In December 1952, Albert Luthuli was elected president general of the ANC with the support of the
ANC Youth League (ANCYL) and African communists.
Nelson Mandela was elected as his deputy. The ANCYL's support for Luthuli reflected its desire for a leader who would enact its programmes and goals, and marked a pattern of younger, more militant members within the ANC ousting presidents they deemed inflexible. The ANCYL had previously succeeded in removing
Xuma,
Moroka, and Champion when they no longer met their expectations. Luthuli led the ANC in its most difficult years; many of his executive members, such as Secretary-General
Walter Sisulu,
Moses Kotane,
JB Marks, and David Bopape were either to be banned or imprisoned. The 1950s witnessed the erosion of black civil liberties, through the
Treason Trial and the passage of the
Suppression of Communism Act, which gave the police power to suppress government critics.
First ban On 30 May 1953, the government banned Luthuli for a year, prohibiting him from attending any political or public gatherings and from entering major cities. He was restricted to small towns and private meetings for the rest of 1953. The Riotous Assemblies Act and the Criminal Law Amendment Act provided the legal framework for the issuing of banning orders. It was the first of four banning orders that Luthuli would receive as President-General of the ANC. Following the expiration of his ban, Luthuli continued to attend and speak at anti-apartheid conferences.
Second ban In mid-1954, following the expiration of his ban, Luthuli was due to lead a protest in the
Transvaal against the Western Areas Removals, a government scheme where close to 75,000 Africans were forced to move from
Sophiatown and other
townships. As he stepped off his plane in
Johannesburg, the
Special Branch handed him new banning orders, not only prohibiting the attendance of meetings but confining him to the
Groutville area for two years until July 1956.
Congress of the People and Freedom Charter In 1953, Z. K. Matthews proposed a large democratic convention, to be known as the
Congress of the People, where all South Africans would be invited to create a
Freedom Charter. Despite complaints within the ANC from
Africanists who believed the ANC should not work with other races, a multiracial organization, the
Congress Alliance, was created as part of the preparation for the Congress of the People. The alliance was led by the ANC and included the
South African Indian Congress, Coloured Peoples Conference,
Federation of South African Women, Congress of Trade Unions, and the
Congress of Democrats. Luthuli viewed the multiracial organisation as a way to bring freedom to South Africa. After convening a secret meeting in December 1954 due to Luthuli's ban, the Congress of the People took place in Kliptown, Johannesburg, in June 1955. Inspired by the values held in the
United States Declaration of Independence and the
UN Declaration of Human Rights, the Congress of the People developed the
Freedom Charter, a list of demands for a democratic, multi-racial, and free South Africa. While well-received by the attendants of the Congress of the People, the Africanist bloc of the ANC rejected it. They opposed the multiracial nature of the charter and what they perceived as communist principles. Although Luthuli recognised the
socialist clauses in the Freedom Charter, he rejected any comparison to the communist ideology of the
Soviet Union. The ANC ratified the Charter at a conference one year after it was ratified by the Congress of the People. Luthuli was not able to attend the Congress of the People or the framing of the Freedom Charter due to a
stroke and
heart attack as well as the banning order that confined him to Groutville. In his absence, he was bestowed the honour of the
Isitwalandwe, which is awarded to individuals who have made significant contributions in the fight for freedom in South Africa.
Treason Trial After his second banning order expired in July 1956, he was arrested on 5 December and detained during the preliminary Treason Trial hearings in 1957. Luthuli was one of 156 leaders who were arrested on charges of
high treason due to their opposition to
apartheid and the
Nationalist Party government. High treason carried the
death penalty. One of the main charges against the
African National Congress leaders were that they were involved in a
communist conspiracy to overthrow the government. Anti-apartheid activists were often accused of being communists, and Luthuli was accustomed to such accusations and frequently dismissed them. The charges brought against the accused covered the period from 1 October 1952 to 13 December 1956, which included events such as the
Defiance Campaign,
Sophiatown removals protest, and the
Congress of the People. Following the preparatory examination period that began on 19 December 1956, all defendants were released on
bail. The
pre-trial examination concluded in December 1957, resulting in charges being dropped against 65 of the accused, including Luthuli who was
acquitted. The
trial for the remaining 91 accused individuals began in August 1958 as the Treason Trial commenced. By 1959, only thirty of the accused remained. The trial concluded on 29 March 1961 as all of the remaining defendants were found
not guilty. Many of the
lawyers who
defended the accused were drawn by Luthuli and
Z. K. Matthews being on trial. Their involvement contributed to raising global awareness and support for the accused. The impression that Luthuli made on the foreigners who came to observe the trial led him to be suggested for the
Nobel Peace Prize.
