Middle Ages Before the
Third Council of Toledo, the Iberian Peninsula was socially divided between
Visigoths and
Hispano-Romans. The latter, who were Catholics, were subject to the former, among whom Arianism initially predominated. Two different legislations applicable to each group also prevailed. From 589 until the
Saracen invasion of 711, in
Visigothic Hispania only one legislation would exist, and both peoples would merge into one. According to
François Guizot, the Third Council of Toledo marked the beginning of a new phase in Spanish civilization led by the Church. Visigothic law, which he characterized as previously personal and “barbaric” in nature, acquired a more systematic and social character, with members of the clergy exerting influence on the governance of the kingdom. For this reason, some currents of Spanish Catholic thought identified the conversion of
Reccared I with the birth of the Spanish nation. The
Suebi, formerly pagan, had already converted to Catholicism with their king
Chararic, being incorporated shortly after into the Visigothic kingdom by Reccared's father,
Liuvigild. Reccared’s successors, particularly from the reign of Sisebut onward, also promoted the conversion of the Jewish population, seeking religious unity within the kingdom of Hispania under Catholicism. The
Muslim conquest of the Iberian Peninsula in 711 altered this situation. During the period of the
Reconquista, Christianity, Islam, and Judaism coexisted both in Muslim-ruled al-Andalus and in the northern Christian kingdoms. Although mixed marriages and apostasy—whether from Islam in al-Andalus or from Catholicism in Christian territories—were prohibited, Christians (
Mozarabs) generally retained the right to practice their religion under Islamic rule, Muslims (
Mudéjars) under Christian rule, and Jews in both spheres. Despite the relative tolerance practiced during the early centuries of Muslim rule, relations among religious and social groups in the
Emirate and
Caliphate of Córdoba were not always peaceful. Episodes of violence occurred, such as the movement of the
Martyrs of Córdoba Umar ibn Hafsun. As the
Reconquista advanced, the population of the northern Christian kingdoms increased significantly through the migration of Mozarabs from Muslim territories and through captives brought north by Christian expeditions. Severe persecution of Mozarabic Christians in al-Andalus occurred particularly after the invasions of the
Almoravids and
Almohads. The Almoravids decreed the
expulsion of the Mozarabs in 1126, and the Almohads ordered the expulsion of Jews from al-Andalus in 1146. . Equestrian statue in the
Plaza Nueva in Seville. After the
expedition of Alfonso the Battler, with which the Mozarabs collaborated, a multitude of them were deported to Africa by decree of the Almoravid emir
Ali ibn Yusuf in the year 1126 (thousands of them would manage to return to Spain two decades later, settling in Toledo) and a few years later those who remained, subjected to continuous harassment, were forced, by decree of the Almohad sultan
Abd al-Mu'min, to emigrate to
Castile and
León or Islamize, under penalty of death and confiscation of their property. According to Francisco Javier Simonet, the tyranny of the Almoravids was such that the Muslims of Seville themselves requested the protection of Emperor
Alfonso VII of León, obliging themselves to pay him tribute. After Lower Andalusia was reconquered by King
Saint Ferdinand in the following century, the Muslims would finally be expelled from this region as a consequence of the
Mudéjar revolt of 1264. Following the departure of the former Muslim population, the region was gradually repopulated with Christians from the north. From the reign of
Alfonso X the Wise, legislation began to incorporate the principle of Catholic unity, which would be reflected in the
Fuero Real, the
Siete Partidas, and the
Ordenamiento de Alcalá.
