in Thailand
Core teachings The core of Theravāda Buddhist doctrine is contained in the Pāli Canon, the only complete collection of
early Buddhist Texts surviving in a classical
Indic language. The fundamentals of Theravadin Buddhism are shared by the other early Buddhist schools and
Mahayana traditions. They include central concepts such as: • A doctrine of action (
karma)—which is based on intention (
cetanā)—and a related doctrine of
rebirth, which holds that after death, sentient (albeit incompletely awakened) beings will transmigrate to another body, possibly in another
realm. The type of realm a being is reborn in is determined by the being's past karma, defining a fundamental reality driven by a cycle of birth and death (
saṃsāra). • A rejection of other doctrines and practices found in
Brahmanical religions like
Hinduism, including the notion that the
Vedas are a divine authority. Any form of sacrifices to the gods (including
animal sacrifices) and
ritual purification by bathing are considered useless and spiritually corrupted. The Pāli texts also reject the idea that
castes are divinely ordained. • A set of major teachings called the
bodhipakkhiyādhammā (factors conducive to awakening). • Descriptions of various meditative practices or states, namely the four
jhanas (meditative absorptions) and the formless dimensions (
arupāyatana). •
Ethical training (
sila), including the ten courses of wholesome action and the
five precepts. •
Nirvana (Pali:
nibbana), the highest good and final state in Theravāda Buddhism. It is the complete and final end of suffering, a state of perfection. It is also the end of all rebirth, but it is
not an annihilation (
uccheda). • The corruptions or influxes (
asavas), such as the corruption of sensual pleasures (
kāmāsava), existence corruption (
bhavāsava), and ignorance corruption (
avijjāsava). • The doctrine of impermanence (
anicca), which holds that all physical and mental phenomena are transient, unstable, and inconstant. • The doctrine of not-self (
Anattā), which holds that all the constituents of a person, namely, the
five aggregates (
physical form,
feelings,
perceptions,
intentions and
consciousness), are empty of a self (
atta), since they are impermanent and not always under our control. Therefore, there is no unchanging substance, permanent self,
soul, or essence. • The
five hindrances (
pañca nīvaraṇāni), which are obstacles to meditation: (1) sense-desire, (2) hostility, (3) sloth and torpor, (4) restlessness and worry, and (5) doubt. • The
Four Divine Abodes (
brahmavihārā), also known as the four immeasurables (
appamaññā). • The
Four Noble Truths, which state, in brief: (1) there is
dukkha (suffering, unease); (2) there is a cause of
dukkha, mainly craving (
taṇhā); (3) the removal of craving leads to the end (
nirodha) of suffering; and (4) there is a path (
magga) to follow to bring this about. • The framework of
dependent arising (
paṭiccasamuppāda), which explains how suffering arises (beginning with
ignorance and ending in birth, old age, and death) and how suffering can be brought to an end. • The
Middle Way, which is seen as having two major facets. First, it is a middle path between extreme asceticism and sensual indulgence. It is also seen as a middle view between the idea that at death beings are annihilated and that there is an eternal self (Pali:
atta). • The
Noble Eightfold Path, one of the main outlines of the
Buddhist paths to liberation. The eight factors are: Right View, Right Intention, Right Speech, Right Conduct, Right Livelihood, Right Effort, Right Mindfulness, and Right
Samadhi. • The practice of taking
refuge in the Triple Gems: the
Buddha, the
Dhamma, and the
Saṅgha. • The
Seven Factors of Awakening (
satta bojjhaṅgā): mindfulness (
sati), investigation (
dhamma vicaya), energy (
viriya), bliss (
pīti)
, relaxation (
passaddhi),
samādhi, and equanimity (
upekkha). • The
six sense bases (saḷāyatana) and a corresponding theory of
sense impression (
phassa) and consciousness (
viññana). • Various frameworks for the practice of
mindfulness (
sati)—mainly, the four
satipatthanas (establishments of mindfulness) and the 16 elements of
anapanasati (mindfulness of breathing).
