Shva

In Modern Hebrew, shva is either pronounced or is mute (Ø), regardless of its traditional classification as shva nach () or shva na (), see following table for examples. The Israeli standard for its transliteration }: • () = amongst others "in", • () = "and", • () = amongst others "as" or "approximately", • () = amongst others "to", dative marker and verb prefix in infinitive, • () as future tense verb prefix: Counterexamples One exception to rule 2 seems to be 'inventory' (although according to the New User-Friendly Hebrew-English Dictionary (Arie Comey, Naomi Tsur; Achiasaf, 2006), the word is instead pronounced ); the absence of a vowel after the () might be attributable to the high sonority of the subsequent liquid (), compare with (, not ) 'filling' (in cuisine). Exceptions to rule 6 include (, not – 'pianist'), (, not – 'English'), (, not – 'we will sprinkle'), several inflections of quinqueliteral roots – e.g.: (, not – 'he synchronized'); (, not – 'he did stupid things'); (, not – 'he had a flirt') – as well as other, more recent loanwords, e.g. (, not – 'mantra'). In earlier forms of Hebrew, shva na and nach were phonologically and phonetically distinguishable, but the two variants resulting from Modern Hebrew phonology no longer conform to the traditional classification, e.g. while the (first) shva nach in the phrase ('books of the Law') is correctly pronounced in Modern Hebrew with the (or /f/ sound) being mute, the shva na in ('time') in Modern Hebrew is often pronounced as a mute Shva (). In religious contexts, however, scrupulous readers of the prayers and scriptures do still differentiate properly between Shva Nach and Shva Na (e.g. ). == Traditional classification ==

