Montigny, Bishop Jean-Claude Miche the Apostolic Vicar of Cambodia, who had accompanied Montigny from Kampot, Cambodia and Father Fontaine, who had earlier delivered Montigny's letter at Thuận An, were horrified at Montigny's failure to force Vietnam to adopt tolerance on Christians and at what would subsequently happen on the Christians in Vietnam. Bishop Pellerin, Bishop Miche and Father Fontaine jointly asked Montigny to retract the Articles 4, 5, 6 and 7, which concerned Christianity, from Montigny's draft treaty that would be sent to the Vietnamese imperial court, for fear that the Vietnamese Emperor would be further enraged by such proposals. The French priests also deplored Montigny to relay the issue of safety of the Christians in Vietnam to Emperor Napoleon III; Charles de Montigny the French imperial plenipotentiary, along with his family, left Danang on the Marceau on 7 February 1857, along with the three French priests Bishop Pellerin, Bishop Miche, Father Fontaine, his assistant Godeaux and Commodore Jules Collier of the Capricieuse, which also left Danang, thus ending Montigny's seven-month diplomatic mission to Siam, Cambodia and Vietnam, seven months after his arrival in Siam on 9 July 1856. Failure of Montigny's mission in Vietnam was usually blamed on Montigny's adoption of coercive tactic in similar manner to his dealings with the Chinese in Shanghai but the lack of clear direction and policy of the French imperial government also contributed. The Vietnamese considered Montigny's mission in Danang to be a trivial event, recorded in a few sentences in the Đại Nam thực lục, in which Montigny's name was not even mentioned, in contrast to Le Lieur and Collier, whose names appeared in Vietnamese records. Montigny was excessively emboldened by his success in Siam, which he believed was the result of his own work. However, Montigny's success in Siam was built on the preceeding efforts of the British, who had honed Siam, which used to be a seclusive polity, for three decades since the 1820s, turning Siam into a Western-friendly nation. Indigenous developments also contributed to the outcome as Siam under King Mongkut was particularly open to Westerners. In contrast, no Western nations had ever managed to humble Vietnam, who would not be swayed by a peaceful diplomatic mission with small display of forces, up until that time. Misdirected objective from the French government doomed Montigny's mission from the start. The French would very soon abandon notion of peaceful approach in favor of active military invasion on Vietnam. == Aftermath and Consequences ==
Aftermath and Consequences
Reflection on Montigny's Mission Charles de Montigny the French imperial plenipotentiary, on the French steam corvette Marceau, who had completed his diplomatic mission to the Southeast Asian nations of Siam, Cambodia and Vietnam, arrived in British Hong Kong in mid-February 1857, along with his family, his entourage including the three French missionaries Bishop François Pellerin from Vietnam, Bishop Jean-Claude Miche of Cambodia and Father Charles Fontaine. His assistant Ernest-Napoléon Godeaux had brought the gilded royal letter from the Siamese king Mongkut and Montigny's France–Siamese Treaty earlier concluded in August 1856 to Paris. This treaty, which was Montigny's only success in his whole mission, was quickly approved by the French government in February 1857. Alphonse de Bourboulon the French Minister in China, who had been on leave to France since 1854, returned to China, also reaching Hong Kong a few days after Montigny. Bishop Pellerin further informed Baron Brénier that Trương Đăng Quế the Vietnamese Prime Minister, who had been in power since the reign of Minh Mạng, called Long-koué, who was also instrumental to ascension of Tự Đức, was the chief instigator of Vietnamese persecutions on Christians. Pellerin persuaded Baron Brénier that the attack of Lapierre on Danang ten years prior in 1847 had made the Vietnamese court fear and tone down the persecutions, allowing some breathing room for Christians until recent failure of Montigny. Rear Admiral De Genouilly, remembering his humiliation in the Gloire and Victorieuse incident with Lapierre near Korea in 1847, however, considered the missionaries to be meddling and misleading France to a false hope of easy conquest on Vietnam; De Genouilly asserted that, in order to attack Vietnam, not only naval forces but land forces were required; at least 1,000 French marines, two artillery companies and one engineering company were needed to take Tourane, its forts and to occupy everything until the Hue government capitulated. Montigny's