In his commentary, Ibn Ezra adhered to the literal sense of the texts, avoiding
Rabbinic allegory and
Kabbalistic interpretation. He exercised an independent criticism that, according to some writers, exhibits a marked tendency toward
rationalism. In addition, he sharply criticized those who blended the simplistic and logical explanation with
Midrash, maintaining that such interpretations were never intended to supplant the plain understanding. Indeed, Ibn Ezra is claimed by proponents of
higher biblical criticism of the
Torah as one of its earliest pioneers.
Baruch Spinoza, in concluding that Moses did not author the Torah and that the Torah and other
protocanonical books were written or redacted by somebody else, cites Ibn Ezra's commentary on Deuteronomy. In his commentary, ibn Ezra examines Deuteronomy 1:1 and expresses concern over the unusual phrasing that describes Moses as being "beyond the Jordan." This wording suggests that the writer was situated in the land of Canaan, which is located west of the Jordan River, even though Moses and the
Children of Israel had not yet crossed the Jordan at that point in the Biblical narrative. Relating this inconsistency to others in the Torah, Ibn Ezra stated, "If you can grasp the mystery behind the following problematic passages: 1) The final twelve verses of this book [i.e., Deuteronomy 34:1–12, describing the death of Moses], 2) 'Moshe wrote [this song on the same day, and taught it to the children of Israel]' [Deuteronomy 31:22]; 3) 'At that time, the Canaanites dwelt in the land' [Genesis 12:6]; 4) '... In the mountain of God, He will appear' [Genesis 22:14]; 5) 'behold, his [Og king of Bashan] bed is a bed of iron [is it not in Rabbah of the children of Ammon?]' you will understand the truth." as "a clear indication that it was not Moses who wrote the Pentateuch but someone else who lived long after him, and that it was a different book that Moses wrote". On the other hand,
Orthodox writers have stated that Ibn Ezra's commentary can be interpreted as consistent with Jewish tradition, stating that the Torah was divinely dictated to Moses. Ibn Ezra is also among the first scholars to have published a text about dividing the
Book of Isaiah into at least two distinct parts. In his commentary to Isaiah, he remarked that chapters 1-39 dealt with a different historical period (second half of the 8th century BCE) than chapters 40-66 (later than the last third of the 6th century BCE). This division of the book into First Isaiah and Deutero-Isaiah has been accepted nowadays by all but the most conservative Jews and Christians. Ibn Ezra's commentaries, especially some of the longer excursuses, contain numerous contributions to the
philosophy of religion. One work in particular that belongs to this province,
Yesod Mora ("Foundation of Awe"), on the division and the reasons for the Biblical commandments, he wrote in 1158 for a
London-based friend, Joseph ben Jacob. In his philosophical thought,
Neoplatonic ideas prevail, and
astrology also had a place in his view of the world. He also wrote various works on mathematical and astronomical subjects. He believed that Greek science had been "pillaged" from Hebrew science which predated it. a 1769 manuscript (defaced) == Bibliography ==