Thanks to a leave of absence from his civil service that was not to last more than two years, Escohotado set out in 1970 to experience a life without luxury, sustained by the income obtained through translations, and dispensing with conventional habits. In those days, Ibiza offered peasant houses (Spanish:
casas payesas) designed in accordance to ancestral techniques, without electricity or running water but very cheap, which their new inhabitants turned into a sort of monastery, as devoted to the collective life and
orgiastic traditions as those of the Middle Ages. Although only a minority had a vehicle, it was enough to walk and hitchhike to sustain a very intense social life, where everything revolved around flirting within a diffuse plan to reinvent life with material austerity and alternative drugs. It was precisely profound experiences with
visionary substances such as LSD, as well as incessant study, that led the author to the project of elaborating his own treatise on
metaphysics. The first part of this project involved a review of the earliest philosophical testimonies —
From physis to polis. La evolución del pensamiento griego desde Tales a Sócrates (Anagrama, 1975)— in which he attempts to thematically order the scattered fragments of each pre-Socratic. The results are debatable when it comes to recomposing the lost work of Heraclitus, although the style gains in fluidity and expressive economy. The prologue of the book ironizes about the figure of the "specialist in the subject", who devotes nine tenths of his space to comment on observations of his colleagues, and one or none to the commented author. The epilogue ironizes on French postmodernity, then germinating, called to
épater with theses such as the "pre-Socratic artificialism" suggested by
Clément Rosset. Like the specialist, who decided to talk about himself in any case, the postmodern does the same by imitating intellectuals like Lacan, Deleuze or Althusser, concentrated according to Escohotado in disguising emptiness with a jargon whose mystery begins and ends by twisting the grammar.
Reality and Substance The second part of Escohotado's metaphysical project took shape in the work
Reality and Substance (Taurus, 1985).
From Physis to Polis concludes with the simultaneous birth of the physical world as a cosmos emancipated from the resource to magic, and of
democracy as an order sustained by
civil liberties.
Reality and Substance begins with the physical world as "unity of the difference between being and thought," where the task of the philosopher is to move "from fact to becoming" by analyzing modalities of action. The metaphysical or
ontological treatise as a classical style of writing philosophy was already then an outdated genre or considered by many as obsolete, which starts from defining basic categories of discourse to then deduce the following categories by linking them from the first to the last, and Escohotado chooses: Commenting on
Bertrand Russell's
An Inquiry into Meaning and Truth, in 1944, Einstein detected "an unfortunate fear of metaphysics [...] and I am especially pleased to note that in the last chapter it is recognized that it is impossible to get along without it. I can only reproach in this respect the bad intellectual conscience that can be perceived between the lines. Escohotado expands this perspective with two extensive appendices on
positivism and
logical empiricism, gravediggers of metaphysics and guardians of a corporate orthodoxy that "grants the mind a subordinate place." In Escohotado's understanding, "what is common to both is a pseudo-empirical attitude, which did not even consider the relationship between being and thought, guided by the goal of turning science into a new religious institute, dogmatic and sectarian in equal parts." When he went on to study complex phenomena, the twelve years devoted to "polishing the prose poetry that is metaphysics" would be remembered by the author as the fruit of an "anachronistic stubbornness" whose only justification a posteriori could be to create familiarity with "those few words —
essence,
existence,
matter,
cause, accident...— on which the meaning of the others rests", as a
sine qua non condition for being able to think for oneself. === Amnesia,
Whores and Wives, and an
indictment === Between 1970 and 1983 Escohotado translated more than forty titles for different publishers, among them the only comprehensive anthology of
Thomas Jefferson,
Hobbes'
Leviathan and
Newton's Philosophiæ naturalis principia mathematica. When he received his widowed mother's inheritance in 1976, it occurred to him to transform a large old farmhouse into a meeting place for the "tribe" —basically equipped with instruments for live music— which would become Amnesia, one of the most multitudinous and best known discotheques in the world. Shortly afterwards he published
Historias de familia, cuatro mitos sobre sexo y deber (Anagrama, 1978), his first anthropological essay. The work examines the marital model exemplified by
Mary and
Joseph, in the light of the contrast offered by the relationship of
Gilgamesh with
Ishtar, that of
Zeus with
Hera and that of
Hercules with
Deyanira. These timeless figures of ancient consciousness manifest themselves for Escohotado in the primordial tension between the two poles of the archaic family: the patriarch who devours the offspring and the matriarch who conspires to turn him into a eunuch in the service of his children. The book was reworked in depth as
Rameras y esposas (Anagrama, 1993),
Whores and Wives. The essay is surprising in the first place for the chronicles contained in the apocryphal Gospels about the child and adolescent
Jesus, who is portrayed as a despot with magical powers that he uses to get his own way. But it includes parallel analyses on
