Origins The Samanid dynasty was founded by
Saman Khuda, his descendants became rulers of the Samanid Empire. He was a
dehqan of Iranian origin from the village of Saman in
Balkh province, in present-day northern Afghanistan. The earliest appearance of the Samanid family appears to be in
Greater Khorasan rather than
Transoxiana. In some sources, the Samanids claimed to be descended from the
House of Mihran of
Bahram Chobin. This claim is further supported by a geographical treatise from the second half of the 8th century, compiled by five choirs (Togonians) and translated into the Tibetan language. In this chronicle, it is mentioned that the descendants of Bahram Chobin migrated to Balkh and settled there. According to Gumilev, they were considered the ancestors of the Samanids. This provides evidence of the claim even before the Samanid Empire existed. It has been claimed that the House of Saman belonged to the
Oghuz Turks, although the veracity is unlikely, others have given a
Sogdian origin, or a
Hephthalite princely background. , dated AH 358 (968/9), with bilingual Middle Persian and Arabic minted in
Bukhara. The obverse is extremely similar to that of the
Western Turk Kaghan
Zik (r. 610–618).
Obverse in Middle Persian: "the
King of Kings has increased the royal splendor"
Reverse in Arabic: "There is no god but
Allah, the One, there is no partner to Him,
Muhammad is the messenger of Allah,
al-Muti' lillah, the victorious king, Mansur son of
Nuh."
Al-Farghani identifies the village of Saman as
min al-bahārima, most likely referring to
bahār diza (the castle monastery), a royal district in Balkh once belonging to one of the last northern Hephthalite rulers,
Nezak Tarkhan, before his execution in 710. According to Luke Treadwell, Hephthalite princely background would explain the Samanids' rapid ascent under
Caliph al-Ma’mun (r. 813–833). As
Tokhari nobles, they shared a common background with the Caliph's mother who hailed from
Badghis (nearby to Balkh and the main headquarters of
Nezak Tarkhan), allowing them to integrate seamlessly with the maternal relatives who made up the Caliph's inner circle in
Merv. Beyond that, being Hephthalite they were linguistically and politically distinct from the rebellious Sogdians of
Transoxiana, making them a loyalist alternative that would ensure authority remained tethered to the Caliphate rather than to regional Sogdian interests. Thus with their unique blend of noble prestige, maternal connections, local expertise, and distinct political loyalty, the Samanids were the ideal candidates to stabilize the volatile Transoxiana region. The same year, he conducted a campaign to gather slaves, taking ten to fifteen thousand captives. The
Samanid slave trade was the main trade income of the Samanid Empire, forming the base of economy of the state. In 900, Ismail sent an army under Muhammad ibn Harun al-Sarakhsi against
Muhammad ibn Zayd, the
Zaydi ruler of Tabaristan and
Gorgan. The invasion was successful; Muhammad ibn Zayd was killed and Tabaristan was conquered by the Samanids. However, Muhammad ibn Harun shortly revolted, forcing Ismail himself to invade the region the following year. Muhammad ibn Harun thereafter fled to
Daylam, while Ismail reconquered Tabaristan and Gorgan. In 901,
Amr Saffari was defeated at the battle of Balkh by the Samanids, which reduced the Saffarid dynasty to a minor tributary in Sistan. It was during this period that the Samanids were at their height of power, ruling as far as
Qazvin in the west and
Peshawar in the east. Ismail is known in history as a competent general and a strong ruler; many stories about him are written in Arabic and Persian sources. Furthermore, because of his campaigns in the north, his empire was so safe from enemy incursions that the defences of Bukhara and Samarkand went unused. However, this later had consequences; at the end of the dynasty, the walls—earlier strong, but now falling apart—were greatly missed by the Samanids, who were constantly under attack by the
Karakhanids and other enemies. Ismail died in November 907, and was succeeded by his son
Ahmad Samani (r. 907–914).