attempt to salvage his Cambodian Treaty Montigny in Singapore, still waiting for instructions from the French government and hoping to salvage his Cambodian treaty, wrote letters to Bishop Jean-Baptiste Pallegoix the Apostolic Vicar of Eastern Siam and Father Louis Larnaudie, two influential French priests in Bangkok, asking them to persuade the Siamese king Mongkut to allow his vassal King Ang Duong of Cambodia to accept Montigny's treaty or else the upcoming French military intervention in Vietnam would affect Cambodia. After receiving Montigny's letter accusing Siam of preventing Cambodia from concluding a treaty with France, Siam sought to explain to Montigny that Montigny's assumption was a misunderstanding. King Mongkut granted permission for Cambodia to make a treaty with France, which had granted before and summoned Phraya Aphaiphubet Nong the Siam-appointed governor of Battambang to Bangkok to reprimand him to treat the Christians right, in the same manner as in Bangkok, not to force Christians in Battambang to partake in Buddhist ceremonies. Montigny came to interpret Siamese sovereignty over Cambodia as "jealousy". Montigny wrote to Walewski again on May 8, defending his failure in Cambodia, saying that "An extraordinary event in the 19th century, the jealousy of a suzerain towards his vassal came to, if not cause of failure, at least delay the resolution of our affairs in Cambodia", informing Walewski about Siam's tenacious hold on Cambodia from accepting the treaty and complaining that he had not been given a clear instruction on his Cambodian mission. Montigny dispatched Bishop Jean-Claude Miche the Apostolic Vicar of Cambodia, who had been with Montigny since their departure from Kampot in October 1856, to return to Cambodia with two copies of Montigny's Cambodian Treaty, a French-language one and a Khmer-language one, for Ang Duong to sign. After seven months of absence, Bishop Miche eventually returned to Cambodia in mid-May 1857. Ang Duong had been anxiously waiting for the outcome of Montigny's mission in Vietnam. A three-hour heated argument ensued between Ang Duong and Bishop Miche, who pointed out to the Cambodian king the benefits of accepting Montigny's treaty, to which Ang Duong replied with his usual rhetoric "I understand all that but what do you want me to do? I have two masters here who always have their eyes fixed on me. They are my neighbors and France is faraway. If I take a step that displeases them, they will tighten their grip on me before France even knows it". Bishop Miche countered Ang Duong's innate fear of Siam and Vietnam that by placing the French in Koh Tral (Phú Quốc), the French would safeguard Cambodia at doorstep from Siam and Vietnam. Bishop Miche urged Ang Duong that, if Ang Duong regarded himself as a true independent king, he should sign Montigny's treaty, or else Cambodia would be bound to the Franco–Siamese Treaty instead because Cambodia would be considered a part of Siam; However, in spite of Bishop Miche's encouraging words, King Ang Duong of Cambodia had made up his mind not to enter into any relations with France without consent of Siam and Vietnam. Eventually, Miche realized the hopelessness of persuading Ang Duong to accept the treaty and wrote to Montigny on May 25 about Ang Duong's second refusal to accept Montigny's treaty, which practically terminated any French attempts to establish relations with Cambodia until 1863. Bishop Miche would not try to bring Cambodia into French protectorate again until six years later in 1863, when the French had already conquered Southern Vietnam, Bishop Miche went to Saigon asking for French protection to free Cambodia from Siamese domination. Bishop Miche then went to Battambang in 1857, where Nong the Battambang governor and his son Luang Aphai received Montigny with courtesy, promising never to force Christians to partake in Buddhist ceremonies again. Deterioration of Franco–Siamese relations As Siam had signed a commercial treaty with France, Dominique Rémi, the French merchant from Shanghai, owner of Remi Schmidt & Co and a friend of Montigny, came to reside in Bangkok, renting a place for his company to trade. Rémi acted as Montigny's confidant in Bangkok. After waiting in Singapore for three months, the only instruction Montigny received from Walewski was that Montigny should return to resume consular responsibilities in Shanghai. Montigny left Singapore in early June 1857, reaching Shanghai on 7 June 1857, four years after his departure in June 1853. At Shanghai, Montigny discovered Mongkut's letter sent to him in January, telling Montigny about the birth of a Siamese prince. Rémi