Durbar showing the Chief (
Raja) and the nobles (
Sardars,
Jagirdars, Istamuradars &
Mankaris) of the
state. nobles in 18th century
Kerala, India. The Nair caste was a martial nobility, similar to the Samurai of Japan. , royalty and
yangban aristocrats were carried in
litters called
gama. A Korean
gama, . in Lhasa,
Tibet in 1936. Bestows a Jewel on a Nobleman.
Indian subcontinent Madhavrao II, surrounded by nobles in his court in 18th-century India. Historically
Rajputs formed a class of aristocracy associated with
warriorhood, developing after the 10th century in the
Indian subcontinent. During the
Mughal Empire era, a class of administrators known as
Nawabs emerged who initially served as governors of
provinces, later becoming independent. In the
British Raj, many members of the nobility were elevated to royalty as they became the monarchs of their princely states, but as many princely state rulers were reduced from royals to noble
zamindars. Hence, many nobles in the subcontinent had royal titles of Raja, Rai, Rana, Rao, etc. In Nepal,
Kaji () was a title and position used by nobility of
Gorkha Kingdom (1559–1768) and
Kingdom of Nepal (1768–1846). Historian
Mahesh Chandra Regmi suggests that
Kaji is derived from Sanskrit word
Karyi which meant functionary. Other noble and aristocratic titles were
Thakur,
Sardar,
Jagirdar,
Mankari,
Dewan,
Mudaliar,
Pradhan,
Kaji, etc. The
Twenty-Sixth Amendment of the Constitution of India, passed in 1971, abolished all noble privileges within the Republic of India.
China In East Asia, the system was often modeled on imperial China, the leading culture. Emperors conferred
titles of nobility. Imperial descendants formed the highest class of ancient Chinese nobility, their status based upon the rank of the empress or concubine from which they descend maternally (as emperors were polygamous). Numerous titles such as
Taizi (crown prince), and equivalents of "prince" were accorded, and due to complexities in
dynastic rules,
rules were introduced for Imperial descendants. The titles of the junior princes were gradually lowered in rank by each generation while the senior heir continued to inherit their father's titles. It was a custom in China for the new dynasty to ennoble and enfeoff a member of the dynasty which they overthrew with a title of nobility and a fief of land so that they could offer sacrifices to their ancestors, in addition to members of other preceding dynasties. China had a feudal system in the
Shang and
Zhou dynasties, which gradually gave way to a more bureaucratic one beginning in the
Qin dynasty (221 BC). This continued through the
Song dynasty, and by its peak power shifted from nobility to bureaucrats. This development was gradual and generally only completed in full by the Song dynasty. In the
Han dynasty, for example, even though noble titles were no longer given to those other than the emperor's relatives, the fact that the process of selecting officials was mostly based on a vouching system by current officials as officials usually vouched for their own sons or those of other officials meant that a de facto aristocracy continued to exist. This process was further deepened during the
Three Kingdoms period with the introduction of the
Nine-rank system. By the
Sui dynasty, however, the institution of the
Imperial examination system marked the transformation of a power shift towards a full bureaucracy, though the process would not be truly completed until the Song dynasty. Titles of nobility became symbolic along with a stipend while governance of the country shifted to
scholar officials. In the
Qing dynasty, titles of nobility were still granted by the emperor, but served merely as honorifics based on a loose system of favours to the Qing emperor. Under a centralized system, the empire's governance was the responsibility of the Confucian-educated scholar-officials and the local gentry, while the
literati were accorded gentry status. For male citizens, advancement in status was possible via garnering the top three positions in imperial examinations. The Qing appointed the Ming imperial descendants to the title of
Marquis of Extended Grace. The oldest held continuous noble title in Chinese history was that held by the descendants of
Confucius, as
Duke Yansheng, which was renamed as the Sacrificial Official to Confucius in 1935 by the
Republic of China. The title is held by
Kung Tsui-chang. There is also a "Sacrificial Official to Mencius" for a descendant of
Mencius, a "Sacrificial Official to Zengzi" for a descendant of
Zengzi, and a "Sacrificial Official to Yan Hui" for a descendant of
Yan Hui. The bestowal of titles was abolished upon the establishment of the People's Republic of China in 1949, as part of a larger effort to remove feudal influences and practises from Chinese society.
