Critical response The
review aggregator website
Rotten Tomatoes reported that 75% of 263 critics gave the film a positive review with an average rating of 6.7/10. The website's critics consensus reads: "With sweeping visuals grounded by strong performances in service of a timeless tale told on a human scale, Darren Aronofsky's
Noah brings the Bible epic into the 21st century." On
Metacritic, the film has a score of 68 out of 100, based on 46 critics, indicating "generally favorable reviews". Audiences polled by CinemaScore gave the film an average grade of "C" on a scale of A+ to F.
Peter Travers of
Rolling Stone wrote of the film: "a film of grit, grace, and visual wonders that for all its tech-head modernity is built on a spiritual core ... In this flawed, fiercely relevant film, wonders never cease."
Richard Corliss of
Time said: "Darren Aronofsky brings out wild ambition and thrilling artistry to one of the Old Testament's best-known, most dramatic, least plausible stories—Noah and the Ark—with Russell Crowe infusing the role of God's first seaman and zookeeper with all his surly majesty."
Kathleen Parker, writing in
The Washington Post, called the film "Noah's Arc of Triumph" and said: "If you like
Braveheart,
Gladiator,
Star Wars,
The Lord of the Rings,
Indiana Jones, or
Titanic, you will like
Noah. If you like two or more of the above, you will love
Noah."
Richard Roeper called the film "One of the most dazzling and unforgettable Biblical epics ever put on film." The film also had its detractors.
IndieWire claimed that "Aronofsky's worst movie is an epic misfire that, like the source material, offers plenty of lessons even if you don't buy the whole package."
The Wrap called the film "Darren Aronofsky's Biblical
Waterworld".
The New Yorkers
David Denby wrote: "Darren Aronofsky's
Noah—an epic farrago of tumultuous water, digital battle, and environmentalist rage ... is the craziest big movie in years.
Noah may not make much sense, but only an artist could have made it."
Racial issues The film was challenged for its lack of non-white cast members. Reverend
Wil Gafney, a
womanist and associate professor of Hebrew and Old Testament at the
Lutheran Theological Seminary at Philadelphia, saw the film as a throwback to the Hollywood era of all-white casts and considered it worrisome in today's more multi-ethnic America. She went on to state, "The Bible is the most multicultural piece of literature that most people will ever read. So a film about the Bible should reflect that diversity."
Efrem Smith, of Los Angeles-based World Impact, critiqued the film as a throwback to the 1956 classic
The Ten Commandments, where an all-white cast played Moses and Pharaoh. Smith stated that
Noah deals with the
curse of Ham by "simply erasing people of color from the story." However, "fittingly for a Biblical story", two of the characters are played by Jewish actors (
Jennifer Connelly and
Logan Lerman). Co-writer Ari Handel addressed the concerns surrounding race in an interview, where he stated: "From the beginning, we were concerned about casting, the issue of race. What we realized is that this story is functioning at the level of myth, and as a mythical story, the race of the individuals doesn't matter."
Christian and Jewish response After the British premiere of the film, Russell Crowe traveled to
Lambeth Palace to discuss "faith and spirituality" with
Justin Welby,
Archbishop of Canterbury and leader of the worldwide
Anglican Communion, and Welby subsequently called
Noah "interesting and thought-provoking". In addition, several Christian organizations in the United States of America expressed support for the film, "including leaders from organizations like the
American Bible Society,
National Catholic Register,
The King's College (New York), Q Ideas, Hollywood Prayer Network, and
Focus on the Family." Focus on the Family president Jim Daly stated: "[
Noah] is a creative interpretation of the scriptural account that allows us to imagine the deep struggles Noah may have wrestled with as he answered God's call on his life. This cinematic vision of Noah's story gives Christians a great opportunity to engage our culture with the biblical Noah, and to have conversations with friends and family about matters of eternal significance." Cultural commenter
Bishop Robert Barron praised the film for its inclusion of "God, creation, providence, sin, obedience, salvation: not bad for a major Hollywood movie!" Darren Aronofsky later tweeted that Barron's "thoughts" were a "smart take". Rabbi
Shmuley Boteach, an
Orthodox Jewish rabbi leader and author, hailed
Noah as "a valuable film, especially for our times." In order to create "a story that tries to explicate Noah's relationship with God and God's relationship with the world as it has become", Aronofsky stated that he was working in "the tradition of Jewish
Midrash". The film generated controversy among some Christians, primarily centered on the film's use of extra-biblical sources as inspiration for elements of the script, rather than just the book of Genesis. In particular, the film heavily incorporated elements of the
Book of Enoch's version of the story of the flood, including, but not limited to, the presence of
Nephilim. Some disliked the film because God is not mentioned by name, being referred to instead as "the Creator".
Ken Ham and
Ray Comfort, both
young-Earth creationists, objected to the film, with the latter
apologist creating his own documentary,
Noah and the Last Days, as a response. Producer Scott Franklin told
Entertainment Weekly that "
Noah is a very short section of the Bible with a lot of gaps, so we definitely had to take some creative expression in it. But I think we stayed very true to the story and didn't really deviate from the Bible, despite the six-armed angels." Kevin Hall, professor of biblical and theological studies and the Ida Elizabeth and J. W. Hollums chair of Bible at Oklahoma Baptist University, observed that "the story in Genesis is extremely concise, so some creativity with the tale—especially by Hollywood—is hardly a surprise." because it was seen by the governments of those countries as contradicting the teachings of
Islam. A representative of Paramount Pictures stated: "Censors for Qatar, Bahrain and the UAE officially confirmed this week that the film will not release in their countries." The film was also disapproved of by the
Al-Azhar University in Egypt, as it was seen as violating Islamic law and could "provoke the feelings of believers". Mohammad Zareef from Pakistan's
Central Board of Film Censors said they tended to steer clear of films with a religious theme, adding: "We haven't seen it yet, but I don't think it can go to the cinemas in Pakistan." However, the
DVD release was to be available in Pakistan. == Literature ==