Mesopotamian ritual prostitution —which commanded virgins to remain on the temple steps and give themselves to the first man who put a coin in their hand—, or the conflict between decency and freedom imposed on Roman women, since only those registered as
harlots enjoyed the status of adults; the rest were considered minors under the tutelage of a male, from the cradle to the grave. The last section reviews ancient family law, followed by a highly polemical epilogue on the
feminist movement. The founding of Amnesia provoked only the first frictions with the local police, which would culminate in 1983 with his prosecution for involvement in cocaine trafficking, accused of directing "the hippy mafia" from the cover offered by his status as a writer and teacher —Escohotado had re-entered the
National University of Distance Education (UNED) as a part-time assistant in 1980—. The newspaper
Diario 16 commented at the time that "The professor of Ethics is a trafficker of hard drugs", and the scandal escalated when
El País published two days later an article by Escohotado himself. A victim of entrapment, forced to participate in a drug dealing operation in which both buyers and sellers were policemen, during his three months in custody he was forced to share a cell with a leader of a Corsican-Marseillaise group, registered with
Interpol for
extortion and three murders, and the pressures he suffered to collaborate with one of the sides, neither of which lacked double agents, pushed him to leave the island for good. Five years later a hearing of the trial was held, where he was convicted of "drug trafficking in the degree of impossible attempt", a figure of the Spanish Penal Code that would soon be replaced by the jurisprudential doctrine of
provoked crime. Instead of appealing the sentence he opted for the "humble but paid vacation" of a year in the penitentiary of Cuenca, and there he remained uncommunicated, which allowed him to work without interruptions, receiving mail and meals under the door.
Teaching, research, and controversies , Antonio Escohotado,
Albert Hofmann and
Ernst Jünger, on a visit to the
Liria palace in 1992. The five years between his indictment and imprisonment are by far the most prolific phase in Escohotado's biography, as he publishes practically a book a year, while simultaneously publishing monthly opinion columns in
El País and a media presence boosted by the audience for his first television confrontation on the program
La Clave (presented by José Luis Balbín) with José María Mato Reboredo, who was the head of the
Central Narcotics Brigade at the time. Escohotado organized two courses on pharmacology and civil disobedience —with
Albert Hofmann,
Thomas Szasz and
Alexander Shulgin among other speakers— that broke attendance records for summer university courses, which unleashed in the 1990s a fashion for television debates on
Prohibition. At the same time, he passed the qualifying exams to become a full professor, in charge of Philosophy and Methodology of Social Sciences at the newly created Faculty of Political Science and Sociology of the
UNED, where he remained until his retirement. Starting with The General History of Drugs, which, despite its 1500 pages, received an extraordinary critical and public acclaim, he was credited with "an army of followers and two or three detractors". The first text of this period is
Majesties, Crimes, and, Victims (Anagrama, 1987), an essay in
legal sociology that reviews a block of apparently disparate crimes —
illegal propaganda,
homosexuality,
apostasy,
euthanasia,
blasphemy,
prostitution,
magical practices,
pharmacological idiosyncrasies,
pornography,
contraception,
sedition,
tax fraud, public scandal,
conscientious objection, and the disclosure of state secrets— whose common denominator is "to blur the boundary between morality and law, with inevitably corrupting effects for both spheres". After analyzing different manifestations of each, Escohotado comes to the conclusion that condemning voluntarily requested services between adults, or publicly expressing forbidden thoughts create crimes of only supposed victim, where the offense does not fall on someone of flesh and blood, but on some
auctoritas of religious origin that declares itself an offended party even though it has not participated in the incident. This whole group of behaviors derives "from the archaic injustice par excellence that is
lèse majesté, a challenge to the power of the prince that secularized societies displace towards new mayestatic powers, sometimes camouflaged by scientific pretexts such as the 'pharmacracy' described by
Thomas Szasz". For Escohotado, freedom is incompatible with any crime of mere defiance, since "every crime of
lèse-majesté is ultimately a crime against humanity, an inertia of slave societies governed by a
military-clerical logic". This analysis aroused the interest of criminologists, prosecutors and judges, and in April 1989, two years after the essay appeared, the jurisprudence issued the first acquittal for
provoked crime. Since then, the Spanish judiciary has been reluctant to confuse morality and law, and almost all crimes of
lèse-majesté —beginning with
blasphemy— lost their validity. Escohotado has continued to draw attention to the legal status of euthanasia (a contempt for divine providence), and even more to the crime of assisting the suicide (a contempt for medical authority) as pending issues. Following this legal essay, the sociologist Emilio Lamo de Espinosa published in 1989 his remarkable work entitled
Delitos sin víctimas: orden social y ambivalencia moral (
Crimes without victims: social order and moral ambivalence). ==
General History of Drugs ==