Box office The Lion King has grossed $425 million in North America and $554 million in other territories, for a worldwide total of $979 million. After its initial run, having earned $763.5 million, it ranked as the
highest-grossing animated film of all time, the highest-grossing film of
Walt Disney Animation Studios, and the
highest-grossing film of 1994. It was the
second-highest-grossing film of all time, behind
Jurassic Park (1993). The film remained as the second-highest-grossing film until the spot was taken by
Independence Day (1996) two years later. It finished as the 5th highest grossing
film of the 1990s domestically. It held the record for the highest-grossing animated feature film (in North America, outside North America, and worldwide) until it was surpassed by
Finding Nemo (2003). With the earnings of the 3D run,
The Lion King surpassed all the aforementioned films but
Toy Story 3 (2010) to rank as the second-highest-grossing animated film worldwide—later dropping to ninth, and then tenth, surpassed by its photorealistic CGI remake counterpart—and it remains the highest-grossing hand-drawn animated film. It is also the biggest animated movie of the last 50 years in terms of estimated attendance.
The Lion King was also the highest-grossing G-rated film in the United States from 1994 to 2003 and again from 2011 to 2019 until its total was surpassed by
Toy Story 4 (2019) (unadjusted for inflation).
Original theatrical run During the first two days of limited release in two theaters,
The Lion King grossed $622,277, and for the weekend it earned nearly $1.6 million, placing the film in tenth place at the box office. The average of $793,377 per theater stands as the largest ever achieved during a weekend, and it was the highest-grossing opening weekend on under 50 screens, beating the record set by
Star Wars (1977) from 43 screens. The film grossed nearly $3.8 million from the two theaters in just 10 days. When it opened wide,
The Lion King grossed $40.9 million—which at the time was the fourth biggest opening weekend ever and the highest sum for a Disney film—to top the weekend box office. It displaced the previous box office champion
Wolf, while also topping
Speed and
Wyatt Earp. At that time, it easily outgrossed the previous biggest 1994 opening, which was the $37.2 million earned by
The Flintstones during the four-day
Memorial Day weekend. The film also produced the third-highest opening weekend gross of any film, trailing only behind
Jurassic Park (1993) and
Batman Returns (1992). For five years, the film held the record for having the highest opening weekend for an animated film until it was surpassed by
Toy Story 2 (1999). For its second weekend,
The Lion King collected a total of $34.2 million, outgrossing the openings of
The Shadow,
Blown Away and
I Love Trouble. It remained the number-one box office film for a total of two weeks until it was displaced by
Forrest Gump, followed by
True Lies the week after. In September 1994, Disney pulled the film from movie theaters and announced that it would be re-released during
Thanksgiving in order to take advantage of the holiday season. At the time, the film had earned $267 million in the United States. Upon its re-release in November 1994, it earned $5.5 million during its first weekend, ranking in fourth place behind
Star Trek Generations,
Interview with the Vampire and
The Santa Clause. Following its re-release, by March 1995, it had grossed $312.9 million,
Box Office Mojo estimates that the film sold over 74 million tickets in the US in its initial theatrical run, equivalent to $812.1 million adjusted for inflation in 2018. Internationally, the film grossed $455.8 million during its initial run, for a worldwide total of $763.5 million.
Critical response The Lion King was widely praised by film critics upon release. On
Rotten Tomatoes,
The Lion King has an approval rating of with an average score of , based on reviews. The website's critical consensus reads, "Emotionally stirring, richly drawn, and beautifully animated,
The Lion King stands tall within Disney's pantheon of classic family films." It also ranked 56th on Rotten Tomatoes' "Top 100 Animation Movies". At
Metacritic, which uses a
weighted average, the film received a score of 88 out of 100 based on 30 critics, indicating "universal acclaim". Audiences polled by
CinemaScore gave the film a rare "A+" grade on an A+ to F scale.