In traditional Hebrew grammar, a shva is categorized according to several attributes of its grammatical context. The three categories of shva relevant to the prescriptive grammar of Modern Hebrew are shva naʻ (), shva naḥ () and the less common shva meraḥef (). When discussing Tiberian pronunciation, some shvas are classified as shva gaʻya (). The following table summarizes four distinguishing attributes which determine these categories: • Does the shva supersede a vowel or no vowel in the word's non-inflected form? • Is the preceding letter pointed with a "short" or a "long" niqqud variant? • Is the following letter, when , pointed with a dagesh qal or not? • Is the letter pointed with shva assigned to the preceding or following syllable? To help illustrate the first criterion (existence or non-existence of a vowel in the word's non inflected form), the location of the shva (i.e., the place within the word where the lack of vowel is indicated by it) is marked within the phonemic transcription with an orange linguistic zero: Ø; if existing, the corresponding vowel in the basic (non inflected) form of the example is also marked in orange. Shva Naʻ In most cases, traditional Hebrew grammar considers shva naʻ "mobile shva" to supersede a vowel that exists in the basic form of a word but was reduced due to inflection or declension. Additionally, any shva marked under an initial letter is classified shva naʻ. Identifying a shva as shva naʻ is relevant to the application of niqqud in Tiberian Hebrew, e.g., a letter following a letter marked with a shva naʻ may not be marked with a dagesh qal; the vowel preceding a letter marked with a shva naʻ must be represented by the "long" niqqud variant for that vowel: qamats and not pataḥ, tsere and not segol, etc.. Furthermore, in the standard syllabification, the letter under which a shva naʻ is marked is grouped with the following syllable. The Academy of the Hebrew Language's transliteration guidelines specify that shva naʻ should be transliterated only if pronounced in Modern Hebrew, in which case be used for general purposes and for precise transliteration. Shva naʻ is sometimes transliterated . However, this symbol is misleading since it is commonly used in linguistics to denote the vowel schwa, which does not exist in Modern Hebrew. A shva naʻ can be identified with the following criteria: • When marked under the first letter of a word, as in , , and , • When marked under the first of two identical letters, • When it's the second of two shvas marked under two consecutive letters (except when marked under the last letter of a word), as in ramʻasēs and wišmaʻu , • When the letter before the one under which it is marked is marked with a "long" niqqud variant,, such as the long vowel of either yod or ḥiriq, as in (yiḥiḏaḵā), or the long vowel of wāw or ḥolam, as in the words , and (holaḵim, yodaʻim and moḵarim) and , "šofaṭim wašoṭarim." • When marked under a letter with a dagesh ḥazaq (historically an indicator of gemination), as and . For a more detailed account, see Shva Naḥ Traditional Hebrew grammar defines shva naḥ, or shva quiescens, as indicating the absence of a vowel. In Modern Hebrew, some shvas classified as shva naḥ are nonetheless pronounced (e.g. the shva under the second dalet in the word – – "you (f.) robbed"; see table above). In a few cases, a shva not conforming to the criteria listed above is classified as shva naḥ. This offers no conclusive indication as to its pronunciation in Modern Hebrew; it is, however, relevant to the application of standard niqqud, e.g.: a letter following a letter marked with a shva nacḥ must be marked with a dagesh qal (Modern Hebrew phonology sometimes disagrees with this linguistic prescription, as in – "to miss" – in which the second pe lacks a dagesh qal although preceded by a shva naḥ), or: the vowel prior to a letter marked with a shva naḥ must be represented by the "short" niqqud-variant for that vowel: pataḥ and not qamats, segol and not tsere etc.. Furthermore, in standard syllabification, the letter under which a shva naḥ is marked is grouped with the preceding syllable. The Academy of the Hebrew Language's transliteration guidelines specify that shva naḥ should not be represented in transliteration. Shva Meraḥef "Shva meraḥef" is the grammatical designation of a shva which does not comply with all criteria characterizing a shva naʻ (specifically, one marked under a letter following a letter marked with a "short", not a "long", niqqud-variant), but which does, like a shva na’, supersede a vowel (or a shva na’) that exists in the primary form of a word but not after this word underwent inflection or declension. The classification of a shva as shva meraḥef is relevant to the application of standard niqqud, e.g.: a letter following a letter marked with a shva meraḥef should not be marked with a dagesh qal. The vowel preceding this letter could be represented by the short niqqud-variant for that vowel. This sometimes, but not always, reflects pronunciation in Modern Hebrew; e.g. ('kings of') is commonly pronounced in accordance with the standard form, (with no dagesh qal in the letter kaf), whereas ('dogs of'), whose standard pronunciation is , is commonly pronounced (as if there were a dagesh qal in the letter bet). In standard syllabification, the letter under which a shva meraḥef is marked is grouped with the preceding syllable. Shva Gaʻya '' (Lamentations) 5:21. According to some traditions, the gaʻya in the word (marked in red) renders the shva stressed. In the Sephardic tradition, the pronunciation is ['vana'šuva]. Shva gaʻya designates a shva marked under a letter that is also marked with the cantillation mark ( lit. 'bleating' or 'bellowing'), or , e.g. the shva under the letter bet in the word "toes" would normally be classified a shva naʻ and be transliterated : (or according to the precise standard, : ). However, if marked with the gaʻya cantillation mark, , this shva is classified as shva gaʻya, and the transliteration believed to reflect its historical pronunciation would be . This "strict application" is found in Yemenite Hebrew. == T'nua hatufa ==

Within niqqud, vowel diacritics are sorted into three groups: big, small and fleeting or furtive ( , and ), sometimes also referred to as long, short and very short or ultrashort. This grouping might have correlated to different vowel lengths in earlier forms of Hebrew (see Tiberian vocalization → Vowels; spoken Israeli Hebrew however does not distinguish between different vowel lengths, thus this orthographic differentiation is not manifest in speech). The vowel diacritics classified as ('fleeting') all share the common feature of being a digraph of a small vowel diacritic (Patach, Segol or Kamatz Katan) plus a shva sign. Similarly, their names are derived from the respective small vowel diacritic's name plus the adjunct : , and . As with a shva na, standard (prescribed) syllabification determines that letters pointed with a fleeting vowel diacritic be considered part of the subsequent syllable, even if in modern Hebrew pronunciation this diacritic represents a full-fledged syllable, thus e.g. the phonologically trisyllabic word ('he placed upright'), pronounced , should standardly be syllabified into only two syllables, (). Comparison table == Unicode encoding ==

As of 2016, a separate Unicode symbol for the sheva na has been proposed but not implemented. == See also ==