Strepsirrhines include the extinct adapiforms and the
lemuriform primates, which include lemurs and lorisoids (
lorises,
pottos, and
galagos). Strepsirrhines diverged from the haplorhine primates near the beginning of the primate
radiation between 55 and 90 mya. Older divergence dates are based on
genetic analysis estimates, while younger dates are based on the scarce
fossil record. Lemuriform primates may have evolved from either
cercamoniines or
sivaladapids, both of which were adapiforms that may have originated in Asia. They were once thought to have evolved from
adapids, a more specialized and younger branch of adapiform primarily from Europe. }} }} Lemurs
rafted from Africa to Madagascar between 47 and 54 mya, whereas the lorises split from the African galagos around 40 mya and later colonized Asia. The lemuriforms, and particularly the lemurs of Madagascar, are often portrayed inappropriately as "
living fossils" or as examples of "
basal", or "inferior" primates. These views have historically hindered the understanding of
mammalian evolution and the evolution of strepsirrhine traits, such as their reliance on smell (
olfaction), characteristics of their skeletal anatomy, and their brain size, which is relatively small. In the case of lemurs,
natural selection has driven this isolated population of primates to diversify significantly and fill a rich variety of
ecological niches, despite their smaller and less complex brains compared to simians.
Unclear origin The divergence between strepsirrhines, simians, and tarsiers likely followed almost immediately after primates first evolved. Although few fossils of
living primate groups – lemuriforms, tarsiers, and simians – are known from the Early to Middle Eocene, evidence from genetics and recent fossil finds both suggest they may have been present during the early
adaptive radiation. The origin of the earliest primates that the simians and tarsiers both evolved from is a mystery. Both their place of origin and the group from which they emerged are uncertain. Although the
fossil record demonstrating their initial
radiation across the Northern Hemisphere is very detailed, the fossil record from the tropics (where primates most likely first developed) is very sparse, particularly around the time that primates and other major
clades of
eutherian mammals first appeared. Lacking detailed tropical fossils,
geneticists and primatologists have used genetic analyses to determine the relatedness between primate lineages and the amount of time since they
diverged. Using this
molecular clock, divergence dates for the major primate lineages have suggested that primates evolved more than 80–90 mya, nearly 40 million years before the first examples appear in the fossil record. The early primates include both
nocturnal and
diurnal small-bodied species, and all were arboreal, with hands and feet specially adapted for maneuvering on small branches.
Plesiadapiforms from the early
Paleocene are sometimes considered "archaic primates", because their teeth resembled those of early primates and because they possessed adaptations to living in trees, such as a divergent big toe (
hallux). Although plesiadapiforms were closely related to primates, they may represent a
paraphyletic group from which primates may or may not have directly evolved, and some
genera may have been more closely related to
colugos, which are thought to be more closely related to primates. that enabled maneuvering along fine branches, as seen in this
slender loris. The first true primates (euprimates) do not appear in the fossil record until the early
Eocene (~55 mya), at which point they radiated across the Northern Hemisphere during a brief period of rapid
global warming known as the
Paleocene–Eocene Thermal Maximum. These first primates included
Cantius,
Donrussellia,
Altanius, and
Teilhardina on the northern continents, as well as the more questionable (and fragmentary) fossil
Altiatlasius from Paleocene Africa. These earliest
fossil primates are often divided into two groups, adapiforms and
omomyiforms. Both appeared suddenly in the fossil record without
transitional forms to indicate ancestry, and both groups were rich in diversity and were widespread throughout the Eocene. The last branch to develop were the adapiforms, a diverse and widespread group that thrived during the
Eocene (56 to 34 million years ago
mya]) in Europe, North America, and Asia. They disappeared from most of the
Northern Hemisphere as the climate cooled: The last of the adapiforms died out at the end of the
Miocene (~7 mya).
Adapiform evolution '', a type of North American adapiform, resembled lemurs but did not give rise to them.
