Through
The Guide for the Perplexed, Mishneh Torah, and the philosophical introductions to sections of his commentaries on the Mishnah, Maimonides exerted an important influence on the
Scholastic philosophers, especially on
Albertus Magnus,
Thomas Aquinas and
Duns Scotus. He was a Jewish Scholastic. Educated more by reading the works of Arab Muslim philosophers than by personal contact with Arabian teachers, he acquired an intimate acquaintance not only with Arab Muslim philosophy, but with the doctrines of Aristotle. Maimonides strove to reconcile
Aristotelianism and science with the teachings of the
Torah. In his
Guide for the Perplexed, he often explains the function and purpose of the statutory provisions contained in the Torah against the backdrop of the historical conditions. The book was
highly controversial in its day, and was banned by French rabbis, who burnt copies of the work in
Montpellier.
Thirteen principles of faith in Judaism In his commentary on the Mishnah (
Tractate Sanhedrin, chapter 10), Maimonides formulates his "13 principles of faith"; and that these principles summarized what he viewed as the required beliefs of Judaism: • The
existence of God. • God's
unity and indivisibility into elements. • God's
spirituality and
incorporeality. • God's
eternity. •
God alone should be the object of
worship. •
Revelation through God's
prophets. • The preeminence of
Moses among the prophets. • That the entire Torah (both the Written and Oral law) are of Divine origin and were dictated to Moses by God on Mt. Sinai. • The
Torah given by Moses is permanent and will not be replaced or changed. • God's awareness of all human actions and thoughts. • Reward of righteousness and punishment of evil. • The coming of
the Messiah. • The
resurrection of the dead. Maimonides is said to have compiled the principles from various Talmudic sources. These principles were controversial when first proposed, evoking criticism by Rabbis
Hasdai Crescas and
Joseph Albo, and were effectively ignored by much of the Jewish community for the next few centuries. However, these principles have become widely held and are considered to be the cardinal principles of faith for
Orthodox Jews. Two poetic restatements of these principles ( and ) eventually became canonized in many editions of the
Siddur (Jewish prayer book). The omission of a list of these principles as such within his later works, the and
The Guide for the Perplexed, has led some to suggest that either he retracted his earlier position, or that these principles are descriptive rather than prescriptive.
Nature of the God of Abraham Maimonides equated the
God of Abraham to what philosophers refer to as the
Necessary Being. God is unique in the universe, and the Torah commands that one
love and
fear God (
Deut 10:12) on account of that uniqueness. To Maimonides, this meant that one ought to contemplate God's works and to marvel at the order and wisdom that went into their creation. When one does this, one inevitably comes to love God and to sense how insignificant one is in comparison to God. This is the basis of the Torah. The principle that inspired his philosophical activity was identical to a fundamental tenet of
scholasticism: there can be no contradiction between the truths which God has revealed and the findings of the human mind in science and philosophy. Maimonides primarily relied upon the science of Aristotle and the teachings of the Talmud, commonly claiming to find a basis for the latter in the former. Maimonides' admiration for the
Neoplatonic commentators led him to doctrines which the later Scholastics did not accept. For instance, Maimonides was an adherent of
apophatic theology. In this theology, one attempts to describe God through negative attributes. For example, one should not say that God exists in the usual sense of the term; it can be said that God is not non-existent. One should not say that "God is wise"; but it can be said that "God is not ignorant," i.e., in some way, God has some properties of knowledge. One should not say that "God is One," but it can be stated that "there is no multiplicity in God's being." In brief, the attempt is to gain and express knowledge of God by describing what God is not, rather than by describing what God "is." Maimonides argued adamantly that God is not corporeal. This was central to his thinking about the sin of
idolatry. Maimonides insisted that all of the
anthropomorphic phrases pertaining to God in sacred texts are to be interpreted
metaphorically. Maimonides also argued that God embodied
reason,
intellect,
science, and
nature, and was
omnipotent and indescribable. He said that science, the growth of scientific fields, and discovery of the unknown by comprehension of nature was a way to appreciate God. He wrote, "One is obligated to conduct his affairs with others in a gentle and pleasing manner." Maimonides advised that those with antisocial character traits should identify those traits and then make a conscious effort to behave in the opposite way. For example, an arrogant person should practice humility. If the circumstances of one's environment are such that it is impossible to behave ethically, one must move to a new location.