Early Modern period '' (work by
Francisco Pradilla, 1882). After the culmination of the
Reconquista with the
taking of Granada, the
Catholic Monarchs would set out to definitively recover the peninsular religious unity lost in 711, as coexistence between different religions in Spain generated frequent and bloody tumults. The Jews, in particular, were hated by Christians, who considered them a cursed and foreign people of excessive greed, and accused them of practicing horrendous crimes, such as the ritual crucifixion of Christian children. For their part, the Hebrews organized themselves to confront the Christians, and in 1485 they assassinated the inquisitor
Saint Peter of Arbués in
La Seo in Zaragoza, which aroused a wave of indignation throughout the kingdom and increased hatred towards Jews and false converts. All this led to the decree in 1492 of the
expulsion of the Jews who did not wish to convert to Christianity. This measure was added to the establishment in 1478 of the
Spanish Inquisition, with jurisdiction only over baptized Christians, which had to ensure the integrity and purity of the faith. The main reason for the creation of this tribunal would have been to put an end to the widespread
Judaizing practice of the converts. According to Modesto Hernández Villaescusa, one of the main functions of the Holy Office would be to avoid collisions between
Old Christians and
New Christians, since the former distrusted the latter, who were suspected of being sacrilegious, heretical, and Judaizing.
Jaime Balmes would go so far as to say that "Ferdinand and Isabella, in establishing the Inquisition, responded more to the wishes of the people than to their own policy." After the first
revolt of the Granada Mudéjars (1499-1501), the legal status of mudejaría was suspended, and in 1502 a pragmatic sanction was issued requiring Muslims who wished to remain in the
Crown of Castile to convert to Christianity. This measure did not initially extend to the Mudéjars of the
Crown of Aragon, largely because of the protection afforded to them by their lords, who derived significant income from their communities. At the popular level, however, hostility toward the Muslim population was pronounced, as demonstrated during the Revolt of the
Germanías (1521-1522) in the
Kingdom of Valencia. In the Cortes of Zaragoza held in 1519,
Charles V swore not to alter the status of the Mudéjars. He subsequently decreed that those wishing to remain in the Crown of Aragon were also required to receive baptism, after obtaining from
Pope Clement VII the bull
Idcirco Nostris (1524), which released him from his prior oath. The papal decision was justified on the grounds that religious unity was considered necessary to ensure tranquility within his kingdoms. Throughout the 16th century on the coasts of Spain, especially in the
Kingdom of Granada, Turks,
Berbers, and
corsairs practiced looting and kidnapping of Christians, which, according to reports transmitted to the king, they were able to do due to the treatment and help they received from some natives of the land. Faced with this situation, in the Pragmatic Sanction of 1567
Philip II would prohibit Morisco customs as a final attempt at assimilation, which provoked the
Rebellion of the Alpujarras, leading to the expulsion of the Moriscos from the Kingdom of Granada. After the continuous failure of efforts to achieve the full conversion of the Moriscos, the various revolts they led, and their alleged dealings with
the Turk, the
King of Morocco, the heretics, and other princes hostile to the King of Spain, it would be
Philip III who finally decreed in 1609 the
expulsion of the Moriscos from all of Spain. (1420-1498). During the reign of
Philip II, the activity of the Inquisition intensified, and both ecclesiastical and civil authorities adopted a markedly vigilant stance in religious matters. Philip II was regarded as a firm defender of Catholic orthodoxy and opposed the spread of Protestantism within his realms. In his work
El Protestantismo comparado con el Catolicismo (1852), Balmes argued that the introduction of Protestantism into Spain during Philip’s reign would likely have provoked civil war, as had occurred in other European countries, and would have endangered the political unity of the Spanish monarchy. At the same time, some authors have contrasted the actions of the Spanish Inquisition with contemporaneous developments in northern Europe. While numerous trials and executions for witchcraft took place in various parts of Europe, it has been argued that in Spain the Inquisition limited such persecutions and that certain Protestant tribunals were comparatively severe in religious matters. According to Francisco Javier García Rodrigo, the Holy Office in Spain showed leniency toward those who abjured heresy, and many of those tried avoided capital punishment and confiscation of property, as execution required a formal declaration of guilt combined with confession and persistence in error. According to García Rodrigo, thanks to its special regulation, the result produced by the Inquisition would have been positive: The codes of