Korea Unlike China,
Silla's bone nobles were much more aristocratic and had the right to collect taxes and rule over people. They also thought of the king as Buddha and justified their rule through the idea that status was determined by birth. However, this strict sense of social status gradually weakened due to the introduction of Confucianism and opposition from the lower class, and even in Silla, opportunities were given to people of low social status through Confucian tests such as '독서삼품과(讀書三品
科)'. However, the still strict status order of Silla caused opposition from many people and collapsed when the country moved to
Goryeo. In Goryeo, powerful families along with existing nobles became nobles, claiming a new lineage nobility. And in Goryeo, dissatisfied lower class people confronted the nobles and took power for a short period of time. Goryeo also had many hereditary families, and they were more aristocratic than Confucian bureaucrats, forcibly collecting taxes from the people being slaughtered by the Mongolian army, killing those who rebelled, and writing poetry ignoring their situation. As Goryeo weakened and nobles pursuing
Joseon appeared, Goryeo's nobility could not stand against them and chose to be absorbed into yangban. However, since the Korean nobility had never experienced defeat by commoners like Han Gaozu Liu Bang, the aristocratic character was not completely extinguished even in Joseon, which began to actively introduce Han Chinese rule. So, in the early days, there were quite a few hereditary powerful noblemen like the Jeju Ko. However, as Confucian reforms continued, it became difficult for yangbans to obtain political positions if they did not pass the exam. Each of them was usually still superior to ordinary people, but was not recognized unless it passed the test. So now, to become a yangban, it was essential for the members to pass the exam.
Japan —the most powerful and important family of nobility in
history of Japan. Medieval Japan developed a feudal system similar to the European system, where land was held in exchange for military service. The
daimyō class, or hereditary landowning nobles, held great socio-political power. As in Europe, they commanded private armies made up of
samurai, an elite
warrior class; for long periods, these held the real power without a real central government, and often plunged the country into a state of civil war. The
daimyō class can be compared to European peers, and the samurai to European knights, but important differences exist. Following the
Meiji Restoration in 1868, feudal titles and ranks were reorganised into the
kazoku, a five-rank
peerage system after the British example, which granted seats in the upper house of the
Imperial Diet; this ended in 1947 following Japan's defeat in World War II.
Islamic world of the
House of Abaza, Egypt's largest aristocratic family. In some Islamic countries, there are no definite noble titles (titles of hereditary rulers being distinct from those of hereditary intermediaries between monarchs and commoners). Persons who can trace legitimate descent from
Muhammad or the clans of
Quraysh, as can members of several present or formerly reigning dynasties, are widely regarded as belonging to the ancient, hereditary Islamic nobility. In some Islamic countries they inherit (through mother or father) hereditary titles, although without any other associated privilege, e.g., variations of the title
Sayyid and
Sharif. Regarded as more religious than the general population, many people turn to them for clarification or guidance in religious matters. In
Iran, historical titles of the nobility including
Mirza,
Khan,
ed-Dowleh and
Shahzada ("Son of a Shah), are now no longer recognised. An aristocratic family is now recognised by their
family name, often derived from the post held by their ancestors, considering the fact that family names in Iran only appeared in the beginning of the 20th century. Sultans have been an integral part of Islamic history. See:
Zarabi During the
Ottoman Empire in the Imperial Court and the provinces there were many
Ottoman titles and appellations forming a somewhat unusual and complex system in comparison with the other Islamic countries. The bestowal of noble and aristocratic titles was widespread across the empire even after its fall by independent monarchs. One of the most elaborate examples is that of the Egyptian aristocracy's largest clan, the
Abaza family, of maternal
Abazin and
Circassian origin.
Philippines Like other Southeast Asian countries, many regions in the
Philippines have indigenous nobility, partially influenced by Hindu, Chinese, and Islamic custom. Since ancient times,
Datu was the common title of a chief or monarch of the many
pre-colonial principalities and sovereign dominions throughout the isles; in some areas the term
Apo was also used. With the titles
Sultan and
Rajah,
Datu (and its
Malay cognate,
Datok) are currently used in some parts of the Philippines,
Indonesia,
Malaysia and
Brunei. These titles are the rough equivalents of European titles, albeit dependent on the actual wealth and prestige of the bearer.
