Context 1972–1973 was a period of purportedly declining interest in religion worldwide, but also filled with movies with religious themes, such as
Jesus Christ Superstar,
Godspell,
Gospel Road: A Story of Jesus,
The Holy Mountain,
Brother Sun, Sister Moon,
Siddhartha, ''
Greaser's Palace, Marjoe, and The Exorcist''. Ellis Nassour and Richard Broderick, writing a book on the musical's history published the year of the film's release, declared 1973 to be "a year of Jesus films" not shot in Hollywood, such as the
New York City-filmed
Godspell, the
Tunisia-shot
The Rebel Jesus, and the
Holy Land-filmed
Gospel Road: A Story of Jesus. Nassour and Broderick noted
Gospel Road,
Jesus Christ Superstar, and
Godspell in particular, deviated from the
Cecil B. DeMille drama style typical of earlier mainstream religious films.
Box office Jesus Christ Superstar grossed $24.5 million ($161.3 million in 2022) at the box office against an estimated production budget of $3.5 million.
Critical response On
Rotten Tomatoes, the film has an approval rating of 50% based on 30 reviews, with an average rating of 6/10. The website's critics consensus reads: "
Jesus Christ Superstar has too much spunk to fall into sacrilege, but miscasting and tonal monotony halts this musical's groove." On
Metacritic, the film has a weighted average score of 64 out of 100 based on 7 critics, indicating "generally favorable" reviews.
Roger Ebert gave the film three stars out of four, calling it "a bright and sometimes breathtaking retelling" of the source material. He praised it as an improved version of the "commercial shlock" of the source material, "being light instead of turgid" and "outward-looking instead of narcissistic". He applauded the portrayal of Jesus as "human, strong and reachable", only achieved elsewhere by
The Gospel According to St. Matthew (1964) and
The Last Temptation of Christ (1988). Arthur D. Murphy of
Variety wrote that the film "in a paradoxical way is both very good and very disappointing at the same time. The abstract film concept ... veers from elegantly simple through forced metaphor to outright synthetic in dramatic impact."
Gene Siskel of the
Chicago Tribune gave the film two-and-a-half stars out of four and called the music "more than fine," but found the character of Jesus "so confused, so shapeless, the film cannot succeed in any meaningful way." Siskel also agreed with the accusations of the film being anti-Semitic.
Charles Champlin of the
Los Angeles Times wrote, "The faults are relative, the costs of an admirable seeking after excellence, and the many strong scenes, visually and dramatically, in 'Superstar' have remarkable impact: the chaos of the temple, the clawing lepers, the rubrics of the crucifixion itself." Gary Arnold of
The Washington Post panned the film as "a work of kitsch" that "does nothing for Christianity except to commercialize it."
Response from religious groups praised the film and suggested it would bring more people to Christianity. Jewison was able to show the film to
Pope Paul VI. Ted Neeley later remembered that the pope "openly loved what he saw. He said, 'Mr. Jewison, not only do I appreciate your beautiful rock opera film, I believe it will bring more people around the world to Christianity than anything ever has before.'" Nevertheless, the film as well as the musical were criticized by some religious groups. A few days before the film version's release, the
National Jewish Community Relations Advisory Council described it as an "insidious work" that was "worse than the stage play" in dramatizing "the old falsehood of the Jews'
collective responsibility for the death of Jesus", and said it would revive "religious sources of anti-Semitism". Jewison argued in response that the film "never was meant to be, or claimed to be an authentic or deep theological work".
Tim Rice said Jesus was seen through Judas' eyes as a mere human being. Some
Christians found this remark, as well as the fact that the musical did not show the
resurrection, to be blasphemous. While the actual resurrection was not shown, the closing scene of the movie subtly alludes to the resurrection (though, according to Jewison's commentary on the DVD release, the scene was not planned this way). Biblical purists pointed out a small number of deviations from biblical text as additional concerns; for example, Pilate himself having the dream instead of his wife, and
Catholics argue the line "for all you care, this bread could be my body" is too Protestant in
theology, although Jesus does say in the next lines, "
This is my blood you drink. This is my body you eat."
Accolades In the 1980 book
The Golden Turkey Awards by
Michael Medved and Harry Medved, Neeley was given "an award" for "The Worst Performance by an Actor as Jesus Christ". Neeley went on to reprise the role in numerous national tours of the show. Years later the film was still popular, winning a 2012
Huffington Post competition for "Best Jesus Movie." == Soundtrack ==