The massacre at San Juan de Wilson changed everything: the members of the Grand Lodge of Colón had become more radicalized, and the members of GOCA recognized their shared sacrifice. However, Masonic authority on the island still remained fragmented. That same year, the Supreme Council established a
Provincial Mother Lodge in Havana, prompting protest from the Grand Lodge. The Warrant for this Mother Lodge was later withdrawn, though the broader dispute between the Grand Lodge and Supreme Council continued. After failing to achieve the desired independence of action, it dissolved on August 28, 1874. Its Grand Master was the Spaniard
Severino Fernández Mora, a doctor in the Military Health Service of the Spanish army, who, due to his activities and ideas, was forced by the colonial authorities to leave the island "within 24 hours. In 1875, the
Gran Logia de Colón resumed its activities and reached an important agreement with the Supreme Council. The Grand Lodge would have exclusive control over Symbolic Masonry (blue lodges). The Supreme Council would oversee the higher degrees. This agreement allowed Freemasonry to reorganize and grow again, but confusion persisted. On May 23, 1875, a Second Provincial Mother Lodge was established in Havana, with a broader base of support than its predecessor. There is little doubt that both initiatives stemmed from members formerly active in GOCA Freemasonry, as well as factions within the Colón Lodge that held views differing from those of the Grand Lodge leadership headquartered in Santiago de Cuba. One of the main points of contention was the perceived ineffectiveness of maintaining the central authority of Cuban Freemasonry far from Havana, the country's political and economic capital.
Lausanne Convention That same year, the Supreme Council of Colón dispatched two delegates,
David Elías Pierre and
Benjamín Odio, to the Convention of Supreme Councils of the Scottish Rite, held in
Lausanne, Switzerland. There, the Cuban representatives became signatories of the
Pact of Confederation of the Supreme Regular Councils of the World. The event resonated strongly in Cuba for two key reasons. First, the Cuban delegation was accepted, whereas Spain's was rejected due to the disorganization of Spanish Freemasonry, which made it impossible to recognize one representative body without excluding others. Second, the pact established new Masonic principles that had far-reaching consequences, particularly in the political sphere. While Scottish Rite Freemasonry had traditionally defined itself as apolitical in practice, in reality it had not remained immune to the political upheavals of the time. Following the Lausanne Convention, however, Cuban Freemasonry underwent a redefinition: it adopted a
philanthropic and
fraternal character not only in theory but also in its practical social engagement. One notable shift was the replacement of politically charged slogans, such as the French revolutionary motto Liberty, Equality, Fraternity, with the more neutral principles of
Brotherly Love, Relief, and Truth, in alignment with Anglo-American Masonic traditions. This ideological transformation was clearly articulated in 1875 by
Francisco de Paula Rodríguez, one of the most influential Cuban Freemasons of the late 19th and early 20th centuries. Reflecting on the change, he stated:“Because of that presumptuous error of attributing a political role to the Institution, we brought upon ourselves constant threats and persecution. We have learned much from this experience. Instead of 'Liberty, Equality, Fraternity,’ a profoundly political motto, we have returned to the values upheld in England and the United States: ‘Brotherly Love, Relief, and Truth.’”This shift did not reduce the institution's social relevance. On the contrary, it facilitated the expansion of Freemasonry by attracting individuals who, while unwilling to be associated with political activism, fully supported its social ideals, cultural aspirations, and philanthropic mission. At the same time, North American influence within Cuban Freemasonry declined, as the institution came to be shaped increasingly by a strong Hispanic cultural foundation and the emergence of distinctly Cuban intellectual traditions.
