India From the end of the war until February 2000, the
Indian stock market rose by more than 30%. The next
Indian national budget included major increases in military spending. There was a surge in patriotism, with many celebrities expressing their support for the Kargil cause. Indians were angered by media reports of the death of pilot
Ajay Ahuja, especially after Indian authorities reported that Ahuja had been murdered and his body
mutilated by Pakistani troops. The war had produced higher than expected fatalities for the Indian military, with a sizeable percentage of them including newly
commissioned officers. One month after conclusion of the Kargil War, the
Atlantique Incident, in which a
Pakistan Navy plane was shot down by India, briefly reignited fears of a conflict between the two countries. After the war, the Indian government severed ties with Pakistan and increased defence preparedness. India increased its defence budget as it sought to acquire more state of the art equipment. Media reported about military procurement irregularities and criticism of
intelligence agencies like
Research and Analysis Wing, which failed to predict the intrusions or the identity and number of infiltrators during the war. An internal assessment report by the armed forces, published in an Indian magazine, showed several other failings, including "a sense of complacency" and being "unprepared for a
conventional war" on the presumption that
nuclearism would sustain peace. It also highlighted the lapses in
command and control, the insufficient troop levels and the dearth of large-
calibre guns like the Bofors. In 2006, retired
Air Chief Marshal, A. Y. Tipnis, alleged that the Indian Army did not fully inform the government about the intrusions, adding that the army chief Ved Prakash Malik, was initially reluctant to use the full strike capability of the Indian Air Force, instead requesting only
helicopter gunship support. Soon after the conflict, India also decided to complete the project, previously stalled by Pakistan, to fence the entire LOC. The end of the Kargil conflict was followed by the
13th Indian General Elections to the
Lok Sabha, which gave a decisive
mandate to the
National Democratic Alliance (NDA) government. It was re-elected to power in September–October 1999 with a majority of 303 seats out of 545 in the Lok Sabha. On the diplomatic front,
Indo-US relations improved, as the United States appreciated Indian attempts to restrict the conflict to a limited geographic area.
Relations with Israel—which had discreetly aided India with ordnance supply and
materiel such as
unmanned aerial vehicles, laser-guided bombs, and
satellite imagery—also were bolstered. The end and victory of the Kargil War is celebrated annually in India as
Kargil Vijay Diwas.
Kargil Review Committee Soon after the war the
Atal Bihari Vajpayee government set up an inquiry into its causes and to analyse perceived Indian intelligence failures. The high-powered committee was chaired by eminent strategic affairs analyst
K. Subrahmanyam and given powers to interview anyone with current or past associations with Indian security, including former
Prime Ministers. The committee's final report (also referred to as the "Subrahmanyam Report") led to a large-scale restructuring of
Indian Intelligence. It, however, came in for heavy criticism in the Indian media for its perceived avoidance of assigning specific responsibility for failures over detecting the Kargil intrusions. The committee was also embroiled in controversy for indicting
Brigadier Surinder Singh of the Indian Army for his failure to report enemy intrusions in time, and for his subsequent conduct. Many press reports questioned or contradicted this finding and claimed that Singh had in fact issued early warnings that were ignored by senior Indian Army commanders and, ultimately, higher government functionaries. In a departure from the norm the final report was published and made publicly available. Some chapters and all annexures, however, were deemed to contain classified information by the government and not released. K. Subrahmanyam later wrote that the annexures contained information on the development of India's