Main doctrinal differences with other Buddhist traditions Moggallana, who is identifiable by his dark (
nila, i.e. blue/black) skin. He was one of the two most senior disciples of the Buddha and regarded as the foremost in psychic powers. The orthodox standpoints of Theravāda in comparison to other
Buddhist denominations are presented in the
Kathavatthu (Points of Controversy), as well as in other works by commentators like
Buddhaghosa. Traditionally, Theravāda maintains the following key doctrinal positions, though not all Theravādins agree with the traditional points of view: • On the
philosophy of time, the Theravāda tradition follows
philosophical presentism—the view that only present moment phenomena (
dhamma) exist—rather than the
eternalist view of the
Sarvāstivādin tradition, which held that
dhammas exist in all three times—past, present, and future. • The
arahant is never a layperson, for they have abandoned the fetters of a layperson, including married life, using money, etc. • The power (
bala) of a Buddha is unique and not common to the disciples (
savaka) or
arahants. •
Theravāda Abhidhamma holds that a single thought (
citta) cannot last as long as a day. • Theravāda Abhidhamma holds that insight into the Four Noble Truths happens instantaneously (
khaṇa), rather than gradually (
anupubba), as was held by
Sarvastivada. The defilements (
kilesa) are also abandoned instantaneously, not gradually. • Theravāda Abhidhamma traditionally rejects the view that there is an intermediate or transitional state (
antarabhāva) between rebirths, instead holding that rebirth happens instantaneously. However, as has been noted by various modern scholars (e.g.,
Bhikkhu Sujato), there are canonical passages that support the idea of an intermediate state (such as the
Kutuhalasāla Sutta). Some Theravāda scholars (such as
Balangoda Ananda Maitreya Thero) have defended the idea of an intermediate state. It is also a widespread belief some monks and laypersons in the Theravāda world (where it is commonly referred to as the
gandhabba or
antarabhāva). • Theravāda does not accept the Mahāyāna notion that there are two forms of
nibbana—an inferior "localized" or "abiding" (
pratiṣṭhita) nirvana and
a non-abiding (apratiṣṭhita) nirvana. Such a dual nirvana theory is absent in the
suttas. According to the
Kathāvatthu, there can be no dividing line separating the unconditioned element, and there is no superiority or inferiority in the unity of
nibbana. • Theravāda exegetical works consider
nibbana to be a
real existent instead of a
conceptual or
nominal existent (
prajñapti), referring to the mere destruction (
khayamatta) of the defilements or non-existence of the five aggregates, as was held by some in the
Sautrāntika school, for example. In Theravāda scholasticism,
nibbana is defined as the cessation (
nirodha) of non-arising and exists separately from the mere destruction of passion, hatred, and delusion. • In Theravāda exegetical works, mental phenomena last briefly or instantly (
khaṇa), but physical phenomena do not. • Theravāda holds that the Buddha resided in the human realm (
manussa-loka). It rejects the
docetic view found in Mahāyāna that the Buddha's physical body was an incorporeal manifestation, emanation, or magical creation (
nirmāṇa) of a transcendental being, and thus, that his birth and death were an illusion. Also, the Theravāda school rejects the view that there are currently numerous Buddhas in all directions. • Theravāda holds that there is a ground level of consciousness called the
bhavaṅga, which conditions the rebirth consciousness. • Theravāda rejects the
Pudgalavada doctrine of the
pudgala ("person" or "personal entity") as being more than a conceptual designation imputed on the five aggregates. • Theravāda rejects the view of the
Lokottaravāda schools that all acts done by the
Buddha (including all speech, defecation, and urination, etc.) were supramundane or transcendental (
lokuttara). In Theravāda, a Buddha does not have the power to stop something that has already arisen from ceasing; they cannot stop a being from getting old, sick, or dying, and they cannot create a permanent thing (like a flower that does not die). • Theravāda traditionally defends the idea that the Buddha himself taught the
Abhidhamma Pitaka. This is now being questioned by some modern Theravādins in light of modern Buddhist studies scholarship. • In Theravāda,
nibbana is the only unconstructed phenomenon (
asankhata-dhamma, asankhatadhatu). Unlike in the
Sarvastivada school,
space (
akasa), is seen as a constructed
dhamma in Theravāda. Even the four noble truths are not unconstructed phenomena, nor is the domain of cessation (
nirodhasamapatti). "Thatness" (
tathatā) is also a constructed phenomenon. According to the
Dhammasangani,
nibbana, the unconstructed element, is 'without condition' (
appaccaya) and is different from the five aggregates which are 'with condition' (
sappaccaya). • In Theravāda, the
bodhisatta path is suitable only for a few exceptional people (like Sakyamuni and Metteya). Theravāda also defines a bodhisatta as someone who has made a vow in front of a living Buddha. • In Theravāda, a physical sensory organ (
indriya) conditions the mental consciousness (
manovinñāna) and is the material support for consciousness. Some later Theravāda works like the
Visuddhimagga locate this physical basis for consciousness at the
heart (
hadaya-vatthu), the Pali Canon itself is silent on this issue. Some modern Theravāda scholars propose alternative notions. For example,
Suwanda H. J. Sugunasiri proposes that the basis for consciousness is the entire physical organism, which he ties with the canonical concept of
jīvitindriya or life faculty. • Theravādins traditionally believe that an awakened
arahant has an "incorruptible nature" and is thus morally perfect. They have no ignorance or doubts. According to Theravāda doctrine, arahants (and the other three lesser ariyas: stream enterers, etc.) cannot fall back or regress from their state.
