Ijtihad Ijtihad (lit. "effort, physical or mental, expended in a particular activity") is an Islamic legal term referring to independent reasoning or the thorough exertion of a jurist's mental faculty in finding a solution to a legal question. According to classical Sunni theory,
ijtihad requires expertise in the Arabic language, theology, revealed texts, and principles of jurisprudence (
usul al-fiqh), Islamic feminists ground their arguments in Islam and its teachings, seek the full equality of women and men in the personal and public sphere, and can include non-Muslims in the discourse and debate. Islamic feminism is defined by
Islamic scholars as being more radical than secular feminism, and as being anchored within the
discourse of Islam with the Quran as its central text. During recent times, the concept of Islamic feminism has grown further with Islamic groups looking to garner support from many aspects of society. In addition, educated Muslim women are striving to articulate their role in society. Examples of Islamic feminist groups are the
Revolutionary Association of the Women of Afghanistan, founded by
Meena Keshwar Kamal, Muslim Women's Quest for Equality from India, and
Sisters in Islam from Malaysia, founded by
Zainah Anwar and
Amina Wadud among other five women. In 2014, the
Selangor Islamic Religious Council (MAIS) issued a
fatwa declaring that Sisters In Islam, as well as any other organisation promoting religious liberalism and pluralism, deviate from the teachings of Islam. According to the edict, publications that are deemed to promote liberal and pluralistic religious thinking are to be declared unlawful and confiscated, while social media is also to be monitored and restricted. As fatwas are legally binding in Malaysia,
Hijab While most Conservative Muslims believe the
hijab is mandatory, many Progressive Muslims take alternate views. In a fatwa,
Khaled Abou El Fadl states that the Quran requires women only to cover their bosoms. The idea that the Quran mandates a piece of cloth (
khimar) to cover either a woman's face or her hair, but not her face, is ahistorical. In addition, he declares that it is an error for Muslim women to continue wearing a hijab if it brings them undue attention or puts her at risk of harm. Sheikh Mustapha Mohamed Rashed at
Al-Azhar University similarly defended a thesis that concluded wearing a hijab is not a religious duty, and that the Quran only mandates a piece of cloth to cover breasts.
Wives' obedience to husbands Verse
An-Nisa 34 of the Quran has traditionally been interpreted as mandating wives' obedience to their husbands and beating as a punishment for disobedience, with the following translations from
Mustafa Khattab and
Sahih International: However, Progressive Muslims have given many alternative interpretations and translations of the verse (such as a deterrent from anger-based domestic violence).
Riffat Hassan, has taken the view that
qawwamun in the verse is not talking about men being superior to women, but rather is referring to men's role as breadwinners.
Nushuz is interpreted as not referring to domestic disobedience but to a mass rebellion of all women against their role as child-bearers.
Asma Barlas has taken a similar view that
qawwamun means moral guidance or caring,
nushuz means disharmony, and that
wa-dribuhunna has multiple meanings, such as "to set an example" or "to separate", and that "to beat" is "the worst one!" of all possible interpretations.
Laleh Bakhtiar, in her Quran translation,
The Sublime Quran, translated
wa-dribuhunna as "to go away from" or "to leave", claiming the verse recommends husbands to leave their wives if there are irreconcilable disagreements and differences. She cites prophetic biographies claiming
Muhammad never beat his wives and talking about his respect for women, and other Quran verses like 2:231. Laury Silvers, based on the methodology of medieval Islamic thinker
Ibn Arabi, believes that "God may intend all meanings, but it does not follow that he 'approves' of all meanings." Using this, she believes that the Quran has to be ambiguous, as if it weren't, there would be no room for human responsibility. Using this, she claims that Allah did intend for all meanings of
wa-dribuhunna, including beating, and that true human morality comes from the freedom to choose the best of these interpretations. It is claimed Muhammad never beat his wives, and that his "conflicted response" to this revelation shows that God revealed it out of necessity (to restrain existing violence against women) rather than out of approval, and that it remains best to refrain from violence entirely.