Third ban and banning of the ANC On 25 May 1959, the government served Luthuli his third banning order, which lasted for five years. This ban prevented Luthuli from attending any meeting held within South Africa and confined him to his home district. Luthuli's democratic values had been recognised by many white South Africans, and he had gained a minor celebrity status among some white people, which caused the government to view him with more contempt. When news of his ban spread, supporters of all races gathered to bid farewell to Luthuli. While Luthuli was still under a banning order, the ANC, led by Luthuli, announced an anti-pass campaign starting at the end of March 1960. The recently created
Pan-Africanist Congress, who split from the ANC because of their opposition to the ANC's multi-racial alliances, decided to jump ahead of the ANC's planned protest by ten days. On 21 March the PAC called for all African men to go to
police stations and hand over their passbooks. The peaceful march in
Sharpeville resulted in
sixty-nine people killed by police fire. Additionally, three people were also killed in
Langa. Luthuli and several other ANC leaders ceremonially burned their passbooks in protest against the Sharpeville massacre. Following a
state of emergency and the passing of the
Unlawful Organisations Act, the government banned the PAC and the ANC. Luthuli and other political leaders were arrested and found guilty of burning their passbooks. In August, Luthuli was fined 100 pounds and initially
sentenced to six months in
jail. However, in September, this was later reduced to a three year
suspended sentence on the condition that he would not be found guilty of a similar
offense during that time. Following his return from prison to
Groutville, Luthuli's power began to wane due to the banning of the ANC and the banning and imprisonment of supporting leaders, a decline in his health since his stroke and heart attack, and the rise of members in the ANC advocating for an armed struggle.
Duma Nokwe,
Walter Sisulu, and
Nelson Mandela, who had provided leadership for the ANC during South Africa's
state of emergency, were determined to steer the ANC in a new direction. In May 1961, following a
strike, they believed that "
traditional weapons of protest… were no longer appropriate." They constantly evaluated whether the conditions were favourable to launch an armed resistance.
uMkhonto we Sizwe on 16 December 1961. In June 1961, during a
National Executive Committee Working Group session, Mandela proposed that the ANC adopt a self-defense platform. With the government's bans on the ANC and nonviolent protests, Mandela believed waiting for
revolutionary conditions to arise, which was favoured by communist members, was not an option. Instead, the ANC had to adapt to their new underground conditions and draw inspiration from successful uprisings in
Cuba,
Algeria, and
Vietnam. Mandela argued that the ANC was the only anti-apartheid organisation that had the capacity to adopt an armed struggle and if they didn't take the lead, they would fall behind in their own movement. In July 1961, the ANC and Congress Alliance met to hold debates during an ANC NEC meeting surrounding the feasibility of Nelson Mandela's proposal of armed self-defence. Luthuli did not support an armed struggle as he believed the ANC members were ill-prepared without modern firearms and battlefield experience. In a following meeting a day later, a contentious back-and-forth arose. Supporters of armed defence believed the ANC was afraid and running from a physical fight while others believed counter-violence would provoke the government into arresting and killing them. While Luthuli did not support an armed struggle, he also did not oppose it. According to Mandela, Luthuli suggested "two separate streams of the struggle": the ANC, which would remain nonviolent, and a "military movement [that] should be a separate and independent organ, linked to the ANC and under the overall control of the ANC, but fundamentally autonomous". The formation of
uMkhonto we Sizwe was part of a larger shift towards armed resistance in southern Africa. Other militant organisations were created in
South West Africa,
Mozambique, and
Southern Rhodesia in the early 1960s. The stated goal of uMkhonto we Sizwe was to cripple South Africa's economy without bloodshed and force the government into negotiating. Mandela explained to Luthuli that only attacks against military installations, transportation links, and power plants would be carried out, which eased Luthuli's fears of the potential of loss of life.
Nobel Peace Prize In October 1961, during his most severe ban yet, Luthuli received the 1960
Nobel Peace Prize, becoming the first African person to win the award. He was awarded the prize for his use of nonviolent methods in his fight against racial discrimination. His nomination was put forward by Andrew Vance McCracken, the editor of
Advance, a
Congregational Church magazine. His name was supported by Norwegian Socialist MPs who nominated him in February 1961. He travelled to
Oslo,
Norway, to receive the award with his wife and his secretary,
Massabalala Yengwa. The Nobel Prize transformed Luthuli from being relatively unknown to a global celebrity. He received congratulatory letters from leaders of 25 countries, including
U.S. President John F. Kennedy. In
Groutville, journalists lined up to interview Luthuli who dedicated the award to the ANC and expressed gratitude to his wife
Nokukhanya. He also used his newfound status as a global podium, and he pleaded to the UN and South Africa's trading partners to impose
sanctions on Verwoerd's government. His comments to the press made the world focus on
apartheid and its effects on Africans. During Luthuli's
Nobel Peace Prize speech he spoke about the contribution of people among all races to find a peaceful solution to South Africa's race problem. He went on to speak of how the "true patriots" of South Africa would not be satisfied until there were
full democratic rights for everyone,
equal opportunity, and the abolition of
racial barriers. Norwegian newspaper
Arbeiderbladet described the effect of Luthuli's visit claiming: "We have suddenly begun to feel Africa's nearness and greatness."
The Times highlighted the strong impression that Luthuli made on the global stage following his appeal to end racial discrimination and establish an equal South Africa. The day after Luthuli returned to South Africa from the award ceremony,
uMkhonto we Sizwe launched their first operations on 16 December 1961. The reaction from South Africa's government, as well as many
White South Africans, was hostile. Luthuli still had to apply for permission to receive the prize in
Oslo,
Norway on 10 December 1961.