Abhidhamma philosophy was one of the great Abhidhamma scholars of the 20th century as well as a teacher of meditation. Theravāda scholastics developed a systematic exposition of the Buddhist doctrine called the
Abhidhamma. In the Pāli Nikayas, the Buddha teaches through an analytical method in which experience is explained using various conceptual groupings of physical and mental processes called "dhammas". Examples of lists of dhammas taught by the Buddha include the twelve sense 'spheres' or
ayatanas, the
five aggregates or khandha, and the eighteen elements of cognition or
dhatus. Theravāda traditionally promotes itself as the
Vibhajjavāda "teaching of analysis" and as the heir to the Buddha's analytical method. Expanding this model, Theravāda Abhidhamma scholasticism concerned itself with analyzing "
ultimate truth" (
paramattha-sacca), which it sees as being composed of
all possible dhammas and their relationships. The central theory of the Abhidhamma is thus known as the "
dhamma theory". "Dhamma" has been translated as "factors" (Collett Cox), "psychic characteristics" (Bronkhorst), "psycho-physical events" (Noa Ronkin), and "phenomena" (
Nyanaponika Thera). Noa Ronkin defines dhammas as "the constituents of sentient experience; the irreducible 'building blocks' that make up one's world, albeit they are not static mental contents and certainly not substances." Thus, while in Theravāda Abhidhamma, dhammas are the ultimate constituents of experience, they are not seen as
substances,
essences or independent particulars, since they are empty (
suñña) of a self (
attā) and conditioned. This is spelled out in the
Patisambhidhamagga, which states that dhammas are empty of
svabhava (
sabhavena suññam). According to Ronkin, the canonical Pāli Abhidhamma remains pragmatic and psychological, and "does not take much interest in
ontology" in contrast with the
Sarvastivada tradition. Paul Williams also notes that the Abhidhamma remains focused on the practicalities of insight meditation and leaves ontology "relatively unexplored". Ronkin does note, however, that later Theravāda sub-commentaries (
ṭīkā) do show a doctrinal shift towards ontological
realism from the earlier epistemic and practical concerns. On the other hand, Y. Karunadasa contends that the tradition of realism goes back to the earliest discourses, as opposed to developing only in later Theravāda sub-commentaries: If we base ourselves on the Pali Nikayas, then we should be compelled to conclude that Buddhism is realistic. There is no explicit denial anywhere of the external world. Nor is there any positive evidence to show that the world is mind-made or simply a projection of subjective thoughts. That Buddhism recognizes the extra-mental existence of matter and, the external world is clearly suggested by the texts. Throughout the discourses it is the language of realism that one encounters. The whole Buddhist practical doctrine and discipline, which has the attainment of Nibbana as its final goal, is based on the recognition of the material world and the conscious living beings living therein. The Theravāda Abhidhamma holds that there is a total of 82 possible types of dhammas, 81 of which are conditioned (
sankhata), while one is unconditioned, which is
nibbana. The 81 conditioned dhammas are divided into three broad categories: consciousness (
citta), associated mentality (
cetasika) and materiality, or physical phenomena (
rupa). Since no dhamma exists independently, every single dhamma of consciousness, known as a
citta, arises associated (
sampayutta) with at least seven
mental factors (cetasikas). In Abhidhamma, all awareness events are thus seen as being characterized by
intentionality and never exist in isolation. The main categories of the planes of existence are: •
Arūpa-bhava, the formless or incorporeal plane. These are associated with the