Intermediate period (907–961) Not long after his accession, Ahmad invaded Sistan; by 911, Sistan was under complete Samanid control, and Ahmad's cousin
Abu Salih Mansur was appointed as its governor. Meanwhile, an
Alid named
Hasan al-Utrush was slowly re-establishing Zaydi over Tabaristan. In 913, Ahmad sent an army under Muhammad ibn Sa'luk to deal with him. Although the Samanid army was much larger, Hasan managed to emerge victorious. Ahmad, before he could plan another expedition to Tabaristan, was the following year murdered by some of his slaves in a tent near Bukhara. During his reign, Ahmad is also said to have replaced the language of the court from Persian to
Arabic, which made him unpopular among his subjects, and forced him to change it back to Persian. After Ahmad's death, his eight-year-old son
Nasr II (r. 914–943) succeeded him. '' from Nīshāpūr area, Sāmānid, 10th century (Museum of Islamic Archaeology, Tehran, Iran). Due to Nasr's youth, his prime minister
Abu 'Abd-Allah al-Jaihani took care over most of the state affairs. Jaihani was not only an experienced administrator, but also a prominent geographer and greatly educated man. Almost right after Nasr II had ascended the throne, several revolts erupted, the most dangerous one being under his paternal grand-uncle, Ishaq ibn Ahmad, who seized Samarkand and began minting coins there, while his son Abu Salih Mansur seized
Nishapur and several cities in Khorasan. Ishaq was eventually defeated and captured, while Abu Salih Mansur died of natural causes in 915. Some time later Nasr II once again had to deal with rebels; in 919, the governor of Khorasan, Husayn ibn Ali Marvarrudhi, rebelled against Samanid authority. Nasr responded by sending an army under
Ahmad ibn Sahl to suppress the rebellion, which the latter managed to accomplish. After a few weeks, however, Ahmad shortly rebelled himself at Nishapur, made incursions into Gorgan, and then fortified himself in
Merv to avoid a Samanid counter-attack. Nevertheless, the Samanid general Hamuya ibn Ali managed to lure Ahmad out of Merv, and defeated him in a battle at
Marw al-Rudh; he was captured and imprisoned in Bukhara, where he remained until his death in 920. At considerable expense, Nasr II b. Ahmad erected a new palace for himself and for his officials in Bukhara, in the ancient Rigistan region. In the west, Nasr II clashed several times with
Daylamite and
Gilite rulers. In 921, the Zaydids under the Gilite ruler
Lili ibn al-Nu'man invaded Khorasan, but were defeated by the
Simjurid general
Simjur al-Dawati. Later in 930, a Dailamite military leader,
Makan ibn Kaki, seized Tabaristan and Gurgan, and even took possession of Nishapur in western Khorasan. He was, however, forced to withdraw back to Tabaristan one year later, due to the threat that Samanids posed. Makan then returned to Tabaristan, where he was defeated by the
Ziyarid ruler
Mardavij, who managed to conquer the region. In 935, Nasr II re-established Samanid control in Gurgan and made Mardavij's successor
Vushmgir his vassal. However, in 939 he declared independence, but was defeated the following year at
Iskhabad. In 943 several Samanid army officers, angry at Nasr's support of
Isma'ili missionaries, formed a conspiracy to murder him. Nasr's son
Nuh I, however, learned of the conspiracy. He went to a banquet designed to organize the plot and had the head of their leader cut off. To appease the other officers, he promised to stop the Isma'ili missionaries from continuing their activities. He then convinced his father to abdicate, who died of
tuberculosis after a few months. in the mid-10th century. Right when Nuh I ascended the throne, a revolt erupted in Khwarazm, which he managed to suppress. Later in 945, he had to deal with the
Muhtajid ruler
Abu 'Ali Chaghani, who refused to relinquish his post as governor of Khorasan to
Ibrahim ibn Simjur. Abu 'Ali Chaghani then rebelled, and was joined by several prominent figures such as
Abu Mansur Muhammad, whom he appointed as his commander-in-chief. In 947, he installed Nuh's uncle
Ibrahim ibn Ahmad as
amir in Bukhara. Abu 'Ali Chaghani then returned to his domains in
Chaghaniyan. Ibrahim, however, was unpopular with the people of Bukhara, and Nuh soon retaliated by retaking the city and blinding Ibrahim and two brothers. When Abu Ali Chaghani received the news of the re-capture of Bukhara, he once again marched towards it, but was defeated by an army sent by Nuh and withdrew back to Chaghaniyan. After some time, he left the region and tried to obtain support from other Samanid vassals. Meanwhile, Nuh had Chaghaniyan ravaged and its capital sacked. Another battle shortly ensued between Abu 'Ali Chaghani and a Samanid army in
Tukharistan, which resulted in a Samanid victory. Fortunately for Abu Ali Chaghani, he managed to secure the support of other Samanid vassals, such as the rulers of
Khuttal, and the Kumiji
mountain people, but in the end made peace with Nuh, who allowed him to keep Chaghaniyan in return for sending his son Abu'l Muzaffar Abdallah as hostage to Bukhara. By 945, the Turkic military slave faction (who were formerly recruited by the Samanid rulers in positions of governance) were fully in charge of the government. By this time, the Samanid family only held nominal power; similar to how the
Buyids held de facto power over the
Abbasid Caliphate around the same time.