Castile,
Aragon, and
Portugal maintained the principle of Catholic unity until the 19th century, as reflected in the Nueva Recopilación (1567) and the Novísima Recopilación (1805), although the rise of Bourbon
regalism in the 18th century led to a partial diminution of the Church’s preeminence. According to Mariano Tirado y Rojas,
Freemasonry was introduced into Spain from England in 1727 and initially promoted freedom of worship. Masonic texts imported from Portuguese lodges around 1750 affirmed respect for “all religious practices that morality allows, because it wants the one deemed appropriate in conscience to be respected” and denied the divinity of
Jesus Christ. Although King
Ferdinand VI, in line with papal condemnations, prohibited Freemasonry in 1751, enforcement was limited, and Masons soon attained prominent political positions. The first Spanish Freemason to hold significant governmental power was the
Count of Aranda, minister of
Charles III, who in 1767 ordered the expulsion of the Jesuits, an action celebrated by Masonic circles. The 18th century also saw the influence of
Jansenist in Spain, a movement hostile to the Jesuits and condemned as heretical by the Holy See, which advocated an enlightened form of regalism that transferred prerogatives from the pope to the king. In the words of the Italian Jansenist cleric Domingo Cavalario, the pope, religious orders, decretals, and the Inquisition were the source of the Church’s ills, and comprehensive reform was necessary. However, the historian Vicente de la Fuente affirmed that
Charles III did not dare to abolish the Inquisition, reportedly telling his minister
Manuel de Roda, “The Spaniards want it, and it does not bother me,” when the subject was raised. His ministers, however, gradually curtailed the tribunal’s powers, leaving it significantly weakened by the end of his reign. Under
Charles IV, the Jansenist
Ramón José de Arce was appointed Inquisitor General, reflecting continued attempts at administrative reform.
Reign of Ferdinand VII . The irruption of
liberalism in Spain after the
French invasion of 1808 undermined the authority of the Church in society. However, neither the
Statute of Bayonne, nor the
Constitution of Cádiz, nor subsequent ones up to
that of 1845 ceased to contain in their articles precepts affirming religious unity as a constitutional essence. In fact, the
Constitution of 1812 would even state in its Article 12: Despite this, on 28 February 1813, the
Cortes of Cádiz decreed the
abolition of the Inquisition, which would be restored in 1814 by
Ferdinand VII after
his return to Spain. The early liberals would also accuse the Ferdinandean absolutists of being liars for stating that the Constitution of 1812, promoted by "libertines, heretics, impious, and
Freemasons", according to them, came to strip Spaniards of their religion. On the contrary, in his pamphlet
La Constitución vindicada de las groseras calumnias de sus enemigos () 1820, the liberal canon Santiago Sedeño affirmed: Nevertheless, during the
Liberal Triennium secularizing measures would occur, such as the suppression of all monasteries of the monastic orders for their
disentailment, and the definitive abolition of the Inquisition. In 1822 the
Royalist War broke out, establishing the so-called
Regency of Urgel in Catalonia. Within the framework of the
Holy Alliance, a French army, known as the
Hundred Thousand Sons of Saint Louis, entered Spain to aid the royalists, and were received as liberators with cries of "Long live the absolute king!" and "Long live Religion and the Inquisition!". Once
Ferdinand VII was liberated in 1823, the king decided not to re-establish the
tribunal of the Holy Office and made a series of concessions to the liberals, which ultimately motivated a new insurrection, also mainly centered in Catalonia, known as the
War of the Aggrieved (), this time against the king's government. After the death of Ferdinand VII in 1833, the
First Carlist War would break out, in which, under a dynastic dispute, the partisans of the
Ancien Régime and those of the new liberal parliamentary system would fight for seven years.
