is considered the initiator of macroeconomics when he published his work
The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money in 1936. Macroeconomics, as a separate field of research and study, is generally recognized to have begun with the publication of
John Maynard Keynes's
The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money in 1936.
Keynes and Keynesian economics When the Great Depression struck, the reigning economists had difficulty explaining how goods could go unsold and workers could be left unemployed. In the prevailing
neoclassical economics paradigm, prices and wages would fall until the market cleared, with all goods and labor sold. Keynes, in his main work, the
General Theory, initiated what is known as the
Keynesian Revolution. He offered a new interpretation of events and a whole intellectual framework - a novel theory of economics that explained why markets might not clear, which would evolve into a school of thought known as
Keynesian economics, also called Keynesianism or Keynesian theory. When the
oil shocks of the 1970s created a high unemployment and high inflation, Friedman and Phelps were vindicated. Monetarism was particularly influential in the early 1980s, but fell out of favor when central banks found the results disappointing when trying to target money supply instead of interest rates as monetarists recommended, concluding that the relationships between money growth, inflation, and real GDP growth are too unstable to be useful in practical monetary policy making.
New classical economics New classical macroeconomics further challenged the Keynesian school. A central development in new classical thought came with
Robert Lucas's introduction of
rational expectations into macroeconomics. Before Lucas, economists had generally used
adaptive expectations, in which agents were assumed to look at the recent past to form expectations about the future. Under rational expectations, agents are assumed to be more sophisticated. which would not adjust, allowing monetary policy to impact quantities instead of prices.
Stanley Fischer and
John B. Taylor produced early work in this area by showing that monetary policy could be effective even in rational-expectations models when contracts locked in workers' wages. Other new Keynesian economists, including
Olivier Blanchard,
Janet Yellen,
Julio Rotemberg,
Greg Mankiw,
David Romer, and
Michael Woodford, expanded on this work and demonstrated other cases where various market imperfections caused inflexible prices and wages leading in turn to monetary and fiscal policy having real effects. Other researchers focused on imperfections in labor markets, developing models of
efficiency wages or
search and matching (SAM) models, or imperfections in credit markets like
Ben Bernanke. The market imperfections and nominal rigidities of new Keynesian theory were combined with rational expectations and the RBC methodology to produce a new and popular type of models called
dynamic stochastic general equilibrium (DSGE) models. The fusion of elements from different schools of thought has been dubbed the
new neoclassical synthesis. These models are now used by many central banks and are a core part of contemporary macroeconomics. • increased emphasis on
empirical work as part of the so-called
credibility revolution in economics, using improved methods to distinguish between
correlation and causality to improve future policy discussions, • interest in understanding the importance of
heterogeneity among the economic agents, leading among other examples to the construction of heterogeneous agent new Keynesian models (
HANK models), which may potentially also improve understanding of the impact of macroeconomics on the
income distribution, • understanding the implications of integrating the findings of the increasingly useful
behavioral economics literature into macroeconomics and behavioral finance.
Growth models Research in the economics of the determinants behind long-run
economic growth has followed its own course. The
Harrod-Domar model from the 1940s attempted to build a long-run growth model inspired by Keynesian demand-driven considerations. The
Solow–Swan model worked out by
Robert Solow and, independently,
Trevor Swan in the 1950s achieved more long-lasting success, however, and is still today a common textbook model for explaining economic growth in the long-run. The model operates with a
production function where national output is the product of two inputs: capital and labor. The Solow model assumes that labor and capital are used at constant rates without the fluctuations in unemployment and capital utilization commonly seen in business cycles. In this model, increases in output, i.e., economic growth, can only occur because of an increase in the capital stock, a larger population, or technological advancements that lead to higher productivity (
total factor productivity). An increase in the savings rate leads to a temporary increase in output as the economy builds more capital. However, eventually the depreciation rate will limit capital expansion: savings will be used to replace depreciated capital, leaving none to pay for additional expansion. Solow's model suggests that economic growth, measured by output per capita, depends solely on technological advances that enhance productivity. The Solow model can be interpreted as a special case of the more general
Ramsey growth model, where households' savings rates are not constant as in the Solow model, but derived from an explicit intertemporal
utility function. In the 1980s and 1990s,
endogenous growth theory arose to challenge the neoclassical growth theory of Ramsey and Solow. This group of models explains economic growth through factors such as increasing returns to scale in capital and
learning-by-doing that are endogenously determined, rather than the exogenous technological improvement used to explain growth in Solow's model. Another type of endogenous growth model endogenizes technological progress by explicitly modelling
research and development activities of profit-maximizing firms. This paper was the first to develop a model to assess the impact of slow, on-set climate change on GDP. More recently, the issue of
climate change and the possibilities of a
sustainable development are examined in so-called
integrated assessment models (IAMs), pioneered by
William Nordhaus. The use of IAMs is now widespread in
climate economics, and is used to get both disaggregated, regional assessment of damages, or global damages, under different policy scenarios. More theoretically, macroeconomic models in
environmental economics model a system in which production takes natural resources such as land, water, or energy as inputs. In this case, one example of an integrated model would replace the
circular flow of income diagram may be replaced by a more complex flow diagram reflecting the input of solar energy, which sustains natural inputs and
environmental services which are then used as units of
production, such as the early work of
Herman Daly. Once consumed, natural inputs pass out of the economy as pollution and waste. The potential of an environment to provide services and materials is referred to as an "environment's source function", and this function is depleted as resources are consumed or pollution contaminates the resources. The "sink function" describes an environment's ability to absorb and render harmless waste and pollution; when waste output exceeds the sink's capacity, long-term damage occurs. Many methods for national accounting that include
environmental goods and services as components of economic output remain under discussion.
Heterodox macroeconomics Other branches of macroeconomics that resist mainstream macroeconomic theories are broadly classified as
heterodox macroeconomics. This discipline includes the aforementioned
ecological economics, modern monetary theory,
Marxian economics, and other schools of thought that build on theoretical traditions beyond neoclassical or Keynesian works. For example, heterodox economists see the driver of economic instability as price flexibility rather than
price stickiness, and therefore develop models with different assumptions and structures. ==Macroeconomic policy==