Historian
William Chafe has explored the defensive techniques developed inside the African American community to avoid the worst features of Jim Crow as expressed in the legal system, unbalanced economic power, and intimidation and psychological pressure. Chafe says "protective socialization by black people themselves" was created inside the community in order to accommodate white-imposed sanctions while subtly encouraging challenges to those sanctions. Known as "walking the tightrope", such efforts at bringing about change were only slightly effective before the 1920s. However, this did build the foundation for later generations to advance racial equality and de-segregation. Chafe argued that the places essential for change to begin were institutions, particularly black churches, which functioned as centers for community-building and discussion of politics. Additionally, some all-black communities, such as Mound Bayou, Mississippi, and Ruthville, Virginia, served as sources of pride and inspiration for black society as a whole. Over time, pushback and open defiance of the oppressive existing laws grew, until it reached a boiling point in the aggressive, large-scale activism of the 1950s civil rights movement.
Brown v. Board of Education '' (1954), the
U.S. Supreme Court under Chief Justice
Earl Warren ruled unanimously that public school segregation was unconstitutional. The NAACP Legal Defense Committee (a group that became independent of the NAACP) – and its lawyer,
Thurgood Marshall – brought the landmark case
Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, before the
U.S. Supreme Court under Chief Justice
Earl Warren.
Integrating collegiate sports Racial integration of all-white collegiate sports teams was high on the Southern agenda in the 1950s and 1960s. Involved were issues of equality, racism, and the alumni demand for the top players needed to win high-profile games. The
Atlantic Coast Conference (ACC) of flagship state universities in the Southeast took the lead. First they started to schedule integrated teams from the North. Finally, ACC schoolstypically under pressure from boosters and civil rights groupsintegrated their teams. With an alumni base that dominated local and state politics, society and business, the ACC schools were successful in their endeavoras Pamela Grundy argues, they had learned how to win:
Public arena In 1955,
Rosa Parks refused to give up her seat on a city bus to a white man in
Montgomery, Alabama. This was not the first time this happened – for example, Parks was inspired by 15-year-old
Claudette Colvin taking the same action nine months earlier – but the Parks act of
civil disobedience was chosen, symbolically, as an important catalyst in the growth of the
post-1954 civil rights movement; activists built the
Montgomery bus boycott around it, which lasted more than a year and resulted in desegregation of the privately run buses in the city. Civil rights protests and actions, together with legal challenges, resulted in a series of legislative and court decisions which contributed to undermining the Jim Crow system.
End of legal segregation signs the
Civil Rights Act of 1964. The decisive action ending segregation came when Congress in bipartisan fashion overcame
Southern filibusters to pass the
Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the
Voting Rights Act of 1965. A complex interaction of factors came together unexpectedly in the period 1954–1965 to make the momentous changes possible. The Supreme Court had taken the first initiative in
Brown v. Board of Education (1954), declaring segregation of public schools unconstitutional. Enforcement was rapid in the North and border states, but was deliberately stopped in the South by the movement called
Massive Resistance, sponsored by rural segregationists who largely controlled the state legislatures. Southern liberals, who counseled moderation, were shouted down by both sides and had limited impact. Much more significant was the civil rights movement, especially the
Southern Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC) headed by
Martin Luther King Jr. It largely displaced the old, much more moderate NAACP in taking leadership roles. King organized massive demonstrations, that seized massive media attention in an era when network television news was an innovative and universally watched phenomenon. SCLC, student activists and smaller local organizations staged demonstrations across the South. National attention focused on
Birmingham, Alabama, where protesters (mostly young teenagers), faced off against Commissioner of Public Safety
Bull Connor, Connor arrested 900 on one day alone. The next day Connor unleashed billy clubs, police dogs, and high-pressure water hoses to disperse and punish the young demonstrators with a brutality that horrified the nation. The brutality undermined the image of a modernizing progressive urban South. President
John F. Kennedy, who had been calling for moderation, threatened to use federal troops to restore order in Birmingham. The result in Birmingham was compromise by which the new mayor opened the library, golf courses, and other city facilities to both races, against the backdrop of church bombings and assassinations. In summer 1963, there were 800 demonstrations in 200 southern cities and towns, with over 100,000 participants, and 15,000 arrests. In