Reign of Isabella II , president of the government when the
Concordat of 1851 was signed. During the
reign of Isabella II, in which
liberalism in Spain would be definitively established, Catholic unity was preserved, although a religious tribunal no longer existed. In the
concordat between Spain and the Holy See of 1851, which re-established Church-State relations after the
disentailments that had deprived the Church of its property, it was stated in its Article 1: However, the
Democratic Party, the left wing of liberalism, would advocate for freedom of worship. During the
progressive biennium, amidst rumors that the draft
Spanish Constitution of 1856 might contemplate freedom of worship, the queen herself, who retained the power of
veto, would state to the progressive deputy
Vicente Sancho: The Carlists, for their part, would not cease to oppose the close possibility of freedom of worship being granted in Spain, and in their "
letter to the Spaniards",
Maria Teresa of Braganza, widow of
Carlos María Isidro de Borbón, in invalidating her stepson
Juan de Borbón y Braganza as the "legitimate king" (due to his liberal thought and his recognition of Isabella II's
constitutional monarchy), defined Catholic unity as "the most fundamental of our laws, the solid foundation of the Spanish Monarchy, as of all true civilization," adding that "the certain and infallible truths of the Catholic faith" were "the solid foundation of our political, civil, and domestic life" and that "the
Decalogue, the Divine Code, is the foundation of all our laws." In the drafting of this and other manifestos of the Princess of Beira, the Bishop of Seo de Urgel,
José Caixal, and the director of the newspaper
La Esperanza, Pedro de la Hoz, collaborated.
Democratic Sexennium . Many of the ministers were
Freemasons.According to Mariano Tirado y Rojas, revolutionary elements such as Generals
Serrano and
Prim,
Práxedes Mateo Sagasta,
Manuel Becerra,
Nicolás María Rivero, Juan Moreno Benítez,
Juan Álvarez de Lorenzana and almost all the ministers, undersecretaries, directors general, civil governors, and captains general belonged to regular
Freemasonry and obeyed the same Supreme Council, which in mid-October 1868 addressed a program with 14 anti-clerical propositions to the
Provisional Government, the first of which was freedom of worship. Article 21 of the
Constitution of 1869 would state: . Due to their defense of Catholic unity, suppressed by the legislation of the
Revolutionary Sexennium, a good part of the
liberal moderates joined
Carlism, which at that time went from being a phenomenon of an insurrectional character that fundamentally demanded the restoration of the
Ancien Régime in the proscribed dynasty, to becoming a renewed political movement with numerous newspapers throughout Spain, a minority of up to 51 deputies in the Cortes, and a defined political doctrine that would make Catholic unity its banner as the main demand. The pretender
Carlos VII defined Catholic unity as "the symbol of our glories, the spirit of our laws, and the blessed bond of union of all Spaniards, who love it and demand it as an integral part of their dearest aspirations." One of the most eloquent defenders of religious unity in the Cortes during this period was the canon Vicente Manterola. Three million signatures from Spaniards were presented asking for the maintenance of Catholic unity, although this did not succeed in changing the law. during this era Carlism also began to make
fuerismo a banner as an essential part of its political doctrine, making it clear that freedom of worship,
civil marriage, and other laws of the revolutionary government constituted a violation of the
fuero (
contrafuero), as denounced by the Biscayan traditionalist Arístides de Artiñano. ).
Restoration Once the
liberal monarchy was restored in the person of
Alfonso XII, a middle ground on the religious question was sought between the maximalist positions of the Carlists and Republicans. The
Constitution of 1876 represented a compromise, and although Article 11 did not strictly maintain religious unity (invoking the
hypothesis of dissident cults and settling on the thesis of the lesser evil), it repealed the freedom of worship of the Constitution of 1869, instead establishing a regime of tolerance of cults. The aforementioned Article 11 read as follows: , architect of the
Constitution of 1876.The Apostolic Nuncio communicated to the government, in the name of
Pope Pius IX, his concern and complaint regarding the aforementioned article, due to the "dire consequences it would bring to the Spanish nation, which since time immemorial has been in possession of the precious jewel of Catholic unity." For his part, the Cardinal Archbishop of Toledo, Primate of the Spains, together with other bishops, wrote to King
Alfonso XII begging him to preserve Catholic unity in Spain, since what was intended with the law of religious tolerance was "to propagate the horrible leprosy of indifferentism, heresy, and impiety" and "to de-Catholicize the Spanish people." Other prelates also stated that the Spanish people would end up despising the laws of God and the Church, without respecting social principles, not even that of authority, because tolerance of cults would engender
