The term "Wilhelminism" () is not meant as a conception of society associated with the name Wilhelm and traceable to an intellectual initiative of the
German Emperor. Rather, it relates to the image presented by Wilhelm II and his demeanour, as manifested by the public presentation of grandiose
military parades and self-aggrandisement on his part. The latter tendency had already been noticed by his grandfather, Emperor
Wilhelm I, while Wilhelm II's father, later
Frederick III, was Crown Prince. Wilhelminism also characterizes the social, literary, artistic, and cultural climate of Wilhelm II's reign, which on the one hand was dominated by the rigidly-
conservative opinions of the
Prussian Junker aristocracy, those associated with the
German Agrarian League, and of the German industrialists, which closely mirrored those of the
British upper class during the parallel
Victorian era in the
British Empire. Ironically, Germany during the Wilhelmian era was, on the other hand, distinguished by escalating
secularization and growing belief in
progress among intellectuals, in response to recent medical and scientific advances and the enormous prosperity of the heavily-industrialized German Empire, but which was at polar odds with the last Kaiser's belief in both
Lutheranism and
social conservatism. Even so, Otto von Bismarck's
Anti-Socialist Laws were not renewed and the Iron Chancellor's efforts to renew them were the catalyst for his forced resignation at the last Kaiser's insistence. The final break between the Iron Chancellor and the last Kaiser came when Bismarck initiated discussions with the opposition to form a new parliamentary majority without consulting with the monarch first. The
Kartell, the shifting
coalition government that Bismarck had been able to maintain since 1867, had finally lost its majority of seats in the Reichstag due to the Anti-Socialist Laws fiasco. The remaining powers in the Reichstag were the
Catholic Centre Party and the Conservative Party. In most
parliamentary systems, the head of government depends upon the confidence of the parliamentary majority and has the right to form coalitions to maintain a majority of supporters. In a
constitutional monarchy like the German Empire, however, the
Chancellor or Prime Minister is required to meet regularly with the monarch to explain his or her policies and intentions within the Government. A Chancellor also could not afford to make an enemy of the monarch, who represented the only real
separation of powers and
check and balance against a Chancellor's otherwise
absolute power. Moreover, a constitutional monarch has plenty of means at his or her disposal of quietly blocking an elected head of state's policy objectives and is one of the only people who can forcibly remove an overly ambitious Chancellor or Prime Minister from power. For these reasons, the last Kaiser believed that he had every right to be informed
before Bismarck began coalition talks with the Opposition. In a deeply ironic moment, a mere decade after expelling
religious orders, banning
Catholic schools, and demonizing all members of the
Catholic Church in Germany as (, "traitors to the Empire") during the
Kulturkampf, Bismarck decided to start coalition talks with the all-Catholic Centre Party. He invited that party's leader in the Reichstag,
Baron Ludwig von Windthorst, to meet with him and began the negotiations by offering to overturn the 1872
Jesuit Law in return for the Centre Party's support. The last Kaiser always had a warm relationship with Baron von Windthorst, whose decades long defence of German Catholics, Poles, Jews, and other minorities against government overreach by the Iron Chancellor have since attracted very high praise and comparisons to
Irish nationalist statesmen
Daniel O'Connell and
Charles Stewart Parnell, but Wilhelm was furious to hear about Bismarck's plans for coalition talks with the Centre Party only after they had already begun. After a heated argument at Bismarck's estate over the latter's alleged disrespect for the Imperial Family, Wilhelm stormed out. Bismarck, forced for the first time in his career into a crisis that he could not twist to his own advantage, wrote a blistering letter of resignation, decrying the Monarchy's involvement in both foreign and domestic policy. The letter was published only after Bismarck's death. In later years, Bismarck created the "Bismarck myth"; the view (which some historians have argued was confirmed by subsequent events) that Wilhelm II's successful demand for Bismarck's resignation destroyed any chance Imperial Germany ever had of stable government and international peace. According to this view, what Wilhelm termed "The New Course" is characterised as Germany's
ship of state going dangerously
off course, leading directly to the carnage of the First and Second World Wars. According to Bismarck apologists, in foreign policy the Iron Chancellor had achieved a fragile balance of interests between Germany, France and Russia. Peace was allegedly at hand and Bismarck tried to keep it that way despite growing popular sentiment against Britain (regarding the
German colonial empire) and especially against Russia. With Bismarck's dismissal, the Russians allegedly expected a reversal of policy in Berlin, so they quickly negotiated a
military alliance with the
Third French Republic, beginning a process that by 1914 largely isolated Germany. " by
John Tenniel, published in
Punch on 29 March 1890, two weeks after Bismarck's forced resignation as Chancellor In contrast, historian
Modris Eksteins has argued that Bismarck's dismissal was actually
long overdue. According to Eksteins, the Iron Chancellor, in his need for a
scapegoat, had demonized
Classical Liberals in the 1860s,
Roman Catholics in the 1870s, and
Socialists in the 1880s with the highly successful and often repeated refrain, "The Reich is in danger." Therefore, in order to
divide and rule, Bismarck ultimately left the
German people even more divided in 1890 than they had ever been before 1871. In interviews with
C.L. Sulzberger for the book
The Fall of Eagles,
Prince Louis Ferdinand of Prussia, grandson and heir of Kaiser Wilhelm II, further commented, "Bismarck was certainly our greatest statesman, but he had very bad manners and he became increasingly overbearing with age. Frankly, I don't think his dismissal by my grandfather was a great tragedy. Russia was already on the other side because of the
Berlin Congress of 1878. Had Bismarck stayed he would not have helped. He already wanted to abolish all the reforms that had been introduced. He was aspiring to establish a kind of
Shogunate and hoped to treat our family in the same way the Japanese shoguns treated the
Japanese emperors isolated in
Kyoto. My grandfather had no choice but to dismiss him." Subsequent Chancellor
Bernhard von Bülow continued to implement legislation at the last Kaiser's insistence that favored industrial worker's rights to
organized labor and collective bargaining, while still opposing
Marxist ideas. Nevertheless, the
German Social Democratic Party continued to expand its base and became the largest
political party elected to the
Reichstag during the
1912 national elections. Despite the party's stronger influence, internal developments were characterised, similarly to the
Labour Party in Great Britain, by an increasing loyalty of the party leadership towards both the Monarchy and the
German colonial empire. This attitude was condemned as "
revisionism" by its opponents, but ultimately culminated in the policy of agreeing to support the war effort during the patriotic euphoria later dubbed the
Spirit of 1914. These developments, however, were closely mirrored by other Leftist parties in other nations. ==Architecture==