Personal and political life Feynman did not return to Cornell. Bacher, who had been instrumental in bringing Feynman to Cornell, had lured him to the
California Institute of Technology (Caltech). Part of the deal was that he could spend his first year on sabbatical in Brazil. He had become smitten by Mary Louise Bell from
Neodesha, Kansas. They had met in a cafeteria in Cornell, where she had studied the history of Mexican art and textiles. She later followed him to Caltech, where he gave a lecture. While he was in Brazil, she taught classes on the history of furniture and interiors at
Michigan State University. He proposed to her by mail from Rio de Janeiro, and they married in
Boise, Idaho, on June 28, 1952, shortly after he returned. They frequently quarreled and she was frightened by what she described as "a violent temper". Their politics were different; although he registered and voted as a
Republican, she was more conservative, and her opinion on the 1954
Oppenheimer security hearing ("Where there's smoke there's fire") offended him. They separated on May 20, 1956. An interlocutory decree of divorce was entered on June 19, 1956, on the grounds of "extreme cruelty". The divorce became final on May 5, 1958. {{blockquote| ... the appointee's wife was granted a divorce from him because of appointee's constantly working calculus problems in his head as soon as awake, while driving car, sitting in living room, and so forth, and that his one hobby was playing his African drums. His ex-wife reportedly testified that on several occasions when she unwittingly disturbed either his calculus or his drums he flew into a violent rage, during which time he choked her, threw pieces of bric-a-brac about and smashed the furniture ... In the wake of the 1957
Sputnik crisis, the U.S. government's interest in science rose for a time. Feynman was considered for a seat on the
President's Science Advisory Committee, but was not appointed. At this time, the FBI interviewed a woman close to Feynman, possibly his ex-wife Bell, who sent a written statement to
J. Edgar Hoover on August 8, 1958: The U.S. government nevertheless sent Feynman to Geneva for the September 1958
Atoms for Peace Conference. On the beach at
Lake Geneva, he met Gweneth Howarth, who was from
Ripponden, West Yorkshire, and working in Switzerland as an
au pair. Feynman's love life had been turbulent since his divorce; his previous girlfriend had walked off with his
Albert Einstein Award medal and, on the advice of an earlier girlfriend, had feigned pregnancy and extorted him into paying for an abortion, then used the money to buy furniture. When Feynman found that Howarth was being paid only $25 a month, he offered her $20 (equivalent to $202 in 2022) a week to be his live-in maid. Feynman knew that this sort of behavior was illegal under the
Mann Act, so he had a friend,
Matthew Sands, act as her sponsor. Howarth pointed out that she already had two boyfriends, but decided to take Feynman up on his offer, and arrived in
Altadena, California, in June 1959. She made a point of dating other men, but Feynman proposed in early 1960. They were married on September 24, 1960, at the
Huntington Hotel in Pasadena. They had a son, Carl, in 1962, and adopted a daughter, Michelle, in 1968. Besides their home in Altadena, they had a beach house in Baja California, purchased with the money from Feynman's Nobel Prize.
Allegations of sexism There were protests over his alleged sexism at Caltech in 1968, and again in 1972. Protesters "objected to his use of sexist stories about 'lady drivers' and clueless women in his lectures." Feynman recalled protesters entering a hall and picketing a lecture he was about to make in San Francisco, calling him a "sexist pig". He later reflected on the incident claiming that it prompted him to address the protesters, saying that "women do indeed suffer prejudice and discrimination in physics, and your presence here today serves to remind us of these difficulties and the need to remedy them". In his 1985 memoir, ''
Surely You're Joking, Mr. Feynman!'', he recalled holding meetings in strip clubs, hiring a student as a nude
life model while learning to draw during his time at Caltech, and pretending to be an undergraduate to deceive younger women into sleeping with him.
Feynman diagram van In 1975, in
Long Beach, California, Feynman bought a
Dodge Tradesman Maxivan with a bronze-khaki exterior and yellow-green interior, with custom
Feynman diagram exterior murals. Feynmann chose
QANTUM as the license plate ID since
QED and
QUARK were taken. After Feynman's death, Gweneth sold the van for $1 to one of Feynman's friends, film producer Ralph Leighton, who later put it into storage, where it began to rust. In 2012, video game designer
Seamus Blackley, a father of the
Xbox, bought the van.