indifferentism, indifferentism irreligion, and irreligion anarchy. The Bishop of Salamanca, Narciso Martínez Izquierdo, would state in the Senate, alluding to Article 11: '' (1875-1936), organ of the
Integrist Party and the
Traditionalist Communion. On the other side, the work of
Cánovas del Castillo was bitterly censured, considering that there had been no need to repeal the constitutional text of 1869 in a matter so substantial for progressive liberalism as freedom of worship, and labeling his actions in this regard as retrograde. Cánovas said that the regime of legal tolerance articulated in the Constitution was preferable to the regime of practical or
de facto tolerance that resulted from the application of the previous
Constitutions of 1837 and
1845. According to
Joaquín Sánchez de Toca, public law should take as its basis, not only that the Catholic religion was that of official Spain, the
religion of the State, but also that of all Spaniards; that being a child of Spain was enough to be a child of the Church. Article 11 of the Constitution confined this profession of faith to official Spain, to the legal organism of national sovereignty, to the State. The Spanish nation continued to be Catholic, but religious unity was no longer the basis of Spanish citizenship; the dissident, and even the apostate, had entered into the common law of Spanish citizenship. This was the most transcendental alteration introduced by the Constitution of 1876, if not in the letter, in the spirit of the
Concordat of 1851, which in theory would continue in force until the proclamation of the
Second Republic in 1931. During the Restoration, the
Integrist Party led by
Ramón Nocedal (separated from
Carlism in 1888), would not only demand the abolition of tolerance of cults, but would also demand Catholic unity with "coercive sanction," that is, the recovery of a repressive body for crimes against the faith like the Inquisition. In their program they would state: In 1889, the partisans of Carlism and Integrism would celebrate extensively the "13th Centenary of the Catholic Unity of Spain" originating in the
Third Council of Toledo. The former created local, provincial, regional, and central committees, and organized civil and religious festivities that constituted a demonstration and a display of the forces of the
Carlist party. The commemoration also served the traditionalists as a counter-celebration of the first centenary of the
French Revolution.
Don Carlos, characterized by the
Marquis of Cerralbo as the "new Reccared," had stated the previous year: "I want to establish that lost Unity, and I want to conquer this Revolution, overwhelming peoples and kings." It was planned to erect a pyramid in
Toledo commemorating the conversion of Reccared, but the project was ultimately not carried out due to financial difficulties and the opposition of the liberal government. For their part, the Integrists began a subscription to place a commemorative plaque in the
Church of Santa Leocadia, where the subsequent
Councils of Toledo had taken place. This initiative, which came from
Félix Sardá y Salvany through the
Diario de Cataluña, was successfully completed in May 1892, in an event attended by the deputies of the Integrist minority in the Cortes,
Ramón Nocedal and Liborio de Ramery. inaugurated in 1893, during the government of
Sagasta. The regent
Maria Christina even assured that she would intervene to close it. The
Liberal Party and other left-wing forces would seek exactly the opposite of the Carlists and Integrists. Thus, in a speech given in Zaragoza in 1908,
Segismundo Moret presented freedom of worship as the fundamental basis upon which the union of all left-wing parties should be constituted, and the various governments presided over by
Sagasta from the beginning of the 20th century repeatedly declared their intention to reform the Concordat of 1851 to reduce the state contribution for worship and clergy to the Church. By Royal Order of 10 June 1910, the work of
José Canalejas, considered by many Catholics as the worst enemy of the Church in Spain, the application of tolerance of cults was further expanded, to the point that a breakdown in relations between the Spanish State and the Holy See came to be spoken of. With the draft law on Associations and the "Padlock Law" against
religious orders, the expansion of
civil marriage, and the secularization of cemeteries, the liberal government also aimed to reduce the influence of the Church in Spanish society. These laws were not vetoed by
Alfonso XIII, despite the requests made to him by the bishops. After the assassination of Canalejas, tensions between the government and the Church ended; the situation began to normalize with the government of the
Count of Romanones and the religious question would lose intensity in subsequent years, although it would not completely disappear.