Roger Ebert of the
Chicago Sun-Times gave the film three and a half stars out of a possible four and called it "a superbly drawn animated feature". He further wrote in his print review, "The saga of Simba, which in its deeply buried origins owes something to Greek tragedy and certainly to
Hamlet, is a learning experience as well as an entertainment." On the television program
Siskel & Ebert, the film was praised but received a mixed reaction when compared to previous Disney films. Ebert and his partner
Gene Siskel both gave the film a "Thumbs Up", but Siskel said that it was not as good as
Beauty and the Beast and that it was "a good film, not a great one". Hal Hinson of
The Washington Post called it "an impressive, almost daunting achievement" and felt that the film was "spectacular in a manner that has nearly become commonplace with Disney's feature-length animations". However, he was less enthusiastic toward the end of his review saying, "Shakespearean in tone, epic in scope, it seems more appropriate for grown-ups than for kids. If truth be told, even for adults it is downright strange." Jeremy Gerard of
Variety opened his review, writing, "Set off by some of the richest imagery the studio's animators have produced, and held together by a timeless coming-of-age tale,
The Lion King marks a dazzling — and unexpectedly daring — addition to the Disney canon." However, he felt the songs were not as memorable as those composed by
Howard Ashman and
Alan Menken.
Janet Maslin of
The New York Times felt
The Lion King "is as visually enchanting as its pedigree suggests. But it also departs from the spontaneity of its predecessors and reveals more calculation." Duane Byrge of
The Hollywood Reporter called
The Lion King "a scrumptiously delightful moviegoing experience", in which he praised the voice cast, the music, and the emotionally resonant storyline.
Owen Gleiberman of
Entertainment Weekly praised the film, writing that it "has the resonance to stand not just as a terrific cartoon but as an emotionally pungent movie".
Rolling Stone film critic
Peter Travers praised the film and felt that it was "a hugely entertaining blend of music, fun, and eye-popping thrills, though it doesn't lack for heart".
James Berardinelli from
Reelviews.net praised the film saying, "With each new animated release, Disney seems to be expanding its already-broad horizons a little more.
The Lion King is the most mature (in more than one sense) of these films, and there clearly has been a conscious effort to please adults as much as children. Happily, for those of us who generally stay far away from 'cartoons', they have succeeded." Some reviewers were critical of the film's narrative.
Kenneth Turan of the
Los Angeles Times felt the film "is less of a piece than its revered predecessors and the first to have a core story noticeably less involving than its scintillating peripheral characters." Maslin felt the storyline has "more noticeably derivative moments", which she attributed to the film having "an original story" than previous Disney animated films.
The New Yorkers Terrence Rafferty considered that despite the good animation, the story felt like "manipulat[ing] our responses at will", as "Between traumas, the movie serves up soothingly banal musical numbers and silly, rambunctious comedy".
Accolades Other honors In 2008,
The Lion King was ranked as the 319th greatest film ever made by
Empire magazine, and in June 2011,
TIME named it one of "The 25 All-TIME Best Animated Films". In June 2008, the
American Film Institute listed
The Lion King as the fourth best film in the animation genre in its
AFI's 10 Top 10 list, having previously put "Hakuna Matata" as 99th on its
AFI's 100 Years...100 Songs ranking. The film was ranked 66th in a
Hollywood Reporter ranking of "Hollywood's Top 100 Movies of All Time" and the film ranked 86th in a BBC ranking of the "100 greatest American films." In 2016, the film was selected for preservation in the United States
National Film Registry by the
Library of Congress as being "culturally, historically, or aesthetically significant".