reported to Montigny that, since Siam had signed commercial treaties with Britain, France and the United States, hundreds of Western merchant vessels had come to trade in Bangkok, among them only six were French. At the death of Charles Hillier the British Consul in Siam, the British sent William Raymond Gingell to be the acting Consul in Bangkok. The Siamese court, impressed by Queen Victoria's letter, received Consul Gingell with honor and pomp ceremonies. Earlier, Montigny had appointed António Frederico Moor the Portuguese Consul in Bangkok as the acting French Consul due to shortage of French diplomats in the Far East. Moor's appointment upset the Siamese, who saw French appointment of a mere merchant from 'small nation' to be French Consul as France not caring about Siam. On 10 June 1857, Count Walewski the French Foreign Minister appointed Auguste Heurtier as the new acting French Consul to Siam but journey of Heurtier from France to Bangkok took time. , younger half-brother of King Mongkut, was the leading figure in conclusion of every Western unequal treaties in Mongkut's reign. The French missionaries in Bangkok believed that Siam had truly been obstructing Cambodia from signing a treaty with France. Father Fontaine in Bangkok even suspected that the British were behind Siamese stance on Cambodia's relation with France. On 13 July 1857, the Siamese prince Kromma Luang Wongsa gathered all the French men in Bangkok including the French merchants Rémi, Catteaux and Dorlancourt, the French missionaries Pallegoix, Clémenceau, Larnaudie, Fontaine, etc and the Portuguese Consul Moor at his residence the Thonburi Palace, asking the French men in Bangkok to testify against Montigny's accusations, to which the French merchants and missionaries refused, saying that they were not accorded with any political power to do so. King Mongkut had been planning to send Siamese diplomatic missions to Paris and London but Siam had to rely on Western steamships to transport the Siamese envoys to Europe. Even though Mongkut mentioned his plan to Montigny first in August 1856, the British did it first by sending a screw sloop HMS Encounter to bring the Siamese envoys to London, reaching Bangkok in July 1857. Mongkut appointed Phraya Montri Suriyawong Chum Bunnag, younger brother of Chuang Bunnag, as the Principal Envoy leading the Siamese diplomatic mission to London, which left Siam in July 1857 on the Encounter. A few days later, on 15 July 1857, the French merchant ship Aigle brought the Franco–Siamese Montigny's Treaty, earlier concluded in August 1856, approved by the French government in February 1857, to Bangkok for ratification on Siamese side. As King Mongkut had sent his gilded royal letter to the French Emperor Napoleon III, expecting a response, France sending the treaty on a simple mail ship without response letter from the French Emperor, not even an official envoy, was an insult to the Siamese king. This incident put France in direct comparison to Britain, who had been closely attending to all of Siam's requests. Harry Parkes had earlier brought the Bowring Treaty from London to Bangkok for ratification in March 1856 with Queen Victoria's letter and Siam expected France to do the same. When the Portuguese Consul Moor presented the Franco–Siamese Treaty for the Siamese king Mongkut to ratify on 23 July 1857, Mongkut refused to ratify the treaty right away. This incident became an injury to Franco–Siamese relations and French prestige in the Siamese eyes. Prince Wongsa told the French merchant Rémi that France had humiliated Siam as the Siamese interpreted this outcome as the French Emperor neglecting Mongkut's letter. Rémi quickly reported this incident to Montigny in Shanghai. On July 24, Phrakhlang Kham Bunnag the Siamese Foreign Minister wrote a letter to Montigny, explaining that the reason of Ang Duong's refusal to accept Montigny's treaty was that Cambodia had been a small nation that feared Vietnam and that Montigny's accusation of Siam preventing Cambodia from signing the treaty was not true. Kham Bunnag asked Abbé Larnaudie to translate the letter into French to send to Montigny, which Larnaudie did so reluctantly. King Mongkut eventually ratified Montigny's Treaty on 24 August 1857 anyway. Montigny sent the complaints of French merchants in Siam to Walewski on August 24; "Our interests and influence are in grave peril in Siam". Montigny informed Walewski that the Siamese thought France scorned them because France had sent the treaty on a mere mail ship without an imperial letter. The British and the Americans had done better in courting Siam's favor. Montigny also pointed out that