Khaled Abou El Fadl claims
nushuz is better understood as "a grave and known sin" and in 4:34, this is a lewd act or sexual sin that can be proven by evidence and verified by a judge. According to his interpretation, 4:34 is about how a judge would punish a woman for a sexual crime, rather than about wifely disobedience.
Fatema Mernissi cites Quran 33:35 as evidence for gender equality within Islam and several hadith to claim that while beating was permissible, the best Muslims would never beat their wives.
Human rights with
Mahatma Gandhi Moderate Islamic political thought contends that the nurturing of the Muslim identity and the propagation of values such as democracy and human rights are not mutually exclusive, but rather should be promoted together. Most liberal Muslims believe that Islam promotes the notion of absolute equality of all humanity, and that it is one of its central concepts. Therefore, a breach of
human rights has become a source of great concern to most liberal Muslims. Liberal Muslims differ with their culturally conservative counterparts in that they believe that all humanity is represented under the umbrella of human rights. Many Muslim majority countries have signed international human rights treaties, although the impact of these largely remains to be seen in local legal systems. Muslim liberals often reject traditional interpretations of Islamic law, which allow
Ma malakat aymanukum and
slavery. They say that slavery opposed Islamic principles which they believe to be based on justice and equality and some say that verses relating to slavery or "Ma malakat aymanukum" now cannot be applied due to the fact that the world has changed, while others say that those verses are misinterpreted and twisted to legitimize slavery. In the 20th century, South Asian scholars
Ghulam Ahmed Pervez and
Amir Ali argued that the expression
ma malakat aymanukum should be properly read in the past tense. When some called for a reinstatement of slavery in
Pakistan upon its independence from the
British colonial rule, Pervez argued that the past tense of this expression means that the Quran had imposed "an unqualified ban" on slavery. Liberal Muslims have argued against
death penalty for apostasy based on the Quranic verse that "There shall be no compulsion in religion".
LGBTQ rights , founding member of Salaam group and the Toronto Unity Mosque / el-Tawhid Juma Circle In January 2013, the
Muslim Alliance for Sexual and Gender Diversity (MASGD) was launched. The organization was formed by members of the Queer Muslim Working Group, with the support of the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force. Several initial MASGD members previously had been involved with the
Al-Fatiha Foundation, including
Faisal Alam and Imam
Daayiee Abdullah. The Safra Project for women is based in the UK. It supports and works on issues relating to prejudice against LGBTQ Muslim women. It was founded in October 2001 by Muslim LBT women. The Safra Project's "ethos is one of inclusiveness and diversity". In Australia, Nur Wahrsage has been an advocate for LGBTI Muslims and founded Marhaba, a support group for
queer Muslims in
Melbourne, Australia. In May 2016, Wahrsage revealed that he is homosexual in an interview on
SBS2’s
The Feed, being the first openly gay
Imam in Australia. In Canada, Salaam was founded as the first gay Muslim organization in Canada and the second in the world. Salaam was founded in 1993 by
El-Farouk Khaki, who organized the Salaam / Al-Fateha International Conference in 2003. In May 2009, the Toronto Unity Mosque / el-Tawhid Juma Circle (ETJC) was founded by Laury Silvers, a
University of Toronto religious studies scholar, alongside Muslim gay-rights activists El-Farouk Khaki and Troy Jackson. Unity Mosque / ETJC is a
gender-equal, LGBT+ affirming. In November 2012, a prayer room was set up in
Paris by gay Islamic scholar and founder of the group Homosexual Muslims of France,
Ludovic-Mohamed Zahed. It was described by the press as the first gay-friendly mosque in Europe. The reaction from the rest of the Muslim community in France has been mixed, and the opening has been condemned by the
Grand Mosque of Paris. Examples of Muslim LGBT media works are the 2006
Channel 4's documentary
Gay Muslims, the film production company Unity Productions Foundation, the 2007 and 2015 documentary films
A Jihad for Love and
A Sinner in Mecca, both produced by
Parvez Sharma, and the Jordanian LGBT publication
My.Kali. In March 2024, a
hijra community in
Mymensingh, Bangladesh opened the
Dakshin Char Kalibari Masjid, a mosque built on government-allocated land after hijra worshippers had been turned away from local congregations.