Aurelio Almeida y González In 1876,
Aurelio Almeida y González, a prominent adherent to the ideas of Vicente Antonio de Castro and widely regarded as the architect of the definitive structure and projection of Cuban Freemasonry, initiated a transformative move that some Masonic historians have described as a "coup d’état" against the existing Colón Freemasonry. At the time, Almeida was one of the leading figures within the Second Provincial Mother Lodge of Havana. Almeida embarked on a tour of the United States, where he successfully secured the support of major North American Masonic bodies. Following this, a
telegram was sent to Havana, and shortly thereafter, on July 28, 1876, the Provincial Mother Lodge announced its self-dissolution. Merely days later, on August 1, with great fanfare, representatives from 13 lodges met in Havana and proclaimed the establishment of a new independent Masonic institution: the
Grand Lodge of the Island of Cuba, a body that deliberately excluded the higher or “Scottish Rite” degrees. This development reintroduced a dual structure within Cuban Freemasonry, further complicated by the simultaneous operation of lodges affiliated with various Spanish Masonic obediences. The new body created under Almeida's leadership immediately undertook a comprehensive reorganization of the lodges and initiated diplomatic efforts to establish fraternal relations with other Masonic jurisdictions abroad. Its efforts quickly bore fruit: the new Grand Lodge received official recognition not only from the Grand Lodges of the United States, but also from the Spanish Masonic body led by Práxedes Mateo Sagasta. Effectively, this institution represented a reorganization of GOCA, now under a regular Masonic framework, bearing a new name and distanced from direct political affiliations and activities. This organization represented, in effect, a reconstitution of the former Grand Orient of Cuba and the Antilles (GOCA), now operating under a new name, with regular Masonic status, and without the overt political affiliations that had previously characterized it. Rather than engaging in direct political activity, both institutions began to emphasize values that contributed to the formation of a modern Cuban national identity. These included a commitment to secularism, the promotion of free intellectual inquiry, and the advocacy of a broad liberal tradition grounded more in ideological principles than in political partisanship. The broader political climate of the time, shaped by the Spanish Restoration and a series of partial reforms and freedoms intended to pacify the island following the end of the Ten Years' War, provided fertile ground for this evolution. Both Masonic movements, the Colón Freemasonry and the Grand Lodge of the Island of Cuba, began to converge in a shared cultural mission, emphasizing the cultivation of values that would come to define Cuban national identity: free thought, secular social values, and a broad, ideologically driven liberalism, more intellectual in nature than explicitly political. On November 24, 1876, the Grand Lodge of the Island of Cuba and the Supreme Council of Colón formalized their reconciliation by signing what became known as the Treaty of Peace and Friendship. This foundational agreement, rooted in the principles established by the Universal Council and the Convention of Lausanne, has been reaffirmed in all subsequent Cuban Masonic constitutions and codes. The treaty marked a significant reorganization of internal Masonic structures in Cuba, notably diminishing the influence of mystical, aristocratic, and authoritarian elements that had previously characterized portions of the institution. As a result, the significance traditionally ascribed to the higher degrees was substantially reduced. Under the terms of the treaty, the Supreme Council of Colón formally recognized the Grand Lodge as the “regular, competent, and sovereign” authority over all lodges practicing the first three Masonic or symbolic degrees. In reciprocity, the Grand Lodge acknowledged the Supreme Council's exclusive jurisdiction over the higher degrees, from the fourth to the 33rd. Both bodies were granted complete autonomy, each operating under its own set of laws and regulations, without subordination to the other. This accord is widely regarded as a model for resolving institutional conflict within Freemasonry and is considered one of the most effective instruments for fostering unity and fraternal cooperation among Cuban Masons. By the end of 1876, three rival Grand Lodges were claiming legitimacy: • The original
Gran Logia de Colón in Santiago de Cuba. • The
Gran Logia de Cuba in Havana. • The
Gran Logia de Colón in Havana. Internal conflicts within the Grand Lodge of Colón persisted throughout the 1870s, primarily manifesting in tensions between lodges in the western region of the island and the leadership headquartered in Santiago de Cuba. The western lodges, represented most prominently by
José Fernández Pellón y Castellanos, advocated for a relocation of the Grand Lodge's seat to Havana. Acting on behalf of 27 western lodges, Fernández Pellón successfully obtained approval for this transfer, while the Supreme Council remained based in Santiago de Cuba. Given that the Grand Lodge oversaw the symbolic lodges, which constituted the majority of Masonic workshops on the island, the relocation to Havana reflected the growing centralization of Cuban Freemasonry in the political and economic capital. Nevertheless, some eastern lodges rejected the move and continued to uphold the authority of the Grand Lodge of Colón in Santiago. On July 20, 1877, a new Grand Lodge of Colón was officially proclaimed in Havana. Its leadership was dominated by a coalition of figures aligned with the liberal reformist movement then gaining prominence in Cuban political life. This same faction would go on to establish the
Liberal Party in 1878, which later adopted the name Autonomist Party. Despite ideological differences, Masonic lodges under this structure facilitated collaboration between reformists and advocates of full independence, united in their concern for the transformation and modernization of colonial Cuba. The Grand Master of the Havana-based Grand Lodge of Colón was , a key figure in the emerging Autonomist Party, where he served as both organizer and secretary. Meanwhile, the Grand Lodge of the Island of Cuba, under the leadership of Aurelio Almeida y González, had achieved greater institutional stability and coherence than its regionalist counterpart. Almeida promulgated a comprehensive Masonic Code, unprecedented in Cuban Freemasonry, which later served as a model for Masonic organizations across the Spanish-speaking world. Under his guidance, the Grand Lodge of Cuba also extended its influence internationally, authorizing the establishment of lodges in Spain. Among Almeida's most influential contributions to Masonic literature were
El consultor del masón (The Mason's Consultant) and
Jurisprudencia masónica (Masonic Jurisprudence), both widely disseminated throughout Latin American Masonic circles. In
El consultor del masón, Almeida included the liturgies originally composed by Vicente Antonio de Castro for the Grand Orient of Cuba and the Antilles, thereby reinforcing a doctrinal continuity within Cuban Freemasonry while adapting it to the evolving cultural and political context. == Conclusion of the Ten Years' War and the formation of the United Grand Lodge of Colón and the Island of Cuba ==