Recognition by the Spanish Crown Upon the
islands' Christianization, the datus retained governance of their territories despite annexation to the
Spanish Empire. In a law signed 11 June 1594, King
Philip II of Spain ordered that the indigenous rulers continue to receive the same honors and privileges accorded them prior their conversion to
Catholicism. The baptized nobility subsequently coalesced into the exclusive, landed ruling class of the lowlands known as the
principalía. On 22 March 1697, King
Charles II of Spain confirmed the privileges granted by his predecessors (in Title VII, Book VI of the
Laws of the Indies) to indigenous nobilities of the Crown colonies, including the principalía of the Philippines, and extended to them and to their descendants the preeminence and honors customarily attributed to the
hidalgos of
Castile.
Filipino nobles during the Spanish era of the late 19th century
Philippines. Exhibit in the Villa Escudero Museum,
San Pablo, Laguna. The Laws of the Indies and other pertinent royal decrees were enforced in the Philippines and benefited many indigenous nobles. It can be seen very clearly and irrefutably that, during the colonial period, indigenous chiefs were equated with the Spanish hidalgos, and the most resounding proof of the application of this comparison is the General Military Archive in
Segovia, where the qualifications of "nobility" (found in the service records) are attributed to those Filipinos who were admitted to the Spanish military academies and whose ancestors were
caciques,
encomenderos, notable Tagalogs, chieftains,
governors or those who held positions in the municipal administration or government in all different regions of the large islands of the Archipelago, or of the many small islands of which it is composed. In the context of the ancient tradition and norms of Castilian nobility, all descendants of a noble are considered noble, regardless of fortune. At the
Real Academia de la Historia, there is a substantial number of records providing reference to the Philippine Islands, and while most parts correspond to the history of these islands, the
Academia did not exclude among its documents the presence of many genealogical records. The archives of the
Academia and its royal stamp recognized the appointments of hundreds of natives of the Philippines who, by virtue of their social position, occupied posts in the administration of the territories and were classified as
"nobles". The presence of these notables demonstrates the cultural concern of Spain in those Islands to prepare the natives and the collaboration of these in the government of the Archipelago. This aspect of Spanish rule in the Philippines appears much more strongly implemented than in the Americas. Hence in the Philippines, the local nobility, by reason of charge accorded to their social class, acquired greater importance than in the
Indies of the
New World. With the recognition of the Spanish monarchs came the privilege of being addressed as
Don or Doña, a mark of esteem and distinction in Europe reserved for a person of noble or royal status during the colonial period. Other honors and high regard were also accorded to the Christianized Datus by the
Spanish Empire. For example, the
Gobernadorcillos (elected leader of the
Cabezas de Barangay or the Christianized Datus) and Filipino officials of justice received the greatest consideration from the Spanish Crown officials. The colonial officials were under obligation to show them the honor corresponding to their respective duties. They were allowed to sit in the houses of the Spanish Provincial Governors, and in any other places. They were not left to remain standing. It was not permitted for Spanish Parish Priests to treat these Filipino nobles with less consideration. The Gobernadorcillos exercised the command of the towns. They were Port Captains in coastal towns. They also had the rights and powers to elect assistants and several lieutenants and
alguaciles, proportionate in number to the inhabitants of the town.
Current status questionis of
Hispanic Hidalgos. class or nobility as depicted in the
Boxer Codex of the 16th century. The recognition of the rights and privileges accorded to the Filipino principalía as hijosdalgos of Castile seems to facilitate entrance of Filipino nobles into institutions of under the Spanish Crown, either civil or religious, which required proofs of nobility. However, to see such recognition as an approximation or comparative estimation of rank or status might not be correct since in reality, although the principales were vassals of the Crown, their rights as sovereign in their former dominions were guaranteed by the
Laws of the Indies, more particularly the Royal Decree of Philip II of 11 June 1594, which Charles II confirmed for the purpose stated above to satisfy the requirements of the existing laws in the Peninsula. It must be recalled that ever since the beginning of the colonialization, the conquistador
Miguel López de Legazpi did not strip the ancient sovereign rulers of the Archipelago (who vowed allegiance to the Spanish Crown) of their legitimate rights. Many of them accepted the Catholic religion and were his allies from the very beginning. He only demanded from these local rulers vassalage to the Spanish Crown, replacing the similar
overlordship, which previously existed in a few cases, e.g.,
Sultanate of Brunei's overlordship of the
Kingdom of Maynila. Other independent polities that were not vassals to other States, e.g.,
Confederation of Madja-as and the
Rajahnate of Cebu, were more of
potectorates or
suzerainties having had alliances with the Spanish Crown before the Kingdom took total control of most parts of the Archipelago. ==Europe==