Adapiform primates are extinct strepsirrhines that shared many anatomical similarities with lemurs. They are sometimes referred to as lemur-like primates, although the diversity of both lemurs and adapiforms do not support this analogy. Like the living strepsirrhines, adapiforms were extremely diverse, with at least 30 genera and 80 species known from the fossil record as of the early 2000s. They diversified across
Laurasia during the Eocene, some reaching North America via a
land bridge.They were among the most common mammals found in the fossil beds from that time. A few rare species have also been found in northern Africa. The most basal of the adapiforms include the genera
Cantius from North America and Europe and
Donrussellia from Europe. The latter bears the most
ancestral traits, so it is often considered a
sister group or
stem group of the other adapiforms. Adapiforms are often divided into three major groups: •
Adapids were most commonly found in Europe, although the oldest specimens (
Adapoides from middle Eocene China) indicate that they most likely evolved in Asia and immigrated. They died out in Europe during the
Grande Coupure, part of a significant
extinction event at the end of the Eocene. •
Notharctids, which most closely resembled some of Madagascar's lemurs, come from Europe and North America. The European branch is often referred to as
cercamoniines. The North American branch thrived during the Eocene, but did not survive into the
Oligocene. Like the adapids, the European branch were also extinct by the end of the Eocene. •
Sivaladapids of southern and eastern Asia are best known from the
Miocene, and the only adapiforms to survive past the Eocene/Oligocene boundary (~34 mya). Their relationship to the other adapiforms remains unclear. They had vanished before the end of the Miocene (~7 mya). The relationship between adapiform and lemuriform primates has not been clearly demonstrated, so the position of adapiforms as a paraphyletic stem group is questionable. Both molecular clock data and new fossil finds suggest that the lemuriform divergence from the other primates and the subsequent lemur-lorisoid split both predate the appearance of adapiforms in the early Eocene. New calibration methods may reconcile the discrepancies between the molecular clock and the fossil record, favoring more recent divergence dates. The fossil record suggests that the strepsirrhine adapiforms and the haplorhine omomyiforms had been evolving independently before the early Eocene, although their most basal members share enough dental similarities to suggest that they diverged during the Paleocene (66–55 mya).
Lemuriform evolution Lemuriform origins are unclear and debated. American
paleontologist Philip Gingerich proposed that lemuriform primates evolved from one of several genera of European adapids based on similarities between the front lower teeth of adapids and the
toothcomb of extant lemuriforms; however, this view is not strongly supported due to a lack of clear transitional fossils. Instead, lemuriforms may be descended from a very early branch of Asian cercamoniines or sivaladapids that migrated to northern Africa. Until discoveries of three 40 million-year-old fossil lorisoids (
Karanisia,
Saharagalago, and
Wadilemur) in the
El Fayum deposits of Egypt between 1997 and 2005, the oldest known lemuriforms had come from the early Miocene (~20 mya) of
Kenya and
Uganda. These newer finds demonstrate that lemuriform primates were present during the middle Eocene in Afro-Arabia and that the lemuriform lineage and all other strepsirrhine taxa had diverged before then.
Djebelemur from
Tunisia dates to the late early or early middle Eocene (52 to 46 mya) and has been considered a cercamoniine, but also may have been a stem lemuriform.
Azibiids from
Algeria date to roughly the same time and may be a sister group of the
djebelemurids. Together with
Plesiopithecus from the late Eocene Egypt, the three may qualify as the stem lemuriforms from Africa. Molecular clock estimates indicate that lemurs and the lorisoids diverged in Africa during the Paleocene, approximately 62 mya. Between 47 and 54 mya, lemurs dispersed to Madagascar by
rafting. In isolation, the lemurs diversified and filled the niches often filled by monkeys and apes today. In Africa, the lorises and galagos diverged during the Eocene, approximately 40 mya. Unlike the lemurs in Madagascar, they have had to compete with monkeys and apes, as well as other mammals. ==History of classification==