Story of Lut Quranic verses about the Story of Lut have traditionally been interpreted as condemning homosexuality, with the following translations of
Al-A'raf 81 from Mustafa Khattab and Sahih International: Scott Siraj al-Haqq Kugle, a professor of Islamic Studies at
Emory University, has argued for a different interpretation of the Lot narrative focusing not on the sexual act but on the infidelity of the tribe and their rejection of Lot's Prophethood. According to Kugle, "where the Qur'an treats same-sex acts, it condemns them only so far as they are exploitive or violent." More generally, Kugle notes that the Quran refers to four different levels of personality. One level is "genetic inheritance." The Qur'an refers to this level as one's "physical stamp" that "determines one's temperamental nature" including one's sexuality. On the basis of this reading of the Qur'an, Kugle asserts that homosexuality is "caused by divine will", so "homosexuals have no rational choice in their internal disposition to be attracted to same-sex mates." Kugle argues that if the classical commentators had seen "sexual orientation as an integral aspect of human personality", they would have read the narrative of Lot and his tribe "as addressing male rape of men in particular" and not as "addressing homosexuality in general". A critique of Kugle's approach, interpretations and conclusions was published in 2016 by Mobeen Vaid. In 2018, Junaid Jahangir and Hussein Abdullatif published their own critique of Vaid's criticisms against Kugle.
Secularism The definition and application of
secularism, especially the place of religion in society, vary among Muslim countries as it does among non-Muslim countries. As the concept of secularism varies among secularists in the Muslim world, reactions of Muslim intellectuals to the pressure of
secularization also varies. On the one hand, secularism is condemned by some Muslim intellectuals who do not feel that religious influence should be removed from the public sphere. On the other hand, secularism is claimed by others to be compatible with Islam. For example, the quest for secularism has inspired some Muslim scholars who argue that secular government is the best way to observe
sharia; "enforcing [sharia] through coercive power of the state negates its religious nature, because Muslims would be observing the law of the state and not freely performing their religious obligation as Muslims" says Abdullahi Ahmed An-Na'im, a professor of law at Emory University and author of
Islam and the secular state: negotiating the future of Shariʻa. Moreover, some scholars argue that secular states have existed in the Muslim world since the Middle Ages.
Egalitarianism The place of equality versus hierarchy in Islam is sometimes disputed, with Progressive Islam coming down on the side of equity and equality. Progressive Islam emphasizes what is sometimes called the "decidedly egalitarian spirit" (Judith Miller) of Islam, and how it is "in principle egalitarian, recognizing no superiority of one believer over another by birth or descent, race or nationality, or social status" (Bernard Lewis). At the same time, Muslims known as
Sayyids (those accepted as descendants of the Islamic prophet
Muhammad) traditionally have special privileges in Islam, notably of tax exemptions and a share in
Khums. A number of scholars (quoted in a number of fatwa sites) have also encouraged discrimination in regards to intermarriage between persons of Arab and non-Arab lineages (Darul Ifta Birmingham (
Hanafi fiqh) quoting Raddul Muhtar, and Islamic Virtues website quoting the
Shafi’i manual
Reliance of the Traveller ...) Quraishi and non-Quraishi, and Sayyid and non-Sayyid, as can be found in a number of fatwa sites. This is notably in direct contrast to the Prophet Muhammad's last sermon, "...All mankind is from Adam and Eve, an Arab has no superiority over a non-Arab nor a non-Arab has any superiority over an Arab; also a white has no superiority over a black nor a black has any superiority over white except by piety and good action." ==Movements==