France had commercial stake in Siam as, since signing of the treaty, French merchant ships from Bordeaux, Nantes, Le Havre and Marseilles had come to trade in Bangkok, never before had China seen so many French ships at one time. Lastly, Montigny deplored Walewski to have the French Emperor reply to Mongkut's letter or else the French trade in Siam would suffer. Walewski and the French government, however, were too preoccupied with the upcoming war in China and Vietnam to properly take care of the Siamese matter. By August 1857, Montigny seemed to accept his failure in Cambodia and reconciled with Siam. Montigny in Shanghai wrote a reply letter to Mongkut on 30 August 1857, addressing the Siamese king as "His Majesty the King of Siam, Sovereign of Laos, Suzerain of Cambodia and part of the Malay Peninsula" (French: A Sa Majesté le Roi de Siam, souverain du Laos, suzerain du Cambodge et d'une partie de la presqu'ile Malaise), congratulating Mongkut on the birth of the Siamese prince and asking permission for his wife Madame de Montigny to send her own letter to congratulate. In the letter, Montigny stated that, if he had known that Siam had sent officials with him, he would have them board with him on the Marceau and take a good care of them. Montigny urged Mongkut to forget this incident altogether, letting it pass and expressing his regret that Cambodia would remain a small country; "The consequences of the entire Cambodia affair seem easy to foresee. As the sovereign of this small country cannot reasonably sign a trade treaty with France and thus remains in a state of exclusion". For Mongkut's notion that Vietnam was a greater nation than Siam because none of the Western nations had ever managed to force any treaties on Vietnam, Montigny countered that Siam signing treaties with Western powers indeed preserved its independence by integration into world order; "On the contrary, I believe that, by establishing sound treaties with these [Western] powers, your states thereby enter into the general balance of power among European governments and receive from them, forevermore, the guarantee of their independence.". Decision of Emperor Napoleon III to invade Vietnam The Spanish priest Bishop Díaz, the Apostolic Vicar of Central Tonkin, who had earlier been arrested in Nam Định in Northern Vietnam, was eventually executed by beheading and martyred on 20 July 1857. On 30 August 1857, Bishop Pellerin had an audience with Emperor Napoleon III at Biarritz, presenting a petition declaring that destruction of Christianity in Vietnam was at stake and deploring the French Emperor to intervene to save the missionaries and the Christians; Pellerin did not spare a chance to blame Montigny in his plead; "Monsieur de Montigny left the port of Tourane after suffering the most deplorable defeat, and it could not have been otherwise, given the resources at his disposal". Lastly, Pellerin persuaded that, if Emperor Napoleon decided to intervene in Vietnam, grace would come upon the Emperor and his dynasty; "What you do for us will bring down upon you and your august dynasty the blessings of God." News of arrest of Bishop Díaz by Vietnamese authorities only reached Macau in late August 1857 and his death was not even known yet. Upon learning of Bishop Díaz's danger, the Spanish Consul General in Macau Nicasio Cañete y Moral came to ask Alphonse de Bourboulon the French Minister in China for help. Bourboulon immediately came up with a "humanitarian mission" to rescue Bishop Díaz from Vietnam, assigning on August 31; • Count Michel-Alexandre Kleczkowski, who had formerly been Montigny's Chinese translator in Shanghai, then secretary of French legation in China, as the head of the mission • Rear Admiral De Genouilly the commander of French naval forces in China assigned the French warship Catinat, the very same warship that had earlier bombarded Danang in September 1856, under the very same Captain Le Lieur de Ville-sur-Arce, as the transporting vessel for Count Kleczkowski. This time, De Genouilly insisted to Le Lieur that this mission was to be absolutely peaceful. • The Spanish Consul General Cañete y Moral also bought an American steamer Lily for himself to join the mission. Next day, on September 1st, Bourboulon wrote a lengthy report to Walewski about a review of Franco–Vietnamese history prepared by Bishop Pierre Retord the Apostolic Vicar of Western Tonkin, asserting that Montigny's mission to Vietnam was doomed to fail and, in order for France to coerce Vietnam to French terms, France should attack and occupy some coastal lands of Vietnam. == References ==
tickerdossier.comtickerdossier.substack.com