Year-end lists • 2nd – Douglas Armstrong,
The Milwaukee Journal • 5th – Sandi Davis,
The Oklahoman • 5th – Todd Anthony,
Miami New Times • 6th –
Stephen Hunter,
The Baltimore Sun • 6th – Christopher Sheid,
The Munster Times • 7th – Joan Vadeboncoeur,
Syracuse Herald American • 7th – Dan Craft,
The Pantagraph • 8th – Steve Persall,
St. Petersburg Times • 8th –
Desson Howe,
The Washington Post • 10th – Mack Bates,
The Milwaukee Journal • 10th – David Elliott,
The San Diego Union-Tribune • Top 7 (not ranked) – Duane Dudek,
Milwaukee Sentinel • Top 9 (not ranked) – Dan Webster,
The Spokesman-Review • Top 10 (listed alphabetically, not ranked) –
Matt Zoller Seitz,
Dallas Observer • Top 10 (listed alphabetically, not ranked) – William Arnold,
Seattle Post-Intelligencer • Top 10 (listed alphabetically, not ranked) – Mike Mayo,
The Roanoke Times • Top 10 (not ranked) – Bob Carlton,
The Birmingham News • "The second 10" (not ranked) – Sean P. Means,
The Salt Lake Tribune • Honorable mention –
Michael MacCambridge,
Austin American-Statesman • Honorable mention – Dennis King,
Tulsa World • Honorable mention – Glenn Lovell,
San Jose Mercury News • Honorable mention – John Hurley,
Staten Island Advance • Honorable mention – Jeff Simon,
The Buffalo News Criticisms Protests were raised against one scene where it appears as if the word "SEX" might have been embedded into the dust flying in the sky when Simba flops down, which conservative activist
Donald Wildmon asserted was a
subliminal message intended to promote
sexual promiscuity. Animator and story artist
Tom Sito has stated that the letters spell "SFX" (a common abbreviation for "
special effects"), not with an "E" instead of the "F", and were intended as an innocent "signature" created by the effects animation team. Hyena biologists protested against the animal's portrayal, though the complaints may have been somewhat
tongue-in-cheek. One hyena researcher, who had organized the animators' visit to the
University of California, Berkeley, Field Station for the Study of Behavior, Ecology, and Reproduction, where they would observe and sketch captive hyenas, listed "
boycott The Lion King" in an article listing ways to help preserve hyenas in the wild, and later "joke[d] that
The Lion King set back hyena conservation efforts." Even so, the film was also credited with "spark[ing] an interest" in hyenas at the Berkeley center. Others have also criticized the film for advancing a
fascist narrative in its portrayal of a lion kingdom and a circle of life where "only the strong and the beautiful triumph, and the powerless survive only by serving the strong."
Resemblance to Kimba the White Lion cub and a butterfly. Elements of
The Lion King bear some superficial resemblance to the 1960s Japanese
anime television series
Jungle Emperor (known as
Kimba the White Lion in the United States). The 1994 release of
The Lion King drew a protest in Japan, where
Kimba and its creator,
Osamu Tezuka, are cultural icons. 488 Japanese cartoonists and animators, led by the
manga author
Machiko Satonaka, signed a petition accusing Disney of plagiarism and demanding that they give due credit to Tezuka. Broderick believed initially that he was working on an American version of
Kimba. Allers said he was unfamiliar with
Kimba until
The Lion King was almost complete, and did not remember it being mentioned during development. The law professor
Madhavi Sunder suggested that Allers might have seen the 1989 remake of
Kimba on television while living in Tokyo. However, while Allers did move to Tokyo in 1983 to work on
Little Nemo: Adventures in Slumberland (1989), he moved back to the United States in 1985, four years before the 1989 remake of
Kimba began airing. Minkoff also said he was unfamiliar with
Kimba, Yoshihiro Shimizu of Tezuka Productions refuted rumors that the studio was paid
hush money by Disney and said they had no interest in suing Disney, explaining that "we think it's a totally different story". Shimizu said that they rejected urges from some American lawyers to sue because "we're a small, weak company... Disney's lawyers are among the top twenty in the world!" Tezuka's family and Tezuka Productions never pursued litigation. The American writer
Fred Ladd, who was involved with importing
Kimba and other Japanese anime into America for
NBC, expressed incredulity that Disney staff could be ignorant of
Kimba. Ladd said at least one animator was remembered by his colleagues as a
Kimba fan and vociferous about Disney's conduct during production. The animators
Tom Sito and Mark Kausler said they had watched
Kimba as children in the 1960s, but Sito denied any influence, and Kausler emphasized Disney's
Bambi as their model. ==Legacy==