Ibn Hanbal's principal doctrine is what later came to be known as "traditionalist thought," which emphasized the acceptance of only the
Quran and
hadith as the foundations of orthodox belief. Censuring those who alleged that this was referring to the form of
Adam, Ibn Hanbal asserted: "He who says that Allah created Adam according to the form of Adam, he is a
Jahmi (disbeliever). Which form did Adam have before He created him?"
The Quran One of Ibn Hanbal's most famous contributions to
Sunni thought was the considerable role he played in bolstering the
orthodox doctrine of the Quran being the "
uncreated Word of God" (
kalām Allāh g̲h̲ayr mak̲h̲lūḳ). in the case of scholars, although he did allow taqlid for laymen and the average Muslim community. His staunch condemnation of
taqlid is reported in the treatise
Fath al-Majid by Hanbali judge Abd al-Rahman ibn Hasan (1782–1868). Comparing
taqlid to polytheism (
shirk), Ibn Hanbal states: "I am amazed at those people who know that a chain of narration is authentic, and yet, in spite of this, they follow the opinion of Sufyan, for God says, 'And let those who oppose the Messenger's commandment beware, lest some
fitna should befall them, or a painful torment be inflicted on them.' Do you know what that
fitna is? That
fitna is
shirk. Maybe the rejection of some of his words would cause one to doubt and deviate in his heart, and thereby be destroyed." It is important to understand that this statement was directed towards his students, who were capable of
Ijtihad, and is not meant towards laymen. This statement is explained by
Ibn Taymiyya: "Imam Ahmad deemed it unlawful for a scholar capable of ijtihad to make taqlid of them. He said: “Do not make taqlid of me, nor of Malik, al-Shafi‘i, or al-Thawri” … He instructed the lay people to seek fatwas from Ishaq, Abu ‘Ubayd, Abu Thawr, and Abu Mus‘ab. But he forbade the scholars from among his students – like Abu Dawud, ‘Uthman b. Sa‘id, Ibrahim al-Harbi, Abu Bakr al-Athram, Abu Zur‘ah, Abu Hatim al-Sijistani, Muslim and others – from making taqlid of any other scholar. He would say: “Stick to the basic principle by following the Book and the
Sunnah.” This makes it evident that Ahmad ibn Hanbal’s prohibition of taqlid was intended solely for scholars (
Ulama), and he harshly condemned those who rejected the layman’s duty to perform taqlid.
Intercession It is narrated by Abū Bakr al-Marwazī in his
Mansak that Ibn Hanbal preferred one to make
tawassul or "intercession" through Muhammad in every supplication, with the wording: "O God! I am turning to Thee with Thy Prophet, the Prophet of Mercy. O Muhammad! I am turning with you to my Lord for the fulfillment of my need." This report is repeated in many later Hanbali works, in the context of personal supplication as an issue of jurisprudence.
Ibn Qudamah, for example, recommends it for the obtainment of need in his
Wasiyya. In the same way,
Ibn Taymiyyah cites the Hanbali fatwa on the desirability of Muhammad's intercession in every personal supplication in his
Qāida fil-Tawassul wal-Wasiīla where he attributes it to "Imām Ahmad and a group of the pious ancestors" from the
Mansak of al-Marwazī as his source.
