Historically, important approaches to the study of mythology have included those of
Vico,
Schelling,
Schiller,
Jung,
Freud,
Lévy-Bruhl,
Lévi-Strauss,
Frye, the Soviet school, and the
Myth and Ritual School.
Ancient Greece and
Assyria'' (1916) 's
Mythology has been a major channel for English speakers to learn classical Greek and Roman mythology The critical interpretation of myth began with the
Presocratics.
Euhemerus was one of the most important pre-modern mythologists. He interpreted myths as accounts of actual historical events, though distorted over many retellings.
Sallustius divided myths into five categories: •
theological; • physical (or concerning
natural law); •
animistic (or concerning soul); • material; and • mixed, which concerns myths that show the interaction between two or more of the previous categories and are particularly used in initiations.
Plato condemned poetic myth when discussing education in the
Republic. His critique was primarily on the grounds that the uneducated might take the stories of gods and heroes literally. Nevertheless, he constantly referred to myths throughout his writings. As
Platonism developed in the phases commonly called
Middle Platonism and
neoplatonism, writers such as
Plutarch,
Porphyry,
Proclus,
Olympiodorus, and
Damascius wrote explicitly about the symbolic interpretation of traditional and
Orphic myths. Mythological themes were consciously employed in literature, beginning with
Homer. The resulting work may expressly refer to a mythological background without itself becoming part of a body of myths (
Cupid and Psyche). Medieval romance in particular plays with this process of turning myth into literature.
Euhemerism, as stated earlier, refers to the rationalization of myths, putting themes formerly imbued with mythological qualities into pragmatic contexts. An example of this would be following a cultural or religious paradigm shift (notably the re-interpretation of
pagan mythology following
Christianization).
European Renaissance relates the second half of the
Metamorphoses. In the upper left, Jupiter emerges from clouds to order Mercury to rescue Io. Interest in
polytheistic mythology revived during the
Renaissance, with early works of mythography appearing in the sixteenth century, among them the
Theologia Mythologica (1532).
19th century , the wise
demigod and one of the significant characters of
Finnish mythological 19th-century epic poetry,
The Kalevala (''Väinämöinen's Play'', Robert Wilhelm Ekman, 1866)|upright=1.05 .
Thor is the god of thunder in
Norse mythology. The first modern, Western scholarly theories of myth appeared during the second half of the 19th century—at the same time as "myth" was adopted as a scholarly term in European languages. The intellectual context for nineteenth-century scholars was profoundly shaped by emerging ideas about
evolution. These ideas included the recognition that many Eurasian languages—and therefore, conceivably, stories—were all descended from a lost common ancestor (the
Indo-European language) which could rationally be reconstructed through the comparison of its descendant languages. They also included the idea that
cultures might evolve in ways comparable to species. Unable to conceive impersonal natural laws, early humans tried to explain natural phenomena by attributing souls to inanimate objects, thus giving rise to
animism. According to Tylor, human thought evolved through stages, starting with mythological ideas and gradually progressing to scientific ideas. Müller also saw myth as originating from language, even calling myth a "disease of language". He speculated that myths arose due to the lack of
abstract nouns and
neuter gender in ancient languages.
Anthropomorphic figures of speech, necessary in such languages, were eventually taken literally, leading to the idea that natural phenomena were in actuality conscious or divine. Not all scholars, not even all 19th-century scholars, accepted this view.
Lucien Lévy-Bruhl claimed that "the primitive mentality is a condition of the human mind and not a stage in its historical development." Recent scholarship, noting the fundamental lack of evidence for "nature mythology" interpretations among people who actually circulated myths, has likewise abandoned the key ideas of "nature mythology". The mid-20th century saw the influential development of a
structuralist theory of mythology, led by
Lévi-Strauss. Strauss argued that myths reflect patterns in the mind and interpreted those patterns more as fixed mental structures, specifically pairs of opposites (good/evil, compassionate/callous), rather than unconscious feelings or urges. Meanwhile,
Bronislaw Malinowski developed analyses of myths focusing on their social functions in the real world. He is associated with the idea that myths such as
origin stories might provide a "mythic charter"—a legitimisation—for
cultural norms and
social institutions. Thus, following the Structuralist Era (–1980s), the predominant
anthropological and
sociological approaches to myth increasingly treated myth as a form of narrative that can be studied, interpreted, and analyzed like ideology, history, and culture. In other words, myth is a form of understanding and telling stories that are connected to power, political structures, and political and economic interests. These approaches contrast with approaches, such as those of
Joseph Campbell and
Eliade, which hold that myth has some type of essential connection to ultimate sacred meanings that transcend cultural specifics. In particular, myth was studied in relation to history from diverse social sciences. Most of these studies share the assumption that history and myth are not distinct in the sense that history is factual, real, accurate, and truth, while myth is the opposite. In the 1950s,
Barthes published a series of essays examining modern myths and the process of their creation in his book
Mythologies, which stood as an early work in the emerging
post-structuralist approach to mythology, which recognised myths' existence in the modern world and in
popular culture. The 20th century saw rapid
secularization in
Western culture. This made Western scholars more willing to analyse narratives in the
Abrahamic religions as myths; theologians such as
Rudolf Bultmann argued that a modern Christianity needed to
demythologize; and other religious scholars embraced the idea that the mythical status of
Abrahamic narratives was a legitimate feature of their importance. This, in his appendix to
Myths, Dreams and Mysteries, and in
The Myth of the Eternal Return,
Eliade attributed modern humans' anxieties to their rejection of myths and the sense of the sacred. The Christian theologian
Conrad Hyers wrote:
21st century Both in 19th-century research, which tended to see existing records of stories and folklore as imperfect fragments of partially lost myths, and in 20th-century structuralist work, which sought to identify underlying patterns and structures in often diverse versions of a given myth, there had been a tendency to synthesise sources to attempt to reconstruct what scholars supposed to be more perfect or underlying forms of myths. From the late 20th century, researchers influenced by
postmodernism tended instead to argue that each account of a given myth has its own cultural significance and meaning, and argued that rather than representing degradation from a once more perfect form, myths are inherently plastic and variable. There is, consequently, no such thing as the 'original version' or 'original form' of a myth. One prominent example of this movement was
A. K. Ramanujan's essay "
Three Hundred Ramayanas". Correspondingly, scholars challenged the precedence that had once been given to texts as a medium for mythology, arguing that other media, such as the visual arts or even landscape and place-naming, could be as or more important. Myths are not texts, but
narrative materials (
Erzählstoffe) that can be adapted in various media (such as epics, hymns, handbooks, movies, dances, etc.). In contrast to other academic approaches, which primarily focus on the (social) function of myths,
hylistic myth research aims to understand myths and their nature out of themselves. As part of the Göttingen myth research, Annette and Christian Zgoll developed the method of
hylistics (narrative material research) to extract mythical materials from their media and make possible a transmedial comparison. The content of the medium is broken down into the smallest possible plot components (
hylemes), which are listed in standardized form (so-called
hyleme analysis). Inconsistencies in content can indicate stratification, i.e. the overlapping of several materials, narrative variants and edition layers within the same medial concretion. To a certain extent, this can also be used to reconstruct earlier and alternative variants of the same material that were in competition and/or were combined with each other. The juxtaposition of hyleme sequences enables the systematic comparison of different variants of the same material or several different materials that are related or structurally similar to each other. In his overall presentation of the hundred-year history of myth research, the classical philologist and myth researcher Udo Reinhardt mentions Christian Zgoll's basic work
Tractatus mythologicus as "the latest handbook on myth theory" with "outstanding significance" for modern myth research. ==Modernity==