Minister of the Interior Jan de Klerk initially refused to issue Luthuli a
passport but after intense domestic and international pressure, the government finally issued him one. After he was granted permission and received his award,
Eric Louw, the
Minister of Foreign Affairs, rejected Luthuli's demands for
universal suffrage and claimed that Luthuli's speech justified the government restricting his travel within South Africa. The government-operated
South African Broadcasting Corporation aired a
defamatory broadcast about Luthuli.
Volksblad argued the way Luthuli had "grasped every opportunity to besmirch South Africa was shocking".
The Star stated: "Mr. Luthuli demands a universal franchise, which is just as silly as restricting the vote to people of one colour and he asks the world to apply sanctions to his own country, which is as reckless and damaging as has been another leader's (
HF Verwoerd) impetuous
withdrawal from the commonwealth. Neither speaks for the authentic South African". The belief that qualified franchise could be extended to Africans without accepting a
democracy based on "
one person, one vote" was the view of a majority of White South Africans. Luthuli received congratulations from some
White South Africans, such as parliamentarian
Jan Steytler and the
Pietermaritzburg City Council. The
Natal Daily News, a white-owned newspaper, described him as "a man with moral and intellectual qualities that have earned him the respect of the world and a position of leadership". They also urged the government to "listen to the voice of responsible African opinion". South African author and
Liberal Party leader
Alan Paton concluded that Luthuli was "the only man in South Africa who could lead both the left and the right... both Africans and non-Africans".
International popularity Following his
Nobel Peace Prize win, Luthuli was in a position of international renown for his
nonviolence despite the concurrent
sabotage operations of
uMkhonto we Sizwe. On 22 October 1962,
University of Glasgow students elected Luthuli as
Lord Rector in recognition of his "dignity and restraint". The rectorship position was honorary. Luthuli's role would have been chair of the
university court, the university's executive body, which met every month. Students elected Luthuli knowing he would serve
in absentia. Although ceremonial, Luthuli's election was significant as he was the first African and first non-white person to be nominated as Rector. The South African government allegedly intercepted all
mail from the University to Luthuli, an allegation the government denied. Luthuli's adherence to nonviolence also had support from his friend and
civil rights activist Martin Luther King Jr., who commended Luthuli's reputation and spoke of his admiration for Luthuli's "dedication to the cause of freedom and dignity". In September 1962, King and Luthuli had issued the Appeal For Action Against Apartheid organised by the
American Committee on Africa, which boosted
solidarity between the
anti-apartheid and
civil rights movements and urged
Americans to
protest apartheid through nonviolent measures such as
boycotts. In 1964, King became the youngest Nobel Peace Prize winner receiving the award for his nonviolent activism against
racial discrimination, similar to Luthuli. While travelling to
Oslo to receive his Nobel Peace Prize in 1964, King stopped in London to give an "Address on South African Independence." The audience included Luthuli's exiled compatriots, citizens of different
African countries, and
human rights advocates from
India,
Pakistan, the
West Indies, and the
United States. King compared the racism in America to South Africa stating: "clearly there is much in
Mississippi and
Alabama to remind South Africans of their own country." He praised Luthuli for his leadership and identified "with those in a far more deadly struggle for freedom in South Africa." King anticipated that the
withdrawal of all economic investments and trade from South Africa by the
United States and
Britain would end apartheid and enable people of all races to build the society they want. During King's Nobel Peace Prize acceptance speech on 10 December 1964, Luthuli received a special mention. King called Luthuli a "pilot" of the
freedom movement and claimed South Africa was the "most brutal expression of man's inhumanity to man". Artist
Ronald Harrison, 22 years old at the time, unveiled his painting, The Black Christ, in 1962. Harrison portrayed Luthuli as
Christ crucified on a cross. The painting was unveiled in St. Luke's Anglican Church in
Salt River with the permission of
Archbishop Joost de Blank. The painting garnered controversy across South Africa. Along with Christ being depicted as Black, the two Roman soldiers resembled
Prime Minister H. F. Verwoerd and Minister of Justice
John Vorster. The Minister of the Interior,
Jan de Klerk, ordered the painting to be taken down and Harrison to appear before the Censorship Board. The Censorship Board banned the painting, deeming it disrespectful to religious sentiments. Following a
CBS television documentary on the artwork, the government mandated its destruction.
Danish and
Swedish supporters of the anti-apartheid movement smuggled the painting to Britain where, under Anglican priest
John Collins' supervision, its display raised money for the
International Defence and Aid Fund, a fund created to defend
political prisoners. Harrison was
arrested and
tortured by the
Special Branch who intended on discovering who Harrison collaborated with to paint and display The Black Christ. He would later serve eight years of
house arrest on charges related to his painting. Luthuli desired to meet Harrison after learning of his painting and its significance, and the Norwegian Embassy arranged a visit for Harrison to Luthuli. Norwegians took Harrison from
Cape Town to
Durban, and Harrison met Luthuli clandestinely in
Groutville. == Fourth ban ==