The "prophetic" state Maimonides agreed with "the Philosopher" (Aristotle) that the use of logic is the "right" way of thinking. He claimed that in order to understand how to know God, every human being must, by study, and meditation attain the degree of perfection required to reach the
prophetic state. Despite his rationalistic approach, he does not explicitly reject the previous ideas (as portrayed, for example, by
Yehuda Halevi in his ) that in order to become a prophet, God must intervene. Maimonides teaches that prophecy is the highest purpose of the most learned and refined individuals.
Problem of evil in spite of God's presence Maimonides wrote on
theodicy (the philosophical attempt to reconcile the existence of a God with the existence of evil). He took the premise that an omnipotent and good God exists. In
The Guide for the Perplexed, Maimonides writes that all the evil that exists within human beings stems from their individual attributes, while all good comes from a universally shared humanity (Guide 3:8). He says that there are people who are guided by higher purpose, and there are those who are guided by physicality and must strive to find the higher purpose with which to guide their actions. To justify the existence of evil, assuming God is both omnipotent and omnibenevolent, Maimonides postulates that one who created something by causing its opposite not to exist is not the same as creating something that exists; so evil is merely the absence of good. God did not create evil, rather God created good, and evil exists where good is absent (Guide 3:10). Therefore, all good is divine invention, and evil both is not and comes secondarily. Maimonides contests the common view that evil outweighs good in the world. He says that if one were to examine existence only in terms of humanity, then that person may observe evil to dominate good, but if one looks at the whole of the universe, then he sees good is significantly more common than evil (Guide 3:12). Man, he reasons, is too insignificant a figure in God's myriad works to be their primary characterizing force, and so when people see mostly evil in their lives, they are not taking into account the extent of positive Creation outside of themselves. Maimonides believes that there are three types of evil in the world: evil caused by nature, evil that people bring upon others, and evil man brings upon himself (Guide 3:12). The first type of evil Maimonides states is the rarest form, but arguably of the most necessary—the balance of life and death in both the human and animal worlds itself, he recognizes, is essential to God's plan. Maimonides writes that the second type of evil is relatively rare, and that humanity brings it upon itself. The third type of evil humans bring upon themselves and is the source of most of the ills of the world. These are the result of people's falling victim to their physical desires. To prevent the majority of evil which stems from harm one does to oneself, one must learn how to respond to one's bodily urges.
Skepticism of astrology Maimonides answered an inquiry concerning astrology, addressed to him from
Marseille. He responded that man should believe only what can be supported either by rational proof, by the evidence of the senses, or by trustworthy authority. He affirms that he had studied astrology, and that it does not deserve to be described as a science. He ridicules the concept that the fate of a man could be dependent upon the constellations; he argues that such a theory would rob life of purpose, and would make man a slave of destiny. Unlike some of his contemporaries, Maimonides did not believe that Greek knowledge had originated with the Jews originally, but he does believe that the sages and
Solomon knew science and philosophy, however he does not believe those books have survived down to his time. He notes that rabbinical knowledge of mathematics was imperfect because it was learned from contemporary men of science, and not divinely inspired prophecy.
True beliefs versus necessary beliefs In
The Guide for the Perplexed Book III, Chapter 28, Maimonides draws a distinction between "true beliefs," which were beliefs about God that produced intellectual perfection, and "necessary beliefs," which were conducive to improving social order. Maimonides places anthropomorphic personification statements about God in the latter class. He uses as an example the notion that God becomes "angry" with people who do wrong. In the view of Maimonides (taken from
Avicenna), God does not become angry with people, as God has no human passions; but it is important for them to believe God does, so that they desist from doing wrong.
Hierarchy of righteousness (tzedakah) Maimonides conceived of an eight-level hierarchy of
tzedakah, where the highest form is to give a gift, loan, or partnership that will result in the recipient becoming self-sufficient instead of living upon others. In his view, the lowest form of
tzedakah is to give begrudgingly. The eight levels are: • Giving begrudgingly • Giving less than you should, but giving it cheerfully • Giving as much as you should after being asked • Giving the correct amount before being asked • Giving when you do not know the recipient's identity, but the recipient knows your identity • Giving when you know the recipient's identity, but the recipient doesn't know your identity • Giving when neither party knows the other's identity • Enabling the recipient to become self-reliant
Biblical eschatology and events The Messianic era Perhaps one of Maimonides' most highly acclaimed and renowned writings is his treatise on the Messianic era, written originally in
Judeo-Arabic and which he elaborates on in great detail in his Commentary on the
Mishnah (Introduction to the 10th chapter of
tractate Sanhedrin, also known as ).