Second Republic The
Second Republic approached the issue of freedom of worship in a
liberal-progressive manner, and broke any type of relationship between the State and the Church. From the recognition of the Catholic religion as the official one of the State, it moved to a radical separation between both realities. Likewise, the Republic abolished state funding of the Church from the beginning, introduced
divorce, decreed
secular education, and dissolved the
Society of Jesus in Spain. According to María Teresa de Lemus, the
Republican Constitution of 1931 was, above all, anti-Catholic.
Francoism in
Ceuta, inaugurated on 18 July 1940. After the Spanish Civil War of 1936–1939 and the establishment of the Franco regime under Francisco Franco, the practice of religions other than Catholicism was tolerated to a limited extent, particularly among foreign residents, as had occurred during the Restoration period. This situation was formalized in the Fuero de los Españoles, which, in terms similar to those of the Spanish
Constitution of 1876, stated that "No one shall be molested for their religious beliefs or the private exercise of their worship," although the same article added immediately that "No other ceremonies or external manifestations other than those of the Catholic Religion shall be permitted." On 12 December 1946, the newly created
United Nations condemned the Spanish regime for not respecting "freedom of speech, of opinion, and of religion," a condemnation joined in 1947 by the decision of US President
Harry S. Truman to exclude Spain from the
Marshall Plan. In 1947, Harry S. Truman excluded Spain from the Marshall Plan, and in 1952 he opposed Spain’s admission to NATO, citing delays by the Spanish government in allowing individuals to practice their religion freely. During the post-war period, traditionalist sectors denounced these external pressures and the expansion of Protestantism in Spain. In 1948, the National Secretariat of the Traditionalist Student Group, an organization aligned with Javier de Borbón Parma and Manuel Fal Conde, published a manifesto in defense of Catholic unity, describing Protestantism as a political danger for Spain and accusing the victorious powers of the Second World War of mobilizing European religious sectarianism against the country. It further warned of Protestant infiltration and expansion within Spain. The Carlist
Melchor Ferrer also denounced in early 1950 the establishment of a Protestant seminary near Madrid, the circulation of Protestant publications, and the degree of official tolerance that permitted, among other measures, the appointment of a Protestant professor in
Zaragoza. The practice of other non-Christian religions would also be tolerated. In 1938,
Ramón Serrano Suñer, then Minister of the Interior in the rebel government, initiated the construction of a mosque in Ceuta and delivered a speech praising the Muslim population. In 1947, the Francoist authorities inaugurated the Central Mosque of Melilla. From the late 1940s onward, Jewish religious practice was also permitted, and during the 1950s references appeared in official reports to the synagogue in Madrid and to the Jewish community in Spain. , architect of the 1967 religious freedom law. Nevertheless, the 1941 Agreement and the
Concordat of 1953 between the Spanish State and the
Holy See partly reaffirmed what was stated in the
Concordat of 1851, which referred to the Catholic, Apostolic, Roman Religion as "the sole religion of the Spanish nation." However, the expression “to the exclusion of any other worship” was omitted, leading Melchor Ferrer to argue that genuine religious unity did not exist under Francoism. During the 1940s and 1950s, some of the Protestant chapels that were being established were assaulted and looted, apparently by Carlist militants, far-rightists, or dependents of the diocesan Church. The pastoral letters of
Cardinal Segura and the writings of Bishop Zacarías de Vizcarra in turn made reference to the "immense Protestant propaganda" taking place in Spain. In 1962, the Francoist government announced the preparation of a statute intended to grant broader freedoms to Protestant communities. The draft, promoted by Foreign Minister
Fernando María Castiella, prompted opposition from sectors of the ultra-Catholic press. Faced with this situation, in 1963 the leaders of the
Traditionalist Communion issued a manifesto in defense of Catholic unity in the name of Javier de Borbón Parma. In 1965, the professor
Rafael Gambra, author of the book
La unidad religiosa y el derrotismo católico (), published by Editorial Católica Española S. A. and awarded that same year, argued in a press article that the introduction of religious freedom would facilitate Protestant and Jewish influence in Spain. Among the publications that showed their frontal opposition to the religious freedom project were, among others, the magazines