Alabama in June 1963, Governor
George Wallace escalated the crisis by defying court orders to admit the first two black students to the
University of Alabama. Kennedy responded by sending Congress a comprehensive civil rights bill, and ordered Attorney General
Robert F. Kennedy to file federal lawsuits against segregated schools, and to deny funds for discriminatory programs. Martin Luther King launched a huge march on Washington in August 1963, bringing out 200,000 demonstrators in front of the
Lincoln Memorial, at the time the largest political assembly in the nation's history. The Kennedy administration now gave full-fledged support to the civil rights movement, but powerful southern congressmen blocked any legislation. After Kennedy was assassinated, President
Lyndon B. Johnson called for immediate passage of Kennedy's civil rights legislation as a memorial to the martyred president. Johnson formed a coalition with Northern Republicans that led to passage in the House, and with the help of Republican Senate leader
Everett Dirksen with passage in the Senate early in 1964. For the first time in history, the southern filibuster was broken and the Senate finally passed its version on June 19 by vote of 73 to 27. The Civil Rights Act of 1964 was the most powerful affirmation of equal rights ever made by Congress. It guaranteed access to public accommodations such as restaurants and places of amusement, authorized the Justice Department to bring suits to desegregate facilities in schools, gave new powers to the
Civil Rights Commission; and allowed federal funds to be cut off in cases of discrimination. Furthermore, racial, religious and gender discrimination was outlawed for businesses with 25 or more employees, as well as apartment houses. The South resisted until the last moment, but as soon as the new law was signed by President Johnson on July 2, 1964, it was widely accepted across the nation. There was only a scattering of diehard opposition, typified by restaurant owner
Lester Maddox in Georgia. In January 1964, President Lyndon Johnson met with civil rights leaders. On January 8, during his first
State of the Union address, Johnson asked Congress to "let this session of Congress be known as the session which did more for civil rights than the last hundred sessions combined." On June 21, civil rights workers
Michael Schwerner,
Andrew Goodman, and
James Chaney disappeared in
Neshoba County, Mississippi, where they were volunteering in the registration of African American voters as part of the
Freedom Summer project. The disappearance of the three activists captured national attention and the ensuing outrage was used by Johnson and civil rights activists to build a coalition of northern and western Democrats and Republicans and push Congress to pass the
Civil Rights Act of 1964. On July 2, 1964, Johnson signed the historic Civil Rights Act of 1964. It invoked the
Commerce Clause By 1965, efforts to break the grip of state disenfranchisement by education for voter registration in southern counties had been underway for some time, but had achieved only modest success overall. In some areas of the Deep South, white resistance made these efforts almost entirely ineffectual. The murder of the three voting-rights activists in Mississippi in 1964 and the state's refusal to prosecute the murderers, along with numerous other acts of violence and terrorism against black people, had gained national attention. Finally, the
unprovoked attack on March 7, 1965, by county and state troopers on peaceful Alabama marchers crossing the
Edmund Pettus Bridge en route from Selma to the state capital of
Montgomery, persuaded the President and Congress to overcome Southern legislators' resistance to effective voting rights enforcement legislation. President Johnson issued a call for a strong voting rights law and hearings soon began on the bill that would become the Voting Rights Act. The
Voting Rights Act of 1965 ended legally sanctioned state barriers to voting for all federal, state and local elections. It also provided for federal oversight and monitoring of counties with historically low minority voter turnout. Years of enforcement have been needed to overcome resistance, and additional legal challenges have been made in the courts to ensure the ability of voters to elect candidates of their choice. For instance, many cities and counties introduced
at-large election of council members, which resulted in many cases of diluting minority votes and preventing election of minority-supported candidates. After passage of the act, Martin Luther King, Jr., began to turn his attentions to a fledgling
Poor People's Campaign. His ill-fated proposal for an Economic Bills of Rights was met with hostility from southern Democrats as well as northern and southern Republicans in Congress. In 2013, the
Roberts Court, in
Shelby County v. Holder, removed the requirement established by the Voting Rights Act that Southern states needed Federal approval for changes in voting policies. Several states immediately made changes in their laws restricting voting access. ==Influence and aftermath==