four formless meditations: infinite space, infinite consciousness, infinite nothingness, and neither perception nor non-perception. Beings in these realms live extremely long lives (thousands of
kappas). •
Kāma-bhava, the spiritual plane of desires. This includes numerous realms of existence such as: various
hells (
niraya) which are devoid of happiness, the realms of animals, the hungry ghosts (
peta), the realm of humans, and various
heaven realms where the
devas live (such as
Tavatimsa and
Tusita). •
Rūpa-bhava, the plane of form. The realms in this plane are associated with the four meditative absorptions (
jhanas), and those who attain these meditations are reborn in these divine realms. These various planes of existence can be found in countless world systems (
loka-dhatu), which are born, expand, contract, and are destroyed in a cyclical nature across vast expanses of time (measures in kappas). This cosmology is similar to other ancient Indian systems, such as the
Jain cosmology.
Soteriology and Buddhology According to Theravāda doctrine, release from suffering (i.e.
nibbana) is attained in
four stages of awakening (
bodhi): •
Once-Returners: Those who have destroyed the first three fetters and have weakened the fetters of desire and ill-will; •
Non-Returners: Those who have destroyed the five lower fetters, which bind beings to the world of the senses; •
Arahants (lit. "honorable" or "worthies"): Those who have realized
Nibbana and are free from all defilements. They have abandoned all ignorance, craving for existence, restlessness (
uddhacca) and subtle pride (
māna). The Theravāda canon depicts
Gautama Buddha as the most recent Buddha in a line of previous Buddhas stretching back for aeons. They also mention the future Buddha, named
Metteyya. Traditionally, the Theravāda school also rejects the idea that there can be numerous Buddhas active in the world simultaneously. Buddha Regarding how a sentient being becomes a Buddha, the Theravāda school also presents this path. Indeed, according to
Buddhaghosa, there are three main soteriological paths: the path of the Buddhas (
buddhayāna); the way of the individual Buddhas (
paccekabuddhayāna); and the way of the disciples (
sāvakayāna). However, unlike in Mahāyāna Buddhism, the Theravāda holds that the Buddha path is not for everyone and that beings on the Buddha path (
bodhisattas) are quite rare. While in Mahāyāna, bodhisattas refers to beings who have developed the
wish to become Buddhas, Theravāda (like other early Buddhist schools), defines a bodhisatta as someone who has resolved (
abhinīhāra) to become a Buddha in front of a living Buddha, and has also received a confirmation from that Buddha that they will reach Buddhahood.
Cariyāpiṭaka is a Theravāda text which focuses on the path of the Buddhas, while the
Nidānakathā and the
Buddhavaṃsa are also Theravāda texts which discuss the Buddha's path.
Buddhist modernist trends can be traced to figures like
Anagarika Dhammapala, King
Mongkut, and the first prime minister of Burma
U Nu. They promoted a form of Buddhism that was compatible with
rationalism and science, and opposed to superstition and certain folk practices.
Walpola Rahula's
What the Buddha Taught is seen by scholars as an introduction to modernist Buddhist thought, and the book continues to be widely used in universities. The modern era also saw new Buddhist works on topics which pre-modern Buddhists avoided, such as socially
engaged Buddhism and
Buddhist economics. Thinkers such as Buddhadasa,
Sulak Sivaraksa,
Prayudh Payutto,
Neville Karunatilake, and Padmasiri de Silva have written on these topics. Modern scholarship in Western languages by Western Buddhist monks such as
Nyanatiloka,
Nyanaponika,
Nyanamoli,
Bhikkhu Bodhi, and
Analayo is another recent development in the Theravāda world. ==Practice (
paṭipatti)==