Juan Pérez,
¿Qué pasa? and
El Cruzado Español. The latter reproduced in 1963 a paragraph by Zacarías de Vizcarra, in which he said: The
Second Vatican Council and its declaration on religious freedom
Dignitatis humanae would strengthen Castiella's position. On 22 November 1966, General Franco announced to the Cortes the modification of Article 6 of the Fuero of the Spaniards, which would be worded as follows: Shortly after the reform of the Fuero de los Españoles, which was favorably received by the
Movement press, the Council of Ministers approved on 24 February 1967 the draft law prepared by Fernando María Castiella. Castiella argued that religious freedom constituted a natural right and was necessary if Spain wished to attain full respect within the international community. The bill, which was intensely debated in the
Francoist Cortes, received 239 amendments. The Archbishop of Valencia,
Marcelino Olaechea, one of the procuradores, left the chamber at the outset of the debates. Approximately twenty procuradores expressed total opposition to the project, including
Blas Piñar and the traditionalists
Joaquín Manglano and
José Luis Zamanillo. The
Baron de Cárcer, Ramón Albistur Esparza, and Fermín Yzurdiaga submitted amendments rejecting the bill in its entirety. Blas Piñar did not oppose the text as a whole but maintained that the development of religious freedom did not require statutory rank and could be implemented by the government through other regulatory provisions. On 20 May, a tribute was held at the Madrid restaurant El Bosque in honor of fifteen procuradores who had most strongly opposed the project, although, according to the Official Gazette of the Spanish Cortes, between nine and eleven ultimately voted against the final text. the principle known as Catholic unity ceased to have legal effect in Spain, and Protestant representatives publicly expressed their gratitude to Castiella. In December 1968, the Franco government repealed the
edict of expulsion of the Jews by the Catholic Monarchs and inaugurated a new Sephardic synagogue in central Madrid. Although the religious freedom law adopted by the Francoist Cortes was presented as compatible with the Catholic confessional character of the State, the conciliar declaration generated unease and uncertainty among leaders of the
Traditionalist Communion. The integrist wing of traditionalism continued to advocate the restoration of Catholic unity, a position reflected in publications such as the magazine
¿Qué pasa?, which adopted a critical stance toward the post-conciliar Church, and in the activities of the Centro de Estudios Históricos y Políticos General Zumalacárregui, directed by
Francisco Elías de Tejada, including the Traditionalist Studies Congresses of 1964 and 1968. Similar positions were maintained by other Carlist groups that rejected the ideological shift introduced by
Carlos Hugo de Borbón-Parma. The Spanish Priestly Brotherhood, established after the Second Vatican Council, also lamented the disappearance of Catholic unity in Spain and expressed the desire for its restoration.
Democracy of 1978 After the dissolution of the
Francoist regime, religious freedom was recognized as a fundamental right in Article 16 of the
Spanish Constitution of 1978, which also established the non-confessional character of the State. This provision was subsequently implemented by Organic Law 7/1980 of 5 July on Religious Freedom and further developed by Royal Decree 142/1981 of 9 January, concerning the organization and functioning of the Registry of Religious Entities, and Royal Decree 1980/1981 of 19 June, on the establishment of the Advisory Commission on Religious Freedom. In 1989, on the occasion of the 14th Centenary of the
Third Council of Toledo, the magazine
Iglesia-Mundo published a special issue in defense of the Catholic unity of Spain. Contributions were made by, among others,
José Orlandis, Tomás Marín,
Rafael Gambra, Mons. Emilio Silva de Castro, Victorino Rodríguez,
Álvaro d'Ors and the Bishop of Cuenca José Guerra Campos, under the direction of
Miguel Ayuso. In 2007, the Fundación Elías de Tejada established the Center for Studies for the Defense of the Catholic Unity of Spain. The center, presided over by
Alberto Ruiz de Galarreta and composed of
José Miguel Gambra Gutiérrez and
Miguel Ayuso, defined its purpose as the defense and promotion of the Catholic unity of Spain, understood as the sociological and legal situation in which the Catholic religion is regarded as the only religion with public relevance and as the foundation of the political community. == See also ==