Mysticism As there exist historical sources indicating patently "mystical elements in his personal piety" and documented evidence of his amiable interactions with numerous early Sufi saints, including
Maruf Karkhi, it is recognized that Ibn Hanbal's relationship with many of the Sufis was one of mutual respect and admiration. Qadi Abu Ya'la reports in his
Tabaqat: "[Ibn Hanbal] used to greatly respect the Sūfīs and show them kindness and generosity. He was asked about them and was told that they sat in mosques constantly, to which he replied, 'Knowledge made them sit.'" Furthermore, it is in Ibn Hanbal's
Musnad that we find most of the
hadith reports concerning the
abdal, forty major saints "whose number [according to Islamic mystical doctrine] would remain constant, one always being replaced by some other on his death" and whose key role in the traditional Sufi conception of the celestial hierarchy would be detailed by later mystics such as
Hujwiri and
Ibn Arabi. Of the same Sufi, Ibn Hanbal later asked rhetorically: "Is religious knowledge anything else than what Maruf has achieved?" and of his sending people with mystical questions to Bishr for guidance. It is also recorded that Ibn Hanbal said, with regard to the early Sufis, "I do not know of any people better than them." Moreover, there are accounts of Ibn Hanbal's son, Sālih, being exhorted by his father to go and study under the Sufis. According to one tradition, Sālih said: "My father would send for me whenever a self-denier or ascetic (
zāhid aw mutaqashshif) visited him so I could look at him. He loved for me to become like this." and later Sufi chroniclers often designated the jurist as a
saint in their hagiographies, praising him both for his legal work and for his appreciation of Sufi doctrine. Both non-Hanbali and Hanbali Sufi hagiographers such as Hujwiri and
Ibn al-Jawzi, respectively, also alluded to Ibn Hanbal's own gifts as a
miracle worker and of the blessedness of his grave. For example, Ibn Hanbal's own body was traditionally held to have been blessed with the miracle of
incorruptibility, with Ibn al-Jawzi relating: "When the Prophet's descendant Abū Ja'far ibn Abī Mūsā was buried next to him, Ahmad ibn Hanbal's tomb was exposed. His corpse had not putrified and the shroud was still whole and undecayed." Although there is a perception that Ibn Hanbal or his school were somehow adverse to Sufism, scholars such as
Eric Geoffrey have asserted that this opinion is more partial than objective, for there is no proof that the Hanbali school "[attacked] Sufism in itself any more than any other school," and it is evident that "during the first centuries some major Sufis [such as
Ibn Ata Allah,
Hallaj, and
Abdullah Ansari] ... followed the Hanbalite school of law." In the same way, Ibn Hanbal also drunk from Muhammad's bowl (technically a "second-class" relic) to seek blessings from it, Ibn Hanbal later ordered that he be buried with Muhammad's hairs he possessed, "one on each eye and a third on his tongue." According to
Twelver Shia writer
Najm al-Din Tabasi, when asked by his son Abdullah about the legitimacy of touching and kissing
Muhammad's grave in
Medina, Ibn Hanbal is said to have approved of both these acts as being permissible according to sacred law.
Jurisprudence According to Hanbali scholar
Najm al-Din Tufi (d. 716 A.H/ 1316 C.E), Ahmad ibn Hanbal did not formulate a legal theory; since "his entire concern was with
hadith and its collection". More than a century after Ahmad's death, Hanbali legalism would emerge as a distinct school; due to the efforts of jurists like Abu Bakr al-Athram (d. 261 A.H/ 874 C.E), Harb al-Kirmani (d. 280 A.H/ 893 C.E), 'Abd Allah ibn Ahmad (d. 290 A.H/903 C.E),
Abu Bakr al-Khallal (d. 311 A.H/ 923 C.E) etc., who compiled Ahmad's various legal verdicts.
Independent reasoning by muftis Ibn Hanbal also had a strict criterion for
ijtihad or independent reasoning in matters of law by
muftis and the
ulema. One story narrates that Ibn Hanbal was asked by Zakariyyā ibn Yaḥyā al-Ḍarīr about "how many memorized ḥadīths are sufficient for someone to be a
mufti [meaning a
mujtahid jurist or one capable of issuing independently reasoned
fatwas]." It is believed that he quoted this on account of the vast number of forged traditions of Muhammad. According to later notable scholars of the
Hanbali school like
Ibn Aqil and
Ibn Taymiyyah, Ibn Hanbal "considered every
madhhab correct and abhorred that a jurist insist people follow his even if he considered them wrong and even if the truth is one in any given matter." As such, when Ibn Hanbal's student Ishāq ibn Bahlūl al-Anbārī had "compiled a book on juridical differences ... which he had named
The Core of Divergence (
Lubāb al-Ikhtilāf)," Ibn Hanbal advised him to name the work
The Book of Leeway (''Kitāb al-Sa'a'') instead. ==Works==