Physics At Caltech, Feynman investigated the physics of the
superfluidity of supercooled
liquid helium, where helium seems to display a complete lack of
viscosity when flowing. Feynman provided a quantum-mechanical explanation for the Soviet physicist
Lev Landau's theory of superfluidity. Applying the Schrödinger equation to the question showed that the superfluid was displaying quantum mechanical behavior observable on a macroscopic scale. This helped with the problem of
superconductivity, but the solution eluded Feynman. It was solved with the
BCS theory of superconductivity, proposed by
John Bardeen,
Leon Neil Cooper, and
John Robert Schrieffer in 1957. in
Waltham, Massachusetts, in 1984 Feynman, inspired by a desire to quantize the Wheeler–Feynman absorber theory of electrodynamics, laid the groundwork for the path integral formulation and Feynman diagrams. With
Murray Gell-Mann, Feynman developed a model of
weak decay, which showed that the current coupling in the process is a combination of vector and axial currents (an example of weak decay is the decay of a neutron into an electron, a proton, and an
antineutrino). Although
E. C. George Sudarshan and Robert Marshak developed the theory nearly simultaneously, Feynman's collaboration with Gell-Mann was seen as seminal because the
weak interaction was neatly described by the vector and axial currents. It thus combined the 1933
beta decay theory of
Enrico Fermi with an explanation of
parity violation. Feynman attempted an explanation, called the
parton model, of the
strong interactions governing nucleon scattering. The parton model emerged as a complement to the
quark model developed by Gell-Mann. The relationship between the two models was murky; Gell-Mann referred to Feynman's partons derisively as "put-ons". In the mid-1960s, physicists believed that quarks were just a bookkeeping device for symmetry numbers, not real particles; the statistics of the
omega-minus particle, if it were interpreted as three identical strange quarks bound together, seemed impossible if quarks were real. The
SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory deep inelastic scattering experiments of the late 1960s showed that
nucleons (protons and neutrons) contained point-like particles that scattered electrons. It was natural to identify these with quarks, but Feynman's parton model attempted to interpret the experimental data in a way that did not introduce additional hypotheses. For example, the data showed that some 45% of the energy momentum was carried by electrically neutral particles in the nucleon. These electrically neutral particles are now seen to be the
gluons that carry the forces between the quarks, and their three-valued color quantum number solves the omega-minus problem. Feynman did not dispute the quark model; for example, when the fifth quark was discovered in 1977, Feynman immediately pointed out to his students that the discovery implied the existence of a sixth quark, which was discovered in the decade after his death. After the success of quantum electrodynamics, Feynman turned to
quantum gravity. By analogy with the photon, which has spin 1, he investigated the consequences of a free massless spin 2 field and derived the
Einstein field equation of general relativity, but little more. The computational device that Feynman discovered then for gravity, "ghosts", which are "particles" in the interior of his diagrams that have the "wrong" connection between spin and statistics, have proved invaluable in explaining the quantum particle behavior of the
Yang–Mills theories, for example,
quantum chromodynamics and the
electro-weak theory. He did work on all four of the
fundamental interactions of nature:
electromagnetic, the
weak force, the
strong force and gravity. John and Mary Gribbin state in their book on Feynman that "Nobody else has made such influential contributions to the investigation of all four of the interactions". Partly as a way to bring publicity to progress in physics, Feynman offered $1,000 prizes for two of his challenges in nanotechnology; one was claimed by
William McLellan and the other by
Tom Newman. Feynman was also interested in the relationship between physics and computation. He was also one of the first scientists to conceive the possibility of
quantum computers. In the 1980s he began to spend his summers working at
Thinking Machines Corporation, helping to build some of the first parallel supercomputers and considering the construction of quantum computers. Between 1984 and 1986, he developed a variational method for the approximate calculation of path integrals, which has led to a powerful method of converting divergent perturbation expansions into convergent strong-coupling expansions (
variational perturbation theory) and, as a consequence, to the most accurate determination of
critical exponents measured in satellite experiments. At Caltech, he once chalked "What I cannot create I do not understand" on his blackboard.