nuclear weapons program and the roles played by Prime Ministers
Rajiv Gandhi,
P. V. Narasimha Rao and
V. P. Singh.
Pakistan ,
Prime minister at that time, after a few months a
military coup d'état was initiated that ousted him and his government. Shortly after declaring itself a nuclear weapons state, Pakistan had been humiliated diplomatically and militarily. Faced with the possibility of
international isolation, the already fragile
Pakistan economy was weakened further. The morale of Pakistan forces after the withdrawal declined as many units of the
Northern Light Infantry suffered heavy casualties. The government refused to accept the dead bodies of many officers, an issue that provoked outrage and protests in the Northern Areas. Pakistan initially did not acknowledge many of its casualties, but Sharif later said that over 4,000 Pakistani troops were killed in the operation. Responding to this, Pervez Musharraf said, "It hurts me when an ex-premier undermines his own forces", and claimed that Indian casualties were more than that of Pakistan. The legacy of Kargil war still continues to be debated on Pakistan's news channels and television political correspondents, which Musharraf repeatedly appeared to justify. Many in Pakistan had expected a victory over the
Indian military based on Pakistani official reports on the war, The military leadership is believed to have felt let down by the prime minister's decision to withdraw the remaining fighters. However, some authors, including Musharraf's close friend and former American
CENTCOM Commander General
Anthony Zinni, and former Prime minister Nawaz Sharif, state that it was General Musharraf who requested that Sharif withdraw Pakistani troops. In 2012, Musharraf's senior officer and retired major-general
Abdul Majeed Malik maintained that Kargil was a "total disaster" and bitterly criticised General Musharraf. Pointing out the fact that Pakistan was in no position to fight India in that area; the Nawaz Sharif government initiated the diplomatic process by involving the US President
Bill Clinton and got Pakistan out of the difficult scenario. With Sharif placing the onus of the Kargil attacks squarely on the army chief Pervez Musharraf, there was an atmosphere of uneasiness between the two. On
12 October 1999, General Musharraf staged a bloodless ''coup d'état'', ousting Nawaz Sharif.
Benazir Bhutto, an
opposition leader in the
parliament and former prime minister, called the Kargil War "Pakistan's greatest blunder". Many ex-officials of the military and the
Inter-Services Intelligence (Pakistan's principal
intelligence agency) also believed that "Kargil was a waste of time" and "could not have resulted in any advantage" on the larger issue of Kashmir. A retired Pakistan Army's Lieutenant-General
Ali Kuli Khan, lambasted the war as "a disaster bigger than the
East Pakistan tragedy", adding that the plan was "flawed in terms of its conception, tactical planning and execution" that ended in "sacrificing so many soldiers". The Pakistani media criticised the whole plan and the eventual climbdown from the Kargil heights since there were no gains to show for the loss of lives and it only resulted in international condemnation. Despite calls by many, no public commission of inquiry was set up in Pakistan to investigate the people responsible for initiating the conflict. The
Pakistan Muslim League (PML(N)) published a
white paper in 2006, which stated that Nawaz Sharif constituted an inquiry committee that recommended a
court martial for General Pervez Musharraf, but Musharraf "stole the report" after toppling the government, to save himself. The report also claims that India knew about the plan 11 months before its launch, enabling a complete victory for India on military, diplomatic and economic fronts. A statement in June 2008 by a former
X Corps commander and
Director-General of
Military Intelligence (M.I.) that time,
Lieutenant-General (retired)
Jamshed Gulzar Kiani said that: "As Prime minister, Nawaz Sharif "was never briefed by the army" on the Kargil attack, reignited the demand for a probe of the episode by legal and political groups. Though the Kargil conflict had brought the Kashmir dispute into international focus, which was one of Pakistan's aims, it had done so in negative circumstances that eroded its credibility, since the infiltration came just after a peace process between the two countries had been concluded. The sanctity of the LOC too received international recognition. President Clinton's move to ask Islamabad to withdraw hundreds of armed militants from Indian-administered Kashmir was viewed by many in Pakistan as indicative of a clear shift in US policy against Pakistan. After the war, a few changes were made to the Pakistan armed forces. In recognition of the Northern Light Infantry's performance in the war, which even drew praise from a retired Indian Lt. General, the regiment was incorporated into the regular army. And like previous unsuccessful infiltrations attempts, such as
Operation Gibraltar, which sparked
the 1965 war, there was little co-ordination or information sharing among the branches of the
Pakistani Armed Forces. One US Intelligence study is reported to have stated that Kargil was yet another example of Pakistan's (lack of)
grand strategy, repeating the follies of the previous wars. In 2013, General Musharraf's close collaborator and confidential subordinate
Lieutenant General (retired)
Shahid Aziz revealed to Pakistan's
news televisions and
electronic media, that "[Kargil] adventure' was India's intelligence failure and Pakistan's miscalculated move, the Kargil operation was known only to General Parvez Musharraf and four of his close collaborators". ==Casualties==