Felis leo was the
scientific name proposed by
Carl Linnaeus in 1758 for a
type specimen from
Constantine, Algeria. Following Linnaeus's description, several lion
zoological specimens from North Africa were described and proposed as subspecies in the 19th century: •
Felis leo barbaricus, described by the
Austrian zoologist Johann Nepomuk Meyer in 1826, was a lion skin from the
Barbary Coast. •
Felis leo nubicus, described by
Henri Marie Ducrotay de Blainville in 1843, was a male lion from
Nubia that had been sent by
Antoine Clot from
Cairo to
Paris, and died in the
Ménagerie du Jardin des Plantes in 1841. In 1930,
Reginald Innes Pocock subordinated the lion to the genus
Panthera, when he wrote about the
Asiatic lion. In the 20th and early 21st centuries, there has been much debate and controversy among zoologists on lion
classification and validity of proposed subspecies: • In 1939,
Glover Morrill Allen considered
F. l. barbaricus and
nubicus synonymous with
F. l. leo. • In 1951,
John Ellerman and
Terence Morrison-Scott recognized only two lion subspecies in the
Palearctic realm, namely the African lion
Panthera leo leo and the Asiatic lion
P. l. persica. • Some authors considered
P. l. nubicus a
valid subspecies and synonymous with
P. l. massaica. • In 2005,
P. l. barbarica,
nubica and
somaliensis were subsumed under
P. l. leo. • In 2016,
IUCN Red List assessors used
P. l. leo for all lion populations in
Africa. The Barbary lion was considered a distinct
lion subspecies. The Barbary lion was also called North African lion,
Genetic research Results of a
phylogeographic analysis using samples from African and Asiatic lions was published in 2006. One of the African samples was a
vertebra from the
National Museum of Natural History (France) that originated in the Nubian part of
Sudan. In terms of
mitochondrial DNA, it grouped with lion skull samples from the
Central African Republic,
Ethiopia and the northern part of the
Democratic Republic of the Congo. While the historical Barbary lion was
morphologically distinct, its genetic uniqueness remained questionable. In a comprehensive study about the evolution of lions in 2008, 357 samples of wild and captive lions from Africa and India were examined. Results showed that four captive lions from Morocco did not exhibit any unique genetic characteristic, but shared
mitochondrial haplotypes with lion samples from
West and
Central Africa. They were all part of a major
mtDNA grouping that also included Asiatic lion samples. Results provided evidence for the hypothesis that this group developed in East Africa, and about 118,000 years ago traveled north and west in the first wave of lion expansion. It broke up within Africa, and later in
West Asia. Lions in Africa probably constitute a single population that interbred during several waves of migration since the
Late Pleistocene.
Genome-wide data of a wild-born historical lion specimen from Sudan clustered with
P. l. leo in mtDNA-based phylogenies, but with a high affinity to
P. l. melanochaita. A comprehensive genetic study published in 2016 confirmed the close relationship between the extinct Barbary lions from Northern Africa and lions from Central and West Africa and in addition showed that the former fall into the same subclade as the Asiatic lion. ==Former distribution and habitat==