Machine technology of a
medical use for
nanotechnology by
swallowing the doctor may be partially achieved by the
ribosome, which functions as a
biological machine. Such
protein domain dynamics can only now be seen by
neutron spin echo spectroscopy. Feynman had studied the ideas of
John von Neumann while researching quantum field theory. His most famous lecture on the subject was delivered in 1959 at the California Institute of Technology, published under the title "
There's Plenty of Room at the Bottom" a year later. In this lecture he theorized on future opportunities for designing miniaturized machines, which could build smaller
reproductions of themselves. This lecture is frequently cited in technical literature on
microtechnology, and nanotechnology. Feynman also suggested that it should be possible, in principle, to make
nanoscale machines that "arrange the atoms the way we want" and do chemical synthesis by mechanical manipulation. He also presented the possibility of "
swallowing the doctor", an idea that he credited in the essay to his friend and graduate student
Albert Hibbs. This concept involved building a tiny, swallowable surgical robot. Converting the lectures into books occupied
Matthew Sands and
Robert B. Leighton as part-time co-authors for several years. Feynman suggested that the book cover should have a picture of a drum with mathematical diagrams about vibrations drawn upon it, in order to illustrate the application of mathematics to understanding the world. Instead, the publishers gave the books plain red covers, though they included a picture of Feynman playing drums in the foreword. Even though the books were not adopted by universities as textbooks, they continue to sell well because they provide a deep understanding of physics. Many of Feynman's lectures and miscellaneous talks were turned into other books, including
The Character of Physical Law,
QED: The Strange Theory of Light and Matter,
Statistical Mechanics,
Lectures on Gravitation, and the
Feynman Lectures on Computation. Feynman wrote about his experiences teaching physics undergraduates in
Brazil. The students' studying habits and the Portuguese language textbooks were so devoid of any context or applications for their information that, in Feynman's opinion, the students were not learning physics at all. At the end of the year, Feynman was invited to give a lecture on his teaching experiences, and he agreed to do so, provided he could speak frankly, which he did. Feynman opposed
rote learning, or unthinking
memorization, as well as other
teaching methods that emphasized form over function. In his mind,
clear thinking and
clear presentation were fundamental prerequisites for his
attention. It could be perilous even to approach him unprepared, and he did not forget fools and pretenders. In 1964, he served on the California State Curriculum Commission, which was responsible for approving
textbooks to be used by schools in
California. He was not impressed with what he found. Many of the mathematics texts covered subjects of use only to
pure mathematicians as part of the "
New Math". Elementary students were taught about
sets, but: {{blockquote|It will perhaps surprise most people who have studied these textbooks to discover that the symbol ∪ or ∩ representing union and intersection of sets and the special use of the brackets { } and so forth, all the elaborate notation for sets that is given in these books, almost never appear in any writings in theoretical physics, in engineering, in business arithmetic, computer design, or other places where mathematics is being used. I see no need or reason for this all to be explained or to be taught in school. It is not a useful way to express one's self. It is not a cogent and simple way. It is claimed to be precise, but precise for what purpose?}} In April 1966, Feynman delivered an address to the
National Science Teachers Association, in which he suggested how
students could be made to think like
scientists, be open-minded, curious, and especially, to
doubt. In the course of the lecture, he gave a definition of science, which he said came about by several stages. The evolution of
intelligent life on planet Earth—creatures such as cats that play and learn from experience. The evolution of humans, who came to use language to pass knowledge from one individual to the next, so that the knowledge was not lost when an individual died. Unfortunately, incorrect
knowledge could be passed down as well as correct knowledge, so another step was needed.
Galileo and others started doubting the truth of what was passed down and to investigate
ab initio, from experience, what the true situation was—this was science. In 1974, Feynman delivered the Caltech commencement address on the topic of
cargo cult science, which has the semblance of science, but is only
pseudoscience due to a lack of "a kind of scientific integrity, a principle of scientific thought that corresponds to a kind of utter honesty" on the part of the scientist. He instructed the graduating class that "The first principle is that you must not fool yourself—and you are the easiest person to fool. So you have to be very careful about that. After you've not fooled yourself, it's easy not to fool other scientists. You just have to be honest in a conventional way after that." Feynman served as doctoral advisor to 30 students.