Alp Tigin, nominal vassal of the Samanids, conquered Ghazna in 962 from the Lawik dynasty. The fifth of these commanders was Sebüktigin, who governed Ḡazna for twenty years till 387 AH/997 CE with the title (as it appears from his tomb inscription) of al-ḥājeb al-ajall (most noble commander). He would later be the founder of an independent dynasty based in Ghazna, following the decline of the Samanid Empire in the 990s.
Decline and fall (961–999) suppressing a rebel.
Majma’ al-tawarikh, dated . The power of the Samanids began to crumble in the latter half of the 10th century. In 962, one of the
ghulams,
Alp Tigin, commander of the army in Khorasan, seized
Ghazna and established himself there. His successors, however, including
Sabuktigin, continued to rule as Samanid "governors". With the weakened Samanids facing rising challenges from the
Karakhanids for control of
Transoxiana, Sabuktigin later took control of all the provinces south of the Oxus and established the
Ghaznavid Empire. In 992, a
Karakhanid, Harun Bughra Khan, grandson of the paramount tribal chief of the
Karluk confederation
Sultan Satuq Bughra Khan, captured
Bukhara, the Samanid capital. Harun died shortly afterwards, however, and the Samanids returned to Bukhara. In 999, Nasr b. Ali, a nephew of Harun, returned and took possession of Bukhara, meeting little resistance. The Samanid domains were split up between the
Ghaznavids, who gained
Khorasan, and the
Karakhanids, who received
Transoxiana; the
Oxus River thus became the boundary between the two rival empires.
Isma'il Muntasir's attempt to resurrect the Samanid state (1000–1005) '', 1314–15.
Isma'il Muntasir was the youngest son of Nuh II—he was imprisoned by the Karakhanids after their conquest of Bukhara in 999. Some time later, Isma'il managed to escape to Khwarazm, where he gained support. Driving the Karakhanids out of Bukhara, he then moved on to and captured Samarkand. The approach of the Karakhanid army, however, forced Isma'il to give up all of his possessions, following which he travelled to Khorasan, where he captured Nishapur. Mahmud's army, however, made its way to the region, and Isma'il decided it necessary to flee again. In 1003 Isma'il came back to Transoxiana, where he requested and received assistance from the Oghuz Turks of the
Zarafshan valley. They defeated the Karakhanids in several battles, even when Nasr Khan was involved. For various reasons, however, Isma'il came to feel that he could not rely on the Oghuz to restore him, so he went back to Khorasan. He tried to gain Mahmud's support for a campaign to restore the Samanid state, but failed. Some time afterwards, he returned to the Zarafshan valley, where he gained the support of the Oghuz and others. A Karakhanid army was defeated in May 1004, but subsequently the Oghuz deserted Isma'il during another battle, and his army fell apart. Fleeing to Khorasan yet again, Isma'il attempted to reenter Transoxiana in the end of 1004. The Karakhanids stopped this and Isma'il was nearly killed. Following this, he sought the hospitality of an
Arab tribe near
Merv. Their chief, however, killed Isma'il in 1005. His death marked the defeat of the last attempt to restore the Samanid state. Descendants of the Samanid family continued to live in Transoxiana where they were well regarded, but their power was relatively broken.
Iranian intermezzo Along with several other states, the Samanid Empire was part of the
Iranian Intermezzo, or "Persian renaissance". This period has been described as having a key importance in the formation of the Islamic civilization, both politically and culturally. In political terms, it saw an effective break up of the
Abbasid power and the rise of several successor states such as the Samanids and Buyids while in cultural terms, it witnessed the rise of new Persian as an administrative and literary language. == Culture ==