Case before the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission In 1977, Feynman supported his English literature colleague
Jenijoy La Belle, who had been hired as Caltech's first female professor in 1969, and filed suit with the
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission after she was refused tenure in 1974. The EEOC ruled against Caltech in 1977, adding that La Belle had been paid less than male colleagues. La Belle finally received tenure in 1979. Many of Feynman's colleagues were surprised that he took her side, but he had gotten to know La Belle and liked and admired her.
''Surely You're Joking, Mr. Feynman!'' In the 1960s, Feynman began thinking of writing an autobiography, and he began granting interviews to historians. In the 1980s, working with
Ralph Leighton (Robert Leighton's son), he recorded chapters on
audio tape that Ralph transcribed. The book was published in 1985 as ''
Surely You're Joking, Mr. Feynman!'' and became a best-seller. Gell-Mann was upset by Feynman's account in the book of the weak interaction work, and threatened to sue, resulting in a correction being inserted in later editions. This incident was just the latest provocation in decades of bad feeling between the two scientists. Gell-Mann often expressed frustration at the attention Feynman received; he remarked: was a great scientist, but he spent a great deal of his effort generating anecdotes about himself." Feynman has been criticized for a chapter in the book entitled "You Just
Ask Them?", where he describes how he learned to seduce women at a bar he went to in the summer of 1946. A mentor taught him to ask a woman if she would sleep with him before buying her anything. He describes seeing women at the bar as "bitches" in his thoughts, and tells a story of how he told a woman named Ann that she was "worse than a whore" after Ann persuaded him to buy her sandwiches by telling him he could eat them at her place, but then, after he bought them, saying they actually could not eat together because another man was coming over. Later on that same evening, Ann returned to the bar to take Feynman to her place. Feynman states at the end of the chapter that this behavior was not typical of him: "So it worked even with an ordinary girl! But no matter how effective the lesson was, I never really used it after that. I didn't enjoy doing it that way. But it was interesting to know that things worked much differently from how I was brought up."
Challenger disaster Feynman played an important role on the Presidential
Rogers Commission, which investigated the 1986
Space Shuttle Challenger disaster. He had been reluctant to participate, but was persuaded by advice from his wife. Feynman clashed several times with commission chairman
William P. Rogers. During a break in one hearing, Rogers told commission member
Neil Armstrong, "Feynman is becoming a pain in the ass." During a televised hearing, Feynman demonstrated that the material used in the shuttle's
O-rings became less resilient in cold weather by compressing a sample of the material in a clamp and immersing it in ice-cold water. The commission ultimately determined that the disaster was caused by the primary O-ring not properly sealing in unusually cold weather at
Cape Canaveral. He warned in his appendix to the commission's report: "For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for nature cannot be fooled."
Recognition and awards The first public recognition of Feynman's work came in 1954, when
Lewis Strauss, the chairman of the
Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) notified him that he had won the Albert Einstein Award, which was worth $15,000 and came with a gold medal. Because of Strauss's actions in stripping Oppenheimer of his security clearance, Feynman was reluctant to accept the award, but
Isidor Isaac Rabi cautioned him: "You should never turn a man's generosity as a sword against him. Any virtue that a man has, even if he has many vices, should not be used as a tool against him." It was followed by the AEC's
Ernest Orlando Lawrence Award in 1962. Schwinger, Tomonaga and Feynman shared the 1965 Nobel Prize in Physics "for their fundamental work in quantum electrodynamics, with deep-ploughing consequences for the physics of elementary particles". He was elected a
Foreign Member of the Royal Society in 1965, received the
Oersted Medal in 1972, and the
National Medal of Science in 1979. He was elected a
Member of the National Academy of Sciences, but ultimately resigned and is no longer listed by them. Schwinger called him "an honest man, the outstanding intuitionist of our age, and a prime example of what may lie in store for anyone who dares